Monday, June 9, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN is due to start legal action against Ruth Kelly - more, here, soon
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN is due to start legal action against Ruth Kelly - more, here, soon
Contrary to his preaching about justice, Gordon Brown takes the side with Big Business... Crossrail is a Big Business ploy...
Monday's belated bid by UK Transport fronter in Gordon Brown's cabinet reinforces the view that as with London Crossrail they are wrong on M'chester
By©Muhammad Haque
1950 GMT
London
Monday
9 June 2008
Gordon Brown has shown that contrary to his preaching about justice, he takes the side with Big Business... Crossrail is a Big Business ploy...
More on this after I update on the errors of Gordon Brown and his 'cabinet' on Transport. As illustrated today in the 'decision' or the spin by his transport fronter Ruth kelly on Manchester...
Gordon Brown is wrong to have made the statement in late September 2007 and early October 2007] that he will make £Billions of public money available to Crossrail in London. That scheme is a big Business scam. That scam is wasteful, irrelevant and obsolete. Because of that, even Gordon Brown's own 'expert', ex head of British Airways Rod Eddington, had refused to recommend or to to endorse Crossrail....
And as Brown, his fronter on transport in his cabinet, Ruth Kelly is guilty of incomplete [if any] thought. This has become clear in the response from several MPs, from Brown's Blaired side in the UK House of Commons, who have spoken of their unease at Kelly's announcement of a C-Charge in Manchester....And on Manchester
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1950 GMT
London
Monday
9 June 2008
Gordon Brown has shown that contrary to his preaching about justice, he takes the side with Big Business... Crossrail is a Big Business ploy...
More on this after I update on the errors of Gordon Brown and his 'cabinet' on Transport. As illustrated today in the 'decision' or the spin by his transport fronter Ruth kelly on Manchester...
Gordon Brown is wrong to have made the statement in late September 2007 and early October 2007] that he will make £Billions of public money available to Crossrail in London. That scheme is a big Business scam. That scam is wasteful, irrelevant and obsolete. Because of that, even Gordon Brown's own 'expert', ex head of British Airways Rod Eddington, had refused to recommend or to to endorse Crossrail....
And as Brown, his fronter on transport in his cabinet, Ruth Kelly is guilty of incomplete [if any] thought. This has become clear in the response from several MPs, from Brown's Blaired side in the UK House of Commons, who have spoken of their unease at Kelly's announcement of a C-Charge in Manchester....And on Manchester
[To be continued]
The behaviour of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ 'select committees' in the UK Parliament has been totally servile to Big Business agenda....
The behaviour of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ 'select committees' in the UK Parliament has been totally servile to Big Business agenda. And a disgrace to the idea of democratic, accountable parliament
By©Muhammad Haque
1555 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 9 June 2008
DISSECTING THE LUDICROUS BEHAVIOUR in PARLIAMENT OF THE STOOGED SELECT COMMITTEE IN THE NAME of the UK HOUSE OF LORDS and under the de facto influence of Big BUSINESS and assorted corrupting ‘professionals ’ lobbyists and lying lawyers that have been peddling the lies in the ‘palace of Westminster’....
What is the ‘ludicrous behaviour’ that I am talking about?
Short answer is this: the UK Houses of Parliament,ent are behaving ludicrously. Most of the times. They are not representing the people on most things. they are participating in prompting the line that the UK Executive [that is the 'Government' of the day - more on that concept, later] is proposing... This is to be understood even in the week when the latest charade of rebellion is being hyped up in propaganda terms by the pliant, servile media. Servile to the Executive. Serving the pro[agenda purpose of the paraders of democracy in the name of Parliament... There is no rigourous parliament in Britain. Never has been. And as I have said, the ‘nearest’ moment in historic terms that can be found when parliament was in in any real sense ‘sovereign’ and active was when Oliver Cromwell did those unconstitutional things. But then Cromwell was not sustainable. And there were more questions than answers in what he did. Dreadful dire things. Not really democratic.
Not really sustainable.
Not really just. Not in the end...
But as moments of what could be done in asserting a real rebellion, his activities were undeniably representative.
Citable....
Since Cromwell’s time, and since the reversal of his actions, the behaviour of Parliament has been a token.
A fake.
A token of what in truth should happen but is not allowed to happen.
. So much so that the word ‘opposition’ in Parliament has lost all meaning....
No, it never had any meaning...
So the Opposition has no meaning....
I shall apply this analysis to what has been going on in the ‘Select Committees’ in both Houses where that formula of pliant rebellion has been sued to advance the Big Business agenda.......
How did the ‘peers’ [!] peering into the abyss of absurdity attributable to the crass conceivers of the Crossrail hole assault on the East End of London LOOK when they paid a ‘site’ ‘visit’ on 20 February 2008?
Did they LOOK real?
Did they LOOK human as when human beings listening, thinking and understanding?
Did they LOOK as if they were being shown the evidence of just how wrong the CRASS plot was? Did they get told how imprudent [note that word again] Gordon Brown had come across as on Crossrail ?
More, including more historic KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot CAMPAIGN pictures of the peering peers on site visit in the Hanbury Street, off Brick Lane, London E1 on 20 February 2008, here soon
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1555 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 9 June 2008
DISSECTING THE LUDICROUS BEHAVIOUR in PARLIAMENT OF THE STOOGED SELECT COMMITTEE IN THE NAME of the UK HOUSE OF LORDS and under the de facto influence of Big BUSINESS and assorted corrupting ‘professionals ’ lobbyists and lying lawyers that have been peddling the lies in the ‘palace of Westminster’....
What is the ‘ludicrous behaviour’ that I am talking about?
Short answer is this: the UK Houses of Parliament,ent are behaving ludicrously. Most of the times. They are not representing the people on most things. they are participating in prompting the line that the UK Executive [that is the 'Government' of the day - more on that concept, later] is proposing... This is to be understood even in the week when the latest charade of rebellion is being hyped up in propaganda terms by the pliant, servile media. Servile to the Executive. Serving the pro[agenda purpose of the paraders of democracy in the name of Parliament... There is no rigourous parliament in Britain. Never has been. And as I have said, the ‘nearest’ moment in historic terms that can be found when parliament was in in any real sense ‘sovereign’ and active was when Oliver Cromwell did those unconstitutional things. But then Cromwell was not sustainable. And there were more questions than answers in what he did. Dreadful dire things. Not really democratic.
Not really sustainable.
Not really just. Not in the end...
But as moments of what could be done in asserting a real rebellion, his activities were undeniably representative.
Citable....
Since Cromwell’s time, and since the reversal of his actions, the behaviour of Parliament has been a token.
A fake.
A token of what in truth should happen but is not allowed to happen.
. So much so that the word ‘opposition’ in Parliament has lost all meaning....
No, it never had any meaning...
So the Opposition has no meaning....
I shall apply this analysis to what has been going on in the ‘Select Committees’ in both Houses where that formula of pliant rebellion has been sued to advance the Big Business agenda.......
How did the ‘peers’ [!] peering into the abyss of absurdity attributable to the crass conceivers of the Crossrail hole assault on the East End of London LOOK when they paid a ‘site’ ‘visit’ on 20 February 2008?
Did they LOOK real?
Did they LOOK human as when human beings listening, thinking and understanding?
Did they LOOK as if they were being shown the evidence of just how wrong the CRASS plot was? Did they get told how imprudent [note that word again] Gordon Brown had come across as on Crossrail ?
More, including more historic KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot CAMPAIGN pictures of the peering peers on site visit in the Hanbury Street, off Brick Lane, London E1 on 20 February 2008, here soon
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN is also the campaign against IMPOSING new poverty on the inner city East End...
Our exclusive investigative report due here during Monday 9 June 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)