This AADHIKARonline page was last edited at 0538 GMT
Wednesday 16 July 2008
Tower Hamlets Council corrupts and a ‘Royal-visitor'-stamped’ Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique corrupts even more...
Whereas the failure of the corrupting Council in its dis-education programme should be subjected to audit and demands made for it to account for its failures, the parades of parasitic time-servers, either in the controlling clique or feeding off it on the peripheries, are grotesquely engaged in self-promotion, pocket-filling and petty opportunistic stunts...
They are the ones that keep the impoverishment and deprivation of and in the community going...
How the Big Business Crossrail hole agenda is being applied to keep the community in the East End 'failing' is revealed this week in yet another foolish and irresponsible stunt staged around the promotion of Charles around a heavily-secretive 'meet the children' stunt......
[To be continued]
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot-inviter Tower Hamlets Council clique and the bankrupt 'local' 'newspaper'
By©Muhammad Haque
0420 Hrs GMT
London Wednesday 16 July 2008
This [reproduced immediately below this updater] analysis of the role of the 'local' 'East London Idiotiser' was written and published in February 2006, over 2 years before the IDIOTISER assumed the role of being a 'player' in 'Tower Hamlets politics'. The KHOODEELAAR! analysis accurately foresaw the IDIOTISER's corrupting role, as is clear in the contextual analysis of February 2006. We shall be publishing more updater items from the KHOODEELAAR! archive, in the next few days and show that the very corruption and lying that 'informs' [!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!] the corrupt clique on the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council also infects - no, PERVADES the East London IDIOTISER. And as we have pointed out again EARLIER THIS WEEK, DESPITE THE 'apparent protestations' by the 'current' 'editor' Malcolm Starbrook, the East London IDIOTISER is just as bankrupt as the local Tower Hamlets Council's Crossrail hole plot-inviting controlling clique is and has been...... BOTH are engaged in misrepresenting the community and letting down the East End of London.....
0420 Hrs GMT
London Wednesday 16 July 2008
Crossrail 'bias' of 'East London Advertiser' causing undermining local people
By©Muhamad Haque
20 February 2006
The political struggle to defend the community across the East End borough of Tower Hamlets, starting with the Brick Lane London E1 area and taking in and stretching through Stepney, Mile End Park and Bow, is hotting up in a way that has not been seen in the East End for a very long time. In fact the role of the local Tower Hamlets council is increasingly coming under serious scrutiny from local campaigners headed by the khoodeelaar movement. The resulting pressure that the Borough has been undergoing has not been known since Tower Hamlets was created in the 1960s replacing and amalgamating the former smaller boroughs of Stepney, Bethnal Green, Poplar, plus. Yet the ‘local weekly’ the ‘East London Advertiser’ is not willing to reflect the political battler. It is only ever interested in serving as a secondary propaganda rag for the CrossRail-backing ruling clique on Tower Hamlets Council. This is depriving the local community the access to the facts that the local paper must provide if it is to escape being consigned to the dustbin by the sheer power of community action against CrossRail in the East End.
The Khoodeelaar campaign against the Crossrail hole plan scheme Bill and the ‘position’ of the ‘RESPECT’ coalition and George Galloway, MP as reported [or NOT] by the East London Advertiser
What is the ‘position’?
This question should not even be asked, because George Galloway MP has made his position abundantly clear.
In case there had been any doubt or confusion about where George Galloway the RESPECT Coalition’s leader and their only Member of Parliament stood on Crossrail, the statement he made at the public meeting on Saturday 11 February 2006 left no room for any doubt or confusion. Khoodeelaar web site has already reported the substance of Galloway’s statement on 11 February 2006.
But the ‘local rag’ the East London Advertiser, which does its business as the main Borough-wide ‘commercial’ ‘newspaper’ in Tower Hamlets, has been depriving its readers of the facts of the main movement that is vigourously active against the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End.
An item in the ‘EAST LONDON ADVERTISER’ [138 Cambridge heath road, London E1 6QJ] [dated thursday 16 February 2006], headlined, “I’m coming to get you’ [“Galloway’s warning as he launches respect election campaign”] by-lined to ted jeory, includes this: “but when quizzed by the advertiser at Monday’s press conference, Rees outlined a position on Crossrail’s proposal to bore under Hanbury street that was strikingly similar to Labour’s”
The reference to “Rees” is to john Rees the UK ‘national secretary’ of the Respect coalition, represented in the UK House of Commons by George Galloway mp.
The ‘east London advertiser’ item does not refer to the comprehensive position of the respect coalition on the crossrail project that had been set out by George Galloway at a special public meeting against the crossrail hole’ bill held on Saturday 11 February 2006. at the Brady centre in Hanbury street which is at the centre of the khoodeelaar! Campaign against the crossrail hole plan-project-scheme bill in the brick lane London e1 area
In that statement George Galloway was unequivocal in his opposition to Crossrail and he pledged that if the respect coalition won control of TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL following the scheduled 4 May 2006 council election then the Respect coalition would scrap the agreement made by the current TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL. Galloway stated empathic support for the KHOODEELAAR CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL HOLE project scheme Bill. In addition to that Galloway said that the Respect coalition would do everything to delay and to defeat Crossrail. He made extensive references in his speech to the keynote speech that had been delivered at the meeting by Muhammad Haque, the Khoodeelaar organiser. Galloway endorsed the khoodeelaar position and reiterated his previous commitment to oppose Crossrail on every aspect of the planned attack on the East End.
Galloway said that they [he and RESPECT] would take judicial review actions and other measures to delay Crossrail, towards defeating the Crossrail attacks on the East End.
Given that the same meeting was addressed by john Rees himself and given that George Galloway gave the closing speech containing very detailed policy commitments about what he [George Galloway] and the RESPECT coalition would be doing about the Crossrail attacks when he spoke against Crossrail on Saturday 11 February 2006, it is significant that the ‘EAST LONDON ADVERTISER’ item makes no reference to any of these facts.
The , “I’m coming to get you’ headline is given to the item which apparently is based on the Respect coalition’s news conference held on Monday 13 February 2006 at which event the group announced the majority of their selected candidates for the 4 May 2006 local council election.
It is very strange that the ‘east london advertiser’ item does not make any reference to the George Galloway / respect position against crossrail as set out by Galloway on Saturday 11 February 2006.
Instead there is the reference to [John] Rees outlining ‘a position on Crossrail’s proposal to bore under Hanbury Street that was strikingly similar to Labour’s”.
What were the details of that reported position of the Respect coalition as attributed to John Rees by the ‘EAST LONDON ADVERTISER’?
The ‘EAST LONDON ADVERTISER’ ‘report’ [“I’m coming to get you’] does not give any answers or clues.
Instead, the title explains that the local election battle for control of the Tower Hamlets Council between the different parties and groups “would be fought over Labour’s housing choice programme, the proposed revamp of the royal london hospital and, crucially, issues surrounding crossrail.”
which makes the absence of any details about what the respect coalition’s ‘national secretary’ had allegedly stated to the reporter ted jeory that justified the assertion that the respect position on Crossrail’s proposal was ‘strikingly similar to labour’s” even more curious and odd.
Furthermore, the TED JEORY piece does not contain any reference to any facts that would justify his inclusion of the words ‘strikingly similar to Labour’s’.
Reasonable standards of journalism would require that any reference to competing groups should be accompanied by a reasonable amount of information or evidence to support any opinion.
The TED JEORY statement reads like an opinion rather than fact. And that opinion is the real clue as to what the agenda of the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER must be.
They [the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER] are operating in their ‘reporting’ of the campaign against the Crossrail attacks on the EAST END borough on assumptions that are linked with their commercial dealings with the controlling clique on TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL. They are deliberately suppressing the key facts and are misleading those who read their publication about what is actually going on about crossrail in the London borough of Tower Hamlets.
In the same issue as they carry the Ted Jeory statement, the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER also publish [PAGES 18-19] an unprecedented feature page that gives the impression that it contains the key facts. It does not. In fact, it is yet another excuse for the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER to run a plastic-faced picture of Crossrail-plugging ‘Tower Hamlets Council leader’’ Michael Keith.
In the accompanying item the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER repeats a pack of untruths about alleged Tower Hamlets Council ‘actions’ on Crossrail that once again is devoid of the crucial facts.
The EAST LONDON ADVERTISER prints a double falsehood in describing ‘Arup’ as merely ‘engineering giant’ who had been ‘commissioned by’ Tower Hamlets Council. ARUP are very deeply involved in the multinational looting of the public purse scams that actually underlies the mad propaganda for Crossrail.
That they also operate as an allegedly independent expert is not separate from their overall role in the Big Business agenda.
Only last week they were again linked with reports concerning the latest parasitic activities of Crossrail chair Adrian Montague who is fronting the Big Business agencies current bid to effectively grab the multi£Billion Channel Tunnel railway company.
But the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER paints Arup as an almost pure, academic outfit doing the honest slog for the cause of truth and local environment.
That ARUP was at all commissioned by by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council is also linked with the deeply dubious and unrepresentative role played by Michael Keith in bringing the Crossrail problems to the East. Keith is now ‘leader’ of Tower Hamlets Council. And the position of ‘leader’ is linked with the internecine, racist power-game that he has been indulging in. He has been doing so
The item makes references to
The controlling clique does not represent the views of the labour party membership in the borough. The vast majority of the labour party in tower hamlets have not been asked their views on any issue or any alleged manifesto
0420 Hrs GMT
London Wednesday 16 July 2008
This [reproduced immediately below this updater] analysis of the role of the 'local' 'East London Idiotiser' was written and published in February 2006, over 2 years before the IDIOTISER assumed the role of being a 'player' in 'Tower Hamlets politics'. The KHOODEELAAR! analysis accurately foresaw the IDIOTISER's corrupting role, as is clear in the contextual analysis of February 2006. We shall be publishing more updater items from the KHOODEELAAR! archive, in the next few days and show that the very corruption and lying that 'informs' [!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!] the corrupt clique on the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council also infects - no, PERVADES the East London IDIOTISER. And as we have pointed out again EARLIER THIS WEEK, DESPITE THE 'apparent protestations' by the 'current' 'editor' Malcolm Starbrook, the East London IDIOTISER is just as bankrupt as the local Tower Hamlets Council's Crossrail hole plot-inviting controlling clique is and has been...... BOTH are engaged in misrepresenting the community and letting down the East End of London.....
0420 Hrs GMT
London Wednesday 16 July 2008
Crossrail 'bias' of 'East London Advertiser' causing undermining local people
By©Muhamad Haque
20 February 2006
The political struggle to defend the community across the East End borough of Tower Hamlets, starting with the Brick Lane London E1 area and taking in and stretching through Stepney, Mile End Park and Bow, is hotting up in a way that has not been seen in the East End for a very long time. In fact the role of the local Tower Hamlets council is increasingly coming under serious scrutiny from local campaigners headed by the khoodeelaar movement. The resulting pressure that the Borough has been undergoing has not been known since Tower Hamlets was created in the 1960s replacing and amalgamating the former smaller boroughs of Stepney, Bethnal Green, Poplar, plus. Yet the ‘local weekly’ the ‘East London Advertiser’ is not willing to reflect the political battler. It is only ever interested in serving as a secondary propaganda rag for the CrossRail-backing ruling clique on Tower Hamlets Council. This is depriving the local community the access to the facts that the local paper must provide if it is to escape being consigned to the dustbin by the sheer power of community action against CrossRail in the East End.
The Khoodeelaar campaign against the Crossrail hole plan scheme Bill and the ‘position’ of the ‘RESPECT’ coalition and George Galloway, MP as reported [or NOT] by the East London Advertiser
What is the ‘position’?
This question should not even be asked, because George Galloway MP has made his position abundantly clear.
In case there had been any doubt or confusion about where George Galloway the RESPECT Coalition’s leader and their only Member of Parliament stood on Crossrail, the statement he made at the public meeting on Saturday 11 February 2006 left no room for any doubt or confusion. Khoodeelaar web site has already reported the substance of Galloway’s statement on 11 February 2006.
But the ‘local rag’ the East London Advertiser, which does its business as the main Borough-wide ‘commercial’ ‘newspaper’ in Tower Hamlets, has been depriving its readers of the facts of the main movement that is vigourously active against the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End.
An item in the ‘EAST LONDON ADVERTISER’ [138 Cambridge heath road, London E1 6QJ] [dated thursday 16 February 2006], headlined, “I’m coming to get you’ [“Galloway’s warning as he launches respect election campaign”] by-lined to ted jeory, includes this: “but when quizzed by the advertiser at Monday’s press conference, Rees outlined a position on Crossrail’s proposal to bore under Hanbury street that was strikingly similar to Labour’s”
The reference to “Rees” is to john Rees the UK ‘national secretary’ of the Respect coalition, represented in the UK House of Commons by George Galloway mp.
The ‘east London advertiser’ item does not refer to the comprehensive position of the respect coalition on the crossrail project that had been set out by George Galloway at a special public meeting against the crossrail hole’ bill held on Saturday 11 February 2006. at the Brady centre in Hanbury street which is at the centre of the khoodeelaar! Campaign against the crossrail hole plan-project-scheme bill in the brick lane London e1 area
In that statement George Galloway was unequivocal in his opposition to Crossrail and he pledged that if the respect coalition won control of TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL following the scheduled 4 May 2006 council election then the Respect coalition would scrap the agreement made by the current TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL. Galloway stated empathic support for the KHOODEELAAR CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL HOLE project scheme Bill. In addition to that Galloway said that the Respect coalition would do everything to delay and to defeat Crossrail. He made extensive references in his speech to the keynote speech that had been delivered at the meeting by Muhammad Haque, the Khoodeelaar organiser. Galloway endorsed the khoodeelaar position and reiterated his previous commitment to oppose Crossrail on every aspect of the planned attack on the East End.
Galloway said that they [he and RESPECT] would take judicial review actions and other measures to delay Crossrail, towards defeating the Crossrail attacks on the East End.
Given that the same meeting was addressed by john Rees himself and given that George Galloway gave the closing speech containing very detailed policy commitments about what he [George Galloway] and the RESPECT coalition would be doing about the Crossrail attacks when he spoke against Crossrail on Saturday 11 February 2006, it is significant that the ‘EAST LONDON ADVERTISER’ item makes no reference to any of these facts.
The , “I’m coming to get you’ headline is given to the item which apparently is based on the Respect coalition’s news conference held on Monday 13 February 2006 at which event the group announced the majority of their selected candidates for the 4 May 2006 local council election.
It is very strange that the ‘east london advertiser’ item does not make any reference to the George Galloway / respect position against crossrail as set out by Galloway on Saturday 11 February 2006.
Instead there is the reference to [John] Rees outlining ‘a position on Crossrail’s proposal to bore under Hanbury Street that was strikingly similar to Labour’s”.
What were the details of that reported position of the Respect coalition as attributed to John Rees by the ‘EAST LONDON ADVERTISER’?
The ‘EAST LONDON ADVERTISER’ ‘report’ [“I’m coming to get you’] does not give any answers or clues.
Instead, the title explains that the local election battle for control of the Tower Hamlets Council between the different parties and groups “would be fought over Labour’s housing choice programme, the proposed revamp of the royal london hospital and, crucially, issues surrounding crossrail.”
which makes the absence of any details about what the respect coalition’s ‘national secretary’ had allegedly stated to the reporter ted jeory that justified the assertion that the respect position on Crossrail’s proposal was ‘strikingly similar to labour’s” even more curious and odd.
Furthermore, the TED JEORY piece does not contain any reference to any facts that would justify his inclusion of the words ‘strikingly similar to Labour’s’.
Reasonable standards of journalism would require that any reference to competing groups should be accompanied by a reasonable amount of information or evidence to support any opinion.
The TED JEORY statement reads like an opinion rather than fact. And that opinion is the real clue as to what the agenda of the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER must be.
They [the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER] are operating in their ‘reporting’ of the campaign against the Crossrail attacks on the EAST END borough on assumptions that are linked with their commercial dealings with the controlling clique on TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL. They are deliberately suppressing the key facts and are misleading those who read their publication about what is actually going on about crossrail in the London borough of Tower Hamlets.
In the same issue as they carry the Ted Jeory statement, the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER also publish [PAGES 18-19] an unprecedented feature page that gives the impression that it contains the key facts. It does not. In fact, it is yet another excuse for the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER to run a plastic-faced picture of Crossrail-plugging ‘Tower Hamlets Council leader’’ Michael Keith.
In the accompanying item the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER repeats a pack of untruths about alleged Tower Hamlets Council ‘actions’ on Crossrail that once again is devoid of the crucial facts.
The EAST LONDON ADVERTISER prints a double falsehood in describing ‘Arup’ as merely ‘engineering giant’ who had been ‘commissioned by’ Tower Hamlets Council. ARUP are very deeply involved in the multinational looting of the public purse scams that actually underlies the mad propaganda for Crossrail.
That they also operate as an allegedly independent expert is not separate from their overall role in the Big Business agenda.
Only last week they were again linked with reports concerning the latest parasitic activities of Crossrail chair Adrian Montague who is fronting the Big Business agencies current bid to effectively grab the multi£Billion Channel Tunnel railway company.
But the EAST LONDON ADVERTISER paints Arup as an almost pure, academic outfit doing the honest slog for the cause of truth and local environment.
That ARUP was at all commissioned by by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council is also linked with the deeply dubious and unrepresentative role played by Michael Keith in bringing the Crossrail problems to the East. Keith is now ‘leader’ of Tower Hamlets Council. And the position of ‘leader’ is linked with the internecine, racist power-game that he has been indulging in. He has been doing so
The item makes references to
The controlling clique does not represent the views of the labour party membership in the borough. The vast majority of the labour party in tower hamlets have not been asked their views on any issue or any alleged manifesto
Another twisted face of the CRASSrail lying Crossrail hole plot-inviter Tower Hamlets Council clique - as seen via CRASSrail Wharf
Another twisted face of the CRASSrail lying Crossrail hole plot-inviter Tower Hamlets Council clique - as seen via CRASSrail Wharf
More here shortly after the following KHOODEELAAR! response:
KHOODEELAAR! first comment at 1920 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 15 july 2008 on the CRASSrail plug as peddled by the Crassly untruthful web site doing the plug for the Big Business.... NOTe what they actually say in describing what 'Crossrail ' is.... Remember that description when you next come across Denise Jones and challenge her to explain why she had been lying for CRASSrail when she was making claims, as she did in her last formal utterance as the so-called leader of the local Council, that CRASSrail was going to bring benefits to the community...By what stretch of the imagination is the capitalist, Big Business and held Canary Wharf part of the ordinary people and community of Tower Hamlets.... the Tower Hamlets Borough that Denise Jones has been reported only today 15 July 2008 as having admitted to be the MOST DEPRIVED BOROUGH IN THE COUNTRY ?.[To be continued]
More here shortly after the following KHOODEELAAR! response:
KHOODEELAAR! first comment at 1920 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 15 july 2008 on the CRASSrail plug as peddled by the Crassly untruthful web site doing the plug for the Big Business.... NOTe what they actually say in describing what 'Crossrail ' is.... Remember that description when you next come across Denise Jones and challenge her to explain why she had been lying for CRASSrail when she was making claims, as she did in her last formal utterance as the so-called leader of the local Council, that CRASSrail was going to bring benefits to the community...By what stretch of the imagination is the capitalist, Big Business and held Canary Wharf part of the ordinary people and community of Tower Hamlets.... the Tower Hamlets Borough that Denise Jones has been reported only today 15 July 2008 as having admitted to be the MOST DEPRIVED BOROUGH IN THE COUNTRY ?.[To be continued]
Crossrail hole plot-backer Tower Hamlets Council 'leader' [ex!!!] Denise Jones EXPOSED as an utter contradictor, poverty-creator!
By©Muhammad Haque
0945 GMT
London
Tuesday 15 July 2008
Gordon Brown has placed, via Hazel Blears et al, significant value on the Blairing local Councils that are associated his regime. In fact Tower Hamlets Council is often used by Brown as a platform.
But does he realise how devastatingly negligent that Council’s clique of 'leadership' is? And who will count the cost of its letdowns and negligence? Will Brown even be around in office to put a stop to the habit of putting cliques of corruption in positions of State-funded and state-endorsed of power over inner city populations like the ordinary community in the Borough of Tower Hamlets
The Times newspaper web site has published this morning an item about the wasteful and diversionary Tower Hamlets Council. The piece contains an alleged admission by Denise Jones, saying that Tower Hamlets is “the most deprived borough in the country “.
This is truly shocking! For years, Jones has been involved in the ‘leadership’ of the borough Council .
One persistent theme seen in the decisions that ‘leadership’ has been making is this- to make the ordinary people in the borough POORER!
And to bring in speculators and assorted degenerators into the Borough.
The one such degeneration scam which has been boasted of by Denise Jones recently is Crossrail. It will ADD to poverty, social exclusion and devastate, dislocate and destroy people's’ health, lives and livelihood and support structures. The same Council has also been dismantling the public sector housing stock and handing it over to outfits that are in effect private agencies with no legal or social accountability s as part of the framework.
The Borough's;s public;ci libraries have been similarly disbanded all criteria, yardsticks and barometers, Tower Hamlets Council has been the single most persistent agency that has been involved in making the borough's ordinary people POORER! And Denise Jones now makes that statement with no sign of having even the most basic awareness in her of the multiplicity of unforgivable contradiction, negligence and irresponsibility that attach to the Council leadership she has been part of for so long ...
[To be continued]
0945 GMT
London
Tuesday 15 July 2008
Gordon Brown has placed, via Hazel Blears et al, significant value on the Blairing local Councils that are associated his regime. In fact Tower Hamlets Council is often used by Brown as a platform.
But does he realise how devastatingly negligent that Council’s clique of 'leadership' is? And who will count the cost of its letdowns and negligence? Will Brown even be around in office to put a stop to the habit of putting cliques of corruption in positions of State-funded and state-endorsed of power over inner city populations like the ordinary community in the Borough of Tower Hamlets
The Times newspaper web site has published this morning an item about the wasteful and diversionary Tower Hamlets Council. The piece contains an alleged admission by Denise Jones, saying that Tower Hamlets is “the most deprived borough in the country “.
This is truly shocking! For years, Jones has been involved in the ‘leadership’ of the borough Council .
One persistent theme seen in the decisions that ‘leadership’ has been making is this- to make the ordinary people in the borough POORER!
And to bring in speculators and assorted degenerators into the Borough.
The one such degeneration scam which has been boasted of by Denise Jones recently is Crossrail. It will ADD to poverty, social exclusion and devastate, dislocate and destroy people's’ health, lives and livelihood and support structures. The same Council has also been dismantling the public sector housing stock and handing it over to outfits that are in effect private agencies with no legal or social accountability s as part of the framework.
The Borough's;s public;ci libraries have been similarly disbanded all criteria, yardsticks and barometers, Tower Hamlets Council has been the single most persistent agency that has been involved in making the borough's ordinary people POORER! And Denise Jones now makes that statement with no sign of having even the most basic awareness in her of the multiplicity of unforgivable contradiction, negligence and irresponsibility that attach to the Council leadership she has been part of for so long ...
[To be continued]
BREAKING SHOCKING CONFESSION BY CROSSRAIL HOLE PLOT-BOASTER DENISE JONES!
BREAKING SHOCKING CONFESSION BY CROSSRAIL HOLE PLOT-BOASTER DENISE JONES!
Denise Jones has allegedly stated as follows:-
“This is the most deprived borough in the country and we wanted
to bring together - through art - the white working class from the
Isle of Dogs and the Bengali boys from the Boundary Estate.
Whatever you think of us, we had that vision.”
Allegedly, because in her paid role as a still ‘sitting’ councillor on the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council, Denise Jones has not been known to even know that there is a thing called poverty!
Let alone deprivation!
And yet here she is, being named as the maker of a statement that actually says that there is poverty but that there is also deprivation.
No.
She says that Tower Hamlets is the MOST DEPRIVED BOROUGH in the country!
She never said that in the Council Chamber!
Or has she?
Surely both in her ‘end of term’ [as the officially listed leader of the Council] spiel that she delivered in the Council Chamber recently , she BOASTED in words that were shocking for the lies they were conveying for Denise Jones , She was boasting of success and the opposite of deprived borough.......
What we need to be told is this: how much has Denise Jones contributed of her alleged vision to causing so much deprivation that she can now utter such words as the Tower Hamlets Borough is the MOST DEPRIVED BOROUGH IN THE COUNTRY?
is this why she said in her spiel in the Council chamber that she was proud that she with her unnamed colluders had ‘SECURED CROSSRAIL’?
The agenda of the Crossrail hole plot that is designed to make the East End borough even MORE DEPRIVED?
[To be continued]
Denise Jones has allegedly stated as follows:-
“This is the most deprived borough in the country and we wanted
to bring together - through art - the white working class from the
Isle of Dogs and the Bengali boys from the Boundary Estate.
Whatever you think of us, we had that vision.”
Allegedly, because in her paid role as a still ‘sitting’ councillor on the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council, Denise Jones has not been known to even know that there is a thing called poverty!
Let alone deprivation!
And yet here she is, being named as the maker of a statement that actually says that there is poverty but that there is also deprivation.
No.
She says that Tower Hamlets is the MOST DEPRIVED BOROUGH in the country!
She never said that in the Council Chamber!
Or has she?
Surely both in her ‘end of term’ [as the officially listed leader of the Council] spiel that she delivered in the Council Chamber recently , she BOASTED in words that were shocking for the lies they were conveying for Denise Jones , She was boasting of success and the opposite of deprived borough.......
What we need to be told is this: how much has Denise Jones contributed of her alleged vision to causing so much deprivation that she can now utter such words as the Tower Hamlets Borough is the MOST DEPRIVED BOROUGH IN THE COUNTRY?
is this why she said in her spiel in the Council chamber that she was proud that she with her unnamed colluders had ‘SECURED CROSSRAIL’?
The agenda of the Crossrail hole plot that is designed to make the East End borough even MORE DEPRIVED?
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! electoral details LATEST ! MP seats in BOTH constituencies will be contested to stop Crossrail hole....
WHAT the KHOODEELAAR! leaflet is saying TODAY Tuesday 15 July 2008:
"
KHOODEELAAR! campaign with the community in the East End of London are going to CHANGE the local Tower Hamlets Council and STOP the ‘re-election’ or election [if new candidates] to the Council of those who support the Crossrail hole attacks agenda against the community in the East End of London....
We are going to do all we lawfully can do to make sure that no-one gets elected to the Council from the affected E1 area who supports the Crossrail hole Big Business agenda. How are we going to do that? One of the ways we are going to do that is by putting forward candidates directly for election to the council on the KHOODEELAAR! manifesto!The other way is by making John Biggs account for his role on the London Assembly. The other way is to make such an intervention in the election in the two Parliamentary seats that no candidate can get elected without a total Opposition to the Crossrail hole agenda of attacks on the East End of London.
We are looking for suitably dedicated, honest and truthful candidates to stand for Parliamentary election from Bethnal Green and Bow and from the Poplar and Limehouse constituencies. And we are preparing for a long haul constitutional law challenges THROUGH the COURTS [the High Court, the House of Lords and the European Courts: note the plural, many courts],challenges against the bureaucracies in BOTH Houses of Parliament..... To seek election as a KHOODEELAAR! candidate or to join the KHOODEELAAR! Electoral Campaign, send your details in an e-mail by 28 July 2008 to
auditpolitics@yahoo.co.uk
"
KHOODEELAAR! campaign with the community in the East End of London are going to CHANGE the local Tower Hamlets Council and STOP the ‘re-election’ or election [if new candidates] to the Council of those who support the Crossrail hole attacks agenda against the community in the East End of London....
We are going to do all we lawfully can do to make sure that no-one gets elected to the Council from the affected E1 area who supports the Crossrail hole Big Business agenda. How are we going to do that? One of the ways we are going to do that is by putting forward candidates directly for election to the council on the KHOODEELAAR! manifesto!The other way is by making John Biggs account for his role on the London Assembly. The other way is to make such an intervention in the election in the two Parliamentary seats that no candidate can get elected without a total Opposition to the Crossrail hole agenda of attacks on the East End of London.
We are looking for suitably dedicated, honest and truthful candidates to stand for Parliamentary election from Bethnal Green and Bow and from the Poplar and Limehouse constituencies. And we are preparing for a long haul constitutional law challenges THROUGH the COURTS [the High Court, the House of Lords and the European Courts: note the plural, many courts],challenges against the bureaucracies in BOTH Houses of Parliament..... To seek election as a KHOODEELAAR! candidate or to join the KHOODEELAAR! Electoral Campaign, send your details in an e-mail by 28 July 2008 to
auditpolitics@yahoo.co.uk
KHOODEELAAR! electoral details LATEST ! MP seats in BOTH constituencies will be contested to stop Crossrail hole....
WHAT the KHOODEELAAR! leaflet is saying TODAY Tuesday 15 July 2008:
"
KHOODEELAAR! campaign with the community in the East End of London are going to CHANGE the local Tower Hamlets Council and STOP the ‘re-election’ or election [if new candidates] to the Council of those who support the Crossrail hole attacks agenda against the community in the East End of London....
We are going to do all we lawfully can do to make sure that no-one gets elected to the Council from the affected E1 area who supports the Crossrail hole Big Business agenda. How are we going to do that? One of the ways we are going to do that is by putting forward candidates directly for election to the council on the KHOODEELAAR! manifesto!The other way is by making John Biggs account for his role on the London Assembly. The other way is to make such an intervention in the election in the two Parliamentary seats that no candidate can get elected without a total Opposition to the Crossrail hole agenda of attacks on the East End of London.
We are looking for suitably dedicated, honest and truthful candidates to stand for Parliamentary election from Bethnal Green and Bow and from the Poplar and Limehouse constituencies. And we are preparing for a long haul constitutional law challenges THROUGH the COURTS [the High Court, the House of Lords and the European Courts: note the plural, many courts],challenges against the bureaucracies in BOTH Houses of Parliament..... To seek election as a KHOODEELAAR! candidate or to join the KHOODEELAAR! Electoral Campaign, send your details in an e-mail by 28 July 2008 to
auditpolitics@yahoo.co.uk
"
KHOODEELAAR! campaign with the community in the East End of London are going to CHANGE the local Tower Hamlets Council and STOP the ‘re-election’ or election [if new candidates] to the Council of those who support the Crossrail hole attacks agenda against the community in the East End of London....
We are going to do all we lawfully can do to make sure that no-one gets elected to the Council from the affected E1 area who supports the Crossrail hole Big Business agenda. How are we going to do that? One of the ways we are going to do that is by putting forward candidates directly for election to the council on the KHOODEELAAR! manifesto!The other way is by making John Biggs account for his role on the London Assembly. The other way is to make such an intervention in the election in the two Parliamentary seats that no candidate can get elected without a total Opposition to the Crossrail hole agenda of attacks on the East End of London.
We are looking for suitably dedicated, honest and truthful candidates to stand for Parliamentary election from Bethnal Green and Bow and from the Poplar and Limehouse constituencies. And we are preparing for a long haul constitutional law challenges THROUGH the COURTS [the High Court, the House of Lords and the European Courts: note the plural, many courts],challenges against the bureaucracies in BOTH Houses of Parliament..... To seek election as a KHOODEELAAR! candidate or to join the KHOODEELAAR! Electoral Campaign, send your details in an e-mail by 28 July 2008 to
auditpolitics@yahoo.co.uk
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)