AADHIKARonline London UK

KHOODEELAAR! Advising UK CONDEM Collusion’s George Osborne: do not repeat the lies of your alleged predecessor in post. Do not repeat the poverty-creation, debt-creation of the fakers whom you feign to decry! Do not commit new lies to justify the Military Industrial Complex Big Biz agenda Crossrail scam..

2010-06-21T00:54:00.000-07:00

0750 Hrs GMT
London
Monday
21 June 2010

Editor © Muhammad Haque

KHOODEELAAR! Advising UK CONDEM Collusion’s George Osborne: do not repeat the lies of your alleged predecessor in post. Do not repeat the poverty-creation, debt-creation of the fakers whom you feign to decry! Do not commit new lies to justify the Military Industrial Complex Big Biz agenda Crossrail scam..

KHOODEELAAR! Telling George Osborne UK CONDEM Collusion’s apparent front man wielding the general axe: remember what you have been calling Alistair Darling, your alleged predecessor in post!

You have been decrying him in effect as a faker, a fabricator.

Nay, even as a liar.

So you should be careful not to say anything far less do anything that makes it possible to call you all those things.

The rate at which you have been spieling fakery and hocus pocus ‘theories’ however suggests that you will be exposed far sooner than had been anticipated. 'Anticipated' [contextually of course] by the likes of Mervyn King, the Bank of England governor.

It is clear that your being caught out will be more perverse than your ordinary, run of the mill ‘critics’ would like to find you embroiled in: You will be found to be a liar because you will be found lying in the same direction as Alistair Darling would have been found to have been lying!

How?

You have tossed into the arena that corruptly applied word: ‘infrastructure’.

Infrastructure is a word that was – and in effect still is – used by all the UK touts of Big Business Military Industrial Complex to peddle their lies. They did the peddling by dressing up as ‘infrastructure projects’ all their scams entailing huge sums of public money and consequently huge – and avoidable additional - INDEBTEDNESS for the public that will be condemned to bear the ill-imposed brunt of it for decades.

What such scam springs to mind?

CRASSLY conceived crassly massaged, crassly passaged Crossrail scam of course!

And why are YOU, George Osborne, condemned as if by fate to reap the miserable harvests that all big time Big Bizness agenda-touting liars in post are bound to ‘reap’?

Because by your own ’sums’ contrived and cynical as they are, the assertion that a sinking economy and an even more plunging GDP in all respects, in all particulars, in all aspects can however support the monstrosity of a blatantly diversionary wasteful scam as typified by Crossrail is an absurdity, an immaturity, an irresponsibility beyond the bounds of ‘permissible excesses in democratic diabolism’!

Khoodeelaar! will expand on our diagnostic [here cited as ‘the permissible excess of democratic diabolism’]

[To be continued]

-------

Time & Date of a recent UPDATE
1st Edition of day 0115 GMT London Friday 30 October 2009
Editor © Muhammad Haque
Founding News Editor
Shah M Azizul Haque
AADHIKAR Media Foundation, established with the publication of AADHIKAR the weekly on Monday 19 December 1980 from London E1 UK. INTO the 6th. CAMPAIGNING year with KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail holes agenda, the Big Business SCAM, ADDING to poverty in the inner city and in particular the East End of London...” CAMPAIGN

London Assembly Tories' 'idea' for driverless trains is a continuation of CRASS!

2010-06-16T11:39:00.000-07:00

1840 Hrs GMT

London

Wednesday

16 June 2010

Editor © Muhammad Haque

London Assembly Tories' 'idea' for driverless trains is a continuation of CRASS!

And as has been seen on the BBC London NEWS at 1730 Hrs GMT today, the crass idea, fronted by Richard Tracey, is a contradictory mess. It contradicts basic common sense for a start. And on that, we entirely endorse what RMT man Bob Grow has said. Which is a historic moment. For in the past we have shown Mr Crow to have fallen significantly short of the expected level of awareness. But on the driverless trains idea of the BARMY Tories, we can say that the RMT and Mr Crow are right. So right, we think them to be on this matter that we also predict that a wider number of opinion will eventually echo what the RMT has said on the matter so far.

Scrap the Tories who want to scrap drivers!

Let's have a Tory-free environment.

If by Tory they mean Richard Tracey!

Khoodeelaar! Evidentially reiterating the observation that the condem cabinet slotted career-beneficiary Phil Hammond has truly gotten shaped into the daft role-play mode by the daft bureaucracy at big business agenda crossrail-peddling UK DfT hole of crassness! He exhibited a significant bit of it as he descended down the hole of fantasy, idiocy being dug for his likes in a bit of outer space misnamed as being in a so-called ‘east end’ of London which is in fact in the morality-free zone called canary wharf that has been installed upon a formerly bona fide part of the social and cultural and historic and economic ‘East End of London’. Phillip Hammond has never been an exponent of ethics or morality that could truthfully be citable by [or for] him as a basis for his 'claim' [dare he ever go that far!] now being implied and actually asserted for him by the propaganda units put in place to keep afloat the CONDEM COLLUSION that he is part of. To being genuinely in the know. He is an ignorant timeserver. Just like the others before him. And he will find that he was assignment as Geoff Hoon. The hole of ignorance that he has let himself into this week will test even his banality and stupidity. He will be extracted from that hole by the forces of career that he obviously defers to, nay worships! We shall continue to diagnose his dire daft displays from the DfT hole and publish them here and on related Khoodeelaar! Campaign web sites in association with the Aadhikar Media online publishing sites and outlets as we battle ton defend the community against the illicit excesses of the CONDEM Colluders. On his faked flaunting of familiarity with the ‘economy’ and the ‘population’, Phil Hammond exposed the depth of his remoteness from the East End of London just as much as he also exposed his lack of recognition of the realities that is now having to be recognised by all significant post holders in the cabinet in which he sits. Howe crass cans a CONDEM COLLUSION cabinet cubicle-claimant get!

2010-06-16T10:03:00.001-07:00

1658 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
16 June 2010

Editor © Muhammad Haque

Khoodeelaar! Evidentially reiterating the observation that the condem cabinet slotted career-beneficiary Phil Hammond has truly gotten shaped into the daft role-play mode by the daft bureaucracy at big business agenda crossrail-peddling UK DfT hole of crassness! He exhibited a significant bit of it as he descended down the hole of fantasy, idiocy being dug for his likes in a bit of outer space misnamed as being in a so-called ‘east end’ of London which is in fact in the morality-free zone called canary wharf that has been installed upon a formerly bona fide part of the social and cultural and historic and economic ‘East End of London’. Phillip Hammond has never been an exponent of ethics or morality that could truthfully be citable by [or for] him as a basis for his 'claim' [dare he ever go that far!] now being implied and actually asserted for him by the propaganda units put in place to keep afloat the CONDEM COLLUSION that he is part of. To being genuinely in the know. He is an ignorant timeserver. Just like the others before him. And he will find that he was assignment as Geoff Hoon. The hole of ignorance that he has let himself into this week will test even his banality and stupidity. He will be extracted from that hole by the forces of career that he obviously defers to, nay worships! We shall continue to diagnose his dire daft displays from the DfT hole and publish them here and on related Khoodeelaar! Campaign web sites in association with the Aadhikar Media online publishing sites and outlets as we battle ton defend the community against the illicit excesses of the CONDEM Colluders. On his faked flaunting of familiarity with the ‘economy’ and the ‘population’, Phil Hammond exposed the depth of his remoteness from the East End of London just as much as he also exposed his lack of recognition of the realities that is now having to be recognised by all significant post holders in the cabinet in which he sits. Howe crass cans a CONDEM COLLUSION cabinet cubicle-claimant get!
[To be continued].

Khoodeelaar asks: Who ever audited the £100 million that Alistair Darling [then fronting the DAFT, 'UK Department for Transport' gave re CRASSrail ?

2009-10-30T13:34:00.001-07:00

2028 Hrs GMT
London
Friday 30 October 2009:
Editor © Muhammad Haque.

Khoodeelaar! told you so! That the ‘CrossRail scam’ was crass. It is crass. Each and every single utterance of its promotion is crass. Why? Because it is being peddled by the Big Business interests who want to pocket huge loots in the name of the project and from the UK public. Crossrail is also crass because the same lobby interests who are hostile to democratic audit of public funds and facilities are promoting it. Crossrail is crass because it is being promoted at the expense of transport. Transport infrastructure that is crumbling in and around London. That infrastructure needs more attention than a new scam contrived by the Big Business to make fast and unedited bucks. Unaudited? Yes, unaudited. Who ever audited the £100 million that Alistair Darling [then fronting the DAFT, 'UK Department for Transport' that has been the touting outfit in Whitehall operating the scam for Big Business] gave away from the UK public to CLRL in 2005? Has anyone seen any audit of where that money went? Who actually took how many £millions by way of bonuses YEARS before bonuses hit the headlines?

[To be continued]

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Time & Date of LATEST UPDATE
1st Edition of day 0115 GMT London Friday 30 October 2009
Editor © Muhammad Haque
Founding News Editor
Shah M Azizul Haque
AADHIKAR Media Foundation, established with the publication of AADHIKAR the weekly on Monday 19 December 1980 from London E1 UK. INTO the 6th. CAMPAIGNING year with KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail holes agenda, the Big Business SCAM, ADDING to poverty in the inner city and in particular the East End of London...” CAMPAIGN

2009-10-30T00:04:00.001-07:00

KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole scam: Evidential replay of the arguments as written and published by KHOODEELAAR! on Tuesday 28 March 2006

2009-08-26T20:04:00.000-07:00

0250 Hrs GMT London Thursday 27 August 2009:

KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole scam: Evidential replay of the arguments as written and published by KHOODEELAAR! on Tuesday 28 March 2006

[To be continued]

http://uk.geocities.com/khoodeelaardotcom/today.Ed4.html

http://www.khoodeelaar.com

KHOODEELAAR!
The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole-tunnel ‘project, scheme, plan’ Bill [that is ‘the Crossrail Bill’ in the UK House of Commons – in March 2006]

LEGAL DISCLAIMER 0730 Hrs GMT on Monday 13 March 2006
The contents published on this Khoodeelaardotcom web site are written, authored and created by the Editor and they belong to the Editor unless otherwise stated in relation to individual items published here. The name Khoodeelaar is the intellectual property of the Editor and Author. All materials are published here purely and solely for educational purposes. That is, NO part of the items published or cited as original trailers here on this Khoodeelaardotcom web site must be used for commercial, immoral, illegal or party political or sectarian or propaganda purposes or for any purposes that are anathema to the universally accepted and recognised codes of ethics and morality. Intellectual property rights action shall be taken to protect the integrity of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail hole attacks plan scheme project Bill [UK House of Commons at the date of this disclaimer] and their contractors, touts and agencies. NO part of the contents of the Khoodeelaardotcom web site must be included in any promotion of the interests against whose continuation and existence the Khoodeelaardotcom web site is created authored written and published. That means that none of these materials must be used to show Crossrail programme in any positive light as to do so would contradict the aims and objects of the contents of this web site. And that would amount to illegal and immoral distortion of the contents of this Khoodeelaardotcom web site.

This [the 4th edition [of the day] Updated at [1845 Hrs GMT] 1945 Hrs London Time Tuesday 28 March 2006

Editor© Muhammad Haque

Produced by CBRUK for Khoodeelaar!

Political organisation by
London Community Audit Network
Constitutional law support services
by
Lawcompliance

Produced and published by CBRUK for Khoodeelaar!

Constitutional law services are provided by Lawcompliance and

The London Community Audit Network

lawmedia@hotmail.com

Khoodeelaaronline publishing arrangement at [1845 Hrs GMT] 1945 Hrs London Time Tuesday 28 March 2006
All visitors to this website khoodeelaardotom are advised to read the following special legal disclaimer on our publication schedules and campaign updating frequencies policies and practices

This announcement of this arrangement in this internet edition of the khoodeelaardotom website supersedes any previous publishing schedule, sequence or topicality that we had published in the last edition that was put on the internet before this edition.. This arrangement is integrally linked with and is the direct product of the Khoodeelaar! “Campaign against the Crossrail hole plan scheme project Bill” activities and we have to adjust at short or no notice [these words have been added to this disclaimer with effect from 1800 Hrs GMT on Tuesday 28 March 2006] these publishing arrangements in order to deal with campaign priorities and campaign events that occur and are organised at short notice [or no notice at all] as we go along.

Galloway Party Blasts latest Crossrail hole lies by controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council
A khoodeelaaronline report
at [1845 Hrs GMT] 1945 Hrs London Time Tuesday 28 March 2006
George Galloway’s Tower Hamlets RESPECT coalition breaks silence on Michael Keith’s repeated assertions that George Galloway backed away from an electoral fight with Keith at the 4 May 2006 council election in the Shadwell ward in London’s East End.– This is contained in a Khoodeelaaronline report compiled this evening [London Tuesday 28 March 2006] in view of the latest lies that Michael Keith’s clique has been spreading [through the ‘EAST END LIES’ and via bribery and abuse linked with the clique’s access to ‘current powers’ on Tower Hamlets Council to make ‘ethnicity-linked financial grants to ‘community groups’ which are situated in parts of the Brick Lane London E1 area] about the London mayor’s pro-Crossrail-hole stunt on Friday [24 March 2006] saying that the threatened Big Crossrail hole in the Brick Lane London E1 area was off.

In the interview with khoodeelaaronline, Bethnal Green and Bow Member of Parliament
George Galloway’s RESPECT Coalition says that the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the CrossRail hole has brought about the latest U-turn by the Crossrail-hole-pushing interests.

Speaking to Khoodeelaronline from the RESPECT coalition’s office in Club Row [which is within a quarter of Mile off the Brick Lane spot targeted for the CrossRail hole until the U-turn, RESPECT spokesperson Rob Hoveman branded Tower Hamlets Council LIES about ‘their “campaign against the hole” as ridiculous and contemptible

Hoveman also said that Crossrail-hole-pusher Michael Keith [who is the ‘leader’ of the controlling clique at Tower Hamlets Council] was destined for the electoral dustbin.

Asked if the RESPECT coalition were optimistic about Michael Keith’s imminent electoral disappearance from Shadwell, Rob Hoveman said , “ We are very confident” that Michael Keith was a goner come the day after the scheduled 4 May 2006 election.

[The rest of this report will be published on this site and on allied sites in the next 48 hours]

KHOODEELAARONLINE Report next on the Tories in Tower Hamlets

We are introducing a report at 2200 Hrs GMT on this Khoodeelaardotcom website on the response from the Conservative Party in Tower Hamlets to latest Crossrail-hole-lies by and fir the clique on Tower Hamlets Council

A khoodeelaaronline report

This page of the Khoodeelaardotcom web site can also be viewed by logging on at

http://uk.geocities.com/khoodeelaardotcom/today.Ed4.html

Editor © Muhammad Haque
Khoodeelaar! CBRUK Lawmedia 2006
KHOODEELAAR!
The Brick Lane London E1 Area Campaign
against the Crossrail hole Bill
Monday 27 March 2006
lawmedia@hotmail.com
Web site
http://www.khoodeelaar.com

KHOODEELAARONLINE IST Edition Tuesday 28 March 2006
The Brick Land London E1 Area camapopagn against the CrossRail hole “plan, scheme, project” Bill

Index of the latest Campaign reports commentaries and updates at 0700 Hrs GMT 28 March 2006

1. Why is the Crossrail-hole-touting controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council [East London] lying on about the CrossRail hole?

The first part of the KHOODEELAARonline report is due to be published here at 1000 Hrs GMT Tuesday 28 March 2006

That KHOODEELAARonline report will also include an examination of the latest lying antics of the identifiable members of the CrossRail-hole-touting clique on the London Borough of Tower Hamlets.

2. We shall also update during the day Tuesday 28 March 2006 our reporting on the criminal abuse of public cash by the Crossrail-hole-touting clique in abusing the ‘Council’ propaganda title ‘EAST END LIES’ this week to perpetrate even more pernicious insidious lies at the expense of the people in the East London borough of Tower Hamlets.
3. Revised Khoodeelaar! legal claims against Alistair Darling and Ken Livingstone, Christine Gilbert, Michael Keith, Owen Whalley et al

_________________________________________________________________
KHOODEELAAR! QUESTIONS to ‘ethnic’ ‘language’ [!] publications in London E1 area [and in E2] which have published lies and falsehoods for ‘Michael Keith’ on Crossrail hole.
These questions are reinforced by the facts of the latest lies for Michael Keith that have been published in the following ‘ethnic language publications’ on Monday 27 March 2006
[Khoodeelaar legal note on the definition of ‘published’. In the factual and evidential context of this matter and material, the word ‘published’ means published in the given ‘publication’ which was found to be in circulation in the relevant area on the day in question irrespective of whether the date of the publication of that title is said to be 27 March 2006 or not
Questions on the accuracy of 'news' and 'comment' pieces published about ‘Tower Hamlets Council’ role on Crossrail hole
The ‘titles’ are: - Published in ‘Bangla’
1. Notun Din [weekly] – Published from a postal address in the London E1 area
2. Surma [weekly] Published from a postal address in the London E1 area

3. Janomot [weekly] Published from a postal address in the London E1 area

4. Euro Bangla [weekly] Published from a postal address in the London E1 area

5. Potrika [weekly] Published from a postal address in the London E1 area

Published in English

6. Bangla Mirror [weekly] Published from a postal address in the London E2 area

The QUESTIONS:
7. Why have you published ‘news’ and ‘comment’ pieces in the last 10 weeks which have contained direct assertions or explicit implications to the effect that either the current controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council or its ‘leader’ ‘councillor’ Michael Keith has done anything at all to OPPOSE the Crossrail hole plan in relation to the Brick Lane London E1 Area?

8. What evidence have you to support the headlines, the presentations on the FrontPages and on the leading pages of your publication of the name and or the alleged achievement against the CrossRail hole plan of the current controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council or its ‘leader’ ‘councillor’ Michael Keith?

9. Why have you not published in your ‘news’ publication the chapter and verse of any alleged evidence to support your promotion of the image of the current controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council or its ‘leader’ ‘councillor’ Michael Keith?

10. Why have you not published the name and the title of any alleged document allegedly produced by the fully legally constituted entity of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council allegedly showing the alleged opposition to the Crossrail hole Bill by the said controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council or its ‘leader’ ‘councillor’ Michael Keith?

11. Isn’t the fact that you have not published any evidence or any credible or evident reference to any accessible or producible evidence in support of the publication in your title of the falsehoods for the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council and its ‘leader’ ‘councillor’ Michael Keith PROOF of and because of there being no such evidence that you COULD produce even if you had been motivated by unethical factors so to publish?

12. Why shouldn’t the community in the Brick Lane London E1 area condemn your collusion with the corrupt clique on Tower Hamlets Council on the facts of your deliberate, intentional publication of lies about the whole role of the corrupt clique that almost sunk our community down the Crossrail hole?

13. Why should you be allowed to publish lies for the liars and deprive the community of the benefit of the true facts of what the clique has done and how we the Khoodeelaar! Campaigned against the CrossRail hole plan scheme project Bill have campaigned against the very perpetrators and their perpetrations of the past 27 months and why we have been forced by your 'publishing' behaviour to even issue this questionnaire and other procedural actions against you?

14. Do you ‘in your attitude and in your understanding and in your ordinary perceptions’ belong to this local community in the East End or do you belong in some other place? If you do belong to our community then you must realise that you owe the basic decency to tell your alleged readers the facts of what the CrossRail hole threat our community had involved under the corrupt conspiratorial plots hatched against our community by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council and you must tell the truth about what remains of that plot linked with the CrossRail hole plans that our East End community still faces. You must start by stopping to publish any more lies for the corrupt clique on Tower Hamlets Council or for its ‘leader’ ‘councillor’ Michael Keith. If you fail to publish the truth and if you continue to publish lies then you cannot be surprised if we refer your behaviour first to the Press Complaints Commission and failing that, to a court of Law in the UK. Do you understand this?

15. We first issued this broad notice against your behaviour on 14 March 2006 at a Khoodeelaar! News Conference held at an address in Brick lane London E1. Some of those who were present at that News Conference included some of your ‘staff’ or ‘correspondents. None of what we had said then [14 March 2006] appeared accurately in the relevant editions of your ‘publications’ that were published on dates after our announcement of 14 March 2006. Why did you fail to publish what we announced about your conduct concerned?

16. We made substantially the same comment with additional illustrations at our Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 Seminar held on 19 March 2006. You failed to publish any of that. Why?

17. We have counted the number of times that your ‘publication’ was actually printed between January 2004 and 21 January 2006. You NEVER published a single item at all about any of the key facts or issues or implications of the Crossrail hole plan against our community across the Brick Lane London E1 area. That is, of almost 100 weekly editions, you never found a single week in which to publish the news of our campaign against the CrossRail holed plan assault on the East Ends. What, then, were you printing? Was it ‘news’? If so, for whom? How many ‘news’ items on any of your front pages or how many ‘comments’ in any of those 100 editions of your ‘ethnic language’ publications had you cared to actually tell the truth about what is [and has been] probably the single largest physical assault planned against any section of any settled ‘multi-ethnic’ community anywhere in the whole of Western Europe? Why did you suppress the facts of that assault until after 17 January 2006 when the Khoodeelaar! campaign holds its then latest demonstration in the Brick Lane area against the first sitting on that day of the UK House of Commons Select committee on the Crossrail hole Bill? Do you even know what we have been talking about? We KNOW that you don’t. If you did, you would have had reports about those events. You never do. Why?

London 2050 Hrs GMT Monday 27 March 2006

1. The updated summary of legal claims against Alistair Darling will be posted here in the next 24 hours
2. The contents of the final questionnaires to the ‘ethnic’ ‘newspapers’ that have published untrue and false claims over Crossrail giving ‘cr4edit’ to the perpetrators on Tower Hamlets Council for allegedly relieving the community of the very CrossRail hole thereat that the perpetrators have been causing and still have not given up on. This will be also the de facto equivalent of the pre-action legal action notice on the ‘ethnic language’ publications.
3. Questions that we have put to George Galloway MP about his RESPECT coalition and its undertakings on Crossrail hole attacks on our community
4. Why the ‘petitions’ to UK parliament over the contents of the CrossRail hole Bill are not going to make any significant difference for the communities targeted for devastation by the Crossrail Hole Bill
5. Who is Mike Gapes, MP who ‘congratulated Tower Hamlets Council’ twice on the ‘Politics Show' on BBC1 on Sunday 26 March 2006

Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole

Legal claims against Alistair Darling MP Secretary of State at the Department for Transport UK

the updated claims against Alistair Darling were left at the Treasury Solicitors in central London by a group of Khoodeelaar! Campaigners this lunch time.

The texts of the updated claims will appear here during Monday 27 March 2006-03-27

The update has been linked with the announcement attributed to London mayor Ken Livingstone [whose GLA news release we published on this Khoodeelaardotcom web site in the past 72 hours] and also to the latest spate of lies being promoted for the career of Tower Hamlets CrossRail-hole-Councillor Michael Keith and his co-cliquesters in the East End ‘’ethnic’ ‘publications’.

Separate legal actions against the corrupt clique on Tower Hamlets Council are being started on Tuesday 28 march 2006.

[Details will appear on this and related w khoodeelaar campaign web sites during the day]

Khoodeelaardotcom web pages are being relocated and or published on other web sites simultaneously with their being published here. The plan is to publish the files on entirely different web sites.

The Khoodeelaardotcom files will be accessible at a new URL address which will be displayed here, starting [not later than 1800 Hrs GMT on] Monday 27 March 2006.

Also the Khoodeelaardotcom archived files will be available by request from

khoodeelaardotcom@yahoo.co.uk

From the 3rd [the last] edition so far today Monday 27 March 2006:

To Editors and News Editors

for interview and briefing on today’s Khoodeelaar! legal claims against Transport Secretary Alistair Darling MP, please send your contact details including your cell phone number/s to

khoodeelaartv@yahoo.co.uk

To Editors and News desks

Court action against Tower Hamlets Council

Details of the Khoodeelaar! Court action against the London borough of Tower Hamlets Council will be published at a news conference later today Monday 27 March 2006.

For details of venue and time, please send email request to
Khoodeelaartv@yahoo.co.uk

KHOODEELAAR! Court action against Alistair Darling MP, Secretary of State for Transport on the Crossrail hole Bill

Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole plan scheme project Bill will be formally filing the legal claims against Alistair Darling on Monday 27 March 2006.

The details of the formally drafted claims will be published on this web site first and on other associated sites and pages during Monday 27 March 2006.

Subsidiary claims will be also filed against other defendants including London Mayor Ken Livingstone over claims and assertions that have been published on the media over the past 72 hours.

The NEW details of those claims as amended in view of the latest announcements [as reported here and on the BBC news and factual programmes over the past 72 hours] will also be first published on this web site

For background articles and summarised grounds of legal claims against Alistair Darling, send your request by email to:

bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk

From the last edition of Khoodeelaardotcom:

How the sinking ‘careers’ of the present corrupt, Crossrail-hole-clique on Tower Hamlets Council also contaminated and displaced an ethical standard that should have been established in the BBC London studio where the crassness of the Crossrail plugger Mike Gapes was allowed to be exhibited with no dignified restraint put on him.

The clique did that by proxy.

By the oozing appearance on the show of Mike Gapes [More on his crass role for CrossRail in a later edition]

This took place in the broadcast package on ‘Crossrail’ this afternoon on BBC1 in their weekend POLITICS SHOW which itself was fronted by John Sopel.

Sopel had introduced the Blair DPM John Prescott in the context of the latest allegation of Sleaze as reported in some of the day’s [Sunday] papers.

In the course of that interview, Sopel stated a few times that that interview had resulted from
The call made by Prescott to the BBC.

What followed that statement did not address the question that arsis: Should the BBC ‘Politics Show’ or any other factual programme offer a platform to a Minister only because they received a call from that minister o r one from that Minister’s behalf?

Where will it end?

Should’ the BBC generally and the POLITICS SHOW on the matter of the crass Crossrail adventure in particular, have made can effort to get the facts of the matter across to the viewers

Shouldn’t’ they have pointed out?

Why didn’t the BBC ask Mike |Gapes to substantiate his embarrassing and undignified propensity to twice congratulate Tower Hamlets Council?

Was the BBC under instructions –as it is reported to be so often including as recounted by its former ‘Editor in Chief’, Greg Dyke – to be soft on the Blair regime and on those who are the regime lackeys in areas like the East End of London?

These questions must be asked because of the BBC’s failure to report on the campaign against the CrossRail hole over the past 27 months.

The only time that the BBC editorial decision-makers thought they could ‘concede’ any
Space or time to anyone op[posing the crass project was in July 2004 when they sent a London news crew to a meeting only because it was being addressed by the Blaring MP Oona King and a group of Crossrail-plugging holders of ‘elected’ office.

The BBC did not report on the strength of the arguments against the Crassrail hole plan nor did it show just how uneconomical, anti-social, undemocratic the Crossrail project was

In the time between July 2004 and 24 March 2006, the BBC were sent several hundred transmissions of news and facts and evidence by and on behalf of the Khoodeelaar! campaign.

The BBC must show that they operated on an ethical basis when they showed a very small part of the interviews with Khoodeelaar and gave far too much time and space to the pluggers for Crassrail.

If those plugs had substance backed up with evidence that could have been a different matter.

But the BBC package did not contain that.

And the rest of the BBC factual programme making seems to be following the same line – that the Crossrail plug is believable.

We say it is not.
We say that the Crossrail pluggers must be examined and made to produce evidence to substantiate each of their key arguments.

We say that the BBC publish an explanation of why they thought that only because those in the studio ‘discussion’ had tags of ‘MPs’ attached to their names so therefore they knew the facts of what the CrossRail scheme was or that they had more legitimacy to be given more space on the programme and in the package than the Khoodeelaar! campaign.

[1550 Hrs GMT] 1650 Hrs London Time Sunday 26 March 2006

[To be continued]

Published in the last edition of Khoodeelaardotcom:

Khoodeelaar 1st response to and comments on BBC TV POLITICS SHOW Sunday 26 March 2006-03-26

That programme had its entire London Edition given to the subject of Crossrail hole Bill.

This is the first of the Khoodeelaar! Comment and responses:

By Muhammad Haque
Organiser, Khoodeelaar!

I noticed that on the BBC1 ‘Politics Show’ shown on Sunday 26 March 2006, the Blairing MP Mike Gapes [Ill-fraud] [this is a new word I have just coined for this edition of Khoodeelaardotcom at 1348 Hrs GMT on Monday 27 March 2006] managed to ‘congratulate Tower Hamlets Council’ TWICE in the broadcast package on the CrossRail hole Bill scheme and he was not quizzed on that brazen plug for a very discredited clique which we had found on the facts had been playing a touting role in bringing the Crossrail hole attacks on our community.

Mike Gapes failed to substantiate that oozing eagerness to congratulate the clique. He also failed to mention the fact that on 19 July 2005 he had made assertions in plugging the Crossrail Bill in the House of Commons that were not substantiated cannot be substantiated and have not been substantiated.

The package included references to the grant of £100 million by the Secretary of State in December 2005 and the nearly £40 Million being spent each year on planning.

What evidence was there that that money was being spent for the benefit of the people in London?

Why didn’t the programme give any details about what the money was being spent on and what auditing supervision and accountability?

The programme also jumped to ‘what about the rest of the cost’ part, without examine the relevance of Crossrail in the context of the UK national economy and without giving any space to any examination of what London’s transport system was currently costing the public.

We have opposed the CrossRail hole Bill BOTH on the devastating effects it would cause to vast areas in the East End and also on the fundamental engineering, environmental, economic flaws inherent in the entire Bill. Your programme did not even pretend to examine those. It also allowed the ‘MPs’ to say superficial things without pressing them or asking them to examine the overall transport framework in the UK, in London and beyond

It also failed to question the untruth that causing devastation to the East End equalled bringing benefits. It did not ask what the correlation was between the CrossRail 'plan, scheme, project' in relation to the existing transport infrastructure in London and what only one of the MPs included on your programme [we note that inclusion], George Galloway identified CrossRail plan as a commuter line.

These are, in very brief terms, some of the faults in the factual contents and presentation of the issue as broadcast today Sunday 26 March 2006.

Khoodeelaar! daily publishes the campaign details as well as reports on related matters on the Khoodeelaardotcom in defence of the community and against the Crossrail hole plans scheme project Bill.

Over the past 27 months, we have created and published hundreds of reports covering every single engineering, economic incremental, social, democracy-related aspects of the Crossrail plan.

We are putting this comment on to the BBC web site for the record. We expect that the BBC would not suppress this comment and that they would allow a full-scale debate on the evidence to take place on all the BBC networks, outlets and publications.

Our web site will have updated versions and follow up s to this comment and to any other relevant item either shown or aired or published - directly or in effect - by the BBC

Muhammad Haque
Organiser
Khoodeelaar!
1412 Hrs GMT
Brick Lane London E1 Area
Sunday 26 March 2006
http://khoodeelaar.com
Khoodeelaar!
Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the CrossRail hole plan scheme project Bill
lawmedia@hotmail.com
bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk

“
From the 1st Edition of Khoodeelaardotcom today Sunday 26 March 2006

/>
Khoodeelaar! campaign analysis- some urgent questions, issues and announcements 1030 Hrs GMT London Sunday 26 March 2006

Why have we delayed our report on the role played by the political groupings and parties on the current Tower Hamlets Council over the CrossRail hole attacks on the East End?

Answer: because the ‘parties’ and the ‘groups’ [which are at the time of writing, the Blaired Labour Party, the Conservative Party, the Liberal Democratic Party, the RESPECT Coalition] have not made any statement that has addressed the more than 100 questions that we have published and put to them over the past 27 months.

It is for that reason that we decided to give the groupings and parties [listed above] a period of time just before the scheduled 4 May 2006 council elections to reflect on their record and to address the questions.

We have also found that contrary to the ‘interest’ shown by the ‘groupings’ and ‘parties’ in the matter of the CrossRail hole threat to the East End, they have not made any detailed documentary analysis of the threat.

Why is that so?

The answer can only be because they do not operated on the basis of defending the community. Not when that takes precedence over the careers of those within the groupings and parties.

If there is any other reason then the groupings are hereby being asked one final time to substantiate with legitimate reason why they have not made the statements that they should have made but they have not made.

What could that statement contain that is not contained in the information that they have made available or the information that is available about their role/s?

Answer: for a start, [a] they could say if they have opposed the CrossRail Hole plan in their actions as councillors or as groups of councillors within the Tower Hamlets Council, on the Tower Hamlets Council and as being represented on the Tower Hamlets Council.

The second part of what we have asked them to show – on the facts and nothing but facts –
Is that [b] they must tell us what occasion it was that they opposed the CrossRail hole plan and how they made that known out in the community in the context of the past 27 months of the khoodeelaar ! No to CrossRail hole campaign.

For 27 months, we have made the most explicit series of demands backed up by continuing, ongoing original research into the entire CrossRail scheme and we have done this in a way that neither the Council nor any party nor the Department for Transport nor the CrossRail Company has done in any way whatever. We challenge those organisations on this factual statement. WE challenge them to provide facts to contradict this statement and this Khoodeelaar! Record.

For 27 months, we have asked the most extensive questions of all the holders of all key positions on the Tower Hamlets Council about their conduct in the context of the CrossRail hole.

We have published materials and information in print and on the internet as well as on video.

We have done that against the fact that the corrupt clique on Tower Hamlets Council has abused the access it has to the coffers of the Council to spend the community’s money in bribing certain locally distributed ‘newspapers’.

We have not seen any single mention by these groupings on the Council about any of that.

We have initiated every single disclosure of every single act of corruption by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council.

If these ‘groupings’ are saying that they have been opposing the hole set of Crossrail-hole-corrupt and undemocratic and unaccountable behaviour by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council then we are asking them, this very final time to let us know where they have done that and how they have done that.

We are utterly opposed to corruption sleaze and undemocratic tactics, policies and practices within ALL groups and parties and we have surprising discolours to make about how the current corrupt clique on the Council has been using as political –electoral decoys a significant number of ‘candidates’ and ‘members’ of the ‘opposition’ groups and groupings.

We shall disclose soon how certain ‘leading’ Opposition members on Tower Hamlets Council may in fact have been being used to protect the key interprets and the 'careers as a Councillor' of a number of the current clique in ‘control’ of Tower Hamlets Council.

[To be continued]

The Khoodeelaar! Report
Part 2
In response to the reported ‘announcement by London Mayor Ken Livingstone of the Crossrail hole tunnel in the Brick Lane Area’ being ABANDONED as in ‘scrapped’

By Muhammad Haque
1825 Hrs GMT
Brick Lane London E1 Area
Saturday 25 March 2006

This constitutes the Khoodeelaar! Legal and campaign position statement London Saturday 25 March 2006

[Continued from 1350 Hrs GMT Saturday 25 March 2006 – which had 11 numbered items. The following items will be added to the final report that will be published in full at 0900 Hrs GMT here on Monday 27 March 2006]

1. That Ken Livingstone [‘Mayor of London’] has made the announcement accepting the main arguments of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign is not, of course, expressly recognised or admitted in the contents of the news release which was secretively released to a very small number of people in the UK on Friday 24 March 2006 on Livingstone’s behalf. That is typical of the low standard of ‘ethnics’ that is found all the way across Ken Livingstone's entire ‘London-based--personally-lucrative-'political'-career’. He has no moral courage to admit that he was wrong about Crossrail from start to finish. He has no moral courage to admit that he was extremely immoral and undemocratic when he tried to brand the entire community in the East End as ‘purchasable bribable’ with ’ethnicity-linked;’ grants and offers of concessionary rates on business premises etc which he said in 2005 would be made available to ‘ethnic minorities’ if they cooperated with the Crossrail hole tunnel being dug in the Brick Lane London E1 area.
2. That he has made the about turn is more to do with the pact he has had – the devil’s pact - to do his bit to salvage the sleaze-sunk career of Tony Blair is obvious. Because the hole Crassrail adventure has been, despite the FT’s idiotic suggestion which I have partly dissected in the last 72 hours, exposed as a conceptual fraud and because of the evaporation of any ground for the Big Business , Crossrail-building-fanatics and looters of the public cash [under the pretexts of ‘building a world class transport system’ – one of the obscenely phrases that has been given wide publicity by the limited-horizon London-based over-greedy holders of publicly-paid-for 'elected' offices] after we drew attention to the corrupt behaviour of every singe local tout in the East End who has had anything to do with the selling of the crass CrossRail hole idea over the last five years to the community it has targeted for demolition down the Crossrail hole.
3. What we are now demanding is that Livingstone come totally clean and scrap whatever remains of the callously conceived hole, tunnel attacks on the East End under the grotesquely ghastly uneconomic, unwanted, unjustified CrossRail hole attack. We are asking Alistair DARLING to do the same.
4. We are saying that if either fails to do their best and their duties to complete the task of scrapping the current crossrail hole plan the process immediately and without any prevarication, diversion or dissembling on any aspect of the crassly conceived CrossRail hole – the rational AND the logical task of scrapping the entire Crossrail hole attacks on the East end then the legal action and other lawful campaign programme that we had been scheduled to start on Monday 27 March 2006 wandf which we have temporarily deferred in light of the stunt staged by ken Livingstone on the eve of our campaign activities concerned, will be expanded and will be continued until the hole awful assault plan is totally ands actually scrapped.
5. We have separately asked Transport Secretary Alistair Darling to re-draft the CrossRail Bill, if he still is intent on a Crossrail line of the description that the current Bill resembles and symbolises.
6.
[To be continued]

From the LAST Edition of the Khoodeelaaronline:

How the Khoodeelaar! Community campaign against the Crassrail hole forced London Mayor Ken Livingstone to make the statement on Crossrail hole!

That report has now been delayed until after the first Khoodeelaar! detailed response is published in full. This Khoodeelaar! response will now be published over two days concluding on Sunday 26 March 2006

The Khoodeelaar! Report

By Muhammad Haque
1300 Hrs GMT
Brick Lane London E1 Area
Saturday 25 March 2006

1. Ken Livingstone’s stunt announcement was made only a day before the court actions initiated by Khoodeelaar against Transport Secretary Alistair Darling were due to begin in London!.
2. The series of court actions would have been based in a significant way on the contents of the hybrid Crossrail Bill hole attacks on the Brick Lane London E1 area.
3. With the announced abandonment of the main Crassrail hole assault on the Brick Lane London E1 area, the factual bases of any legal claims against the Secretary of Sate and against all other relevant promoters of the Crossrail hole have changed.
4. The changed factual bases will now be considered in the context of the announced abandonment of the main Crossrail hole assault on the Brick Lane London E1 area.
5. Khoodeelaar! has now sent formal request to London mayor Ken Livingstone and to the Transport Secretary Alistair Darling to provide the full contents of the abandonment of the Crossrail hole plan as contained in the announcement made by and in the name of London Mayor Ken Livingstone.
6. As soon as Khoodeelaar! is able to compare the present CrossRail hole assault plans with the announced abandonment of the Crossrail hole plans, we shall make the appropriate statment as to what other part/s of the CrossRail hole plans remains or remain to be scrapped, abandoned and disposed of and dealt with.
7. Khoodeelaar! is now making specific requests for the disclosure of those fuller facts to us in our latest representation to Alistair Darling MP the Secretary of State for Transport and in our communication to the London mayor and to the Greater London Assembly.
8. Khoodeelaar! does not accept the report about the announcement, as carried on the web site of the ‘East London Advertiser’ on 24 March 2006.
9. Khoodeelaar! rejects the statement in the ‘East London Advertiser’ website as published on 24 March 2006 that the announced abandonment of the Crossrail hole assault on the Brick Lane London E1 area was in any rational or reasonable or factual way positively linked with any alleged lobbying for that result by a person called the Tower Hamlets Councillor Michel Keith.
10. Khoodeelaar! position has been, from the start of our campaign against the Crossrail hole in January 2004, that it is the same Tower Hamlets Councillor Michael Keith who had played a key role as a strategically placed tout or agent for the Crossrail hole assaults plan and strategy on the East End.
11. Khoodeelaar! has already notified the Press Complaints Commission [1 Salisbury Square, London EC4, UK] of our intention initially to challenge the assertions as published on the ‘East London Advertiser’ website and of our policy determination that we shall file a full formal complaint if that same suggestion is published in the print edition of the ‘East London Advertiser’ which is due to be published on Thursday 30 March 2006.
Texts of the ‘East London Advertiser’ web site item as published on that ‘local paper’s web site’ on 24 March 2006 and still on display at 1730 Hrs GMT on Saturday 25 March 2006, is quoted below for the record

KHOODEELAARonline QUOTE the misleading and the corrupting first report on the Crossrail-hole-Brick-Lane Area-hole-abandonment ‘news’ Friday 24 March 2006

Crossrail controversial tunnel plan set to be scrapped
24 March 2006
EXCLUSIVE
By Ted Jeory
CONTROVERSIAL plans to dig a massive tunnelling shaft for Crossrail in the Brick Lane area have been sensationally scrapped, the Advertiser can reveal.
Mayor Ken Livingstone and Transport Secretary Alistair Darling are set to announce today (Friday) that hugely controversial proposals to bore under Hanbury Street in Spitafields will no longer go ahead.
At a stroke, much of the feared environmental damage in the Spitafields and Mile End areas will be wiped out.
It is being seen as a victory for Tower Hamlets council leader Michael Keith who has been lobbying senior government figures for the change.
Until today, Cross London Rail Links - the company behind the £16billion Crossrail ‘super-tube’ linking east and west London - wanted to dig a huge tunnelling shaft in Hanbury Street.
From there, giant boring machines would have worked their way west to Holborn and east to a new Whitechapel station.
The plan would also have meant digging a spur tunnel to a temporary engineering shaft in nearby Pedley Street from where spoil would have been loaded on to a conveyor belt to be dumped in a storage area in beautiful Mile End Park.
Brick Lane businesses and residents have been outraged, fearing their historic community was under threat.
Some even pledged civil disobedience if the diggers were ever move in.
But today’s announcement could strike out those fears for good.
Under the new deal, which will be considered by the sitting Parliamentary Crossrail committee, the tunnelling shaft will now be located in a remote industrial part of the borough at the Limmo Peninsula in Blackwall.
Diggers will work there way from there to Stepney Green and then on to Whitechapel and Liverpool Street.
Plans for the new stations at Whitechapel and the Isle of Dogs remain the same.
Although there will still need to be a smaller, but still quite large, emergency evacuation and ventilation shaft in the Brick Lane area – probably in Woodseer Street – Cllr Keith hailed the decision as ‘fantastic news’.
He said: “It just shows how the community’s campaign and the council’s actions have combined to have real impact.”

KHOODEELAARONLINE UNQUIOTE the misleading and the corrupting first report on the Crossrail-hole-Brick-Lane Area-hole-abandonment ‘news’ Friday 24 March 2006
[This Khoodeelaar! statement is to be continued later on today Saturday 25 March 2006 and on Sunday 26 March 2006]

The announcement made on Friday 24 March 2006 in the name of London mayor Ken Livingstone is quoted in full below:

“/>
"News release
Office hours: 020 7983 4070
Out of hours and weekends: 020 7983 4000
www.london.gov.uk

GLA/2006/185
24 March 2006 for immediate release

Mayor welcomes new tunnelling proposals for Crossrail

Mayor of London Ken Livingstone has welcomed proposed alterations to the Crossrail tunnelling strategy produced by Cross London Rail Links (CLRL), which would greatly reduce disruption caused by Crossrail’s construction.

The Mayor has received new proposals from CLRL which would eliminate the need to launch Tunnel Boring Machines from Hanbury Street in east London.

The recent work undertaken by CLRL shows that, with a recasting of the construction programme, it is now possible to accommodate the major part of the tunnelling activities from the two Tunnel Boring Machine launch sites already proposed at Royal Oak in west London and between Canary Wharf and Custom House in the Docklands area of east London.

Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone said:

“I am delighted with this revised tunnelling proposal. This is exactly where we want to be with this scheme and this revised tunnelling proposal has my full backing. Crossrail is vital for London’s future prosperity and it will give a tremendous boost to the east London economy. These improvements would significantly reduce the disruption which has been feared in east London.”

The London Borough of Tower Hamlets has previously made representations about the possible impact in the Brick Lane area of the tunnelling.

Under the proposals now put to the mayor the major tunnelling in east London would be launched from a shaft located between Canary Wharf and Custom House and would drive all the way to Farringdon instead of stopping at Isle of Dogs.

In the Brick Lane area in east London, the need for a shaft at Pedley Street would be eliminated, as would the conveyor along the Great Eastern main line. Mile End Park would also no longer be needed as a worksite. The only shaft at Hanbury Street would be for ventilation, but this would be a much smaller structure requiring less work and disruption to the local community.

Ends

Contact: Hilary Merrett, Mayor’s Press Office, tel: 020 7983 4753.

DUTY PRESS OFFICER: For out of hours media enquiries please call 020 7983 4000.

GENERAL PUBLIC/NON-MEDIA ENQUIRIES: For non-media enquiries please call the Public Liaison Unit on 020 7983 4100.

Hilary Merrett
Press Officer - Transport & Environment
Mayor of London's Press Office
T: 020 7983 4753
M: 07747 766673
F: 020 7983 4062
GREATERLONDONAUTHORITY
City Hall
The Queen's Walk
London
SE1 2AA
www.london.gov.uk

" “

From Previous editions of the web site KHOODEELAARDOTCOM

KHOODEELAAR! Breaking News [3rd Part: 1930 hrs GMT London Friday 24 March 2006]

Why Crossrail-hole-London Mayor Ken Livingstone staged this stunt and announced the end of the big Crossrail hole in the Brick Lane London E1 area

By Muhammad Haque, Organiser, Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane London E1 Area against the CrossRail hole Bill

1930 Hrs GMT Friday 24 March 2006
Brick Lane London E1 Area

I was asked by a reporter to say if I WAS ‘CELEBRATING;’ THE ANNOUNCVEMENT THAT THE Crossrail hole in the Brick Lane Area was now abandoned by Ken Livingstone, the ‘London mayor’.

I said that I was not in the mood.

I said that in my view, Livingstone was dissembling.

Again.

Why? And how/

Because Livingstone is on record as having backed the very CrossRail hole plan that he has now ‘abadndone4d’.

I know this because for 26 months I have been organising the arguments and the political mobilisation against the CrossRail hole Bill.

Both addressed to the UK House of Commons as well as to the London mayor and to the local tower hamlets Council.

At a crucial stage, Ken Livingstone indulged in the sleaze that he ‘perfected into an art form as the coup-leader on the GLC’.

He promised a generous bout of bribery to many of the people affected by the CrossRail hole.

I shall detail some of the evidence here later.

For today,. Livingstone stunt is to be put in context. While it is a stunt it is also real. As real as political directions can be identified.

And the timing was solely to do with my participation in the constitutional law challenge to Livingstone’s pal Alistair Darling that was due to start at the London high Court on Monday 27 March 2006.

I am partially relieved to note that Livingstone’s retreat has taken place but I am still not sure that Livingstone is realising just how heavy the pressure is going to be on him for a total abandonment of the Crossrail hole attack on our community.

And if the BBC’s report [at the 1830 bulletin today] is anything to go by, the Ken Livingstone stunt and the Crossrail crassness are still evidently being indulged in by the both of them defying their duty – which is to listens the community and give up the planned assault altogether.

As neither has done that, we shall continue to campaign and the campaign does go on Monday with our foiling of the first set of revised claims against the Secretary of State and against Tower Hamlets Council.

[To be continued]

Further additions and updates to these initial khoodeelaaronline reports will be published in detail on this site by 1400 Hrs GMT on Saturday 25 March 2006

1. Khoodeelaar! Revises court claims against Crossrail hole Bill Minister Alistair Darling
2. Khoodeelaar legal claims against Tower Hamlets Council chief Executive Christine Gilbert
3. Khoodeelaar! claims against Tower Hamlets Councillor Michael Keith based on the falsehood of his statements about Crossrail hole
4. Khoodeelaar! revised claims against the CrossRail company
5. Khoodeelaar! revised claims against Tower Hamlets Councillor Judith Gardiner- in relation to her obstructions to a proper scrutiny and overview of the CrossRail hole position of the Tower Hamlets Council
6. Khoodeelaar! revised claims against Owen Whalley in his role as the ‘major projects officer’ employed in Tower Hamlets Council in charge of the Council’s relevant decisions about the CrossRail hole attacks

No time to ‘celebrate’ the Ken Livingstone ‘news’ that Crossrail hole tunnel plan

In the Brick Lane London E1 area is off

Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque said this afternoon that London Mayor Ken Livingstone's statement today that the CrossRail hole would not be dug in the Brick Lane Area cannot be trusted.

Before we are asked to ‘celebrate’ the victory of the Khoodeelaar! no to the CrossRail hole campaign we must see the full extent and the full evidence of the alleged CrossRail U-turn on the hole.

For 26 months we have asked Crossrail hole promoters to tell the truth about their plans and they have told nothing but lies.

The stunt being staged by Ken Livingstone is nothing more than a pathetic imitation at a genuine stunt. He is 20 years out of date.

[A later version of this statement will be published on this site and related sites at 1400 Hrs GMT on Saturday 25 March 2006]

A copy obtained by Khoodeelaaronline of the Greater London Assembly-London Mayor Ken Livingstone’s ‘news release’ dated Friday 24 March 2006-03-24
LAWMEDIA, London, UK is the legal affairs section of the
constituent bodies all of whom are supported by LAWMEDIA by offering advice on the UK constitution, public law, human rights law and international law
Email enquiries to:
lawmedia@hotmail.com

Contextual website

http://www.khoodeelaar.com

_____________________________________

From the Constitutional law support unit

On the instructions of Mr Muhammad Haque

To Ms Lucy Rogers

GLA News Release that Lucy Rogers could not locate:

.

The Brick Lane London E1 area campaign against the CrossRail hole is asking for the full details to be made available to us a matter of urgency.

We have asked CrossRail, for the fullest possible details, as we have asked Alistair Darling
To substantiate what Livingstone has allegedly said.

We are going ahead with our application to the High Court on Monday against Alistair Darling ion the constitutional abuses that he committed when he presented the CrossRail hole Bill.

The Khoodeelaar fuller statements will be published on this site throughout the day and over the weekend.

Khoodeelaar! News briefing on the KHOODEELAAR! High Court action

At 0900 Hrs GMT
The Strand
Outside the High Court
Monday 27 March 2006

Also an edited version of the Khoodeelaar legal action as made at the Khoodeelaar News Briefing on court action against Transport Secretary Alistair Darling MP
1100 Hrs GMT Friday 24 March 2006
will be posted here at 1500 Hrs GMT Saturday 25 March 2006

http://www.khoodeelaar.com

KHOODEELAAR!
The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole-tunnel ‘project, scheme, plan’ Bill [that is ‘the Crossrail Bill’ now in the UK House of Commons]

LEGAL DISCLAIMER 0730 Hrs GMT on Monday 13 March 2006
The contents published on this Khoodeelaardotcom web site are written, authored and created by the Editor and they belong to the Editor unless otherwise stated in relation to individual items published here. The name Khoodeelaar is the intellectual property of the Editor and Author. All materials are published here purely and solely for educational purposes. That is, NO part of the items published or cited as original trailers here on this Khoodeelaardotcom web site must be used for commercial, immoral, illegal or party political or sectarian or propaganda purposes or for any purposes that are anathema to the universally accepted and recognised codes of ethics and morality. Intellectual property rights action shall be taken to protect the integrity of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail hole attacks plan scheme project Bill [UK House of Commons at the date of this disclaimer] and their contractors, touts and agencies. NO part of the contents of the Khoodeelaardotcom web site must be included in any promotion of the interests against whose continuation and existence the Khoodeelaardotcom web site is created authored written and published. That means that none of these materials must be used to show Crossrail programme in any positive light as to do so would contradict the aims and objects of the contents of this web site. And that would amount to illegal and immoral distortion of the contents of this Khoodeelaardotcom web site.

This [the 5th] edition [of the day] Updated at 2000 Hrs GMT on Friday 24 March 2006

Editor© Muhammad Haque

Produced by CBRUK for Khoodeelaar!

Political organisation by
London Community Audit Network
Constitutional law support services
by
Lawcompliance

Produced and published by CBRUK for Khoodeelaar!

Constitutional law services are provided by Lawcompliance and

The London Community Audit Network

lawmedia@hotmail.com

Khoodeelaaronline publishing arrangement as at 2000 Hrs GMT on Friday 24 March 2006

This supersedes any previous publishing schedule, sequence or topicality that we had published. This arrangement is integrally linked with the Khoodeelaar! “campaign against the Crossrail hole plan scheme project Bill” activities and we have to adjust publishing arrangements in order to deal with campaign priorities and campaign events that occur and are organised at short notice as we go along.

KHOODEELAAR! Breaking News [3rd Part: 1930 hrs GMT London Friday 24 March 2006]

Why Crossrail-hole-London Mayor Ken Livingstone staged this stunt and announced the end of the big Crossrail hole in the Brick Lane London E1 area

By Muhammad Haque, Organiser, Khoodeelaar! The Brick Lane London E1 Area against the CrossRail hole Bill

1930 Hrs GMT Friday 24 March 2006
Brick Lane London E1 Area

I was asked by a reporter to say if I WAS ‘CELEBRATING’ THE ANNOUNCVEMENT THAT THE Crossrail hole in the Brick Lane Area was now abandoned by Ken Livingstone, the ‘London mayor’.

I said that I was not in the mood.

I said that in my view, Livingstone was dissembling.

Again.

Why? And how/

Because Livingstone is on record as having backed the very CrossRail hole plan that he has now ‘abadndone4d’.

I know this because for 26 months I have been organising the arguments and the political mobilisation against the CrossRail hole Bill.

Both addressed to the UK House of Commons as well as to the London mayor and to the local tower hamlets Council.

At a crucial stage, Ken Livingstone indulged in the sleaze that he ‘perfected into an art form as the coup-leader on the GLC’.

He promised a generous bout of bribery to many of the people affected by the CrossRail hole.

I shall detail some of their here later.

For today,. Livingstone stunt is to be put in context. While it is a stunt it is also real. As real as political directions can be identified.

And the timing was solely to do with my participation in the constitutional law challenge to Livingstone’s pal Alistair Darling that was due to start at the London high Court on Monday 27 March 2006.

I am partially relieved to note that Livingstone’s retreat has taken place but I am still not sure that Livingstone is realising just how heavy the pressure is going to be on him for a total abandonment of the Crossrail hole attack on our community.

And if the BBC’s report [at the 1830 bulletin today] is anything to go by, the Ken Livingstone stunt and the Crossrail crassness are still evidently being indulged in by the both of them defying their duty – which is to listens the community and give up the planned assault altogether.

As neither has done that, we shall continue to campaign and the campaign does go on Monday with our foiling of the first set of revised claims against the Secretary of State and against Tower Hamlets Council.

[To be continued]

Further additions and updates to these initial khoodeelaaronline reports will be published in detail on this site by 1400 Hrs GMT on Saturday 25 March 2006

1. Khoodeelaar! revises court claims against Crossrail hole Bill Minister Alistair Darling
2. Khoodeelaar legal claims against Tower Hamlets Council chief Executive Christine Gilbert
3. Khoodeelaar! claims against Tower Hamlets Councillor Michael Keith based on the falsehood of his statements about Crossrail hole
4. Khoodeelaar! revised claims against the CrossRail company
5. Khoodeelaar! revised claims against Tower Hamlets Councillor Judith Gardiner- in relation to her obstructions to a proper scrutiny and overview of the CrossRail hole position of the Tower Hamlets Council
6. Khoodeelaar! revised claims against Owen Whalley in his role as the ‘major projects officer’ employed in Tower Hamlets Council in charge of the Council’s relevant decisions about the CrossRail hole attacks

No time to ‘celebrate’ the Ken Livingstone ‘news’ that Crossrail hole tunnel plan

In the Brick Lane London E1 area is off

Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque said this afternoon that London Mayor Ken Livingstone's statement today that the CrossRail hole would not be dug in the Brick Lane Area cannot be trusted.

Before we are asked to ‘celebrate’ the victory of the Khoodeelaar! no to the CrossRail hole campaign we must see the full extent and the full evidence of the alleged CrossRail U-turn on the hole.

For 26 months we have asked Crossrail hole promoters to tell the truth about their plans and they have told nothing but lies.

The stunt being staged by Ken Livingstone is nothing more than a pathetic imitation at a genuine stunt. He is 20 years out of date.

[A later version of this statement will be published on this site and related sites at 1400 Hrs GMT on Saturday 25 March 2006]

A copy obtained by Khoodeelaaronline of the Greater London Assembly-London Mayor Ken Livingstone’s ‘news release’ dated Friday 24 March 2006-03-24
LAWMEDIA, London, UK is the legal affairs section of the
constituent bodies all of whom are supported by LAWMEDIA by offering advice on the UK constitution, public law, human rights law and international law
Email enquiries to:
lawmedia@hotmail.com

Contextual website

http://www.khoodeelaar.com

_____________________________________

From the Constitutional law support unit

On the instructions of Mr Muhammad Haque

To Ms Lucy Rogers

GLA News Release that Lucy Rogers could not locate:

"News release
Office hours: 020 7983 4070
Out of hours and weekends: 020 7983 4000
www.london.gov.uk

GLA/2006/185
24 March 2006 for immediate release

Mayor welcomes new tunnelling proposals for Crossrail

Mayor of London Ken Livingstone has welcomed proposed alterations to the Crossrail tunnelling strategy produced by Cross London Rail Links (CLRL), which would greatly reduce disruption caused by Crossrail’s construction.

The Mayor has received new proposals from CLRL which would eliminate the need to launch Tunnel Boring Machines from Hanbury Street in east London.

The recent work undertaken by CLRL shows that, with a recasting of the construction programme, it is now possible to accommodate the major part of the tunnelling activities from the two Tunnel Boring Machine launch sites already proposed at Royal Oak in west London and between Canary Wharf and Custom House in the Docklands area of east London.

Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone said:

“I am delighted with this revised tunnelling proposal. This is exactly where we want to be with this scheme and this revised tunnelling proposal has my full backing. Crossrail is vital for London’s future prosperity and it will give a tremendous boost to the east London economy. These improvements would significantly reduce the disruption which has been feared in east London.”

The London Borough of Tower Hamlets has previously made representations about the possible impact in the Brick Lane area of the tunnelling.

Under the proposals now put to the mayor the major tunnelling in east London would be launched from a shaft located between Canary Wharf and Custom House and would drive all the way to Farringdon instead of stopping at Isle of Dogs.

In the Brick Lane area in east London, the need for a shaft at Pedley Street would be eliminated, as would the conveyor along the Great Eastern main line. Mile End Park would also no longer be needed as a worksite. The only shaft at Hanbury Street would be for ventilation, but this would be a much smaller structure requiring less work and disruption to the local community.

Ends

Contact: Hilary Merrett, Mayor’s Press Office, tel: 020 7983 4753.

DUTY PRESS OFFICER: For out of hours media enquiries please call 020 7983 4000.

GENERAL PUBLIC/NON-MEDIA ENQUIRIES: For non-media enquiries please call the Public Liaison Unit on 020 7983 4100.

Hilary Merrett
Press Officer - Transport & Environment
Mayor of London's Press Office
T: 020 7983 4753
M: 07747 766673
F: 020 7983 4062
GREATERLONDONAUTHORITY
City Hall
The Queen's Walk
London
SE1 2AA
www.london.gov.uk

"

.

The Brick Lane London E1 area campaign against the CrossRail hole is asking for the full details to be made available to us a matter of urgency.

We have asked CrossRail, for the fullest possible details, as we have asked Alistair Darling
To substantiate what Livingstone has allegedly said.

We are going ahead with our application to the High Court on Monday against Alistair Darling ion the constitutional abuses that he committed when he presented the CrossRail hole Bill.

The Khoodeelaar fuller statements will be published on this site throughout the day and over the weekend.

Khoodeelaar! News briefing on the KHOODEELAAR! High Court action

At 0900 Hrs GMT
The Strand
Outside the High Court
Monday 27 March 2006

Also an edited version of the Khoodeelaar legal action as made at the Khoodeelaar News Briefing on court action against Transport Secretary Alistair Darling MP
1100 Hrs GMT Friday 24 March 2006
will be posted here at 1500 Hrs GMT Saturday 25 March 2006

http://www.khoodeelaar.com

KHOODEELAAR!
The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole-tunnel ‘project, scheme, plan’ Bill [that is ‘the Crossrail Bill’ now in the UK House of Commons]

LEGAL DISCLAIMER 0730 Hrs GMT on Monday 13 March 2006
The contents published on this Khoodeelaardotcom web site are written, authored and created by the Editor and they belong to the Editor unless otherwise stated in relation to individual items published here. The name Khoodeelaar is the intellectual property of the Editor and Author. All materials are published here purely and solely for educational purposes. That is, NO part of the items published or cited as original trailers here on this Khoodeelaardotcom web site must be used for commercial, immoral, illegal or party political or sectarian or propaganda

KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail agenda-stooged role of the two Select Committees in the UK Parliament...

2009-01-31T14:10:00.000-08:00

From the web site of the LONDON EVENING nostandards STANDARD

'
Revealed: the peers who claim the most expenses
Sri Carmichael, Consumer Affairs Reporter
30.01.09 Related Articles
Police discuss possibility of 'Lords for hire' inquiry
'Lords for hire' will be thrown out if guilty, warns Brown
Members rush to declare commercial interests

A SERIES of peers claimed hundreds of pounds each day in expenses without asking ministers any questions and rarely participating in the chamber of the House of Lords.

A "value for money" index compiled by the Evening Standard from the latest list of members' expenses reveals which Lords charged taxpayers up to £300 a day "subsistence" despite rarely speaking in the chamber.

The list includes former BBC director general Lord Birt, a crossbencher, who is the highest claiming peer. He claimed on average £296.38 in overnight and day subsistence for each of the 72 days he attended the House between 1 April 2007 and 31 March 2008.

During that year he did not table a single question, spoke in three debates and voted in five per cent of divisions.

There is growing concern over the make-up and role of the House of Lords following allegations that four peers offered to change the law in exchange for cash. Scotland Yard is considering whether the allegations warrant a criminal investigation.

Two of them, Lord Moonie and Lord Snape, who have denied any wrongdoing, feature in the top 30 highest charging peers. Other peers high up the list of expenses claims include former Labour party economic adviser Lord Eatwell, who is president of Queens' College, Cambridge. He tabled no questions, spoke in 10 debates and voted in 18 per cent of divisions last year.

Lord Birt, Lord Eatwell and another crossbencher in the top five highest charging peers, Lord Oxburgh, are all paid for consultancy work outside Parliament. Six former MPs - three Liberal Democrat, two Conservative and one Labour - feature in the top 30 index.

Also included are the Conservatives' shadow lord chancellor Lord Kingsland, the Liberal Democrats' president Baroness Scott and Lord Razzall, the party's business spokesman.

He shares a London home with his partner Baroness Bonham-Carter and they both take full advantage of the living expenses on offer. Their main residence is in Wiltshire.

Trade unionist Lord Burlison, who died last May, topped the index. He was instrumental in starting Tony Blair and Lord Mandelson's political careers, helping to select them as MPs.

The list also details 39 peers who chose not to ask for any money.

Peers can claim up to £165.50 overnight accommodation expenses for each day they attend the House if they register their main home outside Greater London. A member needs to enter the chamber or a committee and be ticked off by a clerk to qualify for this payment, but it does not matter how long they stay or whether they participate.

Peers can push their total overnight subsistence claim higher if they have a second home in London as a parliamentary base. Then they are entitled to up to £110.50 maintenance costs for each night they spend away from London on select committee business. Peers do not incur any expenses on such trips as they are all paid by the select committee.

A day-to-day allowance of up to £82.50 is also available to cover meals and "incidental" travel. The Standard did not include office costs or travel costs in the value for money index. The latter varies according to the location of the member's main residence. All peers are entitled to first-class train tickets and business-class flights as well as generous car mileage. No receipts are required to claim allowances.

Several of the peers in the table live within striking distance of London by car or train, but can claim travel if they live outside Greater London.

Mark Wallace, campaign director of the Taxpayers' Alliance, said: "It's unacceptable that some peers are getting away with claiming huge amounts of taxpayers' money and then doing little or no work in return."

The House of Lords information office said the Lords cost less than a third of what it costs to run the House of Commons per member. Last year each peer cost the taxpayer £168,000 and each MP cost £599,000. None of the peers was available for comment today.

Link to:
Reader views (37) Add your view
Here's a sample of the latest views published.

One question.
How do I become a Lord? It seems to be perfect way to top up my oap.

- Colin Macpherson, Gramat France

It is peculiar how some of these lightweights have so many expenses yet ask hardly any questions and appear in the Lords so rarely.

Maybe certain expenses ought to be investigate more closely eg secretarial help and I don't mean family members. Let them be identified; I am sure wives would like to know.

- Michael Waugh, Kensington

This is all part of the REALLY BIG BOYS (and girls) CLUB, isn't it? All in the pig swill together stuffing their gobs with cash. What a disgrace. And we lowly taxpayers are supposed to just take this lying down while our lives are being ruined by the bankers and politicians.

- Alf Bennett, London, England.

The other point to make is that these payments are described as "expenses" and hence tax free!!!! I doubt if the Inland Revenue would allow this to happen anywhere else.

- jeremy E, London

Unelected, unaccountable, good value for money? Hmmm... Don't think so sunshine.

- Frank, Home Counties, England.

they also have a five star restaurant and are only charged pennies for the meals they order,,,,,,,

- Stan Shaw, DeLand Florida USA

..I refer to Gilbert & Sullivan's opera Iolanthe. There you will find all the information on the HoL you'll need. When W S Gilbert wrote this in the 19th century, it led to howls of outrage from the HoL. It would be great timing for this to return to the London stage - it would cheer everyone up and show the HoL up for what it is - a gravy train for elderly politicians with nothing else to do and do it very well.

- Joannie, London, England

Troughs/pigs spring to mind but will anything change I doubt it,we are too complacent.We should be shouting from the rooftops about some members of this august assembly to put a stop to their gravy train rip offs.Will the police take any action not on your life it would,nt be politically prudent.

- roy c, wigan

The Lords provide a valueble backstop against kneejerk and often undemocratic laws New Labour have tried to rush through parliment in recent years. Expenses are abused on both sides of the house as we know and should be cleaned up, but I would be very worried if the Lords were not able to challenge parliament.

- Steve, Hereford

Nu Labor go away!

- Jacqueline, Hampstead, London

What self serving scum we now seem to have in the House of Lords!!

- Doff, filey uk

If an electrician has to travel 200 miles to do a job and stay over night,he does it.
He cannot, however claim expenses to do the job. So if you wish to be a Lord or a MP for that matter and your job is in London and you live elsewhere, thats your choice, it should not be for the tax payer to subsidise your traveling and accomodation, or second home expenses.

- Barbus, Liverpool

What are you doing to this country.?

- David,Chertsey, Chertsey.UK.

I used to be in favour of a 2nd house, as a safety valve to crazy decisions made in Parliament. Although the money involved per member is not that great, it still looks like a great wheeze and the cheapest alternative to an old peoples home in the country and from the ga-ga comments from many of its members and the fact an already pensioned old MP, they can still draw a few hundred quid, from just turning up each day. This is an insult and travesty to millions of ordinary pensioners. Get rid of them all, unless they want to serve the people and turn up for nix.

- Bondy, london

Which begs the question... why were they appointed in the first place? Reform can no longer be put on hold.

- Dhanraj, Basildon Essex

The House of Lords currently quite happily accommodates both a convicted arsonist, Lord Watson, and that bumptious perjurer, Lord Archer.
Once you manage to get your snout in that particular Westminster trough, if your a Freemason, you're in it for life.

- Frank, Bristol UK

These are all parasites who don't give a damn to the working classes in hardship !

- Joe, Swanley Kent

What is your exact methodology and sources in determining this list? I am not 100% sure that these figures stand up to scrutiny.

- Mike, New Zealand

GOOD POINT...
Val Daniels, Mijas Costa, Spain
And...
WELL SAID...
Fly, london

- Mark H, London England

Its all a big tax payer funded racket.
But the common man is helpless, weaponless, and is unable to fight against the political elite that have taken over the country and re-instituted serfdom.

- Trunk, US

There has to be mobilisation against the MPs and these unelected peers who continue to grab as much as they can from the people of the UK. Time and time again we hear about incredible acts of gluttony as these people rob from the UK tax payer. When so many people in the UK are struggling to feed themselves and are being evicted, these privileged few are continuing to live a hedonistic lifestyle funded by the UK taxpayer.

I am so angry. This needs to stop. Now.

- The People, London, UK.

Why did you not point out that 8 of the highest claimants were Conservatives, 9 were Labour, and 8 were Liberal Democrats. Not much to choose between any of them. The real difference between Conservative peers and peers from the other parties is that only the Conservatives have an ex-convict (Lord Archer), and a serving prisoner (Lord Black) in the House of Lords.

- Val Daniels, Mijas Costa, Spain

I thought Labour was going to abolish the Lords; instead they seem to be taking every advantage of the gravy train. The sooner we have an elected upper chamber the better.

- John, London, UK

For some reason these lazy good for nothing spongers see this as their divine right, they have no shame and couldn't care less about pensioners, or anyone else, demonstrating. If they did care they wouldn't behave the way they do. I personally know one elderly peer who is amazingly adept at scrounging as much for free as he possibly can - and he is absolutely loaded. It makes me sick!

- Kathy, london

Why do we even have a House of Lords?

- Frederick, London

The country is in deep recession,we are all tightening our belts and these people are claiming every penny from our taxes they can get.We are encouraged to use energy saving lamps,turn the heating down and other ecconomical means while these "lords" are encouraged to behave in this despicable manner.I can sleep at night with a clear conscience can they?

- Gerald Diamond, Romford Essex

It would certainly not embarrass the gilded socks off the Lords if pensioners demonstrated. They have no shame.

- Peter Little, Wendover, England

Do we really need all these peers - they are clearly all on the gravy train and don't appear to be value for money. We have approximately 700 - SEVEN HUNDRED - Lords - it seems outrageous when we have a total population of 60 odd million compared with the approximately 300 million in the American population and they manage with 100 senators in their upper house!

- Barbara, Walton-on-Thames, England

Its always been the same but as per nothing will be done about it, certainly agree with Flys comment.

- Mike, London England

How many of these are in the "Old Boys Club"? (Freemasons are not required to declare their membership) They tend to serve each others interests first.

- Frank, Bristol

Expenses should be paid to reimburse money paid out. It is a farcical situation that MPs and Lords can claim a daily allowance and not even have to turn up to do a day's work.

The French wouldn't stand for it.

- Nobby Clark, Perth, the Scottish one

And that's not even including all the 'extras.' Lord Taylor of Blackburn has been a Lord for 30 years! A good ten year span after serious thoughts were being had about misbehaving lords. And he has been awarded an OBE and an MBE. After 20 years as a local councillor. Now he gets £330 per day attendance, has apparently enjoyed £400,000 in expenses and picks up £120,000 consultancy fees at the drop of an eyelid- plus other remuneration one may suppose. Smart fellow and clearly brighter than I am, suffering from tobacco withdrawal symptoms as I struggle on, looking in despair at my old age pension of £90 per week. Yes, that's £90 per week. The lowest in Europe. Our leaders need to do something about the fabric of our British society, before all we Old Age Pensioners take to the streets and invade Parliament Square, embarrassing the gilded socks off them, waving huge banners saying 'Bring in the UN.' And we've got a list of those who'll be first in the tumbril. Oh yes.

- John Problem, Hackney Wick, London, UK

Can R.F. and all the other people suggesting an elected Lords explain why they think that would be any better? Haven't we had a constant stream of sleeze stories from Parliament as well? I'm sure that if we broke down the list of highest claiming peers that the non-hereditary, government appointed ones would be the majority so surely the pproblem has been exacerbated by appointees. At least the Lords do not get a salary as well.

- Mark, London

So the best-value Lord is a Hereditary Peer.

Looking down the list I see that Baroness Smith of Gilmorehill - whose qualifications for sitting in the Upper House were (a) being the widow of former Labour Party Leader John Smith and (b) a minor champion of Scottish Arts - claimed £60,000 for tabling no questions, speaking in no debates and only even bothering to vote 22% of the time.

Lets see a parallel list of the attendence rates under the old peerage system: it would be interesting to see how they compare. Also, more details about WHO the HECK these people are . . . ?!

- Roz, Chamonix, France - if it really matters!

It may be better for their Lordships to be charged a daily attendance fee, in place of the present allowance and expenses they receive. This could sort out those who really wish to provide public service from those intent on milking the system.

- Duyfken, UK

The latest revelations clearly indicate an immediate need to abolish the house of lords and halt this gravy train in it's tracks. The upper house should consist of elected (honest) members who are accountable to the tax payer. This might help to restore the confidence of the electorate. The current government is seen for what it is - corrupt and dishonest. If found guilty of corruption then the four lords must be severely punished. Justice must not just be done - it must be seen to be done.

- R.F., Yorks, UK

the scum always floats to the surface and right now there is a lot on scum on the pint better known as the UK.

- Fly, london

KHOODEELAAR! updater examination of the poverty of the peddlers of 'child poverty': they HIDE true poverty [207]

2008-12-22T01:57:00.000-08:00

POVERTY in Britain and the poverty of the Brown-fronted Blairing regime that is maintaining poverty in the UK today more brazenly than Brown would ever admit

By © Muhammad Haque
0920 hrs GMT
London Monday 22 December 2008

Talking about ‘child poverty’ by definition excludes discussion of poverty as a whole. That is why the correct term to use is ‘poverty’. Not just ‘child poverty’. So why do the Blaired ‘professionals’ holding the positions on ‘combatting’ ‘poverty’ refuse to use the single word poverty? The answer is to be found in the fact that they are essentially in denial. And in deep ignorance. The half of their dishonest ‘term’ is on many levels misleading. ‘Child’ may sound like the call for care, compassion and delicacy with the fragility of the vulnerable. But this is a confidence trick. Like so many of the terms they use, this [‘child poverty’] is to dress themselves up as a party [with a small p] dedicated to upholding the needs and the rights of the ‘more vulnerable and needy’. The word ‘child’ carries so much instant positive recognition of all things good or at least innocent.…. As different from the whole family.. The neighbourhood. The community. The population... That would be a daunting reality. That one the peddlers of concern on ‘child poverty’ dare not face up to, let alone deal with...

When the entire population is organised in a way that CAUSES poverty, imposes poverty, adds to poverty, it is little wonder that children in it are in poverty.….

By the population I am here referring to that part of the population that is the target of poverty causation, poverty imposition, poverty addition...

The parts that are to be found in the inner cities in the UK.

There are people in poverty in the other parts of the UK populations and conurbation.

But the incidence, the spread, the perpetration and the persistence of poverty in the inner cities areas are so high, frequent and noticeable that a discussion of poverty in Britain today would be done more comprehensively and accurately by looking at the inner cities than by looking at the other areas where poverty also does exist.

Tower Hamlets in the East End of London is of course the London borough that contains most of the features of inner city poverty.…

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! review of 2008 and the campaign against Crossrail agenda [206]

2008-12-21T14:07:00.000-08:00

KHOODEELAAR! review of 2008 and the campaign against Crossrail agenda [206]

2210 Hrs GMT London Sunday 21 December 2008

The most comprehensive series of communications that Khoodeelaar! wrote made and issued and put to any part of the UK Parliament on the subject of the Crossrail agenda was done during the year 2008.

And we addressed those to the so-called Select committee located in the UK House of Lords on Crossrail.

We shall be publishing the key documents and materials as part of this KHOODEELAAR! campaign Review, here:

KHOODEELAAR! tells Gordon Brown to stop concealing the poverty of his spending [400]

2008-12-21T02:35:00.001-08:00

1020 Hrs GMT London Sunday 21 December 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO!

Brown is going over the top [OTT] in funding banks without asking questions about where the money had gone....If he had asked the questions in private they shall remain private. that is, the banks will never be under public pressure to account for their robbery... And Brown will condemn the UK ordinary public; to an age of avoidable debt and resulting social depression... The fundamental problem and the alleged contagion [the inappropriate word that Brown has been using without any criticism so far in the ‘mainstream media’] is in the corruption of the greedy system that allows banks and big business to behave in the way they they do..Brown cannot be touting for them and then be expecting to be getting lasting - as different from speculative electoral - credit... Brown will find, sooner than his careerist, time-serving promoters of the moment tell him, that his over-pumped balloon has burst......Unless he starts to face up-to the fact that the British banks and the banks ‘nearby’ and all the other ‘institutions’ he is making public funds available to, are socially and sustainably economically responsible, credible and above all accountable... HOWEVER Brown cannot feel under much pressure to do that when the likes of Vince Cable turn out to be mere adjuncts to Brown’s propaganda... Vince Cable has had a year of exceedingly disproportionate facilities given him in the media and in particular on the BBC... But what has he done in return for the public? Has he told the truth? Does he even know the truth? Apart from that one utterance that got him all the facilities and invites from the media, what has been the transformation in Vince Cable’s politics in 2008? Going by Cable’s utterances broadcast in the past 80 minutes, NOTHING.…. In fact Cable has become Gordon Brown’s propaganda side-kick, from the allegedly independent party....[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! series of Review of the campaign against Crossrail scam in 2008 is due to start appearing here this weekend

2008-12-20T01:34:00.000-08:00

KHOODEELAAR! series of Review of the campaign against Crossrail scam in 2008 is due to start appearing here this weekend

KHOODEELAAR! tells Gordon Brown to pay heed to Rowan Williams on wanton debts-indulgence and scrap Crossrail

2008-12-18T22:34:00.001-08:00

KHOODEELAAR! tells Gordon Brown to pay heed to Rowan Williams on wanton debts-indulgence and scrap Crossrail

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Tower Hamlets Council's role as a tool for Big Business Crossrail, has been CRASS!

2008-12-18T00:06:00.000-08:00

HOW CRASS has been the 'policy' of Tower Hamlets Council on Crossrail? The EVIDENCE of that came floating on the peddling statement made last night..

That happened in the Council chamber at Mulberry Place, Clove Crescent, London E14 2BG.

Someone stood up, at the cue given by the chair of the meeting, and spoke in the name of the controlling ‘group’ on the Council. By the time he had finished his first sentence, it became clear that he was not really au fait with the facts. let alone with the evidence.

We shall be publishing the report ands analysis on this site and on twitter.com/khoodeelaar during the day today Thursday 18 December 2008

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Even moderate MPs have found Crossrail-peddler UK DfT to be DAFT! We say SCRAP the DfT too

2008-12-16T06:00:00.000-08:00

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Even moderate MPs have found Crossrail-peddler UK DfT to be DAFT! We say SCRAP the DfT too

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That the UK Department for Transport is in cahoots with liars...

2008-12-16T04:39:00.002-08:00

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That the UK Department for Transport is in cahoots with liars...

2008-12-16T04:39:00.001-08:00

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That the UK Department for Transport is in cahoots with liars...

KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law action : publication of evidence against the House of Peers Crossrail Bill Select Committee falsifying evidence.

2008-12-14T07:51:00.000-08:00

KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law action : publication of evidence against the House of Peers Crossrail Bill Select Committee falsifying evidence.

What does this mean?

Answer: it means that the comments made by the chair of the Crossrail Bill Select committee in the UK house of Lords in march 2008 about in particular Khoodeelaar! formal objections to Crossrail, were false. untrue. misleading and Not justified.

How are we saying this?

Answer: because the co,moments were so beyond the pale that to leave them unchallenged would amount to our being clueless. Out of touch. uninformed about our own community.

The comments that were made by the Chair of the Crossrail Bill Select committee in the House of Lords will be continued to be examine here.…

We here publish exhibit 2008/6

The references to the ‘Crossrail Bill’ are to be treated as being made in relation to events before 28 july 2008 when that same Bill was rubber stamped into the ‘Crossrail Act’.

"

At the time that the formal objections
['petitions'] against the 'Crossrail Bill' were being
prepared to be submitted, it became necessary to
comply with the paper requirements of the committee.
Especially the one about 'certificate of
respectability' [!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]'. In that
connection, you referred to a member of the
Spitalfields Society and said that this individual was
a practising 'solicitor' and would give - or [as
you later said] would be approached to give - a
certificate of respectability. In the event the person
refused to give a certificate of respectability. Did
the same person also claim to be opposed to the
Crossrail Bill? If so, in what regard did their
'opposition' relate to the KHOODEELAAR campaign's
opposition IN PRINCIPLE? Or was their opposition to
Crossrail LESS severe than their Opposition TO
Khoodeelaar! And if the person had been OPPOSED to the
same Crossrail Bill that the Khoodeelaar! campaign had
been opposed to then had the person been abroad for
the past 50 months? And is that why they had not
'known' of the Khoodeelaar! campaign or had
heard of them? And is that why they had not known the
Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser? Or was there another
reason, in any way linked with the fact that they, the
individual concerned a and the Spitalfields Society,
did not wish to come across to the 'authorities' as
being in any way in agreement with let alone
supportive of the Khoodeelaar! campaign?

"

KHOODEELAAR! again advising David Cameron to sort out the Tory Party's ‘alternative’ to Brown's CRASS Keynesian indulgence

2008-12-14T07:10:00.000-08:00

By © Muhammad Haque 1500 Hrs GMT London Sunday 14 December 2008

KHOODEELAAR! again advising David Cameron to sort out the Tory Party's ‘alternative’ to Brown's CRASS Keynesian indulgences..

That spiel by cameron staged last week at the opportunistically marketing London School of Economics, was not good enough... Cameron has not reconciled most of the Conservative contradictions.. Unless that happens, no one in their rational, sensible, informed minds can give real credit to Cameron...

Cameron has not addressed the crassest case of crass Keynesianism, that is Boris Johnson's’ persistent and very ignorant peddling of Crossrail...

Where does Cameron stand on Crossrail? Is he as stupidly for Crossrail as Grayling was... As Boris Johnson has been? If Cameron is for Crossrail then he can say goodbye to being taken seriously as the offerer of an alternative economic policy.…

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! wishing Happy Eid to all

2008-12-08T01:26:00.000-08:00

KHOODEELAAR! wishing Happy Eid to all

KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence that London Crossrail is NOT relevant and yet Alistair Darling is bent on wasting £Billions of public money on it..

2008-11-26T12:42:00.000-08:00

2040 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 26 November 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence that London Crossrail is NOT relevant and yet Alistair Darling is bent on wasting £Billions of public money in funding Big Business Crossrail scam...[231]

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! No evidence even from the EU that the Crossrail scam was in any way relevant... yet Darling is bent on going ahead and in wasting £Billions in funding the Big Business London Crossrail scam...

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! tells Brown [and Darling] to scrap Crossrail and similar deals with Big Business and avoid EXTRA £Billions of debt [314]

2008-11-23T17:13:00.000-08:00

KHOODEELAAR! tells Brown [and Darling] to scrap Crossrail and similar deals with Big Business and avoid EXTRA £Billions of debt [314]

KHOODEELAAR! No to Lib Dem [!!!!] Crossrail hole scam-tout Tom Brake ‘MP’. Evidence update [312 b]

2008-11-23T11:40:00.001-08:00

This AADHIKARonline page was last edited at 2150 Hrs GMT London Sunday 23 November 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! No to Lib Dem [!!!!] Crossrail hole scam-tout Tom BRAKE ‘MP’. Why is BRAKE a tout? Because he plugs Crossrail as a tout would do. With no real reason. With no evidence. With no sense.. And as in any tout’s ‘argument’, there will be more holes of idiocy than there would be substance. As has been evident in BRAKE’s latest exhibition as contained in a parallel statement that BRAKE has made during a token ‘debate‘ held about RAIL LINKS in the UK, under the auspices the UK House of Commons and published in the last few days...

One of BRAKE’s allegedly ‘intelligent’ points against air travel and ‘for’ train travel was made at comparative length. In which bit BRAKE appeared to be arguing against HEATHROW. Or at least against the alleged disadvantages of HEATHROW.…

Which BRAKE has every right to indulge in.

Except when he TOUTS for Crossrail. As he did during his typically stooging period as the Lib Dems’ ‘transport’ spokesperson in the House of Commons while the CRASS rail Bill was still in formal STOOGING process...

The point we make about BRAKE and Heathrow is simply this: if HEATHROW is that unattractive [!!!!] then how is it that we the UK public must pay £Billions to build ‘a Crossrail’ in order to access the same CONDEMNED Heathrow?

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence of the really presumptuous conduct and indulgences by Big Business Crossrail scam-backer Boris Johnson [306]

2008-11-22T04:39:00.000-08:00

This AADHIKARonline page was last edited at
1240 GMT London Saturday 22 November 2008

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That Boris Johnson, the Crossrail, Big Business SCAM-tout Ken Livingstone's 'replacement' at S*****Y Hall London SE1, was coming apart as being not only NOT occupying a morally higher ground than Livingstone but that Johnson was in fact coming apart as a CRASSER version of Livingstone....As Johnson’s latest venture [significantly broadcast to the world via Channel 4 news of all places; we shall return to Channel 4 as a frame of reference] into the arena of mendacious megalomania indulged in by Johnson’s displays.... How else could Phil Woolas come across as being an almost substantial and sane politico when compared with Johnson!?! It is not that Johnson has discovered the need to humanise the treatment of 'illegal' immigrants... It is not that he has also discovered the need to make the existing immigration and naturalisation policies genuinely fair and ethical..... It is just that Johnson's 'economic utterances' are totally stupid... Just as can be expected from the peddler of Big Business, a tout and propagandist for the very bankers that are behind one of the tottering capitalism's most inexcusable crises...... [To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence of the callousness and blatant lying by the Crossrail scam propaganda makers: ..[300]

2008-11-21T01:27:00.000-08:00

This page was last edited at 0928 Hrs GMT London Friday 21 November 2008

CRASS propaganda for Crossrail scam: they don't spare even the environment

0920 GMT London Friday 21 November 2008: KHOODEELAAR! Told you so! That "London Crossrail scam" was a CRASSLY conceived excuse to reward big Business and its agencies and touts and that to do this the forces behind the scam would go to any length and twist the facts and lie without end... Now they are abusing the environment and trying to paint the scam look as if they want the £Billions of public money for Crossrail IN ORDER TO SAVE THE BIRDS....! The question again is - do the birds in the Essex area [or anywhere else] deserve to be misrepresented by the immoral plotters set on looting the public of £Billions? The cost of the alleged 'environmental sanctuary' is a few £millions... NOT £Billions... But the plotters are parading it as if Crossrail is being done to save the birds at a cost of £Billions.....When will they stop lying? [To be continued] The following item is being published by KHOODEELAAR! here as an illustration of the 'environment friendly' posture being prompted by the original plotters of the Crossrail hole lying machine... The web site concerned may itself have been partly misled by the Crossrail scam plotters propaganda..."Material excavated from beneath London for Crossrail’s new cross-capital rail link is to be used to create a huge wildlife reserve in Essex. Clay, chalk, sand and gravel taken from the construction of Crossrail will be transferred by ship to Wallasea Island, which the RSPB will transform into 1,500 acres – nearly 2.5 square miles - of tidal wildlife habitat. The agreement links Europe’s largest construction project with the continent’s biggest coastal habitat creation scheme. The project, to help replace wildlife sites damaged by climate change, was announced a year ago but depended on raising at least £12 million. Plans have altered since and costs have risen. .....Graham Wynne, Chief Executive of the RSPB, said: “This is an fantastic agreement that one year ago, we could never have imagined. Wallasea will be the RSPB’s most ambitious and innovative habitat recreation scheme. It will create a huge new area for birds and other wildlife whose existing habitats are being damaged and lost because of climate change. This is a ground-breaking deal between one of the UK’s leading enterprises and an environmental charity. It is absolutely wonderful news for wildlife.” .........The Crossrail proposal was given Royal Assent in July. The 73-mile rail link from Maidenhead and Heathrow in the west, to Shenfield and Abbey Wood in the east, will be Europe’s largest civil engineering project. Crossrail will include works on the existing railway network together with a central underground section from Paddington to Woolwich and Stratford. The RSPB will next week submit a planning application to Essex County Council to transform Wallasea Island with Crossrail material. Public consultation will start in December and Essex County Council is expected to reach a decision in the spring.

KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence for the constitutional law action against Crossrail [290]

2008-11-19T03:03:00.000-08:00

KHOODEELAAR! evidential commentary on the publicity slot that OFSTED's Christine Gilbert has obtained for herself as 'a key player' in the Child P tragedy 'inspection project' via the BBC in the past 40 minutes.

Here. in the next hours

KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence for the constitutional law action against Crossrail [288]

2008-11-18T04:24:00.000-08:00

This page was last edited at 1225 GMT London Tuesday 18 November 2008

KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Big Business Crossrail', updated advice to Boris Johnson: Stop irresponsibly peddling wasteful Crossrail [254]

2008-10-26T21:46:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 0448 GMT London Monday 27 October 2008

0445 GMT London Monday 27 October 2008: KHOODEELAAR! Editor©Muhammad Haque....

KHOODEELAAR! REMINDING Boris Johnson that there is NO EVIDENCE that ‘Crossrail’ is the priority transport need for the people of London. There is no evidence that even officially ‘cited’ experts on transport found any evidence to support the UK treasury incurring public debts to fund the Big Business -craved Crossrail.. There IS evidence that the public money which the touts of Big Business Crossrail scam want to put into the Big business pockets CAN and should be applied to already well and widely recognised transport needs in London....

Boris Johnson must show that he is a thoughtful, rational and responsible holder of the post that he now holds in the name of the people of London Boris Johnson must not confuse a craze that is being driven by Ken Livingstone and his ilk from the background with a considered, responsible and sustainable way forward. ‘Spending public money’ is NOT beyond the universally, objectively recognisable requirements of accountable office... What is even more important right now, spending any amount of public money will have ti be at the expense of cutting back on something even more urgent.... So before Boris Johnson gets too used to being ‘friends’ with the residual foot-soldiers and place men and place women from the regime of Ken Livingstone and assorted, fellow-travelling peddlers of corruption at the expense of the public, he [Boris Johnson] must think very seriously about the immediate effects on his own credibility...Boris Johnson cannot say he has not been warned about Crossrail and the City of London interests..... He has no need to act as a tout of these interests interests... Not only does that role contradict everything Boris Johnson aid in his ‘acceptance’ speech. It also shows that he is not adhering to the principle of telling the truth... Boris knows that everyone who has been watching him is aware of his record as a person who has told lies including a widely documented involvement in seeking to shield a convicted fraudster friend and in doing so, trying to have someone physically attacked...Not to speak of the many reported incidents o adultery and lying to his wife ...... The fact that he is now in office could change so dramatically if any of the as yet unpublicised incidents of Boris Johnson being dishiest, untruthful and immoral ... were to come out... So Boris Johnson has got to make sure that he does not lumber the public with £Billions od debts that can be avoided by listening to reason and dropping Crossrail.....Boris John must not confuse his ‘ability’ to make utterances with the actual entity. Integrity., Does Boris Johnson have integrity? And if he does have integrity, how does he show, in reality, that he has integrity? Integrity will not be substantiated if he is callous in his ‘use’ or misuse of the [powers that go with the post he holds He has not shown what evidence there is that Crossrail is the priority that London;’s transport needs demand.......He has not shown that the alternative spending priorities on Transport and on other aspects of London peoples’ lives are LESS important. Boris Johnson should take the KHOODEELAAR! advice, being repeated here because he has failed to pay attention on previous occasions. Shut up about Crossrail... You do NOT know the facts. Find the facts first. Find the evidence and then open your mouth on Crossrail. And when you do, do it rationally, thoughtfully. And truthfully and honestly. And responsibly Not as a crazy fanatic that is deranged with the egotistic insanity of power... That is what Livingstone did.....And another thing, read up on the leis that Livingstone uttered in talking up THE IMAGE of the City of London.....No rational holder of public office would do that.....[KHOODEELAAR! will return to the duties and the obligations o Boris Johnson in due course]

KHOODEELAAR! [below] quoting the following item about the confused state of Alistair Darling, from the web site of the London daily the INDEPENDENT Monday 27 October 2008.

Darling under pressure to avert meltdown of sterling
By Alistair Dawber and Sean O'Grady
Monday, 27 October 2008

Related Articles

Further global rate cut likely, hints PM
IMF offers to bail out Ukraine with $16.5bn loan
Stephen King: Sometimes the economic beauty contest gets us into an ugly mess
Claire Fox: Not, please, in Marx's name...
Print Email

Search
Go
Independent.co.uk Web
Bookmark & Share

Digg It
del.icio.us
Facebook
Reddit
What are these?

Change font size: A A A
Alistair Darling will come under pressure this week to act to halt the dramatic slide in the value of the pound, which has tumbled to a six-year low against the dollar and all-time low against the euro.

The currency has taken a battering in the markets as investors have become increasingly nervous about the state of the UK economy, the Government's public spending plans and a widely anticipated programme of interest rate cuts by the Bank of England.

The Chancellor of the Exchequer, who is due to make a speech at City University in London on Wednesday evening, is expected to attempt to slow the fall of the pound, which slipped through the $1.60 mark on Thursday last week for the first time since 2003, by assuring the financial community that the Government has not abandoned its budgetary rules.

The pound closed at $1.59 on Friday, its lowest level for six years, and is also down to a record low against the euro, which appreciated to 83p last week.

Investors' nerves were not helped on Friday when the UK economy was shown to have contracted by 0.5 per cent in the last quarter, a bigger slowdown than expected, and after Gordon Brown and the Bank of England's Governor, Mervyn King, said that a recession, measured as two consecutive quarters of negative growth, was likely.

The markets are worried that the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) of the Bank of England will be forced to rapidly cut interest rates in the coming months, starting at its next meeting on 6 November, to reflate the flagging economy. The consensus view among City economists is that the MPC will reduce rates by 0.75 percentage points. This, it is feared, will offer investors fewer incentives to hold the currency, leading to a more dramatic sell-off.

A number of analysts expect thatthe MPC will need to cut rates to just2 per cent by next year, a level that has not been seen in the UK since the 1950s.

It is not just falling interest rates that have put the pound under pressure. As the global economic downturn takes hold, investors are looking for what are traditionally considered to be safe havens, such as short-term US Treasury Bills, the Swiss franc and the yen.

The markets are also worried that as the economy enters a recessionary period the Government will be forced to increase borrowing, paid for largely by issuing government debt in the form of gilts. As the number of bonds floods the market, already saturated by securities from other countries attempting to raise money, so investors are worried that the Government will be forced to increase yields to attract buyers. Some also fear that the higher taxes needed to service the debt, which will soar as a result of the bank recapitalisation programme as well as the economic downturn, could hamper the MPC's ability to reduce base rates, slowing any economic recovery and, ironically, leading to inflationary pressure.

Ruth Lea, a former director of the Centre for Policy Studies and now economic adviser to the Arbuthnot Banking Group, said: "The worst case is that all this leads to a run on the pound: that is the meltdown scenario, and while I would not say it is a probability at this stage, it is certainly a possibility. Sterling has dropped rapidly in the last few days, and while some of that is due to investors rushing to the dollar, which is still the only currency people have to have, the speed of that drop is a concern. Given the amount of borrowing the Government has to do, there is a chance that foreigners will no longer be prepared to hold sterling, and if that happens, it is 1976 all over again and it is back to the IMF."

It is the rate of sterling's decline that has spooked the markets. The pound was worth nearly $2 earlier this year, with many now predicting that the pound could drop as low as the psychologically important $1.50. The currency has also devalued by more than 15 per cent in the last year against a trade-weighted basket of leading currencies.

The Treasury declined to comment on what Mr Darling would say this week, but it is understood that the Government will not take action to artificially stimulate sterling. The last time the UK actively supported the pound was in the early 1990s, when sterling was in the Exchange Rate Mechanism. Last Wednesday sterling fell 6.25 cents against the dollar, suffering its steepest fall since the aftermath of Black Wednesday in 1992, when the Major government had to abandon the ERM.

Instead, Mr Darling is likely to reassert the Government's commitment to its spending plans, saying that the Treasury will stick to its budgetary rules.

Many observers will be keen to see how far Mr Darling wants to go in bringing forward large public spending projects, such as Crossrail and the 2012 Olympics. The bailing out of the banks and reports that the Government will try to spend its way out of recession by using reflationary policies has undermined sterling, some analysts believe.

KHOODEELAAR! Public meeting against Crossrail holes, 6.30 PM Monday 27 October 2008 at BDC at 7-15 Greatorex St London E1 5NF.

2008-10-26T09:55:00.000-07:00

KHOODEELAAR! Public meeting 6.30 PM Monday 27 October 2008 at BDC at 7-15 Greatorex St London E1 5NF.

This KHOODEELAAR! meeting has been organised for residents and community to ask Tower Hamlets Councillors for the wards directly affected by Crossrail holes plan: what have you done on Tower Hamlets Council to stop Crossrail holes attacks on the East End of London. What have you done in the past years that you have been a councillor for these wards?

KHOODEELAAR! Public meeting:

To ask Tower Hamlets ‘local ward councillors’ about Crossrail hole attacks: 6.30 PM Monday 27 October 2008 ....

To Councillors for the following wards in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, London UK: St. Dunstan's and Stepney Green ward, Spitalfields and Bangla Town ward Bethnal Green South [includes Whitechapel Road, Durward Street, Castlemaine Street, Wodeham gardens, Lomas Street, Trahorn Close near Vallance Road, Brady Street, Cambridge Heath Road ] ward and Weavers ward....

We are inviting you as local Ward councillors for our streets to a meeting at 6.30 on Monday 27 October 2008 at 7-15 Greatorex Street London E1 5 NF to discuss with us all the aspects of the “Crossrail” scheme. We have urgent and a very comprehensive series of Questions to put to you face to face....

Signed by residents, tenants and members of the community in the streets mentioned

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! updating on the evidence of Alistair CROSSRAIL scam-funder Darling's fundamental economic ignorance and fiscal irresponsibility [248]

2008-10-26T04:41:00.000-07:00

This page was lasted 1145 Hrs GMT London Sunday 26 October 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO!
Especially when we pointed out in the past weeks, that the over-peddled ‘economics expert’ on the DAILY MAIL group, Alex Brummer, was not upto the task . We said that in view of Brummer’s quite unjustified and baseless promotion of the Big business lobby line that public money should be wasted in bogus projects as a way of creaking fictitious stimulus to the economy........We can see today that the DAILY MAIL group web site is reporting on the same group of economists which we have been reporting on all this m morning....

Here [see the linked item accessible from the column on the right of this page ] is how the DailY Mail Group web site covers it.

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! identifying the poverty-causing role of Crossrail hole-inviter Tower Hamlets Council [250]

2008-10-25T23:57:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 0705 GMT London Sunday 26 October 2008

KHOODEELAAR! has for the past 5 years been actively identifying the causes of poverty and the poverty-causing role of Crossrail hole-inviter Tower Hamlets Council

ARCHIVE OF ACTION AGAINST BIG BUSINESS-funder Brown fronted Blaired regime centrally in the Uk and against the Blaired 'local' Tower Hamlets Council that has been INVITING the Crossrail hole attacks of NEW poverty, new disruption, new-discrimination upon the inner city East End of London....

Archive dated Monday 13 November 2006

"
Muhammad Haque reporting on poverty being caused in Britain by local democratic [!] councils and by the state

AADHIKAR in association with KHOODEELAAR! No to CrossRail hole Bill campaign

About AADHIKAR Media Foundation, LEGAL DISCLAIMER in brief on accessing these contents and what the word AADHIKAR means Updated Saturday 23 September 2006
AADHIKARONLINE
Monday 13 November 2006
AADHIKARonline Monday 13 November 2006

The 1st Edition 0434 Hrs GMT/UK time Monday 13 November 2006
Khoodeelaar! log of Crossrail hole-caused poverty – in the past three years of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the CrossRail hole attacks on the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 Area, we have identified a series of key factors which are present in the Crossrail hole-inviter Tower Hamlets Council’s behaviour against the local community. We are now publishing extended reports on each of those factors this week.
Khoodeelaar! points out the businesses that will be forced out of the area by a Crossrail hole in the Hanbury Street
Khoodeelaar! details the economic and the social destruction that will be caused to local people and their families
Khoodeelaar! points to the London mayor’s craze for more powers, as a root cause for the irrational plug for a CrossRail line at any cost, no matter how bad the CrossRail plan is for the social and the environmental health of the East End of London community
Khoodeelaar! legal action updates – summary of our legal grounds against CrossRail and all those who are being taken to court by Khoodeelaar! to stop the CrossRail hole being dug in the Hanbury Street
legal action grounds will be published here in the next 14 hours
Khoodeelaar! latest warning to the community against Crossrail ‘liaisons’ lies being perpetrated in the East End of London via the Whitechapel fart Gallery alley-way ‘group’ and assorted other CrossRail-hole-Bill-bribed ‘ethnicity linked’ ‘leaders and cabals’
Khoodeelaar! New demands to Crossrail hole-backer controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council -
Khoodeelaar! legal action, grounds against Christine Gilbert, Michael Keith, and others [for their roles in the lies for Crossrail the they told in the period June 2003 to April 2006][inclusive]
How Crossrail-hole-backer ‘councillor’ Judith Gardiner lied against the community – remainder of the allegations against Judith Gardiner
Khoodeelaar! Latest challenge to Crossrail hole Bill-backing craze man Michael Snyder of the City of London Corporation
Khoodeelaar! Latest legal questions to Crossrail hole Bill backing ‘London mayor’ ken Livingstone
Khoodeelaar! Questions to Nick ‘Sickeningly-Crossrail-hole-Bill-fanatic’ Raynsford -
Khoodeelaar! searching Google for any evidence of any political activities by George Galloway ‘local MP’ on Crossrail, produced this result at 2022 Hrs GMT on Sunday 12 November 2006:”Your search - "George Galloway" [and] "Crossrail" - did not match any documents.”

"

Guardian [OBSERVER] in reviving the Ken Livingstone lie as ‘mantra’ insults the holocaust victims’ plight, to peddle the 2012 Olympics stunt! [248]

2008-10-25T22:17:00.001-07:00

By©Muhammad Haque: 0450 GMT London Sunday 26 October 2008:

Degeneration and the London GUARDIAN have always gone hand in hand. Degeneration in and of the ‘inner cities’. Corruption, sleaze and dehumanisation are three of the headline words that can be used to refer to the millions of lives ruined by the degenerative culture flaunted by successions of crooks holding positions of ‘power’ in local councils, regional assemblies and UK central Govt departments and ministries.The Guardian has been at the forefront of backing the crooks. under many diverse guises The buzz word now is of course the equally corrupting, contaminating diversity...It is the one that has replaced the dozens that were ‘in fashion’ as far as the contaminating lies of the Guardian were concerned. What they used to hide under racism they now flaunt in the display box of diversity.And every conceivable contemporary pretext and psychological emotion is invoked to justify the degeneration programme that is being carried out.. The ‘economic’ phrase that the corrupters and the degenerators are now using, in the context of the current phase of the capitalistic outrage, is ‘investment’. And, of course, ‘Keynes’.First on Keynes: The morons do not know that Keynes [J M Keynes, the public schooled boy from cambridge at the UK Ministry....] NEVER was the economist they are painting him to have been. Keynes had NOT the clue as to HOW capitalists rob and loot and bankrupt the public..... If Keynes had the clue that he needed to have then he did not share it with the readers of his overrated works. The point is that Keynes was as patronising and as corrupting as the bands of the adherents of his supposed genius have been these past few weeks... Incredibly, these idiots have been ALSO pretending to be themselves socialists as they have been =doing the work for Alistair darling and acting as his spin-soldiers [here is another KHOODEELAAR! word, just created!]..........Darling is painted now as an almost genuine socialist. So much so that they have been ‘reporting’ the ‘amazing fact’ that Darling has in his office at the UK finance ministry [the ‘Treasury’! even when it is fronting a bankrupting policy!!!] , a portrait of the ‘great man’ himself.... J M Keynes.....J M Keynes thought of the public, the people in general as robots that could be propelled and manipulated by capitalists ploys... And his stimulating [qv] programme - to whatever extent he in fact argued for it or ‘authored’ the idea, which is nonsense, more on this in later parts of this- ddi not recognise the role of justice, fairness and ethics. HE may have opined on this in peripheral terms. But fairness, consideration for others were NOT the moving factors in his scheme... What he was about was a con. And a gigantic, wasteful confidence trick with which to fool the people......And keep CAPITALISM in control....I think it is appropriate therefore to refer to Keynes as Cons. Ads in Keynes Kons for capitalism Keynesianism as Konsyanism for capitalism.....Keynes cons for capitalism!....NO wonder than that the Guardian, the more successful propaganda organ for corrupt capitalistic, exploitative, unjust, unequal, degenerating society programming, is peddling sub-Keynesian mortgaging of the ordinary peoples lives o=so that the crooks in control can put a few million quid in their own ‘local’ ‘deprived area pockets’.No wonder also that the Guardian has unleashed a man who brings in references to the holocaust and the fleeing of his grand father from Nazi Germany, to do a propaganda job for the crooks in control of the corrupt local councils.....He pats them on the back and benignly excuses their corruption by saying they have been ‘muddling through’!It is a wrong use of the plight of the victims of Nazi germany. And it is inappropriate...People who genuinely want to teach others the lessons from the times of the Nazis in power and their atrocities, violations and violence, must not rush to praise the racists of today... They must show they understand racism and they must oppose racism...Degenerating the inner cities has been one of the most ‘successful’ racist projects in the context of the ‘East End’...But then the Guardian man will not live in that East End....And he will not recognise it either even if he physically lived in any part of the East End that was today...He is jaundiced. He is ignorant. And he is very very biased against the communities that make up the population in the East End...No wonder that the Guardian ‘writer’ has not heard any protests against Crossrail. hole scam...[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! quoting the CRASSrail scam peddling Guardian! as admitting that Big Business is bad for the economy [246]

2008-10-25T20:35:00.000-07:00

This page was last edietd at 0335 GMT London Sunday 26 October 2008:

"
small firms are not just being squeezed by the banks, but by big business too

"

KHOODEELAAR! updating on the evidence of the DEEP involvement of Crossrail hole scam -peddling 'Govt' post holders and BiG Business [245]

2008-10-25T08:10:00.000-07:00

KHOODEELAAR! updating on the evidence of the DEEP involvement of Crossrail hole scam -peddling 'Govt' post holders and BiG Business [245]

See the item as published by REUTERS today

"
Mandelson clarifies Russian meetings
Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:34am BST Email | Print | Share | Single Page | Recommend (0) [-] Text [+]

1 of 1Full Size
LONDON (Reuters) - Business Secretary Lord Peter Mandelson confirmed on Saturday that he had met a Russian billionaire at the centre of a recent political storm earlier than previously thought.

In a letter to the Times newspaper, Mandelson said he had first met Russia's wealthiest man Oleg Deripaska in 2004, two years earlier than was previously disclosed.

The media has been awash with stories in recent weeks about meetings senior British politicians had with Deripaska, especially those that took place on board the billionaire's yacht in Corfu this summer.

Mandelson, who made a surprise return to the government this month, has been criticised for having links to the Russian aluminium businessman while he was European Union Trade Commissioner.

Commentators said it raised questions about a possible conflict of interest.

In his letter, Mandelson again rejected accusations that he had intervened on Deripaska's behalf in decisions over EU aluminium tariffs. But he said details about their meetings needed clarification.

"During the weekend when I moved from Brussels to London and prior to me being admitted to hospital for an urgent medical procedure, a statement was released to the press which said I had had meetings with Mr Deripaska in 2006 and 2007," he wrote.

"Some people formed the reasonable view, therefore, that my first meeting with him was in 2006. This is not the case: To the best of my recollection we first met in 2004 and I met him several times subsequently."

The controversy surrounding the Corfu meetings has shifted from Mandelson to Conservative Shadow Chancellor George Osborne in the last few days after it was revealed he had also been a guest on board Deripaska's yacht. Continued...

View article on single pagePrevious Page 1 | 2

"

KHOODEELAAR! Public meeting: to ask Tower Hamlets ‘local ward councillors’ about Crossrail hole attacks: 6.30 PM Monday 27 Oct 2008

2008-10-23T20:51:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 0350 Hrs GMT LOndon Friday 24 October 2008

KHOODEELAAR! Public meeting: to ask Tower Hamlets ‘local ward councillors’ about Crossrail hole attacks: 6.30 PM Monday 27 Oct 2008

To Councillors for the following wards in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, London UK:

St. Dunstan's and Stepney Green ward, Spitalfields and Bangla Town ward Bethnal Green South [includes Whitechapel Road, Durward Street, Castlemaine Street, Wodeham gardens, Lomas Street, Trahorn Close near Vallance Road, Brady Street, Cambridge Heath Road ] ward and Weavers ward

We are inviting you as local Ward councillors for our streets to a meeting at 6.30 on Monday 27 October 2008 at 7-15 Greatorex Street London E1 5NF to discuss with us all the aspects of the “Crossrail” scheme. We have urgent and a very comprehensive series of Questions to put to you face to face.

Signed by residents, tenants and members of the community in the streets mentioned

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! diagnosis of boastful Brown's follies are echoed within hours by UK Tory MPs' frontman [220]

2008-10-23T01:51:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 0850 GMT Thursday 23 October 2008

Exactly 4 hours after I had written and posted the commentary ] [in verse] on Gordon Brown’s economic follies, Alan Duncan [MP] the Conservative shadow to Peter Mandelson’s UK Govt Department, appeared on the BBC TV news channel and spoke to Simon McCoy. The concluding words he said included the following:

“Gordon Brown has been very very boastful. He has been very arrogant. He spent a lot of money on project which won't be paid for 20 years.”

[To be continued]

No to Brown making the sleaze-ball bankers and looters richer while making the inner city poorer...[216]

2008-10-22T22:23:00.000-07:00

0520 GMT London Thursday 23 October 2008
MUHAMMAD HAQUE DAILY POLITICAL COMMENTARY
The markets are down
The markets are up
Gordon Brown is prudent
Gordon Brown is imprudent
Gordon Brown is hurt [!!]
Gordon Brown is not smart
Gordon Brown is half smart
Gordon Brown labours a grin
Gordon Brown harbours sin
Gordon Brown is enriching bankers
Gordon Brown is going bonkers
Gordon Brown is uttering stability
Gordon Brown is funding insanity
Gordon Brown is funding looters
Gordon Brown is raising debtors
Gordon Brown is talking pride
Gordon Brown is causing slide
Gordon Brown is feigning sympathy
Gordon Brown is raining apathy
Upon those his biased policies injure
Gordon Brown is bent to obdure
ignoring as he does the reasoned views
Gordon Brown craving Murdoched news!
[To be continued]

Muhammad Haque political commentary in verse: Gordon Brown is funding Big Business insanity [216]

2008-10-22T22:00:00.000-07:00

MUHAMMAD HAQUE DAILY POLITICAL COMMENTARY
0458 GMT London Thursday 23 October 2008
The markets are down
The markets are up
Gordon Brown is prudent
Gordon Brown is imprudent
Gordon Brown is hurt [!!]
Gordon Brown is not smart
Gordon Brown is half smart
Gordon Brown labours a grin
Gordon Brown harbours sin
Gordon Brown is enriching bankers
Gordon Brown is going bonkers
Gordon Brown is uttering stability
Gordon Brown is funding insanity
Gordon Brown is funding looters
Gordon Brown is raising debtors
Gordon Brown is talking pride
Gordon Brown is causing slide
Gordon Brown is feigning sympathy
Gordon Brown is raining apathy
Upon those his biased policies injure
Gordon Brown is bent to obdure
ignoring as he does the reasoned views
Gordon Brown craving Murdoched news!
[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business STOOGED UK mainstream parties! How they are related! Mandelson, Osborne, Rothschild! [212]

2008-10-21T06:02:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1305 GMT London Tuesday 21 October 2008

KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business STOOGED UK mainstream parties! How they are related! Mandelson, Osborne, Rothschild! [212]

More, here, shortly

KHOODEELAAR! updating on the evidence of imprudence, irresponsibility and brazen abuse of power by Darling et al [204]

2008-10-19T17:39:00.001-07:00

This page was last edited at 0040 GMT London Monday 20 October 2008

KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business Crossrail, No to Big Business-controlled ‘Govt’; No to “imprudence, irresponsibility, irrelevance and ignorance when making ‘policy’ decisions about spending public money, money raised by force of state from ordinary people...... PREDICTING, again, that the latest IRRESPONSIBLE utterances and propensities by the power-clinging, positions-clinging Govt in the UK fronted by Gordon Brown, will come unstuck... and when this happens, Gordon Brown will be sunk without mercy...... Why? Because Brown and Darling are uttering blatant contradictions and irresponsibility as they peddle the agenda set for them by Big Business and City of London...The VERY City that is responsible for the the 'British crisis' affecting the globalised market-based corrupt free-market capitalist spheres... in the first place......The breathtaking brazenness is not being mistaken by the KHOODEELAAR! campaign whatever.... It is, however, being still ‘accepted’ by the ‘mainstream’, or at least by the majority of the mainstream media in the UK....... but KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! [To be continued]

Alistair Darling will find that he has made a bigger mistake by declaring to fund Big Business than he realises [202]

2008-10-19T11:44:00.002-07:00

This page was last edited at 1845 GMT London Sunday 19 October 2008:

Alistair Darling will find that he has made a bigger mistake by declaring to fund Big Business than he realises [202]

KHOODEELAAR! ! TOLD YOU SO

Alistair Darling will find that he has made a bigger mistake by declaring to fund Big Business than he realises [202] Alistair Darling has been featuring, over the past six weeks, in the dishonestly-’edited’ and opportunistically published and ‘one-time’ ‘satirical magazine’ ‘Private Eye’ as having been so left wing [This is NOT true, see more below] [as the DAILY MAIL group now states] as a local councillor in Scotland that even Neil Kinnock did not want to know him!This is a multiple lie. No-one who has been in Tony Blair’s cabinet could have EVER been a genuine believer in any of the even capitalists socialism! Let alone being a socialist in the universally defined and understood sense. No one who EVER was in any way a genuine socialist could have WANTED to remain part of the corrupt and the corrupting Blaired regime that has been in place since May 1997. KHOODEELAAR! analyses of the financial errors of Alistair Darling have been being published for YEARS. Years before anyone, including Darling, had said a single sentence about them. Let alone the ‘mainstream ‘experts’ and ‘opposition spokespeople’ in the UK formal parliament.So it is important to point out the fact that the trend has continued today. Even the Conservative party backing Telegraph ‘interview’ was not followed by George Osborne for hours . Hours AFTER KHOODEELAAR! analysis of the Darling desperation...! And now , even Alex Salmond, of the SNP, has used the very phrase that KHOODEELAAR used for days to describe Gordon Brown’s economic acts of IRRESPONSIBILITY !!! [To be continued]

Alistair Darling will find that he has made a bigger mistake by declaring to fund Big Business than he realises [202]

2008-10-19T11:44:00.001-07:00

Brown heading for a Crossrail new Debts Crash to make the Millennium Dome look like a picnic! [200]

2008-10-19T01:14:00.000-07:00

This page aas last edited at 0815 GMT London Sunday 19 October 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! NO to crassly conceived, crassly peddled London Crossrail hole of new debts, higher tax bills for ordinary people, more £Billions for Big Business that got the country and the economy into the current mess in the first place....KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That London “Crossrail’ was NOT about addressing the transport needs of ordinary people ... but an excuse to give more public cash to Big Business.... Alistair Darling has been stung by new exposures on his own lack of prudence and originality.... So dire is the state of confusion and insecurity that Brown would do anything to stay afloat.... rather than do the right thing... The thing that they should be doing is to hold the EXISTING providers to account..... Bu they have not got the political courage to hold Big Business to account They have the cash from the public to capitulate to Big Business with... Which is what this Darling desperation is signalling and confirming....This is a fakery move It will not improve the economy... It will make things worse...[To be continued]

HOW BROWN and DARLING should NOT be IRRESPONSIBLE in giving any more of the public resources and funds to Big Business, to the City of London .....

2008-10-18T00:57:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 0812 Hrs GMT London Saturday 18 October 2008

KHOODEELAAR! No to CROSSRAIL hole scam.....; No to unconstitutionality, illegitimacy in the UK parliament that has been STOOGED for Big Business set on looting the UK public under Crossrail pretexts.......

HOW BROWN and DARLING should NOT be IRRESPONSIBLE in giving any more of the public resources and funds to Big Business, to the City of London and their touts...

Why Gordon Brown must not repeat the mistakes [!] of the Millennium Dome by wasting more than 20 times the amount on CRASSrail;

Why Alistair Darling must not make another big mistake by being stubborn in wasting £Billions to enrich the greedy, the sleazy Big Business;

WHY BROWN and DARLING must address the urgent unmet and unfunded needs in society, especially in enabling delivery of a democratic society.

WHY DEMOCRACY, as stated and defined in the ‘sermons’ uttered by all its ‘users’ should be PRACTISED as the bulwark against ‘irresponsibility’...

MORE, HERE, during the day Saturday 18 October 2008

KHOODEELAAR! asking OFCOM to do their job and to hold to account the Big Business-peddling, Crossrail scam -promoting UK broadcasters [195]

2008-10-17T09:36:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1638 GMT London Friday 17 October 2008

KHOODEELAAR! asking OFCOM to do their job: Updated complaints against Big Business promoting role by BBC, ITV [195]

KHOODEELAAR! is asking the UK ‘watchdog’ on broadcasting standards and related matters to do their job. The communication comes as KHOODEELAAR! finalises the evidence on the constitutional law acton against the Crossrail scam....

The BBC and ITV have been behaving like stooges for the forces of Big Business and are exhibiting the tentacles of the Big Business greed....... that want to get their corporate, collective greedy hands on £Billions of UK public money under covers of Crossrail..,

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business scam CRossrail. Updating the analysis of Brown's follies. [188]

2008-10-16T01:45:00.002-07:00

This page was last edited at 0900 Hrs GMT London Thursday 16 October 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business scam. First review of the ignorant utterances about economics and finance by David Milibandit on the BBC this morning......

This review is linked with and is a part of our continuing examination of the fundamental errors, flaws and mistakes and falsehoods in and of the Brown-fronted Blaired regime in the UK. This phrase ‘Brown-fronted Blaired regime’ is part of our analysis and a product of our examination of the problem. We are doing this as the continuing examination of the folly of backing Crossrail with £Billions of UK public funding... And we are looking at the whole of the UK Government ‘economic policies’.
Gordon Brown will soon find out that he overstated his need for recognition. For what he says about ‘irresponsibility’ is not something that can be separated from the whole. The 'irresponsibility' is only a part. The whole is everything that capitalism, imp and military industrial complex have caused and produced. There cannot be any ‘responsible’ behaviour by those who do not conduct themselves with ethics and morality. Yet Brown has not shown that he understands this. His apparently decisive acton was not have been HIS doing. He has played a part in it. But he must stop claiming it as credible. Brown must stop allowing Big Business and their lobbys to run the agenda, the policy-making, the policies, the actions, the activities of the Govt.

We here refer to Crossrail. We shall return to that in the course of the day today [Thursday 16 October 2008]

For now, we are looking at David Milibandit’s tactics:
David Milibandit staged a miniature ‘comeback’ this morning! On the Media circuits. Was it ‘perhaps’ to do with Guardian Polly, again? This morning's Guardian [Thursday 16 October 2008] carries a piece that contains the word ‘unravel’ about Gordon Brown ‘bailout’. The headline [early editions] reads, “Brown bailout under threat as banks seek better deal.” And surprise surprise, someone at the BBC [The Milibandit unit! at the Broadcasting House] got it into the list for the day’s ‘news agenda’ as the right excuse. They ‘thought’ : this is it! . A most appropriate, plausible even, peg on which to justify another plug for Milibandit.....But he was full of waffle and hype....So much so that he mixed up the two concepts: ‘economy’ and ‘economics’. O r rather he misused the word ‘economy’ when referring to ‘international’. What he should have said was ‘economies’. Or ‘economics’ in that statement. What he came across as saying was that he did not understand the reality of international economics. He parroted parts of what the USA politicos were saying during the previous few months of their so-called election talks.... Especially what McCain had been saying in his belligerent misutterances about the world .. Milibandit repeated the lying statement, in his own 'words’, that excuses [and perpetuates] the multinational, Military Industrial Complex-ed capitalist looters and bankers... And he showed the same untruthfulness about the wealth and poverty in the world. And about who causes the poverty. And about who the looters loot from...... ....The utterances of David Milibandit were not the results of original thinking on his part..... And they did not deserve to be given the spot by the BBC......
[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business scam CRossrail. Updating the analysis of Brown's folly

2008-10-16T01:45:00.001-07:00

KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business scam CRossrail. Updating the analysis of Brown's folly

2008-10-16T01:45:00.000-07:00

KHOODEELAAR! commentary on Big Business backing, Crossrail plot-flaunting Gordon Brown's LATEST flawed actions [181]

2008-10-15T09:41:00.000-07:00

1640 GMT London Wednesday 15 October 2008: KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Here is another world exclusive summary on how Gordon Brown has got it wrong......... Not one iota of evidence of a railway line as being being ANY ANSWER to the GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS in THIS Gordon Brown document circulated in Brussels this afternoon [Wednesday 15 October 2008]. No evidence whatever EITHER that Canary Wharf contains ANY answer to the economic woes now swamping families and individuals in London. Least of all in Tower Hamlets. Just as Gordon Brown himself did not utter one single word about ANY relevance [!] of Canary Wharf to the lives of people in the East End when Brown appeared on the Reuters Big Business stage situated in Canary Wharf earlier this week........Within minutes of the latest plug of the Gordon Brown parade in Brussels being broadcast the BBC also carried an interview with the public sector employees’ trade union representative Mark Serwotka who set out the facts of how Gordon Brown had got his financial and economic policy WRONG.... sacking public sector employes, doing everything to aid the bankers..... GORDON BROWN’s ‘recovery’ may last for a far shorter time than he may have been ‘advised’ it will do...... Even his regular phone-calls to the ‘emerging’ economic image the ‘Indian Prime Minister’ may not be hitting the right targets.... INDIA has the Largest number of the starving to be found in any country in the world...... No amount of hype associated with Gordon Brown’s and s ‘packaged’ policies can hide the fact that Brown was the Uk finance minister for 10 years..... So the question is, how was it that he did not see [note that word ‘see’ - more on that later] what the bankers were upto ? If he could not see or if he chose to overlook what they were upto than Brown is more at fault than any other UK politician in power..... Brown is also wrong to overhype his historic position.....Bretton Woods was NOT about the hype that Brown is associating with it... In any event, Brown must have been sleeping - even when he was doing his ‘Phd’ that is now being tagged on to his ‘cv’........ Bretton WOODS needed to be reviewed 50 years ago....Instead the prospective reviewers being embarked on miniature adventures and follies in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s...........Brown has not got the necessary knowledge that would enable him to see his fundamental flaws..... He must stop making his ignorance appear even worse... One way to do so is to stop comparing himself with policies and events that he is not entitled to be. On the facts. On the evidence. ... And the BBC has to stop being so ignorant about economics....[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! commentary on Big Business backing, Crossrail plot-flaunting Gordon Brown's LATEST flawed actions [181]

2008-10-15T09:16:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1620 GMT London Wednesday 15 October 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Here is another world exclusive summary on how Gordon Brown has got it wrong......... Not one iota of evidence of a railway line being ANY ANSWER to the GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS in THIS Gordon Brown document circulated in Brussels this afternoon [Wednesday 15 October 2008]. No evidence whatever EITHER that Canary Wharf contains ANY answer to the economic woes now swamping families and individuals in London. Least of all in Tower Hamlets. Just as Gordon Brown himself did not utter one single word about ANY relevance [!] of Canary Wharf to the lives of people in the East End when Brown appeared on the Reuters Big Business stage situated in Canary Wharf earlier this week........Within minutes of the latest plug of the Gordon Brown parade in Brussels being broadcast the BBC also carried an interview with the public sector employees’ trade union representative Mark Serwotka who set out the facts of how Gordon Brown had got his financial and economic policy WRONG.... sacking public sector employes, doing everything to aid the bankers..... GORDON BROWN’s ‘recovery’ may last for a far shorter time than he may have been ‘advised’ it will do...... Even his regular phone-calls to the ‘emerging’ economic image the ‘Indian Prime Minister’ may not be hitting the right targets.... INDIA has the Largest number of the starving to be found in any country in the world...... No amount of hype associated with Gordon Brown’s and s ‘packaged’ policies can hide the fact that Brown was the Uk finance minister for 10 years..... So the question is, how was it that he did not see [note that word ‘see’ - more on that later] what the bankers were upto ? If he could not see or if he chose to overlook what they were upto than Brown is more at fault than any other UK politician in power..... Brown is also wrong to overhype his historic position.....Bretton Woods was NOT about the hype that Brown is associating with it... In any event, Brown must have been sleeping - even when he was doing his ‘Phd’ that is now being tagged on to his ‘cv’........ Bretton WOODS needed to be reviewed 50 years ago....Instead the prospective reviewers being embarked on miniature adventures and follies in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s...........Brown has not got the necessary knowledge that would enable him to see his fundamental flaws..... He must stop making his ignorance appear even worse... One way to do so is to stop comparing himself with policies and events that he is not entitled to be. On the facts. On the evidence. ... And the BBC has to stop being so ignorant about economics....[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Canary Wharf'-peddling by Gordon Brown: Even the BBC is mocking the 'magician' Brown![180]

2008-10-15T01:17:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 0815 Hrs GMT 0915 Hrs UKTime London Wednesday 15 October 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO.... For almost 5 years now we have been telling it like the mainstream media never admitted it was....to be.....That the UK economic ‘health’ and ‘conditions’ were not string enough to justify the wasting of £Billions on a scam like CRASSrail in London....Even the Govt-compliant UK State broadcasting and propaganda outfit the BBC is reporting this Wednesday morning [15 October 2008] that officially acknowledgeable jobless figures are expected to reach or even exceed 2 Million in the next 2 months... This ‘news’ is being broadcast less than 48 hours after the propaganda outlets carried the ‘endorsement’ from the ‘Nobel prize for economics’-recipient t for the year 2008 that Gordon Brown, by ‘taking the actions on banks in the UK..’ , had ‘saved the world’! The BBC is YET to explain the link! If the BBC ever can tell the difference between fakery and the truth... It is after all the BBC that has been lying for almost 80 years about every key aspects of society in Britain... The BBC has NEVER broken a single news tory in truthfulness... in all that time Of course there are the odd, occasional, decorations... Those are NOT to be confused with the BBC’s ever telling the truth... The BBC is FOREVER playing cath-up....Often years and even decades later....The BBC is persisting, as can be EXPECTED, to suppress the truth that CROSSRAIL is a liability that even the ill-advised and the imprudent and the Bankers-friendly Gordon Brown cannot justify.....[To be c continued]

KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidential analysis of the crass, looting behaviour by Crossrail hole plot-peddlers .. [178]

2008-10-13T08:57:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1558 GMT London Monday 13 October 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! No to the continuing, the relentless parade of lying for City of London, Big Business... that is going on, via the lying BBC, even today, ......

This man [Paul Kavanagh], is a typical 'expert' that is hauled in by the BBC on its vacuous and the falsifying 'news channel' around the clock.... The man was given the average amount of sound byte which he deployed to add to vacuity and fabrications and lying for the corruptor and the corrupting City of London and the corrupt city trade......[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidential analysis of the crass behaviour by Crossrail hole plot-inviter Tower Hamlets Council [177]

2008-10-12T23:10:00.001-07:00

0605 GMT London Monday 13 October 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business-serving Crassrail holes inviting Tower Hamlets Council...[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidential analysis of the crass behaviour by Crossrail hole plot-inviter Tower Hamlets Council [177]

2008-10-12T23:04:00.001-07:00

Last updated at 0605 Hrs GMT Monday 13 October 2008

More here shortly

KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidential analysis of Crossrail hole scam Big Business City of London agenda-peddler Ken Livingstone [176]

2008-10-12T07:28:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1420 GMT London Sunday 12 October 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! No to “London Crossrail hole scam Big Business agenda of looting the public purse....” CAMPAIGN looked for a trace of the ‘world class city’ bragging in the ‘10 times-repeated’ [on the BBC TV channels in the past 24 hours] ‘interview’ that Andrew Neil contrived as part of the corrupt peddling of the career of Ken Livingstone ... There was no such bragging. There was a trace of bragging in the utterances of Livingstone in the promotional interview..... such as the bragging that Livingstone never paid any attention to the Blaired party bureaucrats, doing what he considered right for him to do... But there was no bragging about the ‘City of London’ or about ‘London’ as in any way being the ‘world class’ anything... That was significant. That was remarkable... Because Livingstone did refer to his being defeated by Boris Johnson. As did Andrew Neil...Neither, however, referred to what Livingstone had said in the run up to that ‘election’ [dated 1 May 2008]. That was very odd. For Livingstone peddled the ‘success’ and the ‘achievement’ of the Noi York mayor [and warmonger, Billionaire and backer of the occupation of Iraq by the USA imperialist forces] Michael Bloomberg [who is still actively cultivating the field to have a go at being ‘elected’ to the White House, may be at the next, scheduled election 4 years away] ..in the segment... But he did NOT refer to what he HAD said about London in April 2008.... Any look at what he had said would show that Livingstone was unstoppable when it came to bragging for the City of London, boasting OF the City of London.....Bragging of London as ‘the world class capital’.....How come? Perhaps the answer was stated by LYINGSTILL Livingstone himself in another utterance that WAS broadcast... He said that politics was ‘the pursuit of power’ and NOT about ‘fairness’. He did believe that politics was about pursuing power BRUTALLY! He did acknowledge the fact that he was in league with Big Business... He termed it ‘working’ relationship. But he lied in the words he used... He is now on record as having admitted that he has been a Big Business tout....[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! No to banalities about 'Tower Hamlets' as uttered by Nick Clegg in the Party Political Broadcast today!

2008-10-08T11:58:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1900 GMT 2000 Hrs UK time London Wednesday 8 October 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! No to banalities about 'Tower Hamlets' as uttered by Nick Clegg in the Party Political Broadcast today!

More KHOODEELAAR! commentary on Nick Clegg and Tower Hamlets, here, shortly

Gordon Brown had made, almost to the day today a year ago a FALSE statement when he parroted the scripted lines in praise of Big Business-Crossrail

2008-10-08T11:47:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1850 GMT 19 50 Hrs UK time London Wednesday 8 October 2008:

Gordon Brown had made, almost to the day today a year ago a FALSE statement when he parroted the scripted lines in praise of Big Business-craved ploy the London Crossrail ......

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That Gordon Brown had made, almost to the day today a year ago a FALSE statement when he parroted the scripted lines in praise of Big Business-craved ploy the London Crossrail ...... KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO as far back as February 2004, that Crossrail was NOT economically sustainable; that Crossrail was not economically tenable or needed....that Crossrail was not compatible with the transport needs and the transport ‘budgets’ of and in London; that Crossrail was a seriously flawed, crassly conceived project that was not the product of economic demand but a ploy that had been contrived to allow Big Business conglomerates a plausible way to rob the UK public; that the looters’ charter that the London Crossrail ALSO included the looting of the UK public under covers of the banking system operated via the City of London and comparable tools........that Crossrail was not the priority in transport expenditure and investment as seen by ‘experts ‘including Rod Eddington; that Crossrail was bound to be ditched under the sheer weight of wastefulness and diversion of resources that simply were not available..... Today Wednesday 8 October 2008, the day when the UK public was landed with the biggest bailout bill to salvage the city of crooks and their assorted perpetrators against society, EVEN the perennially stupid ITV London news was forced to confess to NOTICING the following inevitable truth: “As for Reading, getting their quicker from this eastern side of the city may now be a pipe-dream. Crossrail may get crushed by the credit-crunch. It was always going to cost several King's ransoms but now it may simply be that the dosh the Government were going to spend digging the tunnel and propping it up, will be spent on digging the Banks out of a hole and propping them up, instead.”

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! NO to Gordon Brown failing to deal with and curb Big Business greed and corruption that is the reason for the crisis...[162]

2008-10-08T02:21:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 0940 GMT on Wednesday 8 October 2008

Gordon Brown - and UK finance minister Alistair Darling [yes the same one who put the CRASS Crossrail Bill into UK Parliament in February 2005]- failed to show at their news conference this morning that the UK Govt was getting to grips with the IRRESPONSIBILITY of Big Business. Despite the repeated utterances of stock phrases suggesting that they were, there was not one word delivered at that news conference that showed that Brown or Darling was concerned about the core of the crisis. That core IS greed. That core is capitalistic corruption. That core is Thatcherite disregard for society.Brown remains a prisoner of Big Business despite suggestions to the contrary.... [To be continued]

Is Gordon Brown at last doing the decent - 'prudent'- thing? SCRAPPING the obsolete, the wasteful the irrelevant CROSSRAIL? [161]

2008-10-07T06:41:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1340 GMT LONDON TUESDAY 7 OCTOBER 2008:

Is Gordon Brown at last doing the decent - 'prudent'- thing? SCRAPPING the obsolete, the wasteful the irrelevant CROSSRAIL? [161]

Has KHOODEELAAR! No to “CRASSrail hole plot...” CAMPAIGN an authoritative source inside the London EVENING STANDARD? Ooooooops! EVENING nostandards STANDARD! There must be, mustn’t there? For at 1030 GMT today Tuesday 7 October 2008 KHOODEELAAR! published on the AADHIKARonline a campaign commentary about an item which had this headline, “ KHOODEELAAR! 'anticipates' a headline like this ,' End of line for city’s Crossrail'' . That item was about a miniature ‘Crossrail’ at and around the Scottish town of Aberdeen......Within minutes of our publication, the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD, which has been THE propaganda organ for peddling the Big Business London CRASSrail for at least the past 6 years, published an item with the following headline, “Crisis puts the Crossrail sums on wrong lines”. And their story, PRINTED at page 34 [‘Business’ ‘City SPY’] of the early editions, read as follows: “ Anxious times for those involved in the Crossrail project, where key funding documents remain unsigned and the downturn and falling property values have put major question marks against some of the calculations.There are doubts about the predicted profits from the redevelopment of land at the bottom end of Tottenham Court Road belonging to Transport for London. Meanwhile, airports operator BAA and the City Corporation have yet to finally sign off their contributions towards the £17 billion bill.
TfL is also to raise a £2.7 billion contingency fund, secured against future fares — something that looks precarious in the current climate. Then there is the planned £3.5 billion levy from London businesses. It seems hardly the right moment to be asking small shops and firms for cash when they are struggling in the credit crunch.
Over and above all that, there is the suspicion that Gordon Brown may wish to delay the development. Building a new express-link for City banks, which are hardly popular in the country at present, could be the last thing he needs as he copes with public finances that are shot to bits.
The counter-argument says that the Prime Minister would not dare to lose face with the City by backtracking on Crossrail, and that a further postponement of the long-fought-for scheme would send a terrible signal about London's claim to be the world's leading financial centre. The last few weeks have shown, if nothing else, just how vital a dynamic City is to the economy and that therefore he will push ahead.
But Brown has also got an Olympic Games to contend with, which just happen to be in the same part of the UK as Crossrail. That too is suffering, with the financing of the 2012 Olympic Village provoking alarm in Whitehall.
City Spy would not be surprised at all if Crossrail was to slow... ”

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence of CRASS conduct by the CLEGG-ed Lib Dems acting as stooged tools for Big Business [160]

2008-10-07T03:38:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1050 GMT Tuesday 7 October 2008

KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence of CRASS conduct by the CLEGG-ed Lib Dems acting as stooged tools for Big Business [160]

The question is; What are the Lib Dems about? And the answer is, as it has been for the best part of a 100 years: Not much! And that is putting it most generously!

Which is odd. Very odd in view o the preponderance of appearance by Vince Cable on the media networks and platforms!

Why?

Because Cable evidently has significant things to say on the current state of the looters crisis. As compared to any counterpart that they could find in either of the ‘mainstream’ parties in Britain.

As is, to a similar extent, Brian Paddick. Who has made noticeable comments about his filed of knowledge, the policing problems in London.

That is it. There is not even a third one from the overall Lib Dem s party that could be found to match the two named here.

And the placing of Norman Baker as a spokesman on transport is not helping at all...

Baker is not an expert or an enthusiast on transport. His field is constitution and the absence of accountability and democracy. That the Lib Dems have found nothing like that to give Baker a platform shows the shallowness of the Nick Clegg ‘leadership’!

It looks as if Clegg is already confused about his own role, and NOT just about the state of the pensioners! plight....

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence of the Crassness of hyping up 'Canary Wharf’ and other CRASSRail scam destinations [146]

2008-10-02T13:08:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 2010 Hrs GMT London Thursday 2 October 2008

KHOODEELAAR! comments on each of the components of this evidence [below] will be pub shed in the next 24 hours

'
HEADLINES:
Mayor forces Met chief out of job..... PM praises Sir Ian's leadership..... Two charged over banker's murder..... Mixed fortunes for bank stocks..... Banks expect to cut back on lending..... Burglar steals MI5 device from home..... MS sufferer's assisted suicide plea..... Water firms plan big price hike..... Cabinet reshuffle is delayed..... Million more homes in fuel poverty.....

Grand design: Irish developer Sean Mulryan and an artist's impression of his Pan Peninsula towers at Canary Wharf

Credit Crunch Towers
Keith Dovkants
02.10.08

A deathly hush has fallen over the Pan Peninsula. Until recently it was one of the noisiest areas of the property boom. Now the only clamour is the sound of buyers stampeding for the exit.

Few places in London characterise so completely the gloom that has overtaken the recent exuberance of the property market, and for good reason. The development, which broke all records for apartment prices in Docklands, was a product of the off-plan phenomenon. It attracted speculators in droves. They saw an opportunity to buy at a discount before even a brick was laid and dashed to place deposits. Now the rush is in the opposite direction.

It's happening all over London. Buyers are walking away from deposits rather than completing on properties now worth far less than they agreed to pay for them. In many cases, even if they wanted to complete the deal they can't, because mortgage funds have dried up. This is the unseen side of the property crash and its full effects are yet to be felt.

The Pan Peninsula project is due to be completed early next spring, ahead of schedule. For months, a sign has hung outside the towers boasting that all flats are sold. The sign is a relic of better times. One property website alone currently has almost 100 advertisements selling flats in the development. Many are being sold by investors hoping to recoup what they have spent on deposits. In some cases, the sums are over £100,000 and hopes of recovering anything like this amount are fading fast.

The man behind Pan Peninsula is Sean Mulryan, one of Ireland's richest tycoons. A stonemason by trade, he named his company, Ballymore, after the town in Co Kildare where he started his building firm in 1982. In 10 years, he had moved to London and Ballymore is now one of the major developers in Britain and Europe, with a property portfolio valued in excess of £1 billion.

Mulryan is among the most successful of the current generation of Celtic tigers. Like his contemporaries John Magnier and JP McManus, he has an impressive string of racehorses and has invested in English football, taking a stake in Sunderland FC.

When he launched the Pan Peninsula development three years ago, there was intense interest, especially among property professionals. Ballymore's daring new towers, one standing 50 storeys tall at 489ft, the other a little lower, were not just the highest of high-rises, they also promised to be the best.

Every apartment, from studios to the penthouse, was designed with floor-to-ceiling windows. The views from the riverside blocks were exceptional, with a glimpse of the sea possible from the upper floors. The fitting-out was exceptional, with high-quality kitchens and bathrooms.

Even more impressive was the marketing. Pan Peninsula was sold not just as a place to live, but as a way to live. Residents of the 762 apartments were promised a “signature” restaurant, a health club and spa, a private cinema and a cocktail lounge on the 50th floor.

They were also offered an entrée to the Quintessential concierge group which links its clientele to the world's most exclusive and expensive shops and services.

Docklands property prices have always lagged behind London's more established areas such as Chelsea and Mayfair but the two towers helped the area stage a quantum leap. The £1,000 a square foot barrier was broken for the first time in sales at Pan Peninsula. Just before Christmas 2006, Ballymore announced it had sold the penthouse for £7 million, believed to be a record for east London.

Mock-ups of the apartments were created on a barge floating on the Thames close to the rising towers. Plans of the development were on display and purchasers were able to choose their flat from those that remained. In those early days, studios were selling for around £299,000, one-bed flats cost around £400,000 and larger ones clustered around £700,000 and above.

At the time, London property prices were rising at a giddy rate. Some estimates suggested gains of 20 per cent a year. Buying off-plan at a place like Pan Peninsula seemed a one-way bet. Soon the website carried a notice advising everything had been sold. The marketing suite number was disconnected.

For those who had bought in, by placing a 10 per cent deposit, it seemed all they had to do was wait for prices to rise sufficiently and then “flip” the property by selling the option for a profit. Some did. Pan Peninsula attracted investors from the City and Canary Wharf, most of whom were financially astute.

It was estimated that 65 per cent of those buying off-plan were single men looking for an investment. Around 20 per cent were single women professionals keen to acquire a smart Docklands home. There was an unconfirmed report that 50 per cent of the purchasers of the flats in the second tower, located to the west of the site, were Irish investors.

In the City bonus frenzy of early 2007, money poured into Ballymore. The company planned another huge tower, this time at Piccadilly, Manchester. That project has now been shelved.
As a development, the future of Pan Peninsula is assured. Work is said to be several months ahead of schedule and the towers appear to be almost finished. But as an investment, the immediate future is far less rosy. A local estate agent revealed that a client bought a one-bedroom flat two years ago, off-plan, for £420,000. So far he has paid two deposits totalling 20 per cent of the price, just over £80,000. Now the flat is thought to be worth only £375,000. He is trying to sell for that price. If he can sell, it will limit his loss to £45,000. If he cannot, he faces losing his deposit of more than £80,000.

“He has to make a decision,” the agent said. “Does he complete and wait for the value to go up, or does he walk away, sacrificing his deposit? Our advice is to go through with the deal and rent out.”

This was the advice being given by Foxtons, who are trying to sell nine flats in the development. If possible, a spokeswoman said, it was better to complete and rent out until values recovered.
Not everyone can afford this option. A Russian investor who is trying to sell two flats privately at Pan Peninsula said the downturn had thrown his investment plans into chaos.

“I bought two two-bedroom apartments, one quite large for £770,000. Now I'm trying to get £775,000 for it but it's not looking good. To be honest, I'm very disappointed. I can't afford to wait for the market to recover. From what I can see now people are not buying because they think the market still has some way to go before it bottoms out. I just don't know how much I'll lose. My strategy now is to try to get buyers in Russia or perhaps Kazakhstan. If the worst came to the worst, I suppose I could live there.”

The off-plan phenomenon was more a feature of the recent property boom than any other. The incentive for buyers, in a decade when prices trebled, was huge. Between reservation, exchange and completion, properties were soaring in value. Speculators had no intention of moving in. Hundreds of thousands of pounds were to be made without so much as lifting a tea chest.

The idea also spawned much-criticised “investment clubs”, which persuaded people of limited means to invest in unbuilt property on the understanding that they would profit from big price rises before they needed to pay up.

In a block of flats near Victoria, two-bed flats were available off-plan for £650,000 in October 2006. At the time of their completion, a year later, local agents were quoting £950,000 with a waiting list. Now owners looking to sell are receiving offers no higher than the £650,000 they paid.

At Arsenal's old stadium in Highbury, now a 700-unit residential development, off-plan buyers have been walking away from their deposits. As the Evening Standard revealed last week, a large number of those who paid 10 or 20 per cent deposits have seen their £500,000 flats plummet in value to around £400,000. Buyers have lost interest and investment clubs have all but disappeared.

Ballymore declined to give details of how the Pan Peninsula development is working out. A spokeswoman said the company was “comfortable” with progress and interest remains high. It was, she added, “virtually sold out”.

Workmen are finishing off the health club and cocktail lounge. Whatever the market does, the view from this 50-storey eyrie will be undiminished, even if some residents find themselves sipping their caipirinhas through gritted teeth.

Link to:
Reader Views (6) Add your view | Show all
Here's a sample of the latest views published. You can click view all to read all views that readers have sent in.
What does the fire brigade say about these and similar height flats and offices?

- Helen, Norwich

Seems like we're all discovering that home is the place where you live, not a cash machine that you get free money from. It's hard to feel sympathy for people who are now suffering financial hardship when they were originally motivated by greed.

- Paul, London

'

KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence of the serious flaws in peddling for Crossrail London at the expense of the needs of the North of England [145]

2008-10-01T11:56:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1858 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 1 October 2008

KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence of the serious flaws in peddling for Crossrail London at the expense of the needs of the North of England [145]

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/opinion/Chris-Leslie-The-North-deserves.4544759.jp

"

Chris Leslie: The North deserves a transport renaissance

Published Date: 01 October 2008
By Chris Leslie
POLITICIANS from both Labour and the Conservatives will have spent some of the past couple of weeks travelling north up the West Coast Mainline on route to their respective party conferences.
I hope that such journeys gave them a chance to reflect on the transport needs for the North of England and in particular how to make sure that the focus on major infrastructure problems doesn't solely focus on London and the South East.

It would ADVERTISEMENT

seem that the Conservatives may be heading in this direction of travel, albeit perhaps taking a little longer in their journey than some of us would have liked. Their announcement this week
that a Conservative government would build a high speed North-South rail link instead of adding a third runway at Heathrow will be
seen as a canny political move. Ruth Kelly's successor as Transport Secretary will need to act swiftly to catch up on this agenda.

It is a truism to say that London remains the economic powerhouse in the UK and its public transport infrastructure must, of course, remain modern and efficient.

However, northern eyebrows should be rightly raised at the sheer scale of investment that is routinely lavished on the capital city by Treasury decisions across the decades.

Just compare the painfully slow time it took to decide and deliverthe upgrades to Leeds City Station or the Bingley Relief Road in my former constituency –following literally decades of campaigning – with the far speedier billions of pounds prioritised for the new Jubilee line and the Crossrail project.

Step on most trains during the day and it becomes quickly apparent that Britain's railways are almost at capacity.

We have seen passenger numbers double in the past 10 years, meaning that more passengers are now travelling by train than at any time since 1946.

If a community can offer a clean, efficient, comfortable and convenient means of linking into the main centres of economic activity, it will boost its prosperity manifold.

Modern rail links could revitalise the North, taking pressure off an already overheated South-East and offering businesses a viable option of investing where costs are more competitive rather than automatically gravitating towards the capital city.

The impact would be astounding – some estimates even suggest fast-rail link journeys from Leeds to Manchester could take as little as a breathtaking 17 minutes, while travel time from Leeds to London would be shaved by over half an hour.

I would go further. At the moment it is quicker and easier to reach the North-East from Lancashire by road than by rail. A complicated system of changing trains at York can sometimes lead to journeys exceeding four hours.

Linking together direct routes to the main northern cities would offer a viable alternative to air and rail travel and encourage better
trade between Yorkshire and the rest of the North. The success of Greater London has been built in part on the infrastructure of the underground network.

A transport network connecting northern cities should surely not be too much to ask.

There are also other issues where the North needs a fairer deal. Unlike the rest of the country, London benefits from a regulated bus
service, ensuring that the Mayor enjoys key strategic power over its services.

There remains a glaring disjoint in the fact that local authorities outside London don't benefit from similar powers. The Government
has relaxed the rules and given council leaders at least a say in
where bus routes should be allocated but a surely more effective solution would be to devolve the entire power to local elected leaders.

Links towards Europe should also be explored. Currently, access to the Eurostar is based on London and Kent, meaning that whole swathes of the country have to travel south just to get on the train.

Local leaders and business in our region should lobby for better links from the North, which would open up new opportunities for business and travel.

Following the notorious Policy Exchange report earlier this year which advocated a mass emigration from northern cities into the "successful" South, the rail link policy is a shrewd move by David Cameron aimed at replenishing his credentials within Yorkshire and the North.

I hope, though, that the fast rail link issue won't become a party political issue. Rather, it should begin a serious debate within Westminster about how we can achieve a renaissance of public transport in the North of England and how economic prosperity can be encouraged in all corners of the country.

Chris Leslie was MP for Shipley from 1997-2005. He is director of the New Local Government Network.

KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence of the crassness-beyond-the-pale plugs by Big Business CROSSRAIL scammers [139]

2008-09-29T08:46:00.000-07:00

THis page was last edited at 1545 GMT 1645 Hrs UKTime London Monday 29 September 2008/29 Ramadan 1429 AH:

KHOODEELAAR! analysis of the Big Business-promoted looting-the-public scam Crossrail has been vindicated in everything that has been happening in the banks and in the bankruptcy of the robbing capitalist operations and raids... But the DAILY MAIL seems to be on another planet.... If the following item taken from its web site is any guide as to any ‘thinking’ that occurs in the ‘editing’ of the publication.... They say that the ‘south east’ of England has been subsidising the ‘north’ of England to the tunes of £Billions... So what do they provide as the answer to that? They don’t say that the ‘saving’ should be spent in improving the EXISTING services and the quality of life of the people whose are let down by the ‘health’ ‘education’ ‘housing’ service providers. They don’t say that crime and social deterioration should be addressed they do not say any of that. The Daily MAIL says ‘build CROSSRAIL’! Now there is a limit to tolerating idiocy... But the DAILY MAIL is behaving even more irrationally than the word CRASS can denote....[To be continued]

Gordon Brown acted irresponsibly in making that 'commitment' of £Billions for London Crossrail! He lacks credibility for doing that [130]

2008-09-26T14:54:00.001-07:00

2150 GMT London Friday 26 September 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole Big Business City of London looting of the public” CAMPAIGN....Gordon Brown acted irresponsibly in making that 'commitment' of £Billions for London Crossrail! He lacks credibility for doing that.. [130]. KHOODEELAAR! Organiser MUHAMMAD HAQUE has this evening told the London timnesonline the following in response to their report on Gordon Brown’s utterances in the USA of the need for responsible acton by the bankers and financial traders: “Gordon Brown may recall the fact that he contributed significantly to the further stooging of the Houses of UK Parliament to suit Big Business agenda. The ‘commitment nt’ that he made of £Billions of public funds for Crossrail was made without allowing Parliament to examine the evidence to justify the irresponsibly contrived project. The main propaganda came from the very City of London interest and Big business elements ‘against’ whom Brown is now floating his own image as a belated and opportunistic backer of ‘integrity and responsibility’! Is Brown going to correct his record of irresponsibility and imprudence in peddling Crossrail and scarp that scam now? [To be continued]

Andrew Neil is PART of the problem. In fact he is part of the worse aspect of Big Business lying that has 'got us all here'

2008-09-25T14:03:00.001-07:00

This page was last edited at 2100 Hrs GMT London Thursday 25 September 2008/ 25 ramadan 1429 AH

Andrew Neil is PART of the problem. In fact he is part of the worse aspect of Big Business lying that has 'got us all here'

There was NOTHING in either Andrew Neil or any of his ‘expert;’ guests said that showed that they can be trusted.

Yet the BBC has over extended its complicity with the parasitic propagandists of the Right.

Andrew Neil now has been given as many slots on the so-called documentary programming on the ‘mainstream’ channels of the BBC as can be counted. Wherever you turn, there is Andrew Neil. As unoriginal and as untrue as ever.

Now what is Andrew neil’s secret? Why do the BBC agenda setters keep giving him so many slots?

[To be continued]

RUTH KELLY had nothing to say about transport needs of people in London. Except a one-line cult-like plug for Big Business CRASSRAIL

2008-09-24T03:57:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1055 Hrs GMT 1155 Hrs UK Time London Wednesday 24 September 2008/24 Ramadan 1429 AH

"

In full: Ruth Kelly's speech

Times Online

This is the full text of the speech by Ruth Kelly to the 2008 Labour Party Conference
Conference, it is a pleasure to close this debate on sustainable communities.
I'd like to start by thanking all of you who've been involved in our discussions over the past year. Labour party members, trade unionists, councillors all working together on the policies we need to deliver a historic fourth Labour term.
In particular I'd like to thank Rosie, Tom and Jim for being such great ministers and such great colleagues over the past year.

Conference, I hope you will forgive me, for departing from my text for a moment.
As you may have heard on the news this morning this will be my last time addressing you as a member of the Cabinet.
I told Gordon before the summer of my decision to leave the Government for family reasons at the next reshuffle.
This was not a decision I took lightly. I was still in my 20s as Labour was given the honour of leading the country.
And I have been particularly proud as a minister at the Treasury to be able through our proposals on the Child Trust Fund. At Education, opening up school choice for parents, At Communities recasting our policies on violent extremism and devolving more power to local government.
In transport, I was delighted it was Labour that secured the deal on Crossrail.
It's also been a tremendous privilege to have worked with both Tony Blair and Gordon Brown - two towering figures in the Labour Party, Government and on the world stage.
But Conference, as well as a front line politician, I am also proud to be a mother and wife. To be able to hold these jobs, I have relied on the support of my husband and family.
So I ask for your understanding when I say that I now owe it to my children and family to put them first. If I do not, then I know that this is something I will come to regret deeply.
Conference, while we have not a lways agreed on every issue, I am enormously proud of all that we have achieved together over the past decade.
And I am confident that Labour has the values, vision and determination to see this country through difficult times.
There are some who claim that there would be no difference between a Conservative and a Labour government.
RELATED LINKS
Ruth Kelly - profile of the young pretender

Ruth Kelly set to quit

Timing of Ruth Kelly departure will hurt Brown

But Conference, tell that to the pensioner using her free bus pass, not just in her own neighbourhood but now right across the country.
Tell that to the young mum who can now rely on a brand new bus service to take her to the local shops.
Tell that to the commuter, who is now benefiting from newer, more frequent and more reliable trains - the biggest investment in capacity in a generation.
Conference, never again must we allow the Tories to take the axe to our vital public infrastructure when economic conditions get tough - as they have done time after time.
To slash investment when the country entered a time of economic difficulty would be reckless, short-sighted and irresponsible.
So that is why the Government will stay true to its commitments - on Crossrail, on Birmingham New Street, on Reading and across the country.
And we must continue to be ambitious for the future and to put in place the right long-term framework to deliver affordable investment in transport.
So Labour will develop options for a rolling programme of electrification of our railways - potentially the largest programme of electrification in our history.
I have asked Network Rail to consider the case for new lines if passenger numbers continue to grow in the future.
And if we need new lines, of course we should be asking whether they should be high speed.
We all know that in the current climate, with high food and fuel prices, getting good value for money is more important than ever.
So I have been working to help rail passengers by ensuring that fares are simp le, fairly set, fairly sold - and readily available.
RELATED LINKS
Ruth Kelly - profile of the young pretender

Ruth Kelly set to quit

Timing of Ruth Kelly departure will hurt Brown

And Conference, I can assure you that the lessons will be learned from the failure of the XL tour company so passengers can feel more secure when booking their annual holiday.
Conference, on Sunday I was privileged to take part in a ceremony naming a train in honour of Barbara Castle, one of the great Labour women of all time.
She was fearless in her determination to improve the lot of working people, full of courage and conviction, never afraid of taking the tough decisions - of doing what she thought was right.
I admire that.
The real test of the character of a politician - or a party - is how they deal with difficult times and unpopular decisions, not just the easy ones. And in transport over the past eighteen months, there have been both.
We all cherish the opportunity to visit friends and family abroad, catch up with loved ones, or take a well earned holiday.
But if we wa nt to maintain those hard-won opportunities, I truly believe we must be brave in challenging those who would ration flying and make it once more the preserve of the rich.
If London is to thrive as a major international hub, supporting the UK economy by providing good international connections, then it needs a hub airport that has sufficient capacity to serve all the regions and countries of the United Kingdom - as well as the emerging economies of China and India.
Boris may find his fantasy island airport a useful device to distract from the Tories' divisions on Heathrow.
I call it politically opportunistic, economically irresponsible and environmentally disastrous.
Conference, we must always be the party prepared to take the tough decisions, to do what is right, not just what is popular. To be the radicals in politics.
So I congratulate Sir Richard Leese and the Greater Manchester authorities for their ambition. Recognising the problems th at congestion causes. And, being prepared to argue for a congestion charge backed by a step-change in public transport to ensure that Manchester remains a world-class place to live and work.
RELATED LINKS
Ruth Kelly - profile of the young pretender

Ruth Kelly to quit Cabinet 'for family reasons'

Timing of Ruth Kelly departure will hurt Brown

It is seeing strong leadership in action, as we have here in Manchester, that has convinced me that we must continue to devolve powers to local communities.
I am proud that from this autumn, councils will have new powers to plan bus routes, fares and frequencies across their borough - powers opposed by the Tories every step of the way in Parliament.
And because buses are a vital lifeline to many in our communities I am delighted to announce today an extra £25 million to Kickstart new bus services, in both urban and rural areas.
Conference, this week we have set out a compelling vision for the future of our country.
This party, the Labour party, will continue to invest, to inspire and to lead.
Because Labour's values are rooted in the convictio n that by investing in our nation we are investing in our future.
This is the greatest of parties which has changed Britain for the better since 1997. It has been the greatest honour of my life to play a part in that.
I am leaving this stage today, but I will be with this great party all the way in the battle to keep improving our country. We can and must do even better - and Conference, I will always be with you in our great mission.
Thank you.
"

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! that CRASSrail has been turned into a ‘CULT Rail’ now by Gordon Brown...

2008-09-24T03:18:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1020 Hrs GMT 1120 Hrs UK Time London Wednesday 24 September 2008/24 Ramadan 1429 AH:

KHOODEELAAR! analysis of Ruth kelly’s role in peddling the Bechtel-contrived London CRASSrail hole scam as being linked with CROSSRAIL being turned into a ‘cult’, has again been confirmed and vindicated..in the last 45 minutes! By Ruth kelly herself! Addressing the Blaired party annual jamboree staged in Manchester, Kelly said she was departing from the script and then stated her reason for leaving the Brown fronted UK cabinet is to do with her family....After that she resumed reading off the script. As the picture we have put here shows... That script contained cult-like reference to the securing of the ‘deal’ on Crossrail! That was it... No reference to London people. No reference e to the transport needs and the transport problems... Except the plug about bus passes... That was already stated by Brown himself in his own spiel as delivered on Tuesday....

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! that CRASSrail has been turned into a ‘CULT Rail’ now by Gordon Brown...

2008-09-24T01:50:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 0850 GMT 0950 Hrs UK Time London Wednesday 24 September 2008/24 Ramadan 1429 AH

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! that CRASSrail has been turned into a ‘CULT Rail’ now by Gordon Brown...

Brown has contradicted the image he pretended to create on Tuesday of being in any way opposed to the core of the corrupt Big Business practices and the conduct of the City of London and that of their assorted colluders, cohorts and co-perpetrators against society... In paying lip service to the over-appointed Ruth Kelly as ‘Govt minister’, Brown could not find anything of substance to say to the vulgar GMTV fronters about Ruth Kelly’s performance at the various Govt posts such as at the ‘Communities...’ department or at the Department in the name of Education [where she was the fronter after 'Bitter-ite' Charles Clarke had been shifted to the UK Department of the Interior]...... Except to ‘praise’ her for the job she allegedly did as the Crossrail hole plot peddling minister... This is callous, to say the least... How could Brown find nothing in Kelly’s other ‘jobs’ as the fronter to ‘praise’ ? The answer is, as all the facts we have been focussing on for almost 5 years now, the influence on Brown’s regime that is being exerted by Big Business...And this is another indication that Brown has NOT learnt the lesson and that he will waste £Billions of public money in enriching conglomerates that are behind the push for CRASSrail in London... [To be continued]

CROSSRAIL hole plot-fronter Ruth Kelly is reported to be due to be dropped by Brown from cabinet.

2008-09-23T15:47:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 2245 GMT London Tuesday 23 September 2008/23 Ramadan 1429 AH

The item below was written at 2120 GMT. While reviewing the contents and verifying the information, we came across the disclosure [!] on the BBC TV NEWSNIGHT programme at 2145 Hrs GMT and as fronted by David Grossman, to the effect that the ‘intelligence’ they had received from No 10 Downing Street was that RUTH KELLYT was being dropped from Gordon Brown’s cabinet in the reshuffle that was scheduled to be announced on Friday. NEWSNIGHT also stated that Ruth Kelly had already indicated that she would resign.

The last bit of the information has already been published by KHOODEELAAR!

KHOODEELAAR! NO to Big Business City of London corruption ploy under covers of Crossrail: Whither Ruth Kelly?

The item below is being published with the above updater:

Gordon Brown made a reference to each of a list of ministers in his admission and implied that he was working as a team with them and that the achievements of his - and Tony’s!!!! – Administration were to be attributed to the work done by those like the ones he was citing approvingly. The citations included Ruth Kelly. The Crossrail hole plot peddling minister at the time that the Bechtel-craved ploy got the ‘Royal Assent’ dated 22 July 2008. [Thus making it 3 years almost to the day since the only charade of a debate staged in the name of the CRASS scam in the House of Commons on 19 July 2005]

It was also the same Ruth Kelly whose mouth delivered the lying propaganda for the Bechtel-propelled Crossrail when she agreed to perform the script.

That scripted packaged lie was perpetrated with Ruth Kelly’s participation and contained in a video that is still accessible. One of the most noticeable phrases used in the scripted utterances was – and is – the one about ‘Crossrail’ being ‘delivered’ by the Brown-fronted Blaired regime after GENERATIONS of gestation.

That word ‘generations’ was an inaccuracy.

But it was a lie because it was uttered and scripted with the intent to inflate the importance of the alleged delivery!

There is no record, no evidence of any substantial or comparable scheme to the currently referred to Crossrail in any proceedings in the UK Houses of Parliament before the 1990s.

Margaret Thatcher’s own lying confidante, Cecil Parkinson, himself did not do anything about it until the end of the 1980s decade…..

So Ruth Kelly was taking party in a lie…

[To be continued]

But that was not the only lie that Ruth Kelly uttered took part in and peddled about CRASSrail…

[To be continued]

CROSSRAIL hole plot-promoter, Big BUSINESS agenda-tout, 'socialist ‘ [!!!!] careerist Ken Livingstone WAS TOO ARROGANT, so he deserved to lose in May

2008-09-23T04:47:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1150 Hrs GMT 1250 Hrs UK Time Lon don Tuesday 23 September 2008/ 23 Ramadan 1429 AH

CROSSRAIL hole plot-promoter, Big BUSINESS agenda-tout, 'socialist ‘ [!!!!] careerist Ken Livingstone WAS TOO ARROGANT, so he deserved to lose on 1 May 2008!

CROSSRAIL hole plot-promoter, Big BUSINESS agenda-tout, 'socialist ‘ [!!!!] careerist Ken Livingstone WAS TOO ARROGANT, so he deserved to lose on 1 May 2008!

Says who?

Says TESSA JOWELL!!!

Who she?

Indeed!

1140 GMT 1240 Hrs UK Time London Tuesday 23 September 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That CROSSRAIL hole plot-peddler, Big Business tout Ken Livingstone WAS arrogant. That he was negligent, contemptuous of the people and was way out of order in his contemptible assumptions that he was BORN to live off London people....that he was the voice of the people.....Now, we hear that the very woman who was supposedly in charge of the Blaired party election spin including Livingstone's bid to stay in post at the XXXXty Hall in London SE1, says that Livingstone was arrogant. That he had been in the post for far too long.... SHE has confessed in effect to the fact that people were put off by LIVINGSTONE himself........KHOODEELAAR! will examine Tessa Jowell’s confession in the next 24 hours. [To be continued] First the impression of a report about what she has confessed to, from the web site of the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD, Tuesday 23 September 2008:

[To be continued]
Ken's arrogance cost him Mayor's job says Jowell
Pippa Crerar and Andrew Gilligan
23.09.08
Related Articles
Boris: Stop neo-socialist whingeing about City bankers and house prices

Minister for London Tessa Jowell has admitted that Ken Livingstone's perceived arrogance could have lost him the mayoral election.
"There is nothing that alienates people more than what they see as the arrogance of power," she told a fringe meeting at Labour's annual conference in Manchester.
Ms Jowell, who oversaw Labour's campaign, also suggested the former mayor's length of service could have put voters off re-electing him.
"You have to assume that in modern politics longevity works against you," she added.
Her remarks underline a belief held by many in the London Labour party that Mr Livingstone should not be allowed to stand again because he represented the past.
However, she added during the debate on the London elections that after four years he would be a "refreshed, reinvigorated" candidate and better placed to win than when he was the incumbent. Meanwhile, Mr Livingstone's former communications director has told how investigations by the Evening Standard "appeared to confirm that (City Hall) grant- giving was inf luenced by favouritism" - the first significant admission about the Lee Jasper scandal by one of Mr Livingstone's inner circle.
Joy Johnson said that Mr Livingstone's decision to "hang on" to Mr Jasper, his race adviser, despite allegations of cronyism, was "wrong", "doomed" and "a mistake" which cost the mayor "much political capital at a crucial time ... (for) someone who was ultimately a figure of secondary importance". At the meeting, a string of senior London Labour figures voiced criticism of Mr Livingstone's mayoral campaign. Councillor Steve Reed, leader of Lambeth council, accused the campaign of sending "mixed messages" about Conservative candidate Boris Johnson.
"With one hand we said he was a buffoon and with the other we said he was a dangerous extremist," said Mr Reed. "Both things cannot be true, and the voters concluded that neither was true."
Len Duvall, leader of the London Assembly Labour group, said: "It doesn't matter how impressive your legacy and achievements, you are not going to win by that alone.
"We had mixed messages and were a bit late coming in to play." Writing in the British Journalism Review Ms Johnson said: "When someone is in the eye of the media storm - on this occasion, Lee Jasper, Livingstone's equalities adviser - resignation must be swift.
"Our reasoning, that resignation would look like an admission of guilt, was a mistake."
The consequence of the Jasper affair was, Ms Johnson said, "an inability" for the Livingstone campaign to get back on the front foot.
"With a barrage of negative stories arising from leaked emails that appeared to confirm grant-giving was influenced by favouritism, which in turn led to allegations of cronyism, we were operating against a backdrop of hostile stories over a sustained period," she added.
Ms Johnson was also fiercely critical of the Evening Standard, saying its coverage was unbalanced and its billboards had caused "incalculable damage" to the Livingstone campaign.
However, she admitted that some of its stories were "legitimate".
Link to:
Reader Views (0)
Add your view
No comments have so far been submitted.

KHOODEELAAR! updating the analysis of Gordon Brown's error in peddling CRASS Crossrail.... SCRAP CROSSRAIL is our message to Brown and Darling [125]

2008-09-21T22:31:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 0530 GMT 0630 Hrs UKTime London Monday 22 September 2008/22 Ramadan 1429 AH

KHOODEELAAR! No to “Big Business agenda of crassly conceived London Crossrail hole scam.....” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! That GORDON BROWN was behaving imprudently. That in jumping unwisely on Ken Livingstone's lying ‘world crass City of London...’ bandwagon that was rolling in 2007 at the pernicious, poisonous instigation of the mega corruptors in and of and from City of London elements peddling the Big Business Crossrail hole plot agenda, Brown had shown, in 2007 that he had given up all pretence of being prudent.... KHOODEELAAR! had said so all along since Brown made the indefensible and very unsound decision to peddle CRASSrail... And on every single count, the KHOODEELAAR! analysis has been vindicated... by the British ‘mainstream’ media, ‘finding out the evidence all by themselves’ way way afterwards! That Gordon Brown is now seen widely to be a liability is not altogether unconnected with his failure to live up to the image of the ‘prudent’ finance Minister.... Because as we have also pointed out, Brown PREVENTED CRASSRAIL for years..... Until, he was ill-advised to think that the lyingstill Livingstone was the beacon of political enlightenment and wisdom and virtue... And Brown gave in... also to the brazenly plugged anti-Scottish line that Livingstone played..... Today, Alistair Darling is set to deliver HIS version of a rescue package fro his own career and for Brown.... KHOODEELAAR! tells BOTH Brown and Darling: SCRAP CRASSrail now and you will see that a significant burden has been lifted and you will begin, just begin, to become reasonably credible again.... That Brown has at last ‘seen the light’, that the City of London is NEVER to be equated with responsibility far less reasonability far less trustworthiness is now beyond all doubt....[to be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! including the BBC as an exhibit in the action against Big Business lies and crassly conceived Crossrail hole scam [124]

2008-09-21T09:18:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1620 GMT on Sunday 21 September 2008/ 21 Ramadan 1429 AH

KHOODEELAAR! including the BBC as an exhibit in the action against Big Business lies and crassly conceived Crossrail hole scam [124]

1620 GMT 1720 Hrs UK London Sunday 21 September 2008: KHOODEELAAR! contextual evidential update on the reasons why the constitutional law acton against the CRASSrail scam will have to go ahead.....KHOODEELAAR! no to “CROSSRAIL HOLE scam plotters’ greed, sleaze, and their unconstitutionality, unethicality, illegality and immorality .......” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! That BIG BUSINESS was crass, immoral uncaring, greedy, corrupt and destructive.... That the Greater London Authority [GLA], now renamed the London Assembly is useless... has been useless and has not held Ken Livingstone [8 years in post in the name of the people of London until May 2008] the main perpetrating peddler of CRASSrail scam and ‘the Big Business scam agenda Crossrail’ to account.... that the London Assembly has failed the people of London on major crime problems as is seen in the persistent incidents of young people getting murdered......that the ‘Metropolitan Police Authority’ is a joke. No, it is a sick joke as it has not shown any competence whatever in operating as a responsible democratic authority for one of the world’s most powerful police forces.... that today’s description by the BBC, no less [more, later, about this phrase ‘no less’], of the current goings on inside the London Metropolitan Police as resembling events in a spy novel show just how bad things have become... that the police are now openly admitting that they are spying on each other [as the BBC programme NEWS CHANNEL has just confirmed with a live interview broadcast in the last 40 minutes with reporter Barney Chaudhury conducted by programme presenter Martine Croxall] to avoid being trapped by fellow police men and women....... That this is a situation which has not been explained by Home Secretary Jacqui Smith ,, whose strangely confident-sounding speech delivered this afternoon at the Manchester rally of the Blaired Party gave no indication that she recognised the very serious crisis that has occurred inside the London Metropolitan Police....that the interviews being given by Jacqui Smith’s junior ministerial colleague closely involved in policing matters, Tony McNulty has sounded just as blasé as he does on anything...that there is NO reason to believe a word any Govt minister or any holder of any such post at any local or regional level says... especially anything Ruth Kelly said.... as even the PRESS ASSOCIATION is predicting today that she is a ‘favourite’ to be given the sack in a Gordon Brown reshuffle... that BOTH McNulty and Kelly have been very closely involved during their times in and at the UK Department for Transport [DfT] in promoting the Crossrail hole scam.,...[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! updating on CRASSrail hole plot-funder Gordon Brown's role as an agent of Big Business destruction and looting of the economy [119]

2008-09-17T18:30:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 0130 GMT 0230 Hrs UK Time London Thursday 18 September 2008/18 Ramadan 1429 AH:

KHOODEELAAR! No to crassly conceived, corrupting Big Business Agenda Crossrail hole plot..." CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! That Gordon Brown was fronting a Blaired regime that was in effect an outfit of Big Business interests… That Big Business was callous… That Big Business did not care whether the needs of ordinary people on transport or on anything else were being actually recognised, correctly addressed and adequately and actually delivered… ALL that Big business ‘cared’ for was profit… and the excuse the pretext to be able to loot as much of the ordinary peoples’ resources, money and rights as the Govt of the day would allow the Big business to rob, steal and misappropriate…. That Crossrail was given the ‘commitment’ of public funding by Gordon Brown acting as a stooge of Big Business, rather than acting as a responsible democrat who was actually are of the truth of the t situation in the K ands in London… hat Gordon Brown has become almost a laughing stock [see,. strictly for references. the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD report on Wednesday 17 September 2008 saying that Brown was humiliated in cabinet...] because of his brazen siding with Big business in contrast with his over-hyped alleged dithering when it comes to ordinary peoples needs….. That Gordon Brown cannot be treated as having even understood what he was saying when he said those words in tune with the then Ken Livingstone entourage as he posed in canary Wharf made the utterances of profound and unforgettable ignorance in peddling the leis scripted by Big Business and dressed as ‘Crossrail’….. That Douglas Oakervee, the hugely discredited operative who cost the public a large amount of money while he, Oakervee had been in Hong Kong, was not fit to be appointed to Crossrail, but that he was appointed and then praised to the skies by Ken Livingstone,….. That Livingstone has been lying …. Was lying and will continue to lie so long as anyone gives him a platform to lie on…. That Oakervee was involved in misleading the UK parliament about what Crossrail Company was getting up to….. that Alistair Darling as Transport Secretary misled parliament and lied to the public when he made that allocation of £100 Million to CLRL under an lyingly passed piece of corrupting legislation called the Railways Act 2005……[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! dissecting the latest pack of CRASS lies for Big Business Crossrail hole plot-peddlers of City of London [109]

2008-09-13T05:23:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1225 GMT London Saturday 13 September 2008 / 13 Ramadan 1429 AH:

0948 GMT 1048 UKTime London Saturday 13 September 2008 / 13 Ramadan 1429 AH:

KHOODEELAAR! No to “the liars’ agenda of digging holes in the inner city East End of London under covers of ‘big benefits’ CROSSRAIL …..” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! That by ALL objective, internationally verifiable criteria of judgement, evaluation, assessment OVER time and across intellectual, analytical disciplines and parameters and evidential signboards, signatures, symbols and validators the Crassly conceived Crossrail hole plot was a foolish scheme…. That the pluggers of the London Crossrail hole scam, as typified by those within Rupert Murdoch’s Times news organisation who keep dropping positive plugs for CRASSrail – be they in the self-confessed liar Matthew Parris’s overrated [by the criminally-enforced publicly-funded BBC] ‘commentary’ or ‘column’ [as has been the case in the last 24 hours] or be they in the untruthfully disguised business’ or ‘City’ sections and pages, as has been the case again in the past 24 hours when they have peddled CRASSrail as part of their promotion of the ‘New Zealand’- born Judith Mayhew whom they have hoisted atop a similarly corrupting plug pole in a brazenly dishonest promotion they had provided earlier this year to Michael Snyder , the peddlers of the Big LIES CROSSRAIL cannot produce one item of substance to back their demand that the UK public should provide funds to the tunes of £Billions for those to be used, in the main, to fill the pockets of Big Business under pretexts of CROSSRAIL which they dishonestly and deliberately misleadingly promote as a ‘big infrastructure project’ that is demonstrably NOT even relevant to the UK economy, let alone being at the core of the economy’s needs…….

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! dissecting the lies and exposing the corrupt intents behind the CRASS plugs for CROSSRAIl via Rupert Murdoch's Times 'news' group [109]

2008-09-13T02:51:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at

0950 GMT 1050 UKTime London Saturday 13 September 2008 / 13 Ramadan 1429 AH:

KHOODEELAAR! No to “the liars’ agenda of digging holes in the inner city East End of London under covers of ‘big benefits’ COSSRAIL …..” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! That by ALL objective, internationally verifiable criteria of judgment, evaluation, assessment OVER time and across intellectual, analytical disciplines and parameters and evidential signboards, signatures, symbols and validators the Crassly conceived Crossrail hole plot was a foolish scheme…. That the pluggers of the London Crossrail hole scam, as typified by those within Rupert Murdoch’s Times news organisation who keep dropping positive plugs CRASSrail – be they in the self-confessed liar Matthew Parris ‘s over-rated [by the criminally-enforced publicly-funded BBC] ‘commentary’ or ‘column’ [as has been the case in the last 24 hours] or be they in the untruthfully disguised business’ or ‘City’ sections and pages, as has been the case again in the past 24 hours when they have peddled CRASSrail as part of their promotion of the ‘New Zealand’- born Judith Mayhew whom they have hoisted atop a similarly corrupting plug

pole in a brazenly dishonest promotion they had provided earlier this year to Michael Snyder , the peddlers of the Big LIES CROSSRAIL cannot produce one item of substance

to back their demand that the UK public

should provide funds to the tunesof £Billions for those to be used in the main to fill the pockets of Big Business under pretexts of CROSSRAIL which they dishonestly deliberately misleadingly
promote as a ‘big infrastructure project’ that is demonstrably NOT even relevant to the UK economy, let alone being at the core of the economy's needs……. [To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! dissecting the latest pack of CRASS lies for Big Business Crossrail hole plot-peddlers of City of London [109]

2008-09-12T18:48:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 0150 GMT 0250 Hrs UK Time London Saturday 13 September 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! EXPOSES the FT’s ignorance again! Within less than 24 hours of our having to expose the latest idiocies and contradictions of the London ECONOMIST magazine outlet, we find that we are having to do the sae on the Financial Times and their abysmal ignorance... They aRE PLUGGING THE CITY OF LONDON and its corrupt ‘traditions and they are showing a borough-sized emptiness in the collective ‘editorial and journalistic heads’ about the East End of Lon don, specially the ‘next door to the City’ the inner city Borough of Tower Hamlets. We shall examine the FT’s contents of ignorance in the next few hours after we have done the scheduled look at the Rupert Murdoch Times.......Below i s the piece the FT has published on its web site at 0103 Hrs GMT saturday 13 september 2008“

KHOODEELAAR! dissecting the latest pack of CRASS lies for Big Business Crossrail hole plot via the Rupert Murdoched Times, London [108.a]

2008-09-12T18:06:00.000-07:00

0105 gmt 0205 Hrs uk time london saturday 13 September 2008: KHOODEELAAR! is now demonstrably THE daily [and often more frequent] voice on the internet of the inner city defence against the Blairing assaults on the rights of the people in the inner city communities to have our say on what happens to the land in the inner city areas, what happens to the resources and the needs in the areas, how we can have our say on the decisions made in our name by the formally installed institutions of alleged local representation by the local councils; Khoodeelaar! no to ‘big business agenda for looting society, the big business agenda of greed and mega corruption of society and of the world, the big Business practice, tradition and culture of contaminating the environment internationally, regionally, locally; the big Business agenda of lying big time to justify the corruption and the looting... the big business agenda of doing way with entire communities with no even pretence at wanting to respect the human rights and the environmental rights of the people in the communities that BiG Business is bent on in effect decimating....... the KHOODEELAAR! campaign is in defence of the inner city East End of London and as part of the defence we are today, this weekend CONTINUING our analysis and dissection of the tactics, the trends and the habits of BiG Business propaganda organs.... as we start with THIS piece to examine the contents of the latest assaults by the Big Business London CROSSRAIL hole plot-justifying-lies by the touts of Big Business Business operating as propaganda tools and agents via the Times news organisation owned, rather CONTROLLED by Rupert Murdoch,...... Rupert Murdoch’s son James has been plugged this past week as ‘confirming that the Murdoch news Business operations will stay headquartered at wapping in the LondoN Borough of Tower Hamlets’. This is a bit of ‘news’ which contains in it almost all key features of Big Business that KHOODEELAAR! has been addressing and analysing for the past almost five years... The lies as published by the Times newspaper web site in the past 10 hours are the ones we look at first, next, in our serial dissection:

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! dissecting the latest pack of CRASS lies for Big Business Crossrail hole plot via the Rupert Murdoched Times, London [108]

2008-09-12T17:34:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 0035 GMT London Saturday 13 September 2008

KHOODEELAAR! dissecting the latest pack of CRASS lies for Big Business Crossrail hole plot via the Rupert Murdoched Times, London [108]

Here, NEXT

KHOODEELAAR! No to “Big Business agenda CRASSRAIL hole plot and SCAM..." CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO... Update on KHOODEELAAR! vindication [105]

2008-09-10T13:47:00.000-07:00

This AADHIKARonline page was last edited at 2050 Hrs GMT Lon don wednesday 10 September 2008

This page was last edited at 2100 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 10 September 2008

By©Muhammad Haque
2100 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 10 September 2008

KHOODEELAAR! No to “Big Business agenda CRASSRAIL hole plot and SCAM..." CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO... Update on KHOODEELAAR! vindication [105]

The following is a quote from a web site which has published in the past few hours this [quoted] comment about CROSSRAIL. Now, to those who are already familiar with the KHOODEELAAR! analysis of CRASSrail London, the quoted statement would not be new at all... Why?
Because KHOODEELAAR! has been saying so for almost 5 years now...

But to those who are ‘new’ to KHOODEELAAR! or to AADHIKARonline publishing, this [quoted below] comment is the latest vindication in a long line of the KHOODEELAAR! analysis and analyses by a third party and source.

KHOODEELAAR! is the leading intellectual, constitutional law and economic opposition to the Big Business London Crassrail hole scam. And we are INCLUDING THIS [quoted statement below] AS ANOTHER ITEM of evidence IN OUR constitutional law challenge to the crassly conceived, crassly promoted, unlawfully pushed and unconstitutionally 'passed through the UK parliament', wasteful, obsolete CROSSRAIL hole scam:

"
Whether Crossrail in its present form is good value for money is questionable. Its primary function is to relieve pressure on the Central Line tube. It may be one of those projects that has grown out of hand, and that what is really needed is another tube line, at a fraction of the cost.

"

KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business agenda is set to ask James Murdoch a series of Questions, shortly

2008-09-10T03:26:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1028 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 10 September 2008

KHOODEELAAR! focus on the role of Tim Archer, Tory Councillor for 'Canary Wharf' on Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole plot-backer Council [103]

2008-09-09T00:05:00.000-07:00

0650 GMT 0750 Hrs UK Time London Tuesday 9 September 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! A year ago, ALMOST to the day [ today is 9 September 2008 and a year ago THIS week on Friday 7 September 2007], KHOODEELAAR! did an actin archive on THIS KHOODEELAAR! site and discussed, amongst other things, the role [however small] played by Francis Maude [MP], then the UK Conservative Party ‘leader’ [ April 2006] who had stated his PARTY’s OPPOSITION to the Crossrail hole in the Brick Lane, London E1 area.......

And yesterday, 8 September 2008, we came to be aware that today’s Guardian was to publish the item promoting Tory councillor Tim Archer. We have already this morning [Tuesday 9 September 2008] begun to focus on Archer’s untrustworthiness..... And we are going to continue the examination of his dubious and lethally anti-community role on Tower Hamlets Council. Before we get to that stage, it is vital to remind visitors of what we had said on 7 September 2007.

ACTION Archive against Crossrail attack on the East end of London: AADHIKARonline report on the Crossrail hole plotter Ken Livingstone 26.04.2006
London mayor Livingstone obstructs Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole
Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of AADHIKARonline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude’s backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
1. Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of AADHIKARonline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude’s backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
2. That communication from the head of Ken Livingstone’s transport department, effectively says that the Khoodeelaar! demands for Ken Livingstone to make full disclosure of all his communications with the clique of corrupt controllers of Tower Hamlets Council are too expensive for the London Mayor to comply with !
3. There is no specific item that the London Mayor has identified in his mayor communication to Khoodeelaar on Monday 24 April 2006 as constituting an allegedly over-the-permitted limit of administration cost request under the Freed of Information Act.
4. The key point is that Khoodeelaar! the campaign against the CrossRail hole Bill attacks plan on the Brick Lane London E1 area, has been issuing ken Livingstone with a series of pre-action [letter before claim] communications and the London mayor has now run out of excuses.
5. At the centre of the Khoodeelaar legal action claims against Ken Livingstone lies in the fact that the mayor has persistently misled Londoners generally and the UK Parliament through his undisclosed deals with the Transport Department and in particular the people of the East End community affected by the CrossRail hole plan.
6. Khoodeelaar! delivered the first demand to ken Livingstone for confirming a number of facts that were linked with the mayor’s release of a news item on 24 March 2006.
7. That was followed within a day or two by other calls on Livingstone to disclose the facts of his dealing with the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council.
8. It was again repeated by Khoodeelaar! no to Crossrail hole campaign updating their calls on Livingstone to deal with the factual questions that arose about the stunt from the written statement about the CrossRail hole Bill that was issued in the UK House of Commons by CrossRail hole Minister Alistair Darling on 30 March 2006.
9. The mayor is on record as having touted for the enlisting of the ‘leaders’ and ‘lead members’ of a number of local councils, including the then leader of Tower Hamlets Council [Helal Uddin Abbas] in February 2004 as part of the Livingstone lobby for CrossRail plan.
10. In a Crossrail-hole-plan promotional ‘letter’ published in 2004 under the name of Ken Livingstone together with the names of Helal Uddin Abbas and others from other local Councils, the promotion of CrossRail was made without a single qualification let alone reservation.
11. Khoodeelaar! immediately wrote to both Livingstone and demanded that the Evening Standard publish the truth about the CrossRail hole plan. Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque told the Editor of the London EVENING STANDARD that their failure to publish the truth about the CrossRail plan [as it still was - because the CrossRail hole Bill was not put before the House of Commons until 22 February 2005, almost a year after Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque was having the series of demands put on Ken Livingstone and Christine Gilbert to tell the truth of their then role in promoting the CrossRail plan. The EVENING STANDARD failed to publish the truth. As did Ken Livingstone.
12.
That was in February 2004.
13. Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque also wrote to Tower Hamlets Council chief Executive Christine Gilbert in February 2004 and in March 2004 asking for a series of detailed answers to questions about her own role in promoting the CrossRail hole plan including the question as to what advice, if any, had she, Christine Gilbert, given to the ruling clique or group on the Tower Hamlets Council. There was no reply. There has been no reply.
14. When Khoodeelaar! issued the latest then updated series of legal claims against Alistair Darling, ken Livingstone, Christine Gilbert and a few others and said that the application to the High Court in London against them would be filed on Monday 27 March 2006, a number of things immediately happened.
15. Ken Livingstone suddenly issued a news release on 24 March 2006 saying that the CrossRail Dirt hole in the Brick Lane London E1 had been scrapped!
16. And that Ken Livingstone Crossrail-Dirt-hole plan against Brick Lane London E1 area scrapping stunt announcement was then used as the peg for the evening TV news which featured the entire cabal of self-seeking politicos doing their fame slots and assorted other fantasies. They were given more time than Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque who did say on the record [BBC London News, Friday 24 April 2006] that as far as Khoodeelaar! Was concerned, they had immediately asked Livingstone to substantiate the claims of the scrapping of the Crossrail Dirty hole plan and demanded that Livingstone to answer the outstanding detailed KHOODELAAR! no to CrossRail hole questions that had been put to him as based on his unqualified plugs for the CrossRail plan over the previous years
17. Accordingly, Muhammad Haque and Khoodeelaar! campaign sent the detailed further questions immediately and also went to City hall on Monday 3 April 2006 and delivered a series of questions for Livingstone to deal with.
18. On the same occasion [3 April 2006] Khoodeelaar demonstrated the campaign’s opposition to Ken Livingstone’s role so far and demanded that Livingstone come out with the overdue answers to the extensive and the very comprehensive KHOODEELAAR! No to the Crossrail hole questions which had arisen from Livingstone’s stunt staged on Friday 24 March 2006 about the alleged scrapping of the CrossRail Dirt hole.
19. Livingstone remained silent
20. Until the AADHIKARonline news carried the first detailed transcripts of the Khoodeelaar! Organiser’s Questions and answers encounter with Conservative party chair Francis Maude in Brick Lane in the mid afternoon of Monday 24 April 2006.
21. Ken Livingstone’s head of Transports sent an e-mail which is full of typical Ken Livingstone’s dissembling. The concept of dissembling as associated with ken Livingstone on 24 April 2006 had already been spotted and identified a month previously [on Friday 24 March 2006] out by Khoodeelaar organiser Muhammad Haque in his news interview with the BBC London political editor Tim Donovan on that date [Friday 24 March 2006].

[KHOODEELAAR! ACTION UPDATE To be continued along with our examination of the role being played by the Tories, typified by Tim Archer. on the Crossrail hole plot-backer Tower Hamlets Council]

KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot' Big Business agenda CAMPAIGN exposes the Tory Councillor Tim Archer [102 C]

2008-09-08T17:54:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited in London at 0108 GMT on Tuesday 9 September 2008

DEPRIVATION is what the Tories CAUSE. Deprivation is what they support. Deprivation is what they profit from. Deprivation is what they exploit. To make careers out of. And profit from.

So it has been EXPECTED that the Tories !!! on Tower Hamlets Council would not be backing the campaign against the Crossrail hole plot on the East End of London..... For to oppose the Crossrail scam would be to oppose the founding pillars of capitalist corruption...

But that is not to say that the timeserving Tories are even aware of the duplicity of the deprivation system that they back and exploit.

Below is an interview and plug in the Guardian for one of the three Tories whom the local 'East London IDIOTISER' has been promoting if they were not only not Tories of Thatcherism but as if they were were from an outer space unconnected with the millennia of wealth-grabbing crime which the Thatchered Conservatives epitomise and which the Canary Wharf Conservatives actually crave and emulate....

We are here examining [in this series of commentaries] Tim Archer's boastful reference to their role on the Council, as published on the Guardian web site in the past 100 minutes:

"Tim Archer, Poplar and Limehouse
Target seat no 105
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday September 09 2008 00:01 BST
Article history
1. Perception: Do you consider yourself to be a progressive?

"Yes. I'm a Conservative councillor in Tower Hamlets, one of the most deprived parts of the country, and am the parliamentary candidate for the marginal new consistency of Poplar and Limehouse, an east London seat that encompasses the wealth of Canary Wharf and some of the poorest estates in London and the country.

"I've been elected as a councillor in Tower Hamlets, which is a naturally Labour area; before 2004 there had never been a Conservative on the council ever before. In Tower Hamlets the Conservatives are the party fighting for local people to ensure they get a fair deal. We want to make sure that local people have the opportunities to take advantage of the economic engine that's on our doorstep in the form of Canary Wharf.

"We want to reduce the gap between the rich and the poor, not by unfair taxation but by giving people the best start in life and the opportunities to make their lives better. For example, Labour have made a small advance in school reform by, for example, the development of local academies. In Tower Hamlets the Labour-run council turned down the offer of £4m from Goldman Sachs to invest in two schools under the academy scheme. I supported this investment as it would bring much needed cash to our local schools and give local children a better start in life. Labour turned down the money as they seem to want to perpetuate the problem of local people not having the opportunities to better themselves. It seems to suit Labour to keep people down. Now which is the more progressive?

"Finally, I was selected as the parliamentary candidate by an open primary, where almost 100 local residents from the East End of London came to choose who they wanted as their candidate."

2. Tax: Should David Cameron offer more tax cuts than he has outlined already?

"By nature Conservatives believe in low taxes, giving people choice over how they spend, invest and save their hard-earned money. It also keeps our economy competitive internationally. We're in difficult economic times so our ability to offer more tax cuts is limited. And with Labour being fresh out of ideas, offering more tax cuts simply gives them more ideas to pinch!"

3. Tax: If yes to the above, do you think they should be funded by
(a) cuts in public spending, or
(b) increases in other taxes

"A combination of both; some taxes are unfair and they should be replaced (inheritance tax, stamp duty for first-time buyers). Some aspects of public spending could be cut, for example the money wasted on the New Deal, which has not delivered."

4. Tax: Should so-called "green" taxes increase?

"True green taxes need to be increased, but not to simply increase the overall tax intake. We need to take the threat to our environment seriously and taxes should be used to encourage environmentally friendly activities."

5. Tax: As a share of GDP tax is currently around 37%. After four years of a Conservative government would you expect it to be:
(a) substantially lower – at least 2 percentage points
(b) slightly lower
(c) much the same as it is now
(d) higher

A.

6 Europe: On balance has Britain lost out or gained from its membership of the EU? If it has lost out, should it withdraw?

"Probably gained, especially in trade, but the EU comes with costs, for example the Lisbon treaty without a referendum, the common agricultural policy, which needs reform."

7. Family: Which of the following statements most reflects your view:
(a) The tax system should be reformed to recognise and promote marriage
(b) The tax system should help parents regardless of their marital status

A.

8. Abortion: The House of Commons recently voted to maintain the upper limit of 24 weeks on abortion. Do you believe it should be reduced? If yes, by how many weeks?

"My personal view is that I would like to see the limit reduced from the current 24 weeks. I would like to see 22 weeks."

Interview by Alexandra Topping

larger | smaller
Politics
Conservatives
Series
The new Tories
Printable version Send to a friend Share Clip Contact us Article history
Related information follows Ads by Google

"

KHOODEELAAR! No to EVENING STANDARD's plugs for CROSSRAIL: Gilligan is a Big Biz Crossrail faker! [101]

2008-09-08T12:07:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1920 GMT London Monday 8 September 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! is republishing the following comment piece by-lined to Andrew Gilligan and carried in the print editions of today's London EVENING nostandards STANDARD. Why we are doing so? As part of the evidence that the EVENING nostandards STANDARD is still treating CRASSrail as a cult item and phenomenon,, always to be left out of any critical assessment or evaluation. We note that the Gilligan piece is apparently an objective attack on ken Livingstone's recorded mess at the TfL. Yet the piece makes an exception of CRASSrail. Describing CRASSRAIL as a 'project of real worth'. This is contradictory., and dishonest. Whether this phrase was inserted by Veronica Wadley or whether itv was Gilligan who wrote it himself is not known as yet. But the fact is that the piece is contradictory because of that plug in it for CRASSrail. Assuming that Gilligan wrote it himself, it is clear on that evidence that Gilligan is just as dishonest as anyone else that has been peddling Crassrail... On that evidence, Gilligan's claimed objectivity in the rest fo the item falls. [To be continued]

"
It’s time to turn your attention to TfL, Boris
Andrew Gilligan
08.09.08
Related Articles
Yes, I’m Boris’s chief enforcer – the supertanker is now turning
Boris Johnson launches the revamped Dial-a-Ride bus
M&S boss Stuart Rose to help Mayor attract global investment
Mayor 'going cold on vital scheme for cross-river tram'

How magnificently brazen it was to see Ken Livingstone attacking Boris's TfL fares increase last week.

This rise, of inflation plus one per cent from January 2009, is, of course, the exact same package which the ex-Great Helmsman himself secretly agreed on 24 October last year.

The only difference, as emails leaked to the Standard in April showed, was that to the horror of his officials, Mr Livingstone simply decided to ignore the decision.

We've short memories, Ken, but not that short. And remind me: just which Mayor was it who raised fares by up to one-third in 2007? Would that have been you, or a totally different one?

The real problem is not that Boris has kept Ken's 2009 fares plan but that he has, so far, left almost everything else about Livingstone's TfL intact, too. It's a problem because TfL is the Ed Balls of public administration: nothing like as good as it thinks it is.

It genuinely believes, in the words of its commissioner, Peter Hendy, that it is an “efficient and effective” provider of bus and train services.

In fact, under Livingstone and Hendy's stewardship, it has achieved the worst of all worlds: rapacious fares, vast public subsidy and often mediocre service.

The buses have improved, though at a disproportionate, unsustainable cost (bus subsidy has risen about 1,300 per cent, while passengers have risen about 45 per cent). But the Tube is the least-reliable, worst-managed metro in Western Europe, and is getting worse, not better. It is hard to overstate the damage it does to London's international reputation and to Londoners' blood pressure.

TfL genuinely believes itself a world leader which other cities follow. Actually, other cities are surprised at our backwardness in, for instance, providing clean public transport. Even the buses in Delhi have been using cleaner fuels for years — but London's bus fleet remains 99.9 per cent diesel. In terms of air pollution (different from C02), TfL buses are among the most poisonous things on the road in London today, directly responsible for the deaths of dozens of Londoners each year.

No other city has followed London's model of the congestion charge, for the good reason that it uses crude, old technology and has, partly as a result, stopped reducing congestion.

TfL does, however, lead the world in pointless extravagance, with 123 of its managers earning more than £100,000 a year and fortunes wasted on vanity projects like the “Greenwich Waterfront Transit” (a six-mile bus route — again diesel — costing £20 million). Hence the high fares.

Now, with big bills looming for projects of real worth such as Crossrail, fare rises alone, however necessary, won't pay for everything. The bus and rail services London depends on simply cannot survive at their current levels unless TfL takes a crash diet.

But four months in, marvels one senior TfL figure, “Boris's arrival has made no difference whatever. It's all going on exactly as before.” No programmes have (yet) been cancelled. No personnel changes have been made. Indeed, one senior TfL person has just been appointed, of all things, Boris's environmental adviser.

Less than a year ago, as further leaked emails show, Mr Hendy was secretly plotting with Ken's chief of staff to “refute Boris's transport ideas”. Now, in a truly gymnastic feat of brown-nosing, he has apparently persuaded the new Mayor that his sole purpose in life is to implement those very same ideas.

It's surprising that someone as bright as Boris can fall for this obvious nonsense. What it probably means is not that TfL will end up working for Boris — but that Boris will end up working for TfL.

Link to:
Reader Views (8) Add your view | Show all
Here's a sample of the latest views published. You can click view all to read all views that readers have sent in.
How much do Deloitte make from TFL? Did they assist with the Oyster card that recently crashed and cost us a small fortune?

- Miss Snipe, London

Dear, dear are these the first signs that Andrew might be falling out of love with his creation, tut,tut!

Remember what happened to Dr Frankenstein.

- David, london UK

Have you ever ridden a bus in Delhi? Have you breathed in the smog in that city? What utter tosh.

I don't live in London, but every time I have been there, I have been pleasantly surprised by a well-organised, frequent, low-cost mass transport system. You perhaps forget what it is like to not live in the well-connected Capital city!

TfL is what the rest of the country's transport network needs! Not subsidised, wholly national, national rail!

- Liam Gooderhall, Hooton, United Kingdom

"

KHOODEELAAR Constitutional law action against “Crossrail hole plot ...’ CAMPAIGN, UPDATE of evidence [101]

2008-09-07T21:44:00.000-07:00

This page of AADHIKARonline was last edited at 0445 GMT 0545 Hrs UK Time London Monday 8 September 2008.

KHOODEELAAR Constitutional law action against “Crossrail hole plot ...’ CAMPAIGN, UPDATE of evidence [101]. Those who are actually familiar with the UK domestic court system! will know of the huge amount of work that has to be done before any actual applications are made to a court... The same applies to KHOODEELAAR! legal and constitutional law action programme... For 4 years and 8 months, we have waited for them to give us answers to the questions that we have put to them.... We have tried again by updating them on those [as visitor to our web web sites, blogs and publicity pages on the internet will be aware]. When we did get a single communication claiming that they have answered, we looked through our files. The result is that the following reply has now been sent to the Tower Hamlets Council this morning [Monday 8 september 2008]: “We have not found answers to our questions in anything that you or any other person representing the tower hamlets borough council has sent to us in the 4 years and 8 months of our campaign so far. This is the reason for the delay in our sending you this reply. We have looked for and thought about the possibility of finding answers to our questions. Answers from TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL. But in vain. The council has never answered our questions.This will now be of course sought - the answers that is - via the courts, as you are aware. I say this in view of your legal section decision to ask you to await our proposed court actions. The court actions have been delayed so far partly in order to give yourselves the one conclusive opportunity to give us the answers to all the outstanding questions. It is clear that
‘the Council’ prefers to have the matter dealt with by the court system. I point out that this will be one component of our claim, that the Council is causing court actions to be taken rather than give us the answers.The costs implications of this behaviour will be stressed in all relevant representation and actions by Khoodeelaar! Yours sincerely
Muhammad Haque Organiser KHOODEELAAR!
0420 Hrs GMT London Monday 8 September 2008

KHOODEELAAR! exposing ANOTHER central lie used by Crossrail hole agenda peddlers on the East End of London [97]

2008-09-06T21:35:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at
0430 GMT 0530 Hrs UK Time London Sunday 7 September 2008

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! The lie that Big Business agenda is based on and the lie that the peddlers of the Crossrail hole plot have been using in all their promotions and lobbying, is that the scam will 'also' 'bring benefits' 'to local people'. They have been perpetrating the lie that JOBS will be available to the people, fo the East End. Ordinary people in the ordinary community. We have said all along that the lie is untenable. That the lie is deliberate and is part of the fraud to get the crassly conceived scam through... That it cannot be allowed to go unchallenged. That their lie is part and parcel of their strategy that was used inside the two Houses of UK Parliament by BIg Business that covered up the truth and lied.........That the lie is exposed in the following jobs and recruitment propaganda piece carried ion one of the construction conglomerates web sites: NOTE the words they use for prospective jobseekers on Crossrail, the 2012 Olympics Games hosting sites and structures ...."particularly those who are qualified and are working towards Chartered status." [To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! No to "pro-imperialist, pro-colonialist Big Business media myths against the people targeted by poverty-creating Crossrail hole plotters”

2008-09-05T14:46:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 2205 GMT London Friday 5 september 2008

For a second time in the past few months, the Rupert Murdoch-owned ed London times newspaper has SUPPRESSED comments critical of the City of London interests as contained in the pieces published with the by-line of Martin Waller, who ‘normally’ presents himself as the ‘City Diarist’..

There are comments accompanying his latest piece concerned. But not those that tell the truth about the role being played by the Big Business backing media.

We shall go into the details of the role being played by the likes of Martin Waller in boosting the image of the Big Business ...

We shall also look at someone else given a job on the same Murdoch owned Times. That someone else is passable as an almost credible member of what could be called the calling of 'journalism !!!!'. She is Camilla Cavendish. She boasts of having lived - and ‘worked’ - in Bangladesh. And comes across as if she knows Tower Hamlets as a 'resident'.

Here is here latest piece that refers to both [Bangladesh and Tower Hamlets]:

"

From The Times mSeptember 4, 2008 Britain 2028: we need ten new cities, please

Our approach to immigration is unsustainable. We must either cap numbers or introduce a tough guest worker scheme

Camilla Cavendish

I came back from holiday in the vast calm of Burgundy to find that the UK will have the largest population in Europe by 2060, on half the land area of France. Sharif told me this while he was doing my hair. He thinks it would be “crazy, darlink, so sweaty, and just not fair”. But he also worries that his Polish builders will go home and leave him with Albanians who are less cute and who have apparently acquired the English tea-break mentality, but not much English.
We have become completely contradictory about migration. We are alarmed by the numbers of people reaching these shores, yet suddenly afraid that they might pack up and leave. Can we afford to lose energetic people who have helped to drive the economy? Can we afford to keep them? How many is too many?
First, the stats. If there is any certainty at all in population projections, it is that a 50-year EU projection is bound to be wrong. So I dug out the Government's 20-year forecast. It's stunning. The Office for National Statistics expects Britain's population to rise by ten million, seven million from immigration. That would require the building of ten big cities. Yet the Government has no plan for housing the numbers it is apparently planning to accept, nor for providing the services they would need. Already, half the babies in London's maternity wards have foreign-born mothers. That doesn't make any baby worth any less. But those of us who have given birth in the capital in recent years know that midwives are dangerously variable in quality and that hospitals are so overstretched that women are being turned away from hospital to give birth on the kitchen floor.
Will a recession empty the wards and leave our dynamic economy bereft of talent? Probably not. The significance of the Polish exodus has been overblown because of the assumption that Eastern Europeans are a majority of those coming here. Yet they have never been. Even in 2004, when the Government opened Britain's doors to the new EU accession countries, of the 940,000 people who came here legally only a third were from the EU. Over the past 15 years more than 90 per cent of legal arrivals have been from non-EU countries.

This gives the lie to the pretence that the Government cannot restrict the numbers entering Britain. The fourfold rise in official immigration in the past decade can be explained largely by deliberate policy. In 1997 the abolition of the Primary Purpose Rule removed the restriction that required applicants to show that they were not just marrying to enter the UK. In 1998 the abolition of embarkation controls ended any effective record of who came in and out. In 2002 the number of work permits was doubled. The Government now claims to have created an “Australian-style points system” to keep out the low-skilled, but it is Australia-lite. Australia sets an annual limit on numbers, then takes those with the most points. The British have no such limit.
Much of our contradictory approach is because while we appreciate the undoubted skills of foreign doctors and builders, we are less enthusiastic about handing out lifetime entitlements to unprecedented numbers of people merely on the basis that they are here, legitimately or not. It is clear that immigration has brought much-needed wealth, ideas and energy into the British economy. It is less clear, over time, how to balance economic benefits against the value of state ones.
The answer may be to decouple the two. There is no cast-iron reason, for example, why immigrants who have been here for five years should automatically acquire a permanent right to remain. Nor is it axiomatic that they should have the same entitlements as British citizens. Many countries with open borders refuse to give immigrants equal rights. When I lived in Bangladesh I met many families whose income came from guest worker relatives in Kuwait and Jordan. During the Gulf War, the sheer number of disgruntled returnees astonished me. For me, the term “guest worker” was flush with imperial exploitation. But these people were just grateful that they could earn. They did not expect additional benefits. They were keen to get back, even to Singapore - which expels guest workers if they become pregnant.
The guest worker concept is unpalatable in many ways. But it may be fairer than shutting people out altogether. The US economist Lant Pritchett has called guest work a liberal solution to the problem of the “irresistible forces of global migration” coming up against the West's “immovable ideas” of nationhood.
I raise the issue because it seems clear to me that our current approach is both undemocratic and unsustainable. When the official figures point exponentially upward - and the official figures are a woeful underestimate because they fail to capture the illegals - we are in danger of stretching the social contract to breaking point. People are getting angry, and they will get angrier if the recessionary tide leaves ever more foreigners claiming benefits here.
The alternative to a guest worker system, which feels more British, would be to offer every legitimate worker equal rights - to benefits, at least, if not to permanent residency. But in this overcrowded island, this will only work if there is some kind of cap on numbers. Come to Tower Hamlets and see people living eight to a room. Spot the secret doors cut into buildings which have been divided up into grim tenements, like the old Jewish ghettos. Many of these people earn below the minimum wage and some are trafficked. It is inhuman. I believe we face a choice: between open borders and guest workers, or closed borders and fewer workers. To continue to pretend that we do not, as recession looms, may prove politically dangerous. The immigration issue is now spatial, not racial. And the fairest solutions may be those that look the least liberal.

"

KHOODEELAAR! No to "uneconomic ... Crossrail scam" CAMPAIGN analyis IS vindicated, AGAIN [93]

2008-09-05T14:19:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 2120 GMT 2220 Hrs UK Time London Friday 5 September 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! No to "uneconomic, untested, unwanted, publicly-costly, publicly-paid-for Big Business-greed-filling Crossrail scam" CAMPAIGn is VINDICATED, again... In the 'reasons' stated in a RAILNEWS web site item about a [admittedly smaller] 'Crossrail' scam in Scotland being unsupported, the KHOODEELAAR! principled analysis as we had been making against the London CROPSSRAIL, has become relevant.....

[To be continued]

"

http://www.railnews.co.uk/news/general/2008/09/05-aberdeen-crossrail.html

North-east Crossrail scheme ‘doomed’

Posted: 5th September 2008 | No Comments

First Minister Alex Salmond
PLANS to set up a £200million commuter transport system in the north-east appeared doomed last night after experts said the business case was weak and questioned potential demand.

First Minister Alex Salmond revealed that Transport Scotland had concerns about the Crossrail scheme and transport partnership Nestrans has been advised to focus on improving the existing rail infrastructure.

Opposition MSPs say the news reinforced their fears for the project, which would involve two new stations in Aberdeen serving the north and south and a service between Inverurie, Aberdeen and Stonehaven every 15 minutes.

Nestrans chairman Kevin Stewart said he believed the project, part of a £1billion transport strategy for the north-east, was feasible but admitted Transport Scotland was not convinced.

North East Conservative MSP Nanette Milne said last night it appeared from the tone of the letter she had received from Mr Salmond that the SNP Government was poised to perform a “spectacular U-turn”.

She said this would be a great pity because the project was “vital” in tackling traffic congestion in Aberdeen, particularly at the Haudagain roundabout.

Mr Salmond wrote: “Transport Scotland has had discussions with Nestrans regarding the emerging conclusions from their draft report relating to the Aberdeen Crossrail proposal.

“The initial findings from this study suggested that the business case for this project might be weak.

“It was therefore jointly agreed that Nestrans should focus on identifying the further passenger benefits that can be gained from the existing rail infrastructure.”

Mrs Milne added: “Local people increasingly feel that the SNP are making a spectacular U-turn which will see these plans and the Crossrail project shelved.

“It is now crucial that the first minister and the SNP government clear up the confusion they have caused surrounding the Aberdeen Crossrail proposal.”

Pivotal to the Crossrail scheme is the reopening of Laurencekirk station, but this has been has been delayed until early next year. Plans are also afoot to reopen Kintore station and Nestrans is funding a feasibility study.

Mr Stewart said: “Transport Scotland do not see there being the demand for the project but it may see it increasing when the timetabling of the trains between Stonehaven and Inverurie changes in December.

“We will judge what happens when Laurencekirk opens in the new year.”

A spokesman for Mr Salmond said: “Obviously we want proposals to be as strong as possible to maximise their chances of success when they advance beyond a draft and come forward in final form for consideration by ministers.

Return to top

"

KHOODEELAAR! No to the abuse of the office of London mayor... CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! that Crossrail hole plot peddler Livingstone was a waster in post

2008-09-04T08:23:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1525 GMT in London on Thursday 4 September 2008

1525 GMT 1625 Hrs UK Time London Thursday 4 September 2008: KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! NOT even BORIS JOHNSON had a clue, let alone ANY MORALITY or evidential or constitutional CLOUT to say what KHOODEELAAR! had said for years about Ken CROSSRAIL HOLE PLOT peddler Livingstone's abuse of the post he held in the name of the people of London..... That Livingstone was irresponsible with the finances and that he was callous with those..... Now, after 8 years of Livingstone's doing it.... the INCUMBENT in the same post says some of the things... and contained in the GLA news releases... and at the Boris Johnson News event staged at the xxxxty Hall London SE1 today [Thursday 4 September 2008]... Then Boris Johnson REVERTS to the same fabricating form as was typical of Livingstone himself... Boris Johnson makes claim to be delivering 'Crossrail' as if that phrase[ is somehow enough top lift the office of the mayor in the name of London to a level where it is seen as and is actually accountable to the people of London.. It is not... Boris Johnson is on notice from KHOODEELAAR! that he will have to answer for any MORE of the Crossrail hole agenda-peddling utterances that he may make in addition to those as had been made by Ken Livingstone himself... Boris Johnson must know, especially on a day when he is announcing cuts to the budget and rises in the fares for bus and tube in London that Crassly is NOT affordable, that Crassly is not the answer to the needs of London... Boris Johnson must not become another Ken Livingstone when it comes to contradicting and giving false statements....KHOODEELAAR! will publish later this evening [Thursday 4 September 2008] the next part of our analysis of today's utterances by the CRASSly-'advised' and lobbyed peddler of CRASSRAIL hole, that Boris Johnson, .

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! that there was no economic case for Crossrail!

2008-09-03T21:30:00.000-07:00

0415 GMT 0515 Hrs UK Time
London Thursday 4 September 2008

KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! that there was no economic case for Crossrail! That the EXISTING infrastructure which related to overwhelming numbers of peoples’ transport needs, needed to be improved and maintained to a high standard with the money that was wrongly being allocated to Big busies under the cover of Crossrail.... Now, a SIMILAR argument in principle, has been recognised up in Scotland... THERE, the much smaller ‘Crossrail’, a word that construction conglomerates have been spreading and pushing as a ‘cult’ word, has been found to be NOT in demand.................KHOODEELAAR! says to Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling: Again, listen to reason and you shall be spared undue woes ....SCRAP London Big Business CRASSrail....Address real transport matters with the money...[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business Lies-propelled CROSSRAIL hole plot: Updater commentary on Alistair Darling's misery: and on Brown's CRASSrail flaws!

2008-08-30T14:56:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 2200 Hrs GMT London Saturday 30 April 2008

2155 GMT London Saturday 30 August 2008:

There is one word that can END Alistair Darling's misery! And end the 'gloom' for the rest of the Gordon Brown-fronted Blaired regime! CRASSrail! All that they need to say is unite, like they did with the sneaky Ken Livingstone in march and April 2008, and chant 'CRASSrail'! Why are we in the KHOODEELAAR! campaign giving this unique, timely and highly economically efficient and prudent and competent advice worth £Billions for free? because unlike Alistair darling, we care about and for the truth.. And we shall continue to care.... Unlike Gordon Brown and his hocus pocus vahloos! WE do have values. We do attach great value to the veracity of what we say before we say it.... Even though what we say may not be greeted with the display of oozing appreciation which Gordon Brown pits on. It is an embarrassing spectacle when Gordon Brown, often portrayed as gloomy [as he has been portrrayed in the media throughout these past months and today Saturday 30 August 2008] g, twists his lips and quivers as a fawning teenager......

It is not half as embarrassing and unforgivable as when Gordon Brown behaves a s a tout for the biggest liars in the world ... Big Business that have held the UK 'Parliament' [the 'elected' 'House of Commons' and the unelected 'House of Peers'] and the UK Govt to ransom in all but name..That is what was acknowledged by the highly state-linked 'Private Eye' magazine, edited by Ian Hislop, an extremely fanatical and brazen backer of everything the Big Business-led UK state agenda-setters want done....Ian Hislop's 'Private Eye' has not reported on the multi£Billion big business scam at all. Except on that one occasion and in one single issue. But they did report that the CRASSrail package was being pushed through the UK Parliament, by someone that had been linked with Douglas Alexander. And that that person was representing BECHTEL....

Apart from that one occasion and that one journal, NO BRITISH media of any description [other than the campaigning web sites and blogs led by KHOODEELAAR!] has carried any reports about the strange phenomenon of the CRASSrail scam being pushed through the Parliament' without any scrutiny.... Given that the same media are now agog with stories, comments, human interest angles, sketches, anecdotal items and updates by the hour about the worsening crisis in the UK economy - and the NY Times 'weekend edition' dated today Saturday 30 August 2008 admitting as much gloom about the USA and the 'economy' 'over there' ... isn't it the media's duty to now clamour for Brown to EXPEDITE the bringing about of the 'miracle'????? Which is how the liars have been peddling the Bechtel CRASSrail ?!!!! Spread the 'magic of CRASSrail oil on all and every element of the ailing UK economy' and the 'cure' will assert itself and the gloom, will be gone and the economy will start dancing in a world class fashion..... from Caracas [where CRASSrail hole peddler Livingstone has just bagged 'transport consultant to Hugo Chavez' job for himself [Livingstone, Kenneth- besuited and be-guiarded as never before!!!!]] to crackpots and to every other lunatic point and destination and station, stop, junction in between....!![To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business agenda of looting public money: how London CRASSrail is DRIVEN by Big Business, NOT by PUBLIC demand!

2008-08-29T08:58:00.001-07:00

KHOODEELAAR! comment on this [below] will follow in the next few hours:

"

Reduced workloads spread to civil engineering sector
Published: 26 August 2008 14:53 Author: Andrea Klettner More by this AuthorLast Updated: 27 August 2008 10:48Reader Responses

Ceca says water work is tapering off at the moment
Increase image
View all images
Civil engineering contractors are reporting a slide in workloads compared to earlier this year.
The sector had largely escaped the woes that have beset the housing market and the commercial and office sectors.

But the latest quarterly report by the Civil Engineering Contractors Association reveals that there are now more firms carrying out less work than in the previous quarter.

Ceca's quarterly workload trends survey – which measures the difference between the number of contractors reporting higher workloads compared to the number reporting reduced workloads – shows the overall balance for the country is now down to – 17 per cent, compared to a rise of 39 per cent in April.

Contractors surveyed said all roads, water and sewage works had decreased over May, June and July, as had work in the utilities and communications sectors.

Ceca director Rosemary Beales said big-ticket civils jobs needed to come on stream quickly.

She added: "Major projects such as Crossrail and nuclear need to move forward at a steady pace if the Government is to combat this loss of confidence."

Rail and airports showed positive balances, while harbours and water ways remained neutral.

In terms of regions, England has experienced the biggest decrease in work – going from 45 per cent in January to –22 per cent last month. Wales also reported a downturn, while Scotland is the only positive region – where confidence remains at 16 per cent.

But Ceca Scotland chief executive Alan Watt admitted contractors could still come under pressure due to decreasing workloads.

He added: "Although we are still pretty confident that the Scottish Government's major public sector infrastructure programme is secure we're becoming increasingly concerned that the housing market slump could get worse."

Mr Watt also called on the Scottish Government to confirm the details of the Scottish Futures Trust so that work can continue on schools, hospitals and infrastructure projects.

Author: Andrea Klettner. Reporter

"

KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Big Business Crossrail hole agenda' Constitutional law UPDATE [79] Crossrail hole Ken REALLY goes CRACKERS! in Caracas!

2008-08-28T18:33:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 0135 GMT in London on Friday 29 August 2008

The utterances of Crossrail hole plot-peddler Ken Livingstone as reported from the Venezuela city of Caracas really confirm that the man has no self-respect where it concerns the records of disasters that he created whilst occupying the post in the name of the people of London at an address we have been referring to as the Onion [for not wanting to use the phrase that we really think describes the place most accurately] in London SE1

Livingstone has shown no dignity in exhibiting himself as a consultant to the Venezuelan regime. Subjects include transport!

Is Livingstone telling the world that Hugo Chavez, his alleged mate, is a convert to the ideology of hiring the likes of Bob Kiley?

And that he, Livingstone,. will commend Kiley's type to Chavez? And cite the 'qualities' like Kiley's ability to INTIMIDATE people at Livingstone-craved carve-up 'meetings'?

KHOODEELAAR! is part of the inner cities community defenec movement that has evidence of what Livingstone has been claiming to be over the past 4 decades... In fact, the same movement has been actively focusing attention to Livingstone's fraudulent claim to being a socialist.... But even we never imagined that Livingstone would go crackers so soon and end up actually being given a career and sanctuary in Caracas for him to go crackers so brazenly....

While we keep counting the cost of the crackers ken while he had been in office in London.....

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Big Business Crossrail hole agenda' Constitutional law UPDATE [78] on the 'Lib Dems' 'group'

2008-08-28T17:35:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 0055 GMT London Friday 29 August 2008

The reason why KHOODEELAAR! did not take the promised legal action [May 2006] against the Tower Hamlets Lib Dems group and the UK Lib Dems Party that had colluded in a series of criminal acts perpetrated by the Group and via the Group in tower Hamlets including the brazen lies it [The Lib Dems Group] told on the eve of the 2006 Council elections by impersonating the KHOODEELAAR! campaign and by fabricating a picture image of Janet Ludlow to paint her as not only backing the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail hole attacks but also leaving out ALL reference to the Campaign whose work it stole and electorally and to a large extent personally benefitted from, is to be found in the generosity which we have shown to a number of other impersonators, profiteers and liars.

Why?

The main focus of the campaign has been to get the Crossrail hole plot scrapped... To commence any action against a party or grouping no matter how relevant , would take the focus away from the main target, that is the decision-makers in post on Crossrail at local level and at the London and UK levels.

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Big Business Crossrail hole agenda' Constitutional law UPDATE [77] on the 'Lib Dems' 'group'

2008-08-28T15:15:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 2215 GMT London Thursday 28 August 2008

KHOODEELAAR! had only completed the research on the updates when the'leader' of the Lib Dems on Tower Hamlets Council was able to get herself placed at the centre of attention by what is normally described as the Right Wing press in Britain...Were we shocked to find that the 'Lib Dems' group ' 'leader' was NOT getting such attention about anything she was saying in defence of the community against the Big Business Crossrail hole agenda.....

OF COURSE WE WERE NOT!!! But Germaine Greer may still join in....

With a historic comment about how things in the world of colonialism actually destroy not just a moment's rest and relaxation... but an entire people......

We may yet see and hear a lot more about colonials business as observed by Germaine Greer in the context of Australia...

And we may yet get to read some of the most topical views expressed by Germaine Greer on the rights of the people in Tower Hamlets itself...... KHOODEELAAR! is putting for the records the following texts, as taken from the web site run by ARCHANT for the 'East London ADVERTISER' at 2205 GMT on Thursday 28 August 2008.

This we are doing for the records. Why? Because the same ARCHANT web site for the 'East London IDIOTISER" has been REMOVING items from their web sites within almost hours of putting them there.... This has been happening with quite a noticeable frequency...

We cannot be sure that the latest promotion of 'senior ' [!!!!!] councillor Stephanie Eaton will not be removed for unexplained reason....

Here then is that piece " Town Hall bid to extend Ramadan fast to non-Muslims fuels row"

"
Town Hall bid to extend Ramadan fast to non-Muslims fuels row

28 August 2008

Ted Jeory

A SENIOR councillor has condemned as “divisive” a move by Town Hall leaders to extend Muslim fasting rules on non-Muslim politicians during the holy month of Ramadan.

Tower Hamlets council’s Lib Dem group leader Stephanie Eaton said she would be ignoring arrangements which favoured one religious group over others.

“The Liberal Democrats have enormous respect for the contribution of all faith groups and cultures to the life of the community,” she said.

“But we fervently believe that the rules of any one religion should not be imposed upon others.”

The row was sparked by an email sent to all councillors this week outlining arrangements for Town Hall committee meetings next month, which marks the Muslim fasting period of Ramadan.

It said that new council leader Lutfur Rahman and his deputy, Siraj Islam, had requested that meetings be kept to a minimum to accommodate fasting councillors.

They have also asked all other councillors to resist eating until the breaking of the fast at sunset.

It is the first time such a request has been made and it comes as Ramadan falls earlier this year during the longer daylight hours.

Council bosses have also ordered that the Town Hall’s business agenda should also be reduced, with only seven scheduled committee meetings for the entire month, to deal with the Ramadan restrictions.

Officers have also been barred from arranging any more and asked to find ways of dropping some of the scheduled seven.

Those going ahead generally start at about 6.30pm, so with sunset due to fall just after 7.30pm at the beginning of September and around 6.30pm by the end of Ramadan, the breaking of the fast, known as Iftar, will take place during meetings.

At those points, there will be 45 minute adjournments to allow members to eat and pray, council leaders have ordered.

But it is the arrangements for the food and other refreshments that has angered Cllr Eaton and the rest of her party, which includes two Muslim councillors.

Normally, tea, coffee and sandwiches are set aside for councillors to nibble at during evening meetings.

But during Ramadan, these will be reduced and complemented by Iftar food packs containing chicken, lamb and vegetarian snacks.

However, in his email the council’s head of democratic services John Williams said: “It is requested that members do not partake of any refreshments until after the Iftar refreshments are served.”

Cllr Eaton said that was going too far.

She added: “We object to the request that non-Muslim councillors observe the fasting rules for Ramadan.

“This sends out the wrong message to our community. Our community consists of a huge number of different religions, all of which should be valued, and no one religion should be accorded more status or influence than others.

“Freedom of belief is an important human right, and we Liberal Democrat councillors, Muslim and non-Muslim, agree that this request is inappropriate.”

She has also written to Town Hall bosses about her concerns that their move “will not enhance community cohesion and asking for their reassurance that no faith is given any particular status or priority in the operation or decisions of the council.”

Within hours of her contacting the East London Advertiser and making a complaint to new council leader Lutfur Rahman, the Town Hall launched a damage-limitation exercise.

In a climb-down statement, the council said the email had been sent after complaints from some councillors last year that non-Muslims had been eating their Iftar packs.

Despite the clear request in the email, the council statement said: “There is absolutely no suggestion that during Ramadan non-Muslim councillors have been asked to refrain from eating or drinking when Muslims are observing the fast.

“As normal, water will be provided at council meetings taking place during Ramadan.

“Tea, coffee, Iftar packs and non Iftar snacks will be available in a separate room for all councillors.

“All that’s being asked for is courtesy to be shown to the sensitivities around some councillors eating during council meetings whilst others in the room are fasting.

“Non-Muslim councillors have simply been asked to ensure that there is Iftar food available for Muslim councillors, because in previous years Muslim councillors wanting to break their fast followings prayers had found that the Iftar packs had been eaten.”

"

[KHOODEELAAR! commentary and analysis To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! No to the poverty-creating agenda of Big Business Crossrail hole plot: Constitutional law, court action EVIDENTIAL Updater [75]

2008-08-28T14:06:00.000-07:00

KHOODEELAAR! No to the poverty-creating agenda of Big Business Crossrail hole plot: Constitutional law court action EVIDENTIAL Updater [75]

By©Muhammad Haque
2100 GMT London Thursday 28 August 2008

What are the factors that make Tower Hamlets ‘the most deprived borough in the country’?

Whatever the ‘consultants’ may say, whatever the alleged academics may say, will not be known fully until after another century has gone by.

What the people in the ordinary population know now, here, today, can be listed as including:

No jobs
No real home
No social cohesion
No respect to the people by those who ‘are in place to serve the community’.
No education standards for MOST
No platform for addressing these for the action by the decision-makers….
No representation on the ‘local’ Council which is stuffed full of time serving small timers
No space in the ‘local’ ‘newspaper’ for telling the truth - there is no ‘local newspaper’ really…
No real say on what goes on in the ‘Parliament’
No real health system or care or service

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Big Business Crossrail hole agenda' Constitutional law UPDATE [74] The Lib Dems' regression

2008-08-28T10:55:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1758 GMT London Thursday 28 August 2008

KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Big Business Crossrail hole agenda' Constitutional law UPDATE 1640 GMT 28.08.2008

The 'presence' of the Lib Dems [='The Liberal Democratic Party' = abbreviated in ordinary conversations to 'Lib Dems'] in Tower Hamlets is itself a questionable concept. Do they exist as a 'political party'? If so, what do they stand for? If they do, what difference does it make, if any.

This is a question that KHOODEELAAR! will go into to a significant extent over the 'role' of the Lib Dems as a party that had an actual membership presence on the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council.

Part of the updated evidence in the constitutional law action [from which corrupt councillors shall be specifically excluded, even as observers!!! We shall go into this more in due course] against Crossrail hole agenda consists of the role played by the so-called official Opposition group on Tower Hamlets Council.

Our submission to court includes the claims that the Lib Dems group was wrongly ‘led’, mis-led and in effect was contributing to the maintenance of the fraudulent stance being exhibited by the corrupt clique that was at that time promoting the CRASSRail hole plot and agenda in the East End of London.

We are very aware of the pretentious posturing promotions of certain ‘Lib Dems’ currently on the Tower Hamlets Council and we intend to draw maximum attention to their own dubious roles in the relevant contexts and we shall do so to reinforce the argument that the so-called opposition benches of councillors in the name of the people of Tower Hamlets should be subject to regular and independent scrutiny by members of the community.

As is quite clear from our daily published scrutiny of the controlling clique, KHOODEELAAR! is already well recognised as the source and the forum for scrutinising the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets in a way that is unrivalled or matched by any other campaign or forum.

What there has not been so far is a regular and sustained scrutiny of the so-called opposition councillors [ 'not' 'soupspoon' ! indeed] .

The word Opposition in Tower Hamlets is almost without any meaning.

Especially after the display stated by three councillors including Lutfur Rahman courtesy of the people who control the decision-making at the LC ['London Muslim Centre'] and who played the decisive role in allowing Towe4r Hamlets councillors use the space at the ‘London Muslim Centre’.

More, later, on the abuse of the phrase 'Open Meeting’ which Lutfur Rahman took part in earlier this week.

BACK to the LIB DEMS in Tower Hamlets and the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail hole agenda :

Much of our comments about the Lib Dems' then 'leader' on the Council repeatedly making claims that they were 'active' about Crossrail by referring to her [Janet Ludlow's] frustrated attempts to get the controlling clique [Khoodeelaar! words, NOT Janet Ludlow's or anyone else's. Janet Ludlow never used the phrase and she would not even know how to ...] to set up a 'consultative forum'.

That was - and here is the first time that KHOODEELAAR! is actually saying so, - a plea by Janet Ludlow to be part of a stooge outfit!

The stooging of councillors is not the same thing as the enabling of a democratically active group of elected members.

Janet Ludlow did not understand that telling people that she was being ignored by the controlling clique did not amount to doing her job as leader of the Opposition on the Tower Hamlets Council.

Janet Ludlow was not comfortable being seen to be in any way identified with the KHOODEELAAR! campaign because it took real political understanding to back the campaign against Crossrail.

Janet Ludlow of course did deliver leaflets when she was 'leader'. At least some members of her group still recall this≥

Khoodeelaar! has no evidence to support or to dispute that particular assertion.

What Khoodeelaar! can say and will say is this: if Janet Ludlow did not want to be seen with KHOODEELAAR! then why was she prepared to come and be photographed at Khoodeelaar! events?

That behaviour occurred on more than one occasion.

the result was not significant for the campaign. Because every single alleged and real opponent to the Blaired band in control of the Tower Hamlets Council at the time, came along to the KHOODEELAAR! events of that particular time and was more than willing to be photographed with the Khoodeelaar!. campaign....

That included the Lib Dems' devious and dishonestly made CD ..... That CD had a series of fabrications in it.

One young person allegedly a supporter of the Janet Ludlow-'led' 'Opposition 'Lib Dem' councillors', is seen in that Lib Dem CD as using the word KHOODEELAAR! in a series of utterances that did not, contextually fit in with the rest of the contents.... And he was filmed at the corner of Hanbury Street and Sp[ital Street, the very spot that has for years been known as the spot for Khoodeelaar! street actins... For obvious reasons...

In fact the Lib Dem CD had NO statement against Crossrail. None that remotely came anywhere near what a Tower Hamlets Councillor said when she spoke at the KHOODEELAAR! demonstrator on 1 March 2006.
\
That councillor was Louise Alexander. She sued to be on the Council until the start of March this year when she gave up on personal grounds.

What she said on 1 March 2006 and what her motion said [in effect supporting almost all the KHOODEELAAR! demands on that occasion] remains the only contribution by any councillor on Tower Hamlets who has in fact done the most to say No to Crossrail within the framework of the existing Council at the time.

Why couldn't Janet Ludlow do what Louise Alexander could do and did do?

What had stopped Janet Ludlow from saying the things against the Crossrail hole that Louise Alexander was able to say and go on the records saying?

Has there been another 'leader' on the Tower Hamlets Council for the almost vanished Lib Dems group?

If there is a 'leader', what is the 'leader' 'leading' the councillors about and in what direction, IF ANY?

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Big Business Crossrail hole agenda' Constitutional law UPDATE [74] The Lib Dems' regression

2008-08-28T09:39:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1740 GMT London Thusrday 28 August 2008

KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Big Business Crossrail hole agenda' Constitutional law UPDATE 1640 GMT 28.08.2008

The 'presence' of the Lib Dems [='The Liberal Democratic Party' = abbreviated in ordinary conversations to 'Lib Dems'] in Tower Hamlets is itself a questionable concept. Do they exist as a 'political party'? If so, what do they stand for? If they do, what difference does it make, if any.

This is a question that KHOODEELAAR! will go into to a significant extent over the 'role' of the Lib Dems as a party that had an actual membership presence on the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council.

Part of the updated evidence in the constitutional law action [from which corrupt councillors shall be specifically excluded, even as observers!!! We shall go into this more in due course] against Crossrail hole agenda consists of the role played by the so-called official Opposition group on Tower Hamlets Council.

Our submission to court includes the claims that the Lib Dems group was wrongly ‘led’, mis-led and in effect was contributing to the maintenance of the fraudulent stance being exhibited by the corrupt clique that was at that time promoting the CRASSRail hole plot and agenda in the East End of London.

We are very aware of the pretentious posturing promotions of certain ‘Lib Dems’ currently on the Tower Hamlets Council and we intre3nd to draw maximum attention on their own dubious roles and we shall do so to reinforce the argument that the so-called opposition benches should be subject to regular sxsruintu8ny by members of the community.

As is quite clear from our daily published scrutiny of the controlling clique, KHOODEELAAR! is already well recognised as the source and the forum for scrutinising the controlling clique.

What there has not been so far is a regular and sustained scrutiny of the so-called soupspoon.

The word Opposition in Tower Hamlets is almost without any meaning.

Especially after the display stated by three councillors including Lutfur Rahman courtesy of the people who control the decision-making at the LC ['London Muslim Centre'] and who played the decisive role in allowing Towe4r Hamlets councillors use the space at the ‘London Muslim Centre’.

More, later, on the abuse of the phrase 'Open Meeting’ which Lutfur Rahman took part in earlier this week.

BACK to the LIB DEMS in Tower Hamlets and the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail hole agenda :

Much of our comments about the Lib Dems' then 'leader' on the Council repeatedly making claims that they were 'active' about Crossrail by referring to her [Janet Ludlow's] frustrated attempts to get the controlling clique [Khoodeelaar! words, NOT Janet Ludlow's or anyone else's. Janet Ludlow never used the phrase and she would not even know how to ...] to set up a 'consultative forum'.

That was - and here is the first time that KHOODEELAAR! is actually saying so, - a plea by Janet Ludlow to be part of a stooge outfit!

The stooging of councillors is not the same thing as the enabling of a democratically active group of elected members.

Janet Ludlow did not understand that telling people that she was being ignored by the controlling clique did not amount to doing her job as leader of the Opposition on the Tower Hamlets Council.

Janet Ludlow was not comfortable being seen to be in any way identified with the KHOODEELAAR! campaign because it took real political understanding to back the campaign against Crossrail.

Janet Ludlow of course did deliver leaflets when she was 'leader'. At least some members of her group still recall this≥

Khoodeelaar! has no evidence to support or to dispute that particular assertion.

What Khoodeelaar! can say and will say is this: if Janet Ludlow did not want to be seen with KHOODEELAAR! then why was she prepared to come and be photographed at Khoodeelaar! events?

That behaviour occurred on more than one occasion.

the result was not significant for the campaign. Because every single alleged and real opponent to the Blaired band in control of the Tower Hamlets Council at the time, came along to the KHOODEELAAR! events of that particular time and was more than willing to be photographed with the Khoodeelaar!. campaign....

That included the Lib Dems' devious and dishonestly made CD ..... That CD had a series of fabrications in it.

One young person allegedly a supporter of the Janet Ludlow-'led' 'Opposition 'Lib Dem' councillors', is seen in that Lib Dem CD as using the word KHOODEELAAR! in a series of utterances that did not, contextually fit in with the rest of the contents.... And he was filmed at the corner of Hanbury Street and Sp[ital Street, the very spot that has for years been known as the spot for Khoodeelaar! street actins... For obvious reasons...

In fact the Lib Dem CD had NO statement against Crossrail. None that remotely came anywhere near what a Tower Hamlets Councillor said when she spoke at the KHOODEELAAR! demonstrator on 1 March 2006.
\
That councillor was Louise Alexander. She sued to be on the Council until the start of March this year when she gave up on personal grounds.

What she said on 1 March 2006 and what her motion said [in effect supporting almost all the KHOODEELAAR! demands on that occasion] remains the only contribution by any councillor on Tower Hamlets who has in fact done the most to say No to Crossrail within the framework of the existing Council at the time.

Why couldn't Janet Ludlow do what Louise Alexander could do and did do?

What had stopped Janet Ludlow from saying the things against the Crossrail hole that Louise Alexander was able to say and go on the records saying?

Has there been another 'leader' on the Tower Hamlets Council for the almost vanished Lib Dems group?

If there is a 'leader', what is the 'leader' 'leading' the councillors about and in what direction, IF ANY?

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Big Business Crossrail hole agenda' Constitutional law action: NEWS Conference 1300 GMT Tuesday 2 Sept 2008

2008-08-28T08:42:00.000-07:00

This page was last edited at 1605 GMT London Thusrday 28 August 2008

_______________________________________________

KHOODEELAAR! is due to announce the next set of actions as part of the constitutional law programme against the Crossrail hole plot Big Busiess agenda.

The programme will be announced at 2 PM London time, 1300 GMT in London on Tuesday 2 September 2008 at a KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot campaign news conference.

The venue details will be communicated by 1100 GMT on Monday 1 September 2008 to all genuine and recognised news media outlets and publishers who have contacted KHOODEELAAR! by 1800 GMT on Friday 29 August 2008

To contact KHOODEELAAR! about the next News Conference, please send your media credentials and relevant details to:

lawmedia@hotmail.com

______________________________________

KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law action evidence update [74] against Crossrail hole plot-inviter Tower Hamlets Council clique

2008-08-27T06:14:00.000-07:00

1305 GMT 1405 uktime London Wednesday 27 august 2008:

Khoodeelaar! constitutional law action against ‘CrossRail hole big business agenda against inner city east end of London’ campaign evidence update…… from 2040 hrs gmt Tuesday 21 February 2006 printed issue number 1002 [b].

That Khoodeelaar! Legal and constitutional law publication contained the then summarised list o grounds for the Khoodeelaar! Campaign’s action against the ‘local’ tower hamlets council.

In the time that has passed since 21 February 2006, a number of additional items of confirmation have been found.

Those reinforce the Khoodeelaar! Campaign analysis that the CrossRail hole plot-inviting controlling clique on tower hamlets council could have openly and unequivocally passed the motion saying no to the CrossRail hole agenda.

How?

In the time that has passed since 21 February 2006, various utterances have been made by the controlling clique [and statements made in the name of the controlling clique suggesting that it, the controlling clique, has been ‘in talks’ with ‘CrossRail’ [very brief contextual note by Khoodeelaar! law unit at 1240 gmt London Wednesday 27 august 2008] ‘CrossRail unit’ and the ‘transport for London and its ‘ CrossRail unit’ and the CLRL company which is nothing without the DfT and the tfl coming into being to give it any accountable, democratic, transparent, relevant administrative reality] ‘seeking to reassure’ the community that it, the Council, ‘is doing something to stop the Crossrail holes being dug here’.

Those utterances have been tested against the evidence of the behaviour of the same clique on the same Tower Hamlets Council an din the context of the Crossrail hole agenda.

The conclusion is compelling. That the COUNCIL clique has lied to the community.

How?

By repeatedly making statements to the effect that it had been in ‘Talks’ with ‘CRASSRail’ while providing no evidence that any ‘talks’ have been going on in line with the community’s demand that the Crossrail hoe/s must not be dug here in the E1 area, the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council has only confounded the already heavy pile of CRASSRail hole plot-backing lies. It has also aggravated its liabilities…Had the controlling clique been telling the truth it would also have published evidence showing what it has said that accords with the community’s demand. This is summarised updated number [74] of the KHOODEELAAR! Constitutional law action against Crossrail hole peddlers, agents, touts and propagandists… [To be continued]

Crossrail hole plot-promoting, clueless Harriet Harman is not doing Brown any favours by her banal, scripted utterances...

2008-07-27T08:07:00.000-07:00

By©Muhammad Haque
1605 Hrs GMT
London Sunday 27 July 2008

It was Harriet Harman, none other than the Heartless one herself, who boasted less than a fortnight ago that the 'House', the Commons that is, would not 'rise' [that is, would not sit down=would not go on the two month long holiday!] until the speaker had confirmed that 'Royal Assent' had been given to the 'Crossrail Bill'!

And why was Harriet wrong to make that statement?
Answer: Because she was behaving there like an insensitive, irresponsive, uncaring, unheeding, unaccountable, irresponsible member of a legislature.... and that she was taking part in the breaking of the constitution........ because she knew that the Crossrail Bill was being allowed through without complying with the due procedures and the processes of constitutionality that the Crossrail Bill was a pack of lies... that it was a product of and linked closely with undemocratic, unaccountable and identified by name forces of greed that in fact plotted to pocket £billions of public money under the cover of Crossrail.....that her pretentious pronouncements in paraded protestations all day throughout the day today Sunday 27 July 2008 are untrue. Untruthful. And unfounded on fact. She voted for the Crossrail Bill all the way. She never even paused to ask if the people in the East End of London or indeed in the centre of the Mayfair area in west London had had our objections heard by Parliament. Harriet Harman is a known failure as a minister. She lost the job as Blair’s first cabinet minister in control of the Social Security Department [=DSS] [=now = DWP] . She did not get to grips with the subject. She in fact allowed the starving of hundreds of thousands of people..... She knew that she was responsible for the people being forced into starvation for no reason.... Was that economic? What economics does Harriet Harman understand? What evidence has she ever shown of the legality, the ECONOMIC justification for casting hundreds of thousands of people into poverty in Britain? That was in 1997-1998... Ten years on , she has the gall to utter today, ten years on from her terrible role at the DSS in 1997-1998 about ‘an economic problem’! Does she mean ONE economic problem? Or does she mean a problem that is economic? With harriet harman, there is no telling whether she is speaking with knowledge or whether she is appearing with a scripted utterance just to put a gloss on a devastating state of affairs...... Is that state anything to do with lack of respect fro people? With Harriet, definitely not. Harriet Harman’s achievement is that as a token, she has achieved herself a corner in the book of records. But she has done so at the expense of the rights of hundreds of thousands of families. She has sacrificed the human rights and violated the dignity of millions of individuals. at And shed has neglected the needs of similar numbers of children... Today, Sunday 27 July 2008, Harriet Harman has been speaking about her awareness of peoples’ struggle;e in making ends meet! She is in fact being sued by Gordon Brown as his voice today...How dare Harriet Harman talk about peoples’ hardship and refer to peoples’ struggles with making ends meet? She is the problem. She is the symbolic problem and she is also the constitutional problem... shall expose Harriet Harman’s hollowness in detail in this series of comments... One key problem that has forced so many people into the struggling position is the lack of honour in the actions and the utterances of the Govt to which Harriet belongs and off which Harriet takes the obvious 'satisfaction'....Personally, she is doing well in her career But she is doing so by sinking so many peoples’ hopes and rights..... She is the one that has been now plugging for the Big Business agenda Govt...She is the one that said that the House will ‘not rise’ until the Crossrail hoe plot was given the status of law on the last day of the current session....She showed contempt when she toured Tower Hamlets DURING THE RUN up to the 1 May 2008 ‘by-elections’ and the GLA , ‘mayor, ‘in the name of London’ elections, making photo appearances in the East Lon don Borough with suitably stooged ‘Blaired machine zombie faces and assorted tokens’ programmed to promote the agenda that she has been backing... That agenda is one of backing Big Business and of riding roughshod over communities like the people affected by the Crossrail hole plot in the area.... She has shown nothing but contempt for the people who have stated so many serious objections and have pointed out so many errors, mistakes and wrongs in the Crossrail package.... She has chosen, instead, to be pals with Oona King, who had insulted people in the community and from the East End of London in 2004-2005 when they tried to talk some sense into Oona King [still ‘MP’ in the name of the people in the parliamentary constituency of Bethnal Green and Bow] and who tried to get her [‘Oona King’ ] to speak against Crossrail hole plot... Oona King did not speak against the Crossrail hole plot. Politically, democratically and electorally she was given due and clear and unmistakable warning that her refusals to show respect to the people of the East End and her refusal and failure to represent the community’s opposition to the Crossrail hole scam, Crossrail hole plot would not be forgotten. People remembered Oona King’s behaviour when the time came in may 2005... By her failures to tell the truth against Crossrail, by her refusal to tell the truth about the campaign in the community against the Crossrail, hole Big Business agenda, Oona King showed that she was not suited to being an MP. Not especially to being an MP that showed respect to the constituency. Especially not in a constituency like the Bethnal Green and Bow .... To this day, Oona King has not stated any opposition to Crossrail hole agenda She has made money by referring to the campaign. That alleged confirmation by Tony McNulty, Crossrail hole plot minister at the time, that Oona king had been STUPID by letting him walk into a meeting where anti-Crossrail hole plot people were present, is still full of questions... It RAISES questions. Much more than it answers.... Why? Because Oona King herself AGREED with the things that McNulty was up to at that time in his de facto role as the plugger of the Big Business scam that was later to become known as the “Crossrail Bill’.... So if Oona King had herself DISAGREED with McNulty on Crossrail and if she had disagreed with Crossrail scam itself then she would have stated that opposition somewhere after referring to McNulty calling her STUPID...........Without acknowledging the campaign against Crossrail hole plot in any honest ethical dignified or democratic way, Oona King has maintained her own alienation from the truth. And from the reality of the community........