Muhammad Haque ethical commentary on the Brown fronted Blaired state in the ‘United Kingdom’ of degeneration, immorality and greed...by the haves as agsinst the havenots....
The Muhammad Haque ethical commentary on the Brown fronted Blaired state in the ‘United Kingdom’ of degeneration, immorality and greed...by the haves as agsinst the havenots....
0840 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday 17 May 2008
If the confronts and the thrust of the really timeserving Raymond Shoddy fronting the BBC's self-justificatory and immoral 'newswatch' slot is any guide, the BBC is as shoddy as Raymond and should be scrapped...
This is another call for a thorough review of publicly paid for broadcasting outfit that serves in all intents and purposes as the state controlled broadcasting and media = meaning PROPAGANDA for the state and the status quo equivalent that would be found in what even the BBC immorally derides a totalitarian state.
For the second time in three days, the BBC mounted ‘Lauren Booth’ ‘as linked to Tony Blair’ as a ‘worthy’ commentator on the affairs of state! On Thursday, they had her do a morally ambivalent promotion job for the side business that Cherie ‘Booth’ ‘Blair’ had embarked on via Rupert Murdoch’s SUN and the Times.
It seems that the BBC is getting shoddier by ‘the event’.
The ‘event’ here is intended to imply and convey what Harold Macmillan meant by ‘events’ when he had reportedly said, ‘Events, dear boy, events’ [that made the difference....].
Whenever an ‘event’ is in the news of the day or of the week, the BBC agenda setters hastily add another example of their breach of the universal code of evidence and factual accuracy.
They rush in with a token that links - so they assume - the BBC to the ‘hear of’ the particular events!
So we suffered the spectacle of a barely articulate and barely significant ‘panellist’ Rachel Johnson, ‘sister’ of Boris Johnson, being flaunted on the David Dimbleby fronted Question Time on Thursday following the announcement of the result of the London elections for a ‘mayor in the name of the people of London’ and this last Thursday, self-respecting ‘viewers’ of the BBC TV slot had to pout up with the latest display of Lauren Booth, inappropriately described as ‘Writer and Broadcaster’, giving her own commercial in support of Cherie Booth ‘Blair’ as the ‘author’ and as the Liverpool working class girl who made it [to No 10 Downing Street] !
Lauren Booth should have been described as the ‘half-sister’ to Cherie Booth WHO HAD launched herself almost within days of the May 1997 UK generally election when Cherie Blair was able to arrive at No 10 Downing Street.
Lauren Booth might have existed as a ‘writer’ or as a ‘broadcaster’ Moore 2 May 1997 but she had not been noticed until the BBC and other broadcast and 'mainstream' media', later including [and in particular] the Mail on sunday decided to go into a subcontract with her ina miniature joint venture....
They were capitalising on the very tenuous and threadbare [in the context of society, politics, democracy and accountability] links that Lauren had with the Tony Blair regime just installed.
For ALL the past 11 years since Lauren Booth was mounted on the mainstream media abased on the alleged ‘half’ sibling relations with Cherie Blair,. lauren Booth had not made any contribution that objective commentators or observers of the ‘pair in power’ had not made.
In fact Lauren’s surfacing on the media has been measurable by the height or the level of media presence that has been attached to Cherie Booth ‘Blair’ over the years....
All the while, Lauren Booth has been allowed the media spots - and the not insignificant cash that has been placed into her direction including in the direction of her ‘place’ in ‘France’ on the most tenuous of evidential grounds.
This latest appearance today [Saturday 17 May 2008] when she talked to the BBC News Breakfast programme, was the most embarrassing. And inappropriate. She is evidently of the wrong view that Cherie Blair is ‘working class’, that she had not had much material possessions as a could etc....
And so she feels that on 17 May 2008, almost a year after Cherie had left the ‘official address’ of ‘Britain’s Prime Minister’ and two days after she was told [by another, sitting, ‘judge’] to resign as a ‘judge’ because she was bringing the ‘legal profession’ into disrepute by her ‘vulgar, obscene indulgences’ in publishing the most private of details about herself [so disgusting the spread of the public that even someone so lowly-esteemed in public as Graham Norton, was able to claim a ‘higher’ ground [in ‘taste’ if not in morality necessarily] as compared to Cherie Blair, as Norton showed on BBC TV on Friday night 16 May 2008].
[To be continued]
