"
1110 Hrs GMT 1210 Hrs UK Time London Thursday 3 July 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! the Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area No to ‘Crossrail hole plot-inviting corrupt clique in control of the inner city, East London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council.........” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! That the clique is covering up mass and institutionalised disenfranchisement and criminalisation of the parts of the community that most need the protection of the ‘locally elected Council’.
KHOODEELAAR! has also SAID, with concurrent evidence, over the past 55 months, that the corrupt clique that has been in control of the Tower Hamlets Council has been engaged in CREATINg poverty, creating criminality and in adding to the criminalisation and social exclusion, incohesion and disharmony in and across the Borough of Tower Hamlets ..
That the mass perpetration of negligence and wrongdoing by Tower Hamlets Council towards and against the various individuals, groups and areas in Tower Hamlets and the corrupt behaviour of the corrupt clique and its colluders among the ‘executive’ employees in dismantling the ‘public sector’ housing stock and in handing over the same to antisocial controllers and profit-seeking exploiters thus adding to existing poverty and disadvantage in Tower Hamlets is unlawful, illegal but the evidence of such behaviour also is akin to the behaviour of the clique in INVITING the Crossrail hole attacks upon the community.....
That by sheer ACCIDENT we have come across today Thursday 3 July 2008 the backhanded, reluctant and the twisted admission by the same Council that a number of otherwise innocent young persons has been branded as mentally ill by institutions that are controlled [!!!!! for the UK central Govt funding that such ‘control’ status allows the controlling claque to apply for and receive -as distinguished from, opposed to and different from the clique's providing the services in whose names the clique seeks the funding and pockets the funding] by the same Council.........
We say again: the lies that the corrupt clique has been confecting for Crossrail hole plot over the past at least 8 years are the same lies the same sorts of lies that the controlling clique confects and perpetrates about other areas of its wrongdoing... As we now report with the help of an external web site [SEE the linking words on the column next to this main page] .......
.[To be continued]
"
Thursday, July 3, 2008
KHoodeelaar! has shown up BOTH Houses of UK Parliament as being unfit for purpose: BOTH Houses fail to audit the 'executive'..[2]
The following ILLUSTRATIVE item has been taken from the web site of the London daily Mail at 0810 Hrs GMT Thursday 3 July 2008;
"
COMMENTARY: 'Egotistical, ambitious, sleazy ... The perfect candidate for a peerage'
By JAMES CHAPMAN
Last updated at 1:20 AM on 03rd July 2008
Comments (0) Add to My Stories
Self-regard is not a quality generally in short supply in the world of Westminster politicians.
Yet Keith Vaz's ego has the capacity to take even many of his Labour colleagues by surprise.
He once described himself as 'a leading member, if not the leading member, of the Asian community in this country'.
Europe Minister Keith Vaz, pictured leaving the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in London yesterday
Over the last 20 years, he has veered from one extreme of his party to the other - moving from the hard-left Campaign Group of MPs to become one of Tony Blair's most unctuous New Labour supporters.
But consistency, alas, has never been Keith Vaz's strongest point.
More...
Riddle of the Keith Vaz 'reward': How Geoff Hoon may have hinted at an honour for MP who helped win terror vote
DAILY MAIL COMMENT: How much does it cost to buy an MP?
Two years after being elected in Leicester East in 1987, he marched publicly with Muslim constituents who wanted Salman Rushdie's head over his Satanic Verses book.
It later emerged that at the same time, he was telephoning the author to offer his private support.
Once an arch Eurosceptic, he became such a strong pro-European that as Europe Minister, he threatened to hound Eurosceptics out of the Labour Party.
In one leaked piece of correspondence, he was said to have written: 'We know who you Eurosceptics are and we're coming to get you in your constituencies.'
Born in 1956 in Aden, he is a Goanese Catholic christened Nigel Keith Anthony Standish Vaz. His father was the correspondent in Aden for the Times of India.
Vaz, pictured with Shilpa Shetty, once described himself as 'a leading member, if not the leading member, of the Asian community in this country'
Academically brilliant, he want from Latymer Upper School in Hammersmith, West London, to Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, where he dropped the Nigel.
His contemporaries there included Mr Blair's chief spin doctor Alastair Campbell, the novelist and Labour supporter Robert Harris and the BBC presenter Andrew Marr.
A solicitor turned barrister, his family's involvement in politics always made it likely he would seek to follow the same route.
His mother, Merlyn, who died in 2003, was a long-serving Labour councillor in Leicester.
An early attempt at entering Parliament as Labour's candidate in Richmond and Barnes ended in failure, as did a bid to become Euro MP for Surrey West the following year.
He was selected as Labour's candidate in Leicester East for the 1987 election - possibly in part thanks to his outspoken support for hugely controversial 'black sections' in the Labour Party.
These were to be clubs closed to white party members and were designed to draw in disaffected ethnic minorities to Labour.
Enlarge
Vaz pictured at a reception in honour of Lord Irvine, who once described him as 'the most incredible networker I have ever met'
Mr Vaz's stance is thought to have helped win him support in Leicester East, a constituency with 16,000 minority workers.
He went on to defeat the sitting Tory MP Peter Bruinvels, a prominent supporter of capital punishment who once offered to act as a public hangman.
But Mr Vaz's supporters may have been disappointed when, on entering Parliament, he reversed his support for 'black sections'.
He prompted outrage in 1990 when he suggested an IRA bomb in Leicester might for some reason have been planted by the Army.
Despite the row, he joined Labour's front bench as a junior environment spokesman in opposition in 1992.
But it was his role as a Parliamentary bag carrier to Derry Irvine, a close friend of Tony Blair, that helped propel him to the political frontline.
Lord irvine, the then Lord Chancellor, described him as 'the most incredible networker I have ever met'.
Appointed Europe Minister in 1999, allegations of sleaze and chicanery began to emerge soon afterwards.
The next year, the Parliamentary standards watchdog was called in to investigate allegations of undisclosed payments to Mr Vaz from businessmen in his constituency.
He was cleared of nine of the 28 allegations of financial wrongdoing-accused of blocking investigation-into 18 and censured for one - failure to register payments of £4,500 from a solicitor he went on to recommend for a peerage.
After collapsing during a TV interview he was dropped by Mr Blair from the Government in 2001.
Ill health was officially the reason given, though Mr Blair was said to believe that his continued presence in the Government was an embarrassment.
And in 2002, another inquiry into whether a company connected to Mr Vaz had taken money from the billionaire Indian Hinduja brothers came to a more damning verdict.
It concluded he had 'committed serious breaches of the code of conduct and a contempt of the House' and recommended that he be suspended from the Commons for a month.
Yet even this humiliation was not enough to keep Mr Vaz down. After the 2005 General election he slowly worked his way back - being appointed head of an ethnic minority task force by Mr Blair in 2006.
Controversially, he won the prestigious chairmanship of the home affairs select committee in 2007, replacing the universally respected John Denham.
He was effectively shoehorned into the post by the Government, which claimed there was not enough time to go through the usual procedure of asking a crossparty group of MPs to come up with a nominee.
Critics say he has used the post for grandstanding and showboating. Only this week, he was criticised by commentators for inviting Cherie Blair for a high-profile appearance before his committee to discuss policing and knife crime, despite her limited expertise on the subject.
Even before the latest controversy, MPs suspect that his ambitions still run deep. 'The rumour running around Labour MPs was that he would be offered a knighthood for his vote on 42 days,' said one MP who knows him.
'I think he wants to be a knight. He sees that it's unlikely he will ever be a minister again and he would like to be a peer of the realm.
Whether after yesterday's disclosure such a dream is possible now seems doubtful.
How the speaker cut off Cameron's attack
David Cameron
Speaker Michael Martin raised eyebrows in the Commons yesterday by abruptly calling time on David Cameron's attack on Gordon Brown.
He cut off the Prime Minister as he rose to answer the Tory leader over charges that he had not been straight with the voters.
Mr Cameron had scored a coup by confronting Mr Brown with the leaked letter from Geoff Hoon to Keith Vaz.
The Tory leader had just asked his third question and Mr Brown was rising to reply when the Speaker called 'order', apparently in reply to noise in the Chamber.
There was a moment of confusion as the Prime Minister sat down, then rose again to answer, at which point Mr Martin turned and called Labour MP Tom Levitt, who asked a question about the environment.
A spokesman for Mr Brown rejected suggestions that the Speaker had rescued the Prime Minister from Mr Cameron's attack. 'The Prime Minister just responded to the Speaker's instruction.'
Print this article Read later Email to a friend Share this article:
Digg it | Del.icio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Nowpublic | Facebook | MySpace | Fark
Add your comments
Comments (0)
"
"
COMMENTARY: 'Egotistical, ambitious, sleazy ... The perfect candidate for a peerage'
By JAMES CHAPMAN
Last updated at 1:20 AM on 03rd July 2008
Comments (0) Add to My Stories
Self-regard is not a quality generally in short supply in the world of Westminster politicians.
Yet Keith Vaz's ego has the capacity to take even many of his Labour colleagues by surprise.
He once described himself as 'a leading member, if not the leading member, of the Asian community in this country'.
Europe Minister Keith Vaz, pictured leaving the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in London yesterday
Over the last 20 years, he has veered from one extreme of his party to the other - moving from the hard-left Campaign Group of MPs to become one of Tony Blair's most unctuous New Labour supporters.
But consistency, alas, has never been Keith Vaz's strongest point.
More...
Riddle of the Keith Vaz 'reward': How Geoff Hoon may have hinted at an honour for MP who helped win terror vote
DAILY MAIL COMMENT: How much does it cost to buy an MP?
Two years after being elected in Leicester East in 1987, he marched publicly with Muslim constituents who wanted Salman Rushdie's head over his Satanic Verses book.
It later emerged that at the same time, he was telephoning the author to offer his private support.
Once an arch Eurosceptic, he became such a strong pro-European that as Europe Minister, he threatened to hound Eurosceptics out of the Labour Party.
In one leaked piece of correspondence, he was said to have written: 'We know who you Eurosceptics are and we're coming to get you in your constituencies.'
Born in 1956 in Aden, he is a Goanese Catholic christened Nigel Keith Anthony Standish Vaz. His father was the correspondent in Aden for the Times of India.
Vaz, pictured with Shilpa Shetty, once described himself as 'a leading member, if not the leading member, of the Asian community in this country'
Academically brilliant, he want from Latymer Upper School in Hammersmith, West London, to Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, where he dropped the Nigel.
His contemporaries there included Mr Blair's chief spin doctor Alastair Campbell, the novelist and Labour supporter Robert Harris and the BBC presenter Andrew Marr.
A solicitor turned barrister, his family's involvement in politics always made it likely he would seek to follow the same route.
His mother, Merlyn, who died in 2003, was a long-serving Labour councillor in Leicester.
An early attempt at entering Parliament as Labour's candidate in Richmond and Barnes ended in failure, as did a bid to become Euro MP for Surrey West the following year.
He was selected as Labour's candidate in Leicester East for the 1987 election - possibly in part thanks to his outspoken support for hugely controversial 'black sections' in the Labour Party.
These were to be clubs closed to white party members and were designed to draw in disaffected ethnic minorities to Labour.
Enlarge
Vaz pictured at a reception in honour of Lord Irvine, who once described him as 'the most incredible networker I have ever met'
Mr Vaz's stance is thought to have helped win him support in Leicester East, a constituency with 16,000 minority workers.
He went on to defeat the sitting Tory MP Peter Bruinvels, a prominent supporter of capital punishment who once offered to act as a public hangman.
But Mr Vaz's supporters may have been disappointed when, on entering Parliament, he reversed his support for 'black sections'.
He prompted outrage in 1990 when he suggested an IRA bomb in Leicester might for some reason have been planted by the Army.
Despite the row, he joined Labour's front bench as a junior environment spokesman in opposition in 1992.
But it was his role as a Parliamentary bag carrier to Derry Irvine, a close friend of Tony Blair, that helped propel him to the political frontline.
Lord irvine, the then Lord Chancellor, described him as 'the most incredible networker I have ever met'.
Appointed Europe Minister in 1999, allegations of sleaze and chicanery began to emerge soon afterwards.
The next year, the Parliamentary standards watchdog was called in to investigate allegations of undisclosed payments to Mr Vaz from businessmen in his constituency.
He was cleared of nine of the 28 allegations of financial wrongdoing-accused of blocking investigation-into 18 and censured for one - failure to register payments of £4,500 from a solicitor he went on to recommend for a peerage.
After collapsing during a TV interview he was dropped by Mr Blair from the Government in 2001.
Ill health was officially the reason given, though Mr Blair was said to believe that his continued presence in the Government was an embarrassment.
And in 2002, another inquiry into whether a company connected to Mr Vaz had taken money from the billionaire Indian Hinduja brothers came to a more damning verdict.
It concluded he had 'committed serious breaches of the code of conduct and a contempt of the House' and recommended that he be suspended from the Commons for a month.
Yet even this humiliation was not enough to keep Mr Vaz down. After the 2005 General election he slowly worked his way back - being appointed head of an ethnic minority task force by Mr Blair in 2006.
Controversially, he won the prestigious chairmanship of the home affairs select committee in 2007, replacing the universally respected John Denham.
He was effectively shoehorned into the post by the Government, which claimed there was not enough time to go through the usual procedure of asking a crossparty group of MPs to come up with a nominee.
Critics say he has used the post for grandstanding and showboating. Only this week, he was criticised by commentators for inviting Cherie Blair for a high-profile appearance before his committee to discuss policing and knife crime, despite her limited expertise on the subject.
Even before the latest controversy, MPs suspect that his ambitions still run deep. 'The rumour running around Labour MPs was that he would be offered a knighthood for his vote on 42 days,' said one MP who knows him.
'I think he wants to be a knight. He sees that it's unlikely he will ever be a minister again and he would like to be a peer of the realm.
Whether after yesterday's disclosure such a dream is possible now seems doubtful.
How the speaker cut off Cameron's attack
David Cameron
Speaker Michael Martin raised eyebrows in the Commons yesterday by abruptly calling time on David Cameron's attack on Gordon Brown.
He cut off the Prime Minister as he rose to answer the Tory leader over charges that he had not been straight with the voters.
Mr Cameron had scored a coup by confronting Mr Brown with the leaked letter from Geoff Hoon to Keith Vaz.
The Tory leader had just asked his third question and Mr Brown was rising to reply when the Speaker called 'order', apparently in reply to noise in the Chamber.
There was a moment of confusion as the Prime Minister sat down, then rose again to answer, at which point Mr Martin turned and called Labour MP Tom Levitt, who asked a question about the environment.
A spokesman for Mr Brown rejected suggestions that the Speaker had rescued the Prime Minister from Mr Cameron's attack. 'The Prime Minister just responded to the Speaker's instruction.'
Print this article Read later Email to a friend Share this article:
Digg it | Del.icio.us | Reddit | Newsvine | Nowpublic | Facebook | MySpace | Fark
Add your comments
Comments (0)
"
Khoodeelaar! has shown up BOTH Houses of UK Parliament as being unfit for purpose: BOTH Houses fail to audit the 'executive'...
Khoodeelaar! has shown up BOTH Houses of UK Parliament as being unfit for purpose: BOTH Houses fail to audit the 'executive'...
This becomes clear whenever there is any issue of substance that the ‘Houses’ ‘consider’.
There is, of course, a lot of hype suggesting that the ‘Houses DO hold the executive to account!
But that is a lie.
As even the formally placed ‘chair’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee in the House of Lords’ [= our abbreviation of that is= CBSCHL= where the ‘S’ stands for STOOGED rather than “select’] has confessed: They are useless.
They are MEANT to be useless...
That ‘chair’ has said that objectors to Crossrail who are not impressed by the behaviour of the CBSCHL should seek redress in the courts!
Exactly the point that KHOODEELAAR! had been making and IS continuing to make!
The ‘Parliament’ is being discredited by the parliamentarians. And they know it.
And they say it.
As they said so many ways in the 30 minute stunt called the PMQs staged yesterday.
‘Thanks’ to the Daily Telegraph web site which did a strategic job of publishing the Sleaze suggestion linking keith vaz and Geoff Hoon with the Deal on the 42 day detention without trial.... Gordon Brown found himself, once again, lost without anything valuable to say...
None of his alleged ‘British vahloos’ looked remotely useful or even accessible as Ca-moron caught Brown out....
We say again: SCRAP Crossrail NOW, Gordon. lest ye regret thy
boasts and thy banality and thy imprudent ‘commitment’ to fund CRASSrail to the tune of £Billions that ye were ‘tricked’ by the lying Livingstone into making....
[To be continued]
This becomes clear whenever there is any issue of substance that the ‘Houses’ ‘consider’.
There is, of course, a lot of hype suggesting that the ‘Houses DO hold the executive to account!
But that is a lie.
As even the formally placed ‘chair’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee in the House of Lords’ [= our abbreviation of that is= CBSCHL= where the ‘S’ stands for STOOGED rather than “select’] has confessed: They are useless.
They are MEANT to be useless...
That ‘chair’ has said that objectors to Crossrail who are not impressed by the behaviour of the CBSCHL should seek redress in the courts!
Exactly the point that KHOODEELAAR! had been making and IS continuing to make!
The ‘Parliament’ is being discredited by the parliamentarians. And they know it.
And they say it.
As they said so many ways in the 30 minute stunt called the PMQs staged yesterday.
‘Thanks’ to the Daily Telegraph web site which did a strategic job of publishing the Sleaze suggestion linking keith vaz and Geoff Hoon with the Deal on the 42 day detention without trial.... Gordon Brown found himself, once again, lost without anything valuable to say...
None of his alleged ‘British vahloos’ looked remotely useful or even accessible as Ca-moron caught Brown out....
We say again: SCRAP Crossrail NOW, Gordon. lest ye regret thy
boasts and thy banality and thy imprudent ‘commitment’ to fund CRASSrail to the tune of £Billions that ye were ‘tricked’ by the lying Livingstone into making....
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! has shown up BOTH Houses of UK Parliament as being unfit for purpose: BOTH Houses fail to audit the 'executive'...
Khoodeelaar! has shown up BOTH Houses of UK Parliament as being unfit for purpose: BOTH Houses fail to audit the 'executive'...
This becomes clear whenever there is any issue of substance that the ‘Houses’ ‘consider’.
There is, of course, a lot of hype suggesting that the ‘Houses DO hold the executive to account!
But that is a lie.
As even the formally placed ‘chair’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee in the House of Lords’ [= our abbreviation of that is= CBSCHL= where the ‘S’ stands for STOOGED rather than “select’] has confessed: They are useless.
They are MEANT to be useless...
That ‘chair’ has said that objectors to Crossrail who are not impressed by the behaviour of the CBSCHL should seek redress in the courts!
Exactly the point that KHOODEELAAR! had been making and IS continuing to make!
The ‘Parliament’ is being discredited by the parliamentarians. And they know it.
And they say it.
As they said so many ways in the 30 minute stunt called the PMQs staged yesterday.
‘Thanks’ to the Daily Telegraph web site which did a strategic job of publishing the Sleaze suggestion linking keith vaz and Geoff Hoon with the Deal on the 42 day detention without trial.... Gordon Brown found himself, once again, lost without anything valuable to say...
None of his alleged ‘British vahloos’ looked remotely useful or even accessible as Ca-moron caught Brown out....
We say again: SCRAP Crossrail NOW, Gordon. lest ye regret thy
boasts and thy banality and thy imprudent ‘commitment’ to fund CRASSrail to the tune fo £Billions that ye were ‘tricked’ by the lying Livingstone into making....
[To be continued]
This becomes clear whenever there is any issue of substance that the ‘Houses’ ‘consider’.
There is, of course, a lot of hype suggesting that the ‘Houses DO hold the executive to account!
But that is a lie.
As even the formally placed ‘chair’ of the ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee in the House of Lords’ [= our abbreviation of that is= CBSCHL= where the ‘S’ stands for STOOGED rather than “select’] has confessed: They are useless.
They are MEANT to be useless...
That ‘chair’ has said that objectors to Crossrail who are not impressed by the behaviour of the CBSCHL should seek redress in the courts!
Exactly the point that KHOODEELAAR! had been making and IS continuing to make!
The ‘Parliament’ is being discredited by the parliamentarians. And they know it.
And they say it.
As they said so many ways in the 30 minute stunt called the PMQs staged yesterday.
‘Thanks’ to the Daily Telegraph web site which did a strategic job of publishing the Sleaze suggestion linking keith vaz and Geoff Hoon with the Deal on the 42 day detention without trial.... Gordon Brown found himself, once again, lost without anything valuable to say...
None of his alleged ‘British vahloos’ looked remotely useful or even accessible as Ca-moron caught Brown out....
We say again: SCRAP Crossrail NOW, Gordon. lest ye regret thy
boasts and thy banality and thy imprudent ‘commitment’ to fund CRASSrail to the tune fo £Billions that ye were ‘tricked’ by the lying Livingstone into making....
[To be continued]
Wednesday, July 2, 2008
As London tribunal finds Tower Hamlets Council guilty, how many other cases DO exist of the Council's callousness?
CRASS act by Crossrail hole plot-inviting clique on Tower Hamlets Council, EXPOSED in a tribunal case verdict today...
The crassness of the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council is a theme that the Khoodeelaar! campaign against Crossrail hole plot has pointed out right from the start of our campaign in January 2004.
We have said that Tower Hamlets Council is controlled by a clique that is corrupt. That the Council has been in the corrupt clique's control for most of the time. That decisions made by the corrupt clique are by definition corrupt and or inappropriate and or wasteful;.
This we have said all along and despite the fact that the so-called ‘local’ newspaper, the East London IDIOTISER keeps claiming to be publishing accurate reports about the behaviour of the council when the truth is that the Idiotiser is suppressing the true behaviour of the clique. And of the totally plaint ‘opposition’.
The Conservatives are NOt being treated here as ‘Opposition’. More on the Tower Hamlets Council 'Conservatives' shortly.
Here we publish an item from 24.dash web site which is self explanatory:-
Council worker in line for £1 million pay out in pension claim battle
Published by Jon Land for 24dash.com in Local Government
Wednesday 2nd July 2008 - 3:54pm
Email This Item
Email Address
ARTICLE TOOLS
Print
Email article
Comment
RSS
Atom
Share
TODAY IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Lambeth Council's mobile phone technology wins national award
Councils to get new powers to tackle tax rebels
Horrors of the Holocaust recalled on visit to Auschwitz
'Invest in under-fives' to reduce crime rates
Thousands of ballots 'miscounted' in London Mayoral election
Advertisement
Council worker in line for £1 million pay out in pension claim battle
A council worker made redundant six months before qualifying for a pension payout could receive £1 million compensation after victory at an employment tribunal today.
John Wooster, 50, from Chigwell, Essex, worked for Tower Hamlets council in east London for 33 years from the age of 16.
He was made redundant months before becoming eligible for a lump sum and pension payments.
Today Stratford Employment Tribunal found that he was unfairly dismissed and a victim of age discrimination.
Mr Wooster said: "This is a great victory. I really hope that this will stop the council from treating anyone else in the appalling way that it has treated me.
"I devoted 33 years of my working life to the council and it repaid me by dismissing me so that it would save money by not paying me my pension entitlements."
The council had claimed that Mr Wooster was a temporary employee while he worked as a senior consultation officer on secondment at East End Homes, a registered social landlord.
The firm offered to pay his salary until he reached the age of 50, but Tower Hamlets refused and he was dismissed on December 29 2006.
Solicitor Helen Murphie said: "Mr Wooster started work with the council when he was 16 and continued to work his way up the ladder until he was 49 and a half. Knowing that he would be entitled to his pension and a lump sum if he were made redundant upon reaching the age of 50, the council deliberately refused to redeploy him and dismissed him immediately."
Judge Pritchard-Witts said the tribunal had "no doubt" that it was Mr Wooster's age that had caused his dismissal.
Mr Wooster followed in the footsteps of his father, Tom, and grandfather, also John, in working for the council.
Wooster Gardens in Poplar, east London, are named after Mr Wooster's grandfather, who was once mayor of Poplar.
The 50-year-old is now claiming £1 million in compensation for loss of employment until his age of retirement at 65, loss of pension, and injury to feelings.
The crassness of the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council is a theme that the Khoodeelaar! campaign against Crossrail hole plot has pointed out right from the start of our campaign in January 2004.
We have said that Tower Hamlets Council is controlled by a clique that is corrupt. That the Council has been in the corrupt clique's control for most of the time. That decisions made by the corrupt clique are by definition corrupt and or inappropriate and or wasteful;.
This we have said all along and despite the fact that the so-called ‘local’ newspaper, the East London IDIOTISER keeps claiming to be publishing accurate reports about the behaviour of the council when the truth is that the Idiotiser is suppressing the true behaviour of the clique. And of the totally plaint ‘opposition’.
The Conservatives are NOt being treated here as ‘Opposition’. More on the Tower Hamlets Council 'Conservatives' shortly.
Here we publish an item from 24.dash web site which is self explanatory:-
Council worker in line for £1 million pay out in pension claim battle
Published by Jon Land for 24dash.com in Local Government
Wednesday 2nd July 2008 - 3:54pm
Email This Item
Email Address
ARTICLE TOOLS
Email article
Comment
RSS
Atom
Share
TODAY IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Lambeth Council's mobile phone technology wins national award
Councils to get new powers to tackle tax rebels
Horrors of the Holocaust recalled on visit to Auschwitz
'Invest in under-fives' to reduce crime rates
Thousands of ballots 'miscounted' in London Mayoral election
Advertisement
Council worker in line for £1 million pay out in pension claim battle
A council worker made redundant six months before qualifying for a pension payout could receive £1 million compensation after victory at an employment tribunal today.
John Wooster, 50, from Chigwell, Essex, worked for Tower Hamlets council in east London for 33 years from the age of 16.
He was made redundant months before becoming eligible for a lump sum and pension payments.
Today Stratford Employment Tribunal found that he was unfairly dismissed and a victim of age discrimination.
Mr Wooster said: "This is a great victory. I really hope that this will stop the council from treating anyone else in the appalling way that it has treated me.
"I devoted 33 years of my working life to the council and it repaid me by dismissing me so that it would save money by not paying me my pension entitlements."
The council had claimed that Mr Wooster was a temporary employee while he worked as a senior consultation officer on secondment at East End Homes, a registered social landlord.
The firm offered to pay his salary until he reached the age of 50, but Tower Hamlets refused and he was dismissed on December 29 2006.
Solicitor Helen Murphie said: "Mr Wooster started work with the council when he was 16 and continued to work his way up the ladder until he was 49 and a half. Knowing that he would be entitled to his pension and a lump sum if he were made redundant upon reaching the age of 50, the council deliberately refused to redeploy him and dismissed him immediately."
Judge Pritchard-Witts said the tribunal had "no doubt" that it was Mr Wooster's age that had caused his dismissal.
Mr Wooster followed in the footsteps of his father, Tom, and grandfather, also John, in working for the council.
Wooster Gardens in Poplar, east London, are named after Mr Wooster's grandfather, who was once mayor of Poplar.
The 50-year-old is now claiming £1 million in compensation for loss of employment until his age of retirement at 65, loss of pension, and injury to feelings.
Will 'Supermum' Nicola Join KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail hole agenda of ADDING to poverty in 'Tower Hamlets'?
1140 Hrs GMT 1240 Hrs UK Time London Wednesday 2 July 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot' CAMPAIGN told you so! That the 'City of London' HAS KNOWINGLY devised successions of take-over and occupation scams so that it could remove the 'community' that exists in the area targeted by Crossrail hole attacks. That some of the most high-profiled career-makers in the same 'City of London' KNOW of the dire, desperate destitution that exists in 'Tower Hamlets'.. This last part is what we are addressing in this edition, which we are starting with a quotation from Nicola Horlick...’the Supermum’...Who is quoted today by a City of London propaganda sheet as saying in an interview: “Around the City are some of the poorest areas in London, and that juxtaposition just makes you think. If you live in Tower Hamlets your life expectancy is seven years shorter than if you live in Richmond – it drives you to want to do something.” ....
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot' CAMPAIGN told you so! That the 'City of London' HAS KNOWINGLY devised successions of take-over and occupation scams so that it could remove the 'community' that exists in the area targeted by Crossrail hole attacks. That some of the most high-profiled career-makers in the same 'City of London' KNOW of the dire, desperate destitution that exists in 'Tower Hamlets'.. This last part is what we are addressing in this edition, which we are starting with a quotation from Nicola Horlick...’the Supermum’...Who is quoted today by a City of London propaganda sheet as saying in an interview: “Around the City are some of the poorest areas in London, and that juxtaposition just makes you think. If you live in Tower Hamlets your life expectancy is seven years shorter than if you live in Richmond – it drives you to want to do something.” ....
[To be continued]
Will 'Supermum' Nicola Join KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail hole agenda of ADDING to poverty in 'Tower Hamlets'?
Will 'Supermum' Nicola Join KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail hole agenda of ADDING to poverty in 'Tower Hamlets'?
[To be continued]
[To be continued]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)