You quote Ms Evora as saying that " anything new will be built for the people who are more wealthy.”That is very true. And the fault for leaving people who are 'less wealthy' or 'not wealthy' at all out, lies with the Blaring lunacy that has been operated through the same Tower Hamlets Council.
For the past at least 10 years, Tower Hamlets Council has been carrying out the destruction of public sector housing. Only this week, word has reached the Khoodeelaar! campaign in defence of the East End of London that the Pauline House, in the Hanbury Street off Brick Lane London E1, is included in a housing transfer scam that Tower Hamlets Council is actively promoting. When looked at in the context of what Caroline Flint has admitted, housing is now being used by the Blaired administration fronted by Gordon Brown to decimate even further the more impoverished of the population in inner city areas like Tower Hamlets. Poverty is being generated via the dismantling of public sector housing entitlements.
The word DEGENERATION is raging to be applied to this programme.
Whatever your famous list of architects have done to deserve recognition, it appears from your report that they are antisocially unaware of the human plight of their fantasy obsession and diversionary intervention.
They ought to be calling fro a halt to proceedings about the brutal beauty parade.
And ask: are the locally elected councils there to be used as extensions for the brutal violation of the fundamental human right to decent and secure housing in a decent and dignified environment?
If they had bothered to look at the neighbourhoods that Tower Hamlets Council has degenerated across the populated parts of the borough, they would find brutal architecture in mobile forms in the shapes of undereducated young people being sacrificed to the freedom to destroy their future and their families....
Human life in the East End of London, it seems. is far too invisible for ‘famous architects’ to notice. Or, indeed, for the allegedly locally elected Council to respect enough for it to stand up to the central Govt and speak up for over housing and humanity...
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Khoodeelaar! campaign against Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council is also voicing the No to Council smashing housing...
By©Muhammad Haque
0325 Hrs GMT
London Thursday 29 May 2008
The Times online has quoted [a resident] Ms Evora as saying that " anything new will be built for the people who are more wealthy.”
That is very true. And the fault for leaving people who are 'less wealthy' or 'not wealthy' at all out, lies with the Blaring lunacy that has been operated through the same Tower Hamlets Council.
For the past at least 10 years, Tower Hamlets Council has been carrying out the destruction of public sector housing.
Only this week, word has reached the Khoodeelaar! campaign in defence of the East End of London that the Pauline House, in the Hanbury Street off Brick Lane London E1, is included in a housing transfer scam that Tower Hamlets Council is actively promoting.
When looked at in the context of what Caroline Flint has admitted, housing is now being used by the Blaired administration fronted by Gordon Brown to decimate even further the more impoverished of the population in inner city areas like Tower Hamlets. Poverty is being generated via the dismantling of public sector housing entitlements.
The word DEGENERATION is raging to be applied to this programme. Whatever your famous list of architects have done to deserve recognition, it appears from your report that they are antisocially unaware of the human plight of their fantasy obsession and diversionary intervention.
They ought to be calling fro a halt to proceedings about the brutal beauty parade.
And ask: are the locally elected councils there to be used as extensions for the brutal violation of the fundamental human right to decent and secure housing in a decent and dignified environment?
If they had bothered to look at the neighbourhoods that Tower Hamlets Council has degenerated across the populated parts of the borough, they would find brutal architecture in mobile forms in the shapes of undereducated young people being sacrificed to the freedom to destroy their future and their families....
Human life in the East End of London, it seems. is far too invisible for ‘famous architects’ to notice.
Or, indeed, for the allegedly locally elected Council to respect enough for it to stand up to the central Govt and speak up for over housing and humanity...
"
0325 Hrs GMT
London Thursday 29 May 2008
The Times online has quoted [a resident] Ms Evora as saying that " anything new will be built for the people who are more wealthy.”
That is very true. And the fault for leaving people who are 'less wealthy' or 'not wealthy' at all out, lies with the Blaring lunacy that has been operated through the same Tower Hamlets Council.
For the past at least 10 years, Tower Hamlets Council has been carrying out the destruction of public sector housing.
Only this week, word has reached the Khoodeelaar! campaign in defence of the East End of London that the Pauline House, in the Hanbury Street off Brick Lane London E1, is included in a housing transfer scam that Tower Hamlets Council is actively promoting.
When looked at in the context of what Caroline Flint has admitted, housing is now being used by the Blaired administration fronted by Gordon Brown to decimate even further the more impoverished of the population in inner city areas like Tower Hamlets. Poverty is being generated via the dismantling of public sector housing entitlements.
The word DEGENERATION is raging to be applied to this programme. Whatever your famous list of architects have done to deserve recognition, it appears from your report that they are antisocially unaware of the human plight of their fantasy obsession and diversionary intervention.
They ought to be calling fro a halt to proceedings about the brutal beauty parade.
And ask: are the locally elected councils there to be used as extensions for the brutal violation of the fundamental human right to decent and secure housing in a decent and dignified environment?
If they had bothered to look at the neighbourhoods that Tower Hamlets Council has degenerated across the populated parts of the borough, they would find brutal architecture in mobile forms in the shapes of undereducated young people being sacrificed to the freedom to destroy their future and their families....
Human life in the East End of London, it seems. is far too invisible for ‘famous architects’ to notice.
Or, indeed, for the allegedly locally elected Council to respect enough for it to stand up to the central Govt and speak up for over housing and humanity...
"
Khoodeelaar! has said for 54 months that Crossrail is a big business ploy to rob the UK Public.. No 'left' grouping supported us.. What has changed?
The UK 'Left' 'groupings' cannot now start a scare-mongering tactic to compensate for their follies...
after Boris Johnson 'ousted' Livingstone...
Khoodeelaar! asks the 'Socialist Party' why they are faking it when allegedly attacking Ken Livingstone's touting for Big Business...
‘Big Business’ as a two word phrase may have been around before the Crossrail hole plot was launched by Ken Livingstone.
But the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has made the link and has made that link well known in the past 54 months.
No so the ‘Socialist Party’ . Or indeed any of the other so-called socialist outfits in the UK
ALL of these, to varying degrees. colluded with Ken Livingstone and his fake socialist stunts.
They said that Boris Johnson was a joke!
None of them looked seriously at the history of either the Tory Party or indeed of the Blaired parry. If they did then they kept the act to themselves.
As far s the public domain is concerned they ddi not treat the intervention of Boris Johnson at all seriously.
Or indeed the career and the careerism of Ken Livingstone...
The result was that even upto the morning of 2 May 2008, a day after the London Assembly and ‘London mayor’ elections the ‘left’ was still in delusion and was refusing to see that Livingstone had sunk out of ‘power’ at the ****** Hall London SE1.
Now, some of these left outfits are coming out with immature analyses...
Like the one below , taken from the ‘Socialist party’. It is the same outfit that has backed historically the main racist policies of the former Labour Party. The result is that it is party to the current imperialist involvement by the UK..
Khoodeelaar! will look at the ‘Socialist party’ in a later commentary.
For the record, here is what they have published on their web site today Thursday 29 May 2008:
"
Johnson's Prince of Darkness
LONDON'S NEW Tory mayor Boris Johnson has appointed a ruthless private equity businessman as his "first deputy mayor" in charge of transport. Trade unionists label Tim Parker the 'Prince of Darkness' - Parker has been in charge at the AA, Kwik-Fit and Clarks Shoes and has a reputation for cutting jobs while cutting himself a lucrative deal from the situation.
Parker pocketed £30 million for himself out of AA when he left last year after sacking a third of the workforce and saddling AA/SAGA with £4.8 billion of debt. He arrived in his own Porsche to sack workers at Clark's shoes in Somerset. He made £25 million from his sacking spree at Kwik-Fit. Parker's so rich, he can afford to work for a £1 salary - obviously anticipating more such 'good tidings' in future.
Johnson pledged in the Greater London elections to sign a 'no-strike deal' with London's transport unions, which the unions oppose. Parker's appointment signals Johnson's readiness, at some stage, to attack the strength of these unions, in particular the militant RMT union on the tubes. The contradiction between public transport and private profit, already increased by the public private partnership (PPP) scheme in London Underground, will become even sharper.
RMT general secretary Bob Crow, said: "The world's finest metro system does not need an asset-stripper or a Prince of Darkness. Tube users and workers have already had more than a bellyful of privatisation with the huge waste and failure of the PPP and the collapse of private tube firm Metronet."
Unfortunately former mayor Ken Livingstone started the move towards big business running London's tubes. He refused to fight the Labour government's private public partnership plans and appointed a former union-buster Bob Kylie as his own transport supremo with a huge salary plus £2 million when he left in 2006.
The unions (and transport users) should now take note of Johnson's plans and prepare for stormy times ahead.
"
after Boris Johnson 'ousted' Livingstone...
Khoodeelaar! asks the 'Socialist Party' why they are faking it when allegedly attacking Ken Livingstone's touting for Big Business...
‘Big Business’ as a two word phrase may have been around before the Crossrail hole plot was launched by Ken Livingstone.
But the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has made the link and has made that link well known in the past 54 months.
No so the ‘Socialist Party’ . Or indeed any of the other so-called socialist outfits in the UK
ALL of these, to varying degrees. colluded with Ken Livingstone and his fake socialist stunts.
They said that Boris Johnson was a joke!
None of them looked seriously at the history of either the Tory Party or indeed of the Blaired parry. If they did then they kept the act to themselves.
As far s the public domain is concerned they ddi not treat the intervention of Boris Johnson at all seriously.
Or indeed the career and the careerism of Ken Livingstone...
The result was that even upto the morning of 2 May 2008, a day after the London Assembly and ‘London mayor’ elections the ‘left’ was still in delusion and was refusing to see that Livingstone had sunk out of ‘power’ at the ****** Hall London SE1.
Now, some of these left outfits are coming out with immature analyses...
Like the one below , taken from the ‘Socialist party’. It is the same outfit that has backed historically the main racist policies of the former Labour Party. The result is that it is party to the current imperialist involvement by the UK..
Khoodeelaar! will look at the ‘Socialist party’ in a later commentary.
For the record, here is what they have published on their web site today Thursday 29 May 2008:
"
Johnson's Prince of Darkness
LONDON'S NEW Tory mayor Boris Johnson has appointed a ruthless private equity businessman as his "first deputy mayor" in charge of transport. Trade unionists label Tim Parker the 'Prince of Darkness' - Parker has been in charge at the AA, Kwik-Fit and Clarks Shoes and has a reputation for cutting jobs while cutting himself a lucrative deal from the situation.
Parker pocketed £30 million for himself out of AA when he left last year after sacking a third of the workforce and saddling AA/SAGA with £4.8 billion of debt. He arrived in his own Porsche to sack workers at Clark's shoes in Somerset. He made £25 million from his sacking spree at Kwik-Fit. Parker's so rich, he can afford to work for a £1 salary - obviously anticipating more such 'good tidings' in future.
Johnson pledged in the Greater London elections to sign a 'no-strike deal' with London's transport unions, which the unions oppose. Parker's appointment signals Johnson's readiness, at some stage, to attack the strength of these unions, in particular the militant RMT union on the tubes. The contradiction between public transport and private profit, already increased by the public private partnership (PPP) scheme in London Underground, will become even sharper.
RMT general secretary Bob Crow, said: "The world's finest metro system does not need an asset-stripper or a Prince of Darkness. Tube users and workers have already had more than a bellyful of privatisation with the huge waste and failure of the PPP and the collapse of private tube firm Metronet."
Unfortunately former mayor Ken Livingstone started the move towards big business running London's tubes. He refused to fight the Labour government's private public partnership plans and appointed a former union-buster Bob Kylie as his own transport supremo with a huge salary plus £2 million when he left in 2006.
The unions (and transport users) should now take note of Johnson's plans and prepare for stormy times ahead.
"
Khoodeelaar! focussing on the unconstitutionality of conduct by UK executive, as well as by the bureaucracy that controls the UK Houses of Parliament
By©Muhammad Haque
1900 Hrs GMT
2000 Hrs UK Time
London Wednesday 28 May 2008
If Tom Harris, the Crossrail hole plot ‘minister’ [the UK department ‘for’ Transport, the Daft ‘DfT’ - fronted by Ruth Kelly in Gordon Brown’s current ‘cabinet’] is an insult to the intelligence, then there are other specimen of insult to people's’ intelligence that can be found in the UK House of Commons. And in the UK ‘legislative’ [!!!!!!] ‘House of Lords, come to that.
Why is Tom Harris an insult to the intelligence?
Because he talks leis. He talks unconstitutionality . He talks untruths.
As do ALL the ministers - and whips.
So what is the answer?
The constitutional l law answer is to expose them as being in breach of the constitution The first Principe of constitutionality is that the executive will tell the truth. And nothing but the truth.
In the international context. In the un universal context.
This is order that the people - the presumed, the assumed and the actual proprietors of the de facto republic [!!!!!!] [= in the UK state]
The second acton is of cooers equally frustrating. At the polls. But the UK electoral system itself is no respecter of morality. Not really.
So the third option - which is to expose these liars and to make them the subject of pub lic ridicule. Not because of who they are. But because of their insult to the people...
Harris has been talking a predictably dishonest, antidemocratic, undemocratic , antisocial and unconstitutional package of untruths about the Crossrail hole package.
He has done so whilst the Bill was getting the ‘Third Reading’ in the House of commons. He did so as it was formally passed on to the so-called ‘reviewing’ slot in the House of Lords.
As soon as I spotted the first published instance of Harris’s insult to constitutionality and for Crossrail hole agenda, I published and pointed out that Harris was wrong and that he was behaving in violation of the constitutional duties that every ‘minister’ was under.... And I said that he was undermining the constitutional ‘integrity’ of the UK ‘legislative’ House of Lords...
ASSUMING in a significant way with capital letters that the “legislative’ House of Lords is worthy of being given the recognition of having any integrity whatever....
Going by the behaviour of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ Select Committee, integrity would be the last thing that the ‘House of Lords’ would deserve...
And that is why my advocacy - in DECEMBER 2007 AND JANUARY 2008 [AND ON OTHER DATES] of the theoretical cause of the House of Lords as a legislative part of an ethically OPERATING Parliament, was not followed up by the constitutional conduct by the Select Committee....
And Tom Harris’s remarks were not OPPOSED by anyone in the House of Lords. Or indeed, anyone in any p[art of the UK parliament
Or in the UK ‘mainstream’ UK media.
Or elsewhere...
Mainstream, semi-stream side-stream. On any stream.
What does that tell us about the state of democracy and the state and the quality of discourse about that state in the Uk today?
What quality when there is NO discourse!
[To be continued]
1900 Hrs GMT
2000 Hrs UK Time
London Wednesday 28 May 2008
If Tom Harris, the Crossrail hole plot ‘minister’ [the UK department ‘for’ Transport, the Daft ‘DfT’ - fronted by Ruth Kelly in Gordon Brown’s current ‘cabinet’] is an insult to the intelligence, then there are other specimen of insult to people's’ intelligence that can be found in the UK House of Commons. And in the UK ‘legislative’ [!!!!!!] ‘House of Lords, come to that.
Why is Tom Harris an insult to the intelligence?
Because he talks leis. He talks unconstitutionality . He talks untruths.
As do ALL the ministers - and whips.
So what is the answer?
The constitutional l law answer is to expose them as being in breach of the constitution The first Principe of constitutionality is that the executive will tell the truth. And nothing but the truth.
In the international context. In the un universal context.
This is order that the people - the presumed, the assumed and the actual proprietors of the de facto republic [!!!!!!] [= in the UK state]
The second acton is of cooers equally frustrating. At the polls. But the UK electoral system itself is no respecter of morality. Not really.
So the third option - which is to expose these liars and to make them the subject of pub lic ridicule. Not because of who they are. But because of their insult to the people...
Harris has been talking a predictably dishonest, antidemocratic, undemocratic , antisocial and unconstitutional package of untruths about the Crossrail hole package.
He has done so whilst the Bill was getting the ‘Third Reading’ in the House of commons. He did so as it was formally passed on to the so-called ‘reviewing’ slot in the House of Lords.
As soon as I spotted the first published instance of Harris’s insult to constitutionality and for Crossrail hole agenda, I published and pointed out that Harris was wrong and that he was behaving in violation of the constitutional duties that every ‘minister’ was under.... And I said that he was undermining the constitutional ‘integrity’ of the UK ‘legislative’ House of Lords...
ASSUMING in a significant way with capital letters that the “legislative’ House of Lords is worthy of being given the recognition of having any integrity whatever....
Going by the behaviour of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ Select Committee, integrity would be the last thing that the ‘House of Lords’ would deserve...
And that is why my advocacy - in DECEMBER 2007 AND JANUARY 2008 [AND ON OTHER DATES] of the theoretical cause of the House of Lords as a legislative part of an ethically OPERATING Parliament, was not followed up by the constitutional conduct by the Select Committee....
And Tom Harris’s remarks were not OPPOSED by anyone in the House of Lords. Or indeed, anyone in any p[art of the UK parliament
Or in the UK ‘mainstream’ UK media.
Or elsewhere...
Mainstream, semi-stream side-stream. On any stream.
What does that tell us about the state of democracy and the state and the quality of discourse about that state in the Uk today?
What quality when there is NO discourse!
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! the inner city, East End of London CAMPAIGN AGAINST unconstitutionality by Crossrail cliques
By©Muhammad Haque
1454 Hrs GMT
London Wednesday 28 May 2008
What is the evidence that justifies the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council DESCRIBING the controlling clique as corrupt?
There is not just one piece of evidence. There are countless items of evidence.
The sum of the evidence both shows that the clique is engaged in wrong conduct about Crossrail. And that it is also engaged in wrong conduct about the overall, the general duties it has towards the people in the Borough of Tower Hamlets about other aspects of life that relate to the duties of a local council.
One of the persistent patterns of the lying behaviour by the corrupt clique on the Tower Hamlets 'locally elected' [!!!!!!!] Council has been their refusal to observe basic standards of ethics and behaviour. Ethics and standards of behaviour that on paper any 'locally elected council' 'administration' would be expected to practise and respect.
And how deep, complete, has been the evidence of the Tower Hamlets Council’s wrong and wrongful behaviour?
As deep as the numbers of years over which the clique has been in control. As deep as the particulars and as extensive as the details of the claque’s collusion with Big Business proponents who have got in league with the Tower ~Hamlets Council with the aim of taking over the land and the spaces in the East End of London under covers of plausible projects but in reality for the benefit of Big Business And to benefit the City of London-linked exploiters at the expense of the people of the East End of London the ordinary population in the borough in the end.
This is seen in the dishonest behaviour of the clique that was fronted by Christine Gilbert at the time.
Gilbert as chief executive in the Council made a most untrue assertion about the actual policy of the clique on Crossrail.
This concerned the so-called cabinet meeting of 6 October 2004.
The Khoodeelaar! campaign observed the meeting and it was clear that the community’s serious opposition to the Council’s collusion with the Crossrail scam [it was not a Bill in Parliament yet - that took place nearly 4 months later] was being sidelined by the clique.
So the Khoodeelaar! campaign organised for the relevant aspect of the community's questions to be put to Christine Gilbert in the context of the clique's conduct.
It was never expected that Gilbert would come out with an admission that her clique was in the wrong. Or that the clique had let the community down. But it was essential for the purpose of extensive evidential processing of her conduct that she was given the opportunity to come clean and admit that her clique had indeed been in the wrong.
Regardless of the actual final position Gilbert would take on the subject under reference, it was expected that she should show normal courtesy and behave in accordance with the rules that require the ‘chief officer’ of the local council to properly and timely acknowledge communications she received.
What did Gilbert do?
Did she behave in accordance with the standards expected of the town clerk?
She behaved with undue delay.
She pretended that she had not received the communications containing the questions.
Was that exceptional?
The answer, on the facts, is that NO.
CHRISTINE Gilbert behaved with the same prejudice and with the same lack of accountability towards the whole population in Tower Hamlets that had been the feature of the Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique for decades.
That is why the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has had to establish new criteria so that the history of neglect as shown by the ‘elected’ local council to the people in whose name the council is ‘elected’ is not repeated. That the people are offered accountable representation by the ‘elected’ council.
That was the only way in which the community’s interests could be defended.
That was the only way that the Crossrail hole attacks could be stopped.
Christine Gilbert behaved with no regard for the constitutional duties of the local Council. She behaved opportunistically and on the assumption that there would no ‘issue made on the floor of the council’ by any of the ‘elected members on the 'Tower Hamlets Council'’.
She showed no recognition of the fact that her conduct, her role and the implications of her conduct and of her role could indeed be challenged in court.
Or did she think that the Khoodeelaar! campaign notes to her and to her clique saying that a time would come when their abuse of power and their collusion with the agenda of the Big Business would be challenged in court was not part of the real programme of action ?
How similar was Christine Gilbert’s disrespect to the ordinary codes of ethical, accountable behaviour to the disrespect shown to ethics, morality and the norms of constitutionality by the bureaucracy set up in the name of the ‘House of Lords’ that has been in fact peddling the Crossrail hole plotting agenda desired by Big Business, a la Bechtel of USA ?
[To be continued]
1454 Hrs GMT
London Wednesday 28 May 2008
What is the evidence that justifies the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council DESCRIBING the controlling clique as corrupt?
There is not just one piece of evidence. There are countless items of evidence.
The sum of the evidence both shows that the clique is engaged in wrong conduct about Crossrail. And that it is also engaged in wrong conduct about the overall, the general duties it has towards the people in the Borough of Tower Hamlets about other aspects of life that relate to the duties of a local council.
One of the persistent patterns of the lying behaviour by the corrupt clique on the Tower Hamlets 'locally elected' [!!!!!!!] Council has been their refusal to observe basic standards of ethics and behaviour. Ethics and standards of behaviour that on paper any 'locally elected council' 'administration' would be expected to practise and respect.
And how deep, complete, has been the evidence of the Tower Hamlets Council’s wrong and wrongful behaviour?
As deep as the numbers of years over which the clique has been in control. As deep as the particulars and as extensive as the details of the claque’s collusion with Big Business proponents who have got in league with the Tower ~Hamlets Council with the aim of taking over the land and the spaces in the East End of London under covers of plausible projects but in reality for the benefit of Big Business And to benefit the City of London-linked exploiters at the expense of the people of the East End of London the ordinary population in the borough in the end.
This is seen in the dishonest behaviour of the clique that was fronted by Christine Gilbert at the time.
Gilbert as chief executive in the Council made a most untrue assertion about the actual policy of the clique on Crossrail.
This concerned the so-called cabinet meeting of 6 October 2004.
The Khoodeelaar! campaign observed the meeting and it was clear that the community’s serious opposition to the Council’s collusion with the Crossrail scam [it was not a Bill in Parliament yet - that took place nearly 4 months later] was being sidelined by the clique.
So the Khoodeelaar! campaign organised for the relevant aspect of the community's questions to be put to Christine Gilbert in the context of the clique's conduct.
It was never expected that Gilbert would come out with an admission that her clique was in the wrong. Or that the clique had let the community down. But it was essential for the purpose of extensive evidential processing of her conduct that she was given the opportunity to come clean and admit that her clique had indeed been in the wrong.
Regardless of the actual final position Gilbert would take on the subject under reference, it was expected that she should show normal courtesy and behave in accordance with the rules that require the ‘chief officer’ of the local council to properly and timely acknowledge communications she received.
What did Gilbert do?
Did she behave in accordance with the standards expected of the town clerk?
She behaved with undue delay.
She pretended that she had not received the communications containing the questions.
Was that exceptional?
The answer, on the facts, is that NO.
CHRISTINE Gilbert behaved with the same prejudice and with the same lack of accountability towards the whole population in Tower Hamlets that had been the feature of the Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique for decades.
That is why the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has had to establish new criteria so that the history of neglect as shown by the ‘elected’ local council to the people in whose name the council is ‘elected’ is not repeated. That the people are offered accountable representation by the ‘elected’ council.
That was the only way in which the community’s interests could be defended.
That was the only way that the Crossrail hole attacks could be stopped.
Christine Gilbert behaved with no regard for the constitutional duties of the local Council. She behaved opportunistically and on the assumption that there would no ‘issue made on the floor of the council’ by any of the ‘elected members on the 'Tower Hamlets Council'’.
She showed no recognition of the fact that her conduct, her role and the implications of her conduct and of her role could indeed be challenged in court.
Or did she think that the Khoodeelaar! campaign notes to her and to her clique saying that a time would come when their abuse of power and their collusion with the agenda of the Big Business would be challenged in court was not part of the real programme of action ?
How similar was Christine Gilbert’s disrespect to the ordinary codes of ethical, accountable behaviour to the disrespect shown to ethics, morality and the norms of constitutionality by the bureaucracy set up in the name of the ‘House of Lords’ that has been in fact peddling the Crossrail hole plotting agenda desired by Big Business, a la Bechtel of USA ?
[To be continued]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)