Khoodeelaar! is preaparing for the long overdue court challenge against the 'Crossrail Bill' promotion by the stooged 'Select Committees' in UK

By©Muhammad Haque
0715 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday 21 June 2008


ANALYSING the contents of the licencepayers’-paid-for BBC NEWSNIGHT that did the lying for the UK Govt and overlooked the Gordon Brown regime’s flouting the of UK’s ‘constitutional convention’ that the independence of the judiciary must be respected......

This is being done in the context of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against the unconstitutionality of the Gordon Brown regime in sabotaging any attempt at scrutiny of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ which has just been given de facto stamp of approval by the stooged ‘House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee’.

Khoodeelaar! is now able to confirm that as the role of the two ‘select committees’ has been in effect sabotaged by the Govt and scrutiny of the contents, the purpose and the implications of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ PREVENTED in effect, that the process of ‘law making’ or ‘legislation’ in the Uk has been on this occasion contrary to the UK’;s constitutional obligations, duties shall be filing the first of a series of court challenges against this in due c course....

I am going to look in detail at the BBC’s role in breaching this convention often and on a daily basis.

I shall also focus on the tetchy and persistent way that david Dimbleby interrupted David Davis oN Thursday [QUESTION Time, BBC1 Thursday 19 June 2008] and gave the laboured impression that he, Dimbleby, was determined to call Davis’s bluff! That it was the BBC that had the bluff escaped Dimbleby who was carrying out the agenda that had been set for him by those who wanted the abolition of the Magna Carta to become acceptable... I shall discuss in further detail the role of the Dimbleby brothers in undermining the universally held aspects of ‘civilisation’.... And I shall look at how the ‘radical’ Jonathan Dimbleby was ‘jokingly’ inciting callers to make racist calls and incite to racist disaffection via the BBC.........

I start with the Stuart Wheeler challenge and Gordon Brown’s defiance of the status of the court’s independence...

Evidence under this review: NEWSNIGHT, fronted by Kirsty Wark Friday 20 june 2008

If Kirsty Wark on the BBC NEWSNIGHT were a trader on a genuinely informative and demanding news channel then she would have been asked to submit herself for a review interview. Her performance as shown on NEWSNIGHT on Friday [20 June 2008] about the UK's constitutional position regarding the Lisbon treaty, is a clear example of how lazy Kirsty is...

It is not plausible [on the known evidence] to say that Kirsty is dim. Because she has shown that she is rather good at making money. And at making friends with powerful political position holders... And that she is quite good at escaping accountability. Holyrood overspend. To recall one widely known incident that links her with all sorts of shoddy and shady elements in Scotland [or rather ‘Edinburgh political gangs’] -linked ‘politics...’

For instance.

So Kirsty Wark is a 'successful' businesswoman in her own bank balances.

The source of course of her profit is the poor licence payer.

Fleeced as always by the BBC, the licencepayer has no choice.

And No say on the agenda of NEWSNIGHT. Or on the contents of Kirsty Wark’s brains in context. Or on those of Wark’s colleagues and counterparts.

And hardly any friends in high places. Unlike Kirsty Wark.

And how does Kirsty Wark manage to make and keep those friends in high places?

By asking stupid questions and making idiotic presumptive comments at the expense of anyone who dares to assert that the UK Govt as currently fronted by Gordon Brown has the basic duty to behave in accordance with the rules of the ‘unwritten British constitution’.

This was illustrated in Kirsty Wark’s very ignorant, very stupid and very unacceptable and inaccurate ‘questions’ as put to Stuart Wheeler.

Wheeler is the man who is spending this weekend [today Saturday 21 and tomorrow Sunday 22 June 2008] waiting for the court in London to give its judgement on his [Wheeler's] CURRENT application on the UK Government's duty - constitutional duty- over Lisbon after the Irish have said NO to the EU treaty concerned...


[To be continued]