Long before the Crossrail Bill Select Committee [House of Commons] formally 'heard' some of the evidence against the CrossRail hole Bill threat to the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area, Khoodeelaar! the campaign against CrossRail had decided on a set of actions that included a specific constitutional dimension. After witnessing the blatant obstruction against key presenters of anti-CrossRail evidence in the Committee during June 2006, Khoodeelaar! Has now decided to test the UK law in a way that will perhaps bring the Human Rights Act 1998 into very unexpected focus.
1. The main constitutional law allegation that I could find against the Secretary of State was that he lied in and to Parliament, he misled parliament and he wrongly failed to tell the House of Commons fully and duly of the requirement that UK law had to comply with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental freedoms.
2. That was based on the preliminary and literal reading of the contents of the Crossrail Bill, as introduced to the House of Commons by [the then] Transport Secretary Alistair Darling on 22 February 2005.
3. Having observed since that date the many activities of the Transport Secretary and the rest of the groupings that make up the ‘promoter’ of the Crossrail Bill, it is clear that compatibility with constitutional requirements is not at the top of the priorities of the UK executive seeking to get the Crossrail Bill through Parliament.
4. It has been clear from the behaviour of the two successive holders of the office of Secretary of State at the UK Department for Transport over the past 24 months that compliance with the Treaty obligations on ECHR is nothing more than a nuisance to them and to the Blair regime. They have shown remarkably consistent evidence of hostility to the rule of law and due process and constitutionality for the promotion of the CrossRail project
5. It was only through the sustained campaign on the ground over the past 31 months backed up with original Khoodeelaar!! Legal analyses of the UK executive's behaviour that we have been able to show that the Secretary of State was wrong to have introduced the Crossrail Bill in the shape it was introduced and that he was wrong to have flouted the UK’s constitutional law making treaty obligations that he did.
Especially, as I have pointed out on dozens of occasions already including in pieces carried on indymedia UK and international sites, about the abuses of the executive powers to make several hundred million £ available to the promoters without any justification.
That abuse of public money has included the abuses of the local tiers of peoples and community representation.
Where Ruth Kelly herself lives, the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council has been one abysmally antidemocratic, anti-community, cabal of corruption, misrepresentation of the local people that is found anywhere in the whole of the UK.
And has Ruth Kelly’s aid a word in opposition to the corrupt Tower Hamlets Council?
Has she spoken a word in support of the community that is threatened by Crossrail?
To those who have sought to make light of our legal action programme, we can only say, WATCH this space.
© Muhammad Haque
Friday, June 13, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law campaign against Big Business agenda 'Crossrail Bill' updating on the utter bankruptcy of the UK 'mainstream' media...
KHOODEELAAR! the inner city, East London No to "Crossrail hole scam" CAMPAIGN, TOLD YOU SO! That the ‘meeja’ the mainstream newspapers and their web sites, are liars.
And as the BBC and ITV ..... On the matter of Crossrail, Channel 4 News told a bit of the truth when it reported in October 2007 that Gordon Brown had made the £Billions of funding commitment AGAINST the advice of Rod Eddington, Brown's very own expert on railways.......
That they either lie or they are late....That the likes of ‘The Journal’, published from Newcastle in the North East of England, are stuffed full of garbage in the place of facts and evidence. That they do not tell the truth about the morons that sit in the UK House of Commons. that they never hold the MPs to account for THEIR lies... That the lack of sense and the lack of evidential journalism is stark and brazenly present in ALL the ‘mainstream,’ publications. That that is why lying MPs get away with lying and letting their communities down.
Routinely.
ALL of the ‘MPs’ quoted and or implied by the Journal in Newcastle today BACKED the crassly conceived Big Business looters’ scam CROSSRAIL. NOt one of them spoke out in the House of Commons against that scam.... So the fact that they are even making a squeaky reference ‘against’ Crossrail is very much suspect....
THEY ARE acting from ulterior motives....That the so-called disclosure [see below] by ‘The Journal’ in Newcastle today is no disclosure whatever. That KHOODEELAAR! has initiated the analysis and that KHOODEELAAR! has maintained this analysis fro years. And yet the lying ‘mainstream’ ‘journals’ and the “Journal’ have continued to pretend that they have not seen the analysis and that they have not heard of the analysis... Now the lying ‘mainstream’ is coming out with itsy bitsy acknowledgement and giving the ‘MPs’ the grotesquely un deserved positive image as ‘concerned MPs’... They are NOT concerned for the communities... The ONLY CONCERN these time-servers have is about and for THEIR pathetic careers as MPs... And their ‘anxiety’ that they may get voted out and they may lose the dosh.. and the perks and the pay..... .......
[To be continued]
And as the BBC and ITV ..... On the matter of Crossrail, Channel 4 News told a bit of the truth when it reported in October 2007 that Gordon Brown had made the £Billions of funding commitment AGAINST the advice of Rod Eddington, Brown's very own expert on railways.......
That they either lie or they are late....That the likes of ‘The Journal’, published from Newcastle in the North East of England, are stuffed full of garbage in the place of facts and evidence. That they do not tell the truth about the morons that sit in the UK House of Commons. that they never hold the MPs to account for THEIR lies... That the lack of sense and the lack of evidential journalism is stark and brazenly present in ALL the ‘mainstream,’ publications. That that is why lying MPs get away with lying and letting their communities down.
Routinely.
ALL of the ‘MPs’ quoted and or implied by the Journal in Newcastle today BACKED the crassly conceived Big Business looters’ scam CROSSRAIL. NOt one of them spoke out in the House of Commons against that scam.... So the fact that they are even making a squeaky reference ‘against’ Crossrail is very much suspect....
THEY ARE acting from ulterior motives....That the so-called disclosure [see below] by ‘The Journal’ in Newcastle today is no disclosure whatever. That KHOODEELAAR! has initiated the analysis and that KHOODEELAAR! has maintained this analysis fro years. And yet the lying ‘mainstream’ ‘journals’ and the “Journal’ have continued to pretend that they have not seen the analysis and that they have not heard of the analysis... Now the lying ‘mainstream’ is coming out with itsy bitsy acknowledgement and giving the ‘MPs’ the grotesquely un deserved positive image as ‘concerned MPs’... They are NOT concerned for the communities... The ONLY CONCERN these time-servers have is about and for THEIR pathetic careers as MPs... And their ‘anxiety’ that they may get voted out and they may lose the dosh.. and the perks and the pay..... .......
[To be continued]
Thursday, June 12, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law campaign against Big Business agenda 'Crossrail Bill' pointing out the significance of David Davis statement - [5]
By©Muhammad Haque
0355 Hrs GMT
London Friday
13 June 2008
ISN’T IT STRANGE and monumentally significant - THAT all the servants of the ‘powers that be’, the servants who are deployed as ‘commentators’ on the ‘mainstream British politics’ and who are given regular spots on the slots to opine about and ‘explain’ ‘the meaning/s of the events’, are unanimously at work to undermine the importance of what David Davis said in his statement announcing his resignation about the 42 day detention without charge and the loss in Britain of other values as symbolised by the Magna Carta!!!
From the allegedly former Tory MP and a full time media dog Michael Brown to the arrays of the BBC fronters, they have been at one in denouncing david Davis.
Even Gavin Esler, not known as an informed let alone objective chronicler of events, was fast in deriding David davis as ‘the maverick’ in his introduction to the 'story' as contained in the Thursday night edition of the BBC 2 NEWSNIGHT programme! How did the media dogs get that script so fast ?
Who provided them with that script? And if they were not mouthing off their barking words and phrases to undermine the significance of David Davis’s statement about civil liberties and fundamental values,, doesn't ;t the utter uniformity of their ignorant and untruthful words prove that they are zombies, robots, mechanised? That they are not independent human beings?
Database society is one of the phrases that David Davis used in his statement.
The dogs of the media by barking against davis in uniformity are proving that the media is already in the hands of the machines!!!!
Programmed by the devil!
Now, who could be that devil and how many incarnations are there floating around the “British 'Parliament'’ posing as human beings with human independence and thought and even concern for freedom liberty, justice, fairness, rule of law, human rights and fundamental democratic values.....?
[To be continued]
0355 Hrs GMT
London Friday
13 June 2008
ISN’T IT STRANGE and monumentally significant - THAT all the servants of the ‘powers that be’, the servants who are deployed as ‘commentators’ on the ‘mainstream British politics’ and who are given regular spots on the slots to opine about and ‘explain’ ‘the meaning/s of the events’, are unanimously at work to undermine the importance of what David Davis said in his statement announcing his resignation about the 42 day detention without charge and the loss in Britain of other values as symbolised by the Magna Carta!!!
From the allegedly former Tory MP and a full time media dog Michael Brown to the arrays of the BBC fronters, they have been at one in denouncing david Davis.
Even Gavin Esler, not known as an informed let alone objective chronicler of events, was fast in deriding David davis as ‘the maverick’ in his introduction to the 'story' as contained in the Thursday night edition of the BBC 2 NEWSNIGHT programme! How did the media dogs get that script so fast ?
Who provided them with that script? And if they were not mouthing off their barking words and phrases to undermine the significance of David Davis’s statement about civil liberties and fundamental values,, doesn't ;t the utter uniformity of their ignorant and untruthful words prove that they are zombies, robots, mechanised? That they are not independent human beings?
Database society is one of the phrases that David Davis used in his statement.
The dogs of the media by barking against davis in uniformity are proving that the media is already in the hands of the machines!!!!
Programmed by the devil!
Now, who could be that devil and how many incarnations are there floating around the “British 'Parliament'’ posing as human beings with human independence and thought and even concern for freedom liberty, justice, fairness, rule of law, human rights and fundamental democratic values.....?
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law action against Crossrail Bill agenda: Muhammad Haque commentary on David Davis resignation statement [4]
KHOODEELAAR! No to the unconstitutionality via the UK Houses of Parliament: comment about the conduct of the Murdoched Times, at 0305 Hrs GMT London Friday 13 June 2008 :::
Rupert Murdoch, long called 'The Digger' and the 'Dirty Digger' by Richard Ingrams and associates during the 1980s, never does anything to disprove the evidence underlying that denunciation... Like the rest of pack, the Empire-loyalist, racist front pages being carried on the subject by the ‘British newsappers’ in an untruthful way. On that evidence they are blinded by their racism and they are openly suppressing the truth which is that the 42 day detention without charge .. is an assault not on just some 'foreign' people but on the very foundation of what makes Britain ' a democratic’ country with clear definition of the rule of law.. and the limits of state power and civil rights...'
Given half the chance, Murdoch would defy all that the Magna Carta stands for... As he is doing today by getting the London Times newspaper to carry on the front page so grotesquely untruthful slant on the David Davis resignation that it would require another alternative newspaper to list the components, elements of the Murdoched Times lies... The truth is that David Davis has NOT caused the Tories to be in turmoil, unless of course the Tories are secretly colluding with the 42 day detention scam... The 'Tories' here refers to David Ca-Moron's 'leadership'...
What is the point of any 'leadership' if its leading [!!!!!] to the surrender of some fo the values which are universally laudable, vital and worthy ?
[To be continued]
Rupert Murdoch, long called 'The Digger' and the 'Dirty Digger' by Richard Ingrams and associates during the 1980s, never does anything to disprove the evidence underlying that denunciation... Like the rest of pack, the Empire-loyalist, racist front pages being carried on the subject by the ‘British newsappers’ in an untruthful way. On that evidence they are blinded by their racism and they are openly suppressing the truth which is that the 42 day detention without charge .. is an assault not on just some 'foreign' people but on the very foundation of what makes Britain ' a democratic’ country with clear definition of the rule of law.. and the limits of state power and civil rights...'
Given half the chance, Murdoch would defy all that the Magna Carta stands for... As he is doing today by getting the London Times newspaper to carry on the front page so grotesquely untruthful slant on the David Davis resignation that it would require another alternative newspaper to list the components, elements of the Murdoched Times lies... The truth is that David Davis has NOT caused the Tories to be in turmoil, unless of course the Tories are secretly colluding with the 42 day detention scam... The 'Tories' here refers to David Ca-Moron's 'leadership'...
What is the point of any 'leadership' if its leading [!!!!!] to the surrender of some fo the values which are universally laudable, vital and worthy ?
[To be continued]
Both the BBC and the so-called alternative Channel 4 News are biased against civil liberties..
How DO THE BBC, Channel 4 News, work out that David Davis isn’t serious about civil liberties?
The answer is: Because BOTH the BBC and Channel 4 News belong with the same gang that Gordon Brown fronts...
How is that so?
The evidence is all there. In the words, in the comments that the BBC and Channel 4 news are running....
[To be continued]
The answer is: Because BOTH the BBC and Channel 4 News belong with the same gang that Gordon Brown fronts...
How is that so?
The evidence is all there. In the words, in the comments that the BBC and Channel 4 news are running....
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law Action against Crossrail - more on David Davis 'resignation'-2
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law Action against Crossrail - more on David Davis 'resignation'-2
[To be continued]
[To be continued]
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Tony Benn does NOT represent opposition to the emptiness that exists in Britain where there should be masses of people opposing violation of rights...
Tony Benn does NOT represent opposition to the emptiness that exists in Britain where there should be masses of people opposing violation of rights....
By©Muhammad Haque
0515 Hrs GMT
London
Thursday 12 June 2008
The 42 day detention ‘vote’, rigged by Brown as even the DAILY MAIL and the Tories are saying, was not an accident.
The so-called Labour rebel Mps, numbering between 35 and 40 and actually turning out to be 37, gave the game away!
Was that all there were in the former Labour Party who understood and had the courage to vote No?
Does that not say the real story about why Brown got away this time. And I anticipate, Brown may even get away the next time?
The truth is that there is no political democracy in the institutions in Britain. And there is none in society at large either. Not in a way that can count.
Not yet.
And here is my take today on why this is so.
It is, to start the examination, a great deal to do with Tony Benn.
He is paraded as the symbol of Opposition to authoritarianism,
yet he is NOT that at all.
Tony Benn popped up outside the Place of Westminster and stood very near ‘the Green’ , not far from the ‘active’ brigades of ‘faces’ that were lined up to be given their 15 seconds of ‘appearance’ after and about the 42 day detention charade that Gordon Brown staged in the House of commons on wednesday 11 June 2008.
But Benn was not there to make any statements on behalf of any [party’, not as such. But more as an elder statesman. No, as THE elder statesman
What he said when quizzed for BBC TV News channel by presenter Joanne Gosling was mostly accurate. But he was still wrong.
Why was Tony Benn wrong ?
Because like his so-called opponents and detractors, Benn is an 'issue' politician... Has been. He is most 'effective' [that is getting himself on the TV] by popping up on issues. That is why Benn has remained the 'only figure' to 'symbolise' the 'battles'. The 'media' [that distortion of the word ‘media’ was largely based on him, in the late 1970s and early 1980s] .
Tony Benn is like John Pilger. Pilger is a niche documentary maker and sometime world commentator. Pilger has created a trade that says that he knows better than what he continues racistly to treat as the Third World does about the state of empire, imperialism and poverty. And so is Benn. When it comes to lack of democracy and accountability in and via the UK parliament, Benn pops up offering his expertise.
But Benn has not got the expertise that society demands and deserves.
Benn is perpetuating the myth that he and his fan club will provide the answer.
He is a niche politician who has not really encouraged the idea of other voices to be recognised.
He has been a patron and patronising promoter of his fan club. And that is one of his main failings.
That failing goes to the very core and strikes at the heart of absent political resistance to authoritarianism and lack of democracy in Britain...
And this failing could not be more stark than in the fact on Wednesday 11 June 2008 when the UK House of Commons had a chamber that was hardly brimming with anxious MPs seeking to speak out against the 42 detention......
Benn DOES NOT refer to others as being more worthy of recognition [that is on the topical contemporary media platforms and similar] than himself.
Or at least along side himself. Or as much as himself
In fact , BENN refers to no one else.
Not aNYONE alive. Not anyone active anyway ay.
Those that he does refer to, if at all, [which he does very rarely] are either dead or in de facto retirement.
It follows therefore that Benn does NOT encourage others.
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
0515 Hrs GMT
London
Thursday 12 June 2008
The 42 day detention ‘vote’, rigged by Brown as even the DAILY MAIL and the Tories are saying, was not an accident.
The so-called Labour rebel Mps, numbering between 35 and 40 and actually turning out to be 37, gave the game away!
Was that all there were in the former Labour Party who understood and had the courage to vote No?
Does that not say the real story about why Brown got away this time. And I anticipate, Brown may even get away the next time?
The truth is that there is no political democracy in the institutions in Britain. And there is none in society at large either. Not in a way that can count.
Not yet.
And here is my take today on why this is so.
It is, to start the examination, a great deal to do with Tony Benn.
He is paraded as the symbol of Opposition to authoritarianism,
yet he is NOT that at all.
Tony Benn popped up outside the Place of Westminster and stood very near ‘the Green’ , not far from the ‘active’ brigades of ‘faces’ that were lined up to be given their 15 seconds of ‘appearance’ after and about the 42 day detention charade that Gordon Brown staged in the House of commons on wednesday 11 June 2008.
But Benn was not there to make any statements on behalf of any [party’, not as such. But more as an elder statesman. No, as THE elder statesman
What he said when quizzed for BBC TV News channel by presenter Joanne Gosling was mostly accurate. But he was still wrong.
Why was Tony Benn wrong ?
Because like his so-called opponents and detractors, Benn is an 'issue' politician... Has been. He is most 'effective' [that is getting himself on the TV] by popping up on issues. That is why Benn has remained the 'only figure' to 'symbolise' the 'battles'. The 'media' [that distortion of the word ‘media’ was largely based on him, in the late 1970s and early 1980s] .
Tony Benn is like John Pilger. Pilger is a niche documentary maker and sometime world commentator. Pilger has created a trade that says that he knows better than what he continues racistly to treat as the Third World does about the state of empire, imperialism and poverty. And so is Benn. When it comes to lack of democracy and accountability in and via the UK parliament, Benn pops up offering his expertise.
But Benn has not got the expertise that society demands and deserves.
Benn is perpetuating the myth that he and his fan club will provide the answer.
He is a niche politician who has not really encouraged the idea of other voices to be recognised.
He has been a patron and patronising promoter of his fan club. And that is one of his main failings.
That failing goes to the very core and strikes at the heart of absent political resistance to authoritarianism and lack of democracy in Britain...
And this failing could not be more stark than in the fact on Wednesday 11 June 2008 when the UK House of Commons had a chamber that was hardly brimming with anxious MPs seeking to speak out against the 42 detention......
Benn DOES NOT refer to others as being more worthy of recognition [that is on the topical contemporary media platforms and similar] than himself.
Or at least along side himself. Or as much as himself
In fact , BENN refers to no one else.
Not aNYONE alive. Not anyone active anyway ay.
Those that he does refer to, if at all, [which he does very rarely] are either dead or in de facto retirement.
It follows therefore that Benn does NOT encourage others.
[To be continued]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)