KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law action : publication of evidence against the House of Peers Crossrail Bill Select Committee falsifying evidence.
What does this mean?
Answer: it means that the comments made by the chair of the Crossrail Bill Select committee in the UK house of Lords in march 2008 about in particular Khoodeelaar! formal objections to Crossrail, were false. untrue. misleading and Not justified.
How are we saying this?
Answer: because the co,moments were so beyond the pale that to leave them unchallenged would amount to our being clueless. Out of touch. uninformed about our own community.
The comments that were made by the Chair of the Crossrail Bill Select committee in the House of Lords will be continued to be examine here.…
We here publish exhibit 2008/6
The references to the ‘Crossrail Bill’ are to be treated as being made in relation to events before 28 july 2008 when that same Bill was rubber stamped into the ‘Crossrail Act’.
"
At the time that the formal objections
['petitions'] against the 'Crossrail Bill' were being
prepared to be submitted, it became necessary to
comply with the paper requirements of the committee.
Especially the one about 'certificate of
respectability' [!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]'. In that
connection, you referred to a member of the
Spitalfields Society and said that this individual was
a practising 'solicitor' and would give - or [as
you later said] would be approached to give - a
certificate of respectability. In the event the person
refused to give a certificate of respectability. Did
the same person also claim to be opposed to the
Crossrail Bill? If so, in what regard did their
'opposition' relate to the KHOODEELAAR campaign's
opposition IN PRINCIPLE? Or was their opposition to
Crossrail LESS severe than their Opposition TO
Khoodeelaar! And if the person had been OPPOSED to the
same Crossrail Bill that the Khoodeelaar! campaign had
been opposed to then had the person been abroad for
the past 50 months? And is that why they had not
'known' of the Khoodeelaar! campaign or had
heard of them? And is that why they had not known the
Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser? Or was there another
reason, in any way linked with the fact that they, the
individual concerned a and the Spitalfields Society,
did not wish to come across to the 'authorities' as
being in any way in agreement with let alone
supportive of the Khoodeelaar! campaign?
"
Sunday, December 14, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! again advising David Cameron to sort out the Tory Party's ‘alternative’ to Brown's CRASS Keynesian indulgence
By © Muhammad Haque 1500 Hrs GMT London Sunday 14 December 2008
KHOODEELAAR! again advising David Cameron to sort out the Tory Party's ‘alternative’ to Brown's CRASS Keynesian indulgences..
That spiel by cameron staged last week at the opportunistically marketing London School of Economics, was not good enough... Cameron has not reconciled most of the Conservative contradictions.. Unless that happens, no one in their rational, sensible, informed minds can give real credit to Cameron...
Cameron has not addressed the crassest case of crass Keynesianism, that is Boris Johnson's’ persistent and very ignorant peddling of Crossrail...
Where does Cameron stand on Crossrail? Is he as stupidly for Crossrail as Grayling was... As Boris Johnson has been? If Cameron is for Crossrail then he can say goodbye to being taken seriously as the offerer of an alternative economic policy.…
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! again advising David Cameron to sort out the Tory Party's ‘alternative’ to Brown's CRASS Keynesian indulgences..
That spiel by cameron staged last week at the opportunistically marketing London School of Economics, was not good enough... Cameron has not reconciled most of the Conservative contradictions.. Unless that happens, no one in their rational, sensible, informed minds can give real credit to Cameron...
Cameron has not addressed the crassest case of crass Keynesianism, that is Boris Johnson's’ persistent and very ignorant peddling of Crossrail...
Where does Cameron stand on Crossrail? Is he as stupidly for Crossrail as Grayling was... As Boris Johnson has been? If Cameron is for Crossrail then he can say goodbye to being taken seriously as the offerer of an alternative economic policy.…
[To be continued]
Monday, December 8, 2008
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence that London Crossrail is NOT relevant and yet Alistair Darling is bent on wasting £Billions of public money on it..
2040 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 26 November 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence that London Crossrail is NOT relevant and yet Alistair Darling is bent on wasting £Billions of public money in funding Big Business Crossrail scam...[231]
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! No evidence even from the EU that the Crossrail scam was in any way relevant... yet Darling is bent on going ahead and in wasting £Billions in funding the Big Business London Crossrail scam...
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence that London Crossrail is NOT relevant and yet Alistair Darling is bent on wasting £Billions of public money in funding Big Business Crossrail scam...[231]
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! No evidence even from the EU that the Crossrail scam was in any way relevant... yet Darling is bent on going ahead and in wasting £Billions in funding the Big Business London Crossrail scam...
[To be continued]
Sunday, November 23, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! tells Brown [and Darling] to scrap Crossrail and similar deals with Big Business and avoid EXTRA £Billions of debt [314]
KHOODEELAAR! tells Brown [and Darling] to scrap Crossrail and similar deals with Big Business and avoid EXTRA £Billions of debt [314]
KHOODEELAAR! No to Lib Dem [!!!!] Crossrail hole scam-tout Tom Brake ‘MP’. Evidence update [312 b]
This AADHIKARonline page was last edited at 2150 Hrs GMT London Sunday 23 November 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to Lib Dem [!!!!] Crossrail hole scam-tout Tom BRAKE ‘MP’. Why is BRAKE a tout? Because he plugs Crossrail as a tout would do. With no real reason. With no evidence. With no sense.. And as in any tout’s ‘argument’, there will be more holes of idiocy than there would be substance. As has been evident in BRAKE’s latest exhibition as contained in a parallel statement that BRAKE has made during a token ‘debate‘ held about RAIL LINKS in the UK, under the auspices the UK House of Commons and published in the last few days...
One of BRAKE’s allegedly ‘intelligent’ points against air travel and ‘for’ train travel was made at comparative length. In which bit BRAKE appeared to be arguing against HEATHROW. Or at least against the alleged disadvantages of HEATHROW.…
Which BRAKE has every right to indulge in.
Except when he TOUTS for Crossrail. As he did during his typically stooging period as the Lib Dems’ ‘transport’ spokesperson in the House of Commons while the CRASS rail Bill was still in formal STOOGING process...
The point we make about BRAKE and Heathrow is simply this: if HEATHROW is that unattractive [!!!!] then how is it that we the UK public must pay £Billions to build ‘a Crossrail’ in order to access the same CONDEMNED Heathrow?
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! No to Lib Dem [!!!!] Crossrail hole scam-tout Tom BRAKE ‘MP’. Why is BRAKE a tout? Because he plugs Crossrail as a tout would do. With no real reason. With no evidence. With no sense.. And as in any tout’s ‘argument’, there will be more holes of idiocy than there would be substance. As has been evident in BRAKE’s latest exhibition as contained in a parallel statement that BRAKE has made during a token ‘debate‘ held about RAIL LINKS in the UK, under the auspices the UK House of Commons and published in the last few days...
One of BRAKE’s allegedly ‘intelligent’ points against air travel and ‘for’ train travel was made at comparative length. In which bit BRAKE appeared to be arguing against HEATHROW. Or at least against the alleged disadvantages of HEATHROW.…
Which BRAKE has every right to indulge in.
Except when he TOUTS for Crossrail. As he did during his typically stooging period as the Lib Dems’ ‘transport’ spokesperson in the House of Commons while the CRASS rail Bill was still in formal STOOGING process...
The point we make about BRAKE and Heathrow is simply this: if HEATHROW is that unattractive [!!!!] then how is it that we the UK public must pay £Billions to build ‘a Crossrail’ in order to access the same CONDEMNED Heathrow?
[To be continued]
Saturday, November 22, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence of the really presumptuous conduct and indulgences by Big Business Crossrail scam-backer Boris Johnson [306]
This AADHIKARonline page was last edited at
1240 GMT London Saturday 22 November 2008
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That Boris Johnson, the Crossrail, Big Business SCAM-tout Ken Livingstone's 'replacement' at S*****Y Hall London SE1, was coming apart as being not only NOT occupying a morally higher ground than Livingstone but that Johnson was in fact coming apart as a CRASSER version of Livingstone....As Johnson’s latest venture [significantly broadcast to the world via Channel 4 news of all places; we shall return to Channel 4 as a frame of reference] into the arena of mendacious megalomania indulged in by Johnson’s displays.... How else could Phil Woolas come across as being an almost substantial and sane politico when compared with Johnson!?! It is not that Johnson has discovered the need to humanise the treatment of 'illegal' immigrants... It is not that he has also discovered the need to make the existing immigration and naturalisation policies genuinely fair and ethical..... It is just that Johnson's 'economic utterances' are totally stupid... Just as can be expected from the peddler of Big Business, a tout and propagandist for the very bankers that are behind one of the tottering capitalism's most inexcusable crises...... [To be continued]
1240 GMT London Saturday 22 November 2008
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That Boris Johnson, the Crossrail, Big Business SCAM-tout Ken Livingstone's 'replacement' at S*****Y Hall London SE1, was coming apart as being not only NOT occupying a morally higher ground than Livingstone but that Johnson was in fact coming apart as a CRASSER version of Livingstone....As Johnson’s latest venture [significantly broadcast to the world via Channel 4 news of all places; we shall return to Channel 4 as a frame of reference] into the arena of mendacious megalomania indulged in by Johnson’s displays.... How else could Phil Woolas come across as being an almost substantial and sane politico when compared with Johnson!?! It is not that Johnson has discovered the need to humanise the treatment of 'illegal' immigrants... It is not that he has also discovered the need to make the existing immigration and naturalisation policies genuinely fair and ethical..... It is just that Johnson's 'economic utterances' are totally stupid... Just as can be expected from the peddler of Big Business, a tout and propagandist for the very bankers that are behind one of the tottering capitalism's most inexcusable crises...... [To be continued]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)