By©Muhammad Haque
0035 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
4 June 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot'; No to “Big Business agenda for creating new poverty in inner city East London”.. The .Khoodeelaar! campaign has been arguing for 55 months now, against the poverty creation programme being implemented via the corruptly controlled local Tower Hamlets Borough Council.
Why?
Because the East end is already poor... and the poverty is measured in the poverty of entitlements on the part of the people in the community across the ordinary East End...
The campaign in defence of the East End is also noticing the appearance of elements that are being located in the community with the aim that these elements will undermine the community's defence .
The elements are then also placed on the local Council where they LOOK as if they represent the ‘mixed’ population of the Borough
That is all that they do. They LOOK the part. They do not deliver the democracy.
Hence the Khoodeelaar! campaign for a democratic, accountable local council....
[To be continued]
Tuesday, June 3, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot'-inviting clique on Tower Hamlets Council....
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot'-inviting clique on Tower Hamlets Council....
More to follow
More to follow
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot'; No to Big Business Agenda symbolises true antidote to globalising poverty, hunger....
By©Muhammad Haque
1858 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday 3 June 2008
This is the contextual update of the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto that I had written in December 2005 and published in the last week of December 2005 and the first fortnight of january 2006.
This update will be published over a few days.
The KHOODEELAAR! manifesto as published in December 2005/January 2006 was part of the movement for actual accountability by the ‘local’ ‘elected’ ‘council’ and other ‘locally elected’ holders of positions in the name of the people in the East End of London.
In terms of the contents and the purpose and the implications, the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto was unique. And has remained unique. No ‘party’ ‘group’ or ‘grouping’ has published a manifesto.
They may have claimed to have done so.
By the ‘party’, ‘group’ and ‘grouping’ here, I mean of the ones that have got ‘councillors’ on the Tower Hamlets Council in the names of the ‘parties’ and or ‘groups’ or ‘groupings’.
None of those has published any manifesto.
And the fact that they have not done so has also gone unremarked on, uncommented on. Except by Khoodeleaar!
[To be continued]
_________________________________
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
Khoodeelaar! Manifesto
Part C
Tuesday 10 January 2006
PART C of the KHOODEELAAR MANIFESTO 2006
1. The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will use the existing laws to establish the facts of the local Tower Hamlets council’s use of the legal powers to make grants and other funds available to ‘voluntary’ organisations in the community.
2. The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will make sure that the holders of senior positions in the employment of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council (LBTH ). The LBTH Council do not follow the political orders or personal preferences of individual councillors or of controlling groups of councillors if those orders or preferences are at variance with the interest of the local community and if those orders and preferences are also in conflict with the social, cultural educational, economic and environmental interest of the local community
3. The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will publish the fullest legally available information on which groups in the local community in a given financial year was given what sum of money by the LBTH Council to achieve what objective and under what democratic and transparent criteria
4. The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will publish the active links of all holders of elected positions in the Council with all known groups and groupings in the Borough so that the behaviour of the councillors can be democratically monitored by the community.
5. The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will also publish the information on the councillors’ links with any senior employee of the council and with any other councillor so that the behaviour of the councillors can be democratically monitored by the community
PART D will appear later on this week
1858 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday 3 June 2008
This is the contextual update of the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto that I had written in December 2005 and published in the last week of December 2005 and the first fortnight of january 2006.
This update will be published over a few days.
The KHOODEELAAR! manifesto as published in December 2005/January 2006 was part of the movement for actual accountability by the ‘local’ ‘elected’ ‘council’ and other ‘locally elected’ holders of positions in the name of the people in the East End of London.
In terms of the contents and the purpose and the implications, the KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto was unique. And has remained unique. No ‘party’ ‘group’ or ‘grouping’ has published a manifesto.
They may have claimed to have done so.
By the ‘party’, ‘group’ and ‘grouping’ here, I mean of the ones that have got ‘councillors’ on the Tower Hamlets Council in the names of the ‘parties’ and or ‘groups’ or ‘groupings’.
None of those has published any manifesto.
And the fact that they have not done so has also gone unremarked on, uncommented on. Except by Khoodeleaar!
[To be continued]
_________________________________
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
Khoodeelaar! Manifesto
Part C
Tuesday 10 January 2006
PART C of the KHOODEELAAR MANIFESTO 2006
1. The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will use the existing laws to establish the facts of the local Tower Hamlets council’s use of the legal powers to make grants and other funds available to ‘voluntary’ organisations in the community.
2. The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will make sure that the holders of senior positions in the employment of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council (LBTH ). The LBTH Council do not follow the political orders or personal preferences of individual councillors or of controlling groups of councillors if those orders or preferences are at variance with the interest of the local community and if those orders and preferences are also in conflict with the social, cultural educational, economic and environmental interest of the local community
3. The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will publish the fullest legally available information on which groups in the local community in a given financial year was given what sum of money by the LBTH Council to achieve what objective and under what democratic and transparent criteria
4. The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will publish the active links of all holders of elected positions in the Council with all known groups and groupings in the Borough so that the behaviour of the councillors can be democratically monitored by the community.
5. The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will also publish the information on the councillors’ links with any senior employee of the council and with any other councillor so that the behaviour of the councillors can be democratically monitored by the community
PART D will appear later on this week
Monday, June 2, 2008
Khoodeelaar! says No to Crossrail hole AGENDA because that agenda is to make East End people poorer.....
By©Muhammad Haque
1220 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 2 June 2008
The poverty that dominates the evidence about the East End of London has been in the main CREATED poverty. As all poverty is. But in the case of inner city East End of London, POVERTY HAS BEEN CREATED.
As poverty is about human beings, the human beings that make up the community in ordinary East End have been treated by the controlling forces in the economy with contempt.
The result has been that in the 'schools' and other 'institutions of education', there has been DEFICIT EDUCATION. Rather than positive education, the schools in Tower Hamlets have been the sources of DEFICIT education. In other words, they have ADDED to the negative human p[profiles of the vast majority of their 'students' across DECADES.
This has created the mainly underachieving, under-schooled, non-educated parts in the population that has been also denied the access to activities that would provide decent sustained incomes...
Like the man, a Bangladeshi one, who has been seen to be asking for money from passers-by on the Whitechapel Road... Those who know him also know his age and his history... He is known to spend the money on alcohol...
A more stark reality would be hard to imagine in the East End...
Why?
Because everyone knows that alcoholism is a road to self destruction... And the destruction of all around the person......
And everyone also knows that 'culturally, Bangladeshis are a million miles away from anything to do with alcohol'.
Or are they ?
And how could Bangladeshis get to be alcoholics in the East End of London? Or in any other part of London or the UK!!!
This is the question that is linked with our examination of the many ';benefits' that the pluggers of Crossrail hoe,attacks peddle....
They say that 'Crossrail would bring benefits to the East End'.
They don't mean benefits that are rationally described...
They mean distorted benefits. In fact they mean deficits that destroy the person. The community...
[To be continued]
1220 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 2 June 2008
The poverty that dominates the evidence about the East End of London has been in the main CREATED poverty. As all poverty is. But in the case of inner city East End of London, POVERTY HAS BEEN CREATED.
As poverty is about human beings, the human beings that make up the community in ordinary East End have been treated by the controlling forces in the economy with contempt.
The result has been that in the 'schools' and other 'institutions of education', there has been DEFICIT EDUCATION. Rather than positive education, the schools in Tower Hamlets have been the sources of DEFICIT education. In other words, they have ADDED to the negative human p[profiles of the vast majority of their 'students' across DECADES.
This has created the mainly underachieving, under-schooled, non-educated parts in the population that has been also denied the access to activities that would provide decent sustained incomes...
Like the man, a Bangladeshi one, who has been seen to be asking for money from passers-by on the Whitechapel Road... Those who know him also know his age and his history... He is known to spend the money on alcohol...
A more stark reality would be hard to imagine in the East End...
Why?
Because everyone knows that alcoholism is a road to self destruction... And the destruction of all around the person......
And everyone also knows that 'culturally, Bangladeshis are a million miles away from anything to do with alcohol'.
Or are they ?
And how could Bangladeshis get to be alcoholics in the East End of London? Or in any other part of London or the UK!!!
This is the question that is linked with our examination of the many ';benefits' that the pluggers of Crossrail hoe,attacks peddle....
They say that 'Crossrail would bring benefits to the East End'.
They don't mean benefits that are rationally described...
They mean distorted benefits. In fact they mean deficits that destroy the person. The community...
[To be continued]
Sunday, June 1, 2008
Crossrail hole agenda is the agenda of creating NEW poverty, adding to existing poverty on the already deprived inner city......
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole AGENDA is indisputably also against imposed, additional poverty....Defining poverty...
Crossrail hole agenda is the agenda of creating NEW poverty, adding to existing poverty on the already deprived inner city ...and of enriching the Big Business and their touts in the undemocratic, grubbing, corrupting City of London and all the looting and lying that the City of London typifies....
By©Muhammad Haque
0125 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 2 June 2008
The Crossrail hole attack is not needed. Not in the East End of London. Not in any other part of London. Or the South East. Or the UK. The Big Business agenda that Crossrail is a part of , a product of, is also the agenda that sweeps the truth by lies. Like the new City of London ‘Policy committee’ man has been saying via the Conrad and Barbara Black-ed London Daily Telegraph.
The man is the ‘successor’ to the Crass-talking City of London interests-flaunting fabricator and dissembler, Michael Snyder.
Snyder was even transposed and morphosed into ‘Crossrail’ in a most embarrassingly ****-**cking promotional career obituary by-lined to Martin Waller in the Business pages of the Murdoched London Times....
Snyder did play a fitting part so aptly redolent of his name. His snide comments verged on the racist.
Against the Scottish.
Especially the Scottish in their targeted campaign that could only have been devised by the coup plotters that knew that Gordon Brown was not all that keen for Crossrail.
Only Ken Livingstone matched Snyder’s lies for Crossrail...
For months the two liars for Big Business Crossrail practically competed with each other for the vilest possible things to s ay against Scotland.... Because they thought that by doing down the Scots, by BLAMING the Scots they could incite enough anti-Scottish emotions that would translate into a politically critical pressure and scare on Gordon Brown........
They did coerce, compromise Gordon Brown into making that ‘commitment’ to fund CRASSrail with £Billions of public money...
Money that simply is not there....
[To be continued]
Crossrail hole agenda is the agenda of creating NEW poverty, adding to existing poverty on the already deprived inner city ...and of enriching the Big Business and their touts in the undemocratic, grubbing, corrupting City of London and all the looting and lying that the City of London typifies....
By©Muhammad Haque
0125 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 2 June 2008
The Crossrail hole attack is not needed. Not in the East End of London. Not in any other part of London. Or the South East. Or the UK. The Big Business agenda that Crossrail is a part of , a product of, is also the agenda that sweeps the truth by lies. Like the new City of London ‘Policy committee’ man has been saying via the Conrad and Barbara Black-ed London Daily Telegraph.
The man is the ‘successor’ to the Crass-talking City of London interests-flaunting fabricator and dissembler, Michael Snyder.
Snyder was even transposed and morphosed into ‘Crossrail’ in a most embarrassingly ****-**cking promotional career obituary by-lined to Martin Waller in the Business pages of the Murdoched London Times....
Snyder did play a fitting part so aptly redolent of his name. His snide comments verged on the racist.
Against the Scottish.
Especially the Scottish in their targeted campaign that could only have been devised by the coup plotters that knew that Gordon Brown was not all that keen for Crossrail.
Only Ken Livingstone matched Snyder’s lies for Crossrail...
For months the two liars for Big Business Crossrail practically competed with each other for the vilest possible things to s ay against Scotland.... Because they thought that by doing down the Scots, by BLAMING the Scots they could incite enough anti-Scottish emotions that would translate into a politically critical pressure and scare on Gordon Brown........
They did coerce, compromise Gordon Brown into making that ‘commitment’ to fund CRASSrail with £Billions of public money...
Money that simply is not there....
[To be continued]
The KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law campaign against Crossrail hole plot EVIDENCE shows that the UK Tories are untrustworthy, dishonest ..Worse
1940 Hrs GMT
2040 Hrs UK Time
London Sunday 1 June 2008
Khoodeelaar! no to Crossrail hole campaign ACTION UPDATE on the official Opposition over CROSSRAIL hole in the UK House of Commons...
This ACTION UPDATE is focussing on the role of the official opposition party in the UK House of Commons. The Conservative Party.
The party is known as the Tory party.
This refers to the interview cum exchange that took place between the then Tory party Chair Francis Maude and the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against Crossrail hole Bill organiser Muhammad Haque.
The date was 24 April 2006.
The Place Brick Lane. London E1 UK
This update will set out the basic facts first and then raise the questions about the Tories’ claim that they are more reliable than the Blaired party. or that they are more competent than the battered Blaired image of Gordon Brown, the incumbent tenant at No 10 Downing Street Lon don SW1 UK.
The Khoodeelaar! examination of the Tories record shows that the Tories are NOT any more trustworthy than the Blaired Party [the former Labour Party].
In fact, we shall show the Tories’ main spokesman Chris Grayling to be unreliable, shallow, dishonest and on the subject of his brief a lethally ignorant man.
The fact that Ca-Moron has appointed Grayling to be his Party’s frontman in the UK House of commons about the so-called state welfare ‘reform’ [!!!!] shows the fundamental stupidity of the Ca-Moron party. Or of ‘Team ca-Moron’ , to use a contemporary formulation
[To be continued]
2040 Hrs UK Time
London Sunday 1 June 2008
Khoodeelaar! no to Crossrail hole campaign ACTION UPDATE on the official Opposition over CROSSRAIL hole in the UK House of Commons...
This ACTION UPDATE is focussing on the role of the official opposition party in the UK House of Commons. The Conservative Party.
The party is known as the Tory party.
This refers to the interview cum exchange that took place between the then Tory party Chair Francis Maude and the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against Crossrail hole Bill organiser Muhammad Haque.
The date was 24 April 2006.
The Place Brick Lane. London E1 UK
This update will set out the basic facts first and then raise the questions about the Tories’ claim that they are more reliable than the Blaired party. or that they are more competent than the battered Blaired image of Gordon Brown, the incumbent tenant at No 10 Downing Street Lon don SW1 UK.
The Khoodeelaar! examination of the Tories record shows that the Tories are NOT any more trustworthy than the Blaired Party [the former Labour Party].
In fact, we shall show the Tories’ main spokesman Chris Grayling to be unreliable, shallow, dishonest and on the subject of his brief a lethally ignorant man.
The fact that Ca-Moron has appointed Grayling to be his Party’s frontman in the UK House of commons about the so-called state welfare ‘reform’ [!!!!] shows the fundamental stupidity of the Ca-Moron party. Or of ‘Team ca-Moron’ , to use a contemporary formulation
[To be continued]
Evidence of impeccable constitutionality in the Khoodeelaar! campaign of opposition to Big Business Crossrail hole plot stooges in UK 'House of Lords’
Evidence of impeccable constitutionality in the Khoodeelaar! campaign of opposition to Big Business Crossrail hole plot stooges in UK 'House of Lords’
By©Muhammad Haque
1325 Hrs GMT
1425 Hrs UKTime
London Sunday 1 June 2008
We have been commenting for the past five days on and exposing the packaged lies for CROSSRAIL as contained in and represented by the ‘First Report’ published allegedly on 27 May 2008 in the name of the UK legislative House of Lords ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’.
the lies are for making the ‘proceedings’ referred to as being legitimate, genuine and truthful. the fact and the evidence are that the proceedings were a sham. Just as the equivalent proceedings as performed via the ‘House of Commons’ ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ during the two years [2005-2007] had been.
So why is KHOODEELAAR! bothering to pay so much attention to the lies as told via the ‘House of Lords’ by the Big Business Crossrail hole agenda promoters?
The answer is that because the lies are going to remain on the record and the record must be put right. Our publishing the particular expose will put on the public domain the actual facts and the truth can thereby be accessed.
Also the length of time that Khoodeelaar! has been spending in addressing every relevant aspect of the behaviour of the ‘legislative’ ‘UK House of Lords’ ‘Crossrail Bill’ ‘Select Committee’ in the context of our campaign to oppose the Crossrail hole plot has been significant. Our time, our resources and our specialist knowledge are being continued to be given to further the caused of the community’s rights. the community’s collective defence against the unconstitutional, immoral, unwanted attack on our community.
In particular, we are showing that we had ANTICIPATED that Parliament would be used as a barrier to our representation. We evidentially expected to find that democracy would be thwarted in and via Parliament. That democracy would be defied in Parliament. We anticipated correctly. We had done that as far back as December 2005. We had concluded even before that date that ANY bureaucracy that was set up in the UK either by the UK Government or by the UK parliamentary majority in the UK parliament acting under the de facto influences of the lobbys that had been installed in the various parts of the bureaucracies in Parliament would violate the rights of the people. We said that that would be the case because of the corrupt way that the ‘business’ of parliament was carried out in the UK.
We have been vindicated on each and every count since December 2005.
When we were contacted by the agents of the bureaucracy in the UK House of Lords in November 2007 about the possibility of our putting forward our objections to the contents of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as it was due to be processed in the legislative UK House of Lords, we knew that that approach was not genuine. that it was a sham acton. Intended to create a pretext for the bureaucracy to be able to claim that they did ‘everyone the chance to say what they wanted to s ay about Crossrail’.
As we knew that the UK House of Lords bureaucracy is as corrupt, as unconstitutional as its counterpart set up that existed in relation to the UK House of Commons.
We also knew that the House of Commons bureaucracy had given the Big Business agenda for Crossrail a clear run and had in effect approved of the contents of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ already The sham debate that was stage din the House of Commons on 19 July 2005 was a sham. With a very small - and unstained exception in terms of contribution in that ‘debate - the 19 July 2005 ‘debate’ was a disgrace and a scandal because the overwhelming majority of MPs
So when we got a communication or a circular ‘invite’ to contact the House of Lords bureaucracy,
we made clear our objections to the House of Lords itself being used as a stooge.
So from November 2007 to March 2008, we maintain that opposition.
Thus making our opposition manifold fold.
This multifaceted, multilayered opposition addressed the wrongs that are contained both in the particular piece of legislation that we were addressing As well as to parliament itself which was in control of the legislation. Or in apparent control of the legislation.
In drafting our analysis, or representation, we addressed all the key parts of the UK state and of the Uk Parliament.
In our e-mail sent on 14 and 15 January 2008, for instance, we addressed the key problems that stood in the way of our properly representing our opposition to the Crossrail hole Bill and the agenda that created that Bill. That agenda:: was and remains that of Big Business. And that of their stooges and touts. And that agenda was and remains hostile to the needs of the community. The Khoodeelaar! campaign having been founded for the community, founded in the community is the voice of opposition to that agenda and for the continuing defence of the community.
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law campaign; against Crossrail hole Plot - evidence dated 14 and 15 january 2008
“Date:
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:09:49 -0800 (PST)
From:
"Khoodeelaar NotoCrossrailholeBillUK" View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert
Subject:
Pre-formal communication to the House of Lords from KHOODEELAAR! Khoodeelaar! Objections to Crossrail Bill - as at 1255 Hrs Monday 15.01.2008
To:
[emailaddress1]@parliament.uk, [emailaddress{2}]@parliament.uk
CC:
bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk, lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk
Khoodeelaar! needs answers to the factual questions as
put to you on 14.01.2008
All rights reserved and IPRs asserted by© MUHAMMAD HAQUE and
KHOODEELAAR! And AADHIKAR Media Foundation and CBRUK 2008. This
publication and communication is from the Brick Lane and Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill [the draft - and HYBRID- piece of legislation awaiting formal enactment s now in the UK House of Lords as at Thursday 3 January 2008] Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign information, comments, position statements and news are published on a number of web sites including:
www.khoodeelaar.com
www.aadhikar.com
www.cbruk.com
http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnews/today.html
________________________________________________________
Message [ Download File ]
Date:
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:57:22 -0800 (PST)
From:
"Khoodeelaar NotoCrossrailholeBillUK"
Subject:
Pre-formal communication to the House of Lords from KHOODEELAAR! Khoodeelaar! Objections to Crossrail Bill - as at 1255 Hrs Monday 15.01.2008
To:
[email address.{3}]@parliament.uk
CC:
[email address.{3}]@parliament.uk, bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk, lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk
Dear [[email address.{3}] A and Ms B and Ms C]
the Objections to the CROSSRAIL BILL
Khoodeelaar! Questions as put to the House of Lords
office concerned on Monday 14 January 2008, about the
Procedural 'decision' by [=including on the ASSUMED
behalf of] the 'House of Lords' about the scope of the
objections to the ‘Crossrail Bill’
the Context:
the contents of the ‘guidance’ notes so far received,
show that there are limitations to the
Objections. Those limitations are described in the
notes. So there is no need to repeat them here.
the Question [in parts marked by alphabets]:
a. Did the House of Lords [as defined here, above]
make the decision by actively considering the
constitutional duties, obligations and implications of
the UK Houses of Parliament [=UK Parliament] as those
arise from the UK’s Treaty obligations [ECHR]
[=’Treaty of Rome’ and the relevant subsequent forms,
formulations and agreements, as those stood on the
date/s of the relevant ‘decision/s’]?
b. If they did, what part of the ‘guidance notes’
contain categorical, unambiguous, straightforward and
clear reference/s to and evidence of such
consideration [=‘actively considering the
constitutional duties.’]?
c. If they did not, why?
d. Where – and what - are the, or any, [of the] sources in
constitutional and legally valid ‘justification’ and
or ‘support’ of the decision/s by ignoring and or overlooking the UK’s ECHR Treaty obligations concerned [as described and defined above]
[if any such is citable and or applicable]?
Yours sincerely
Muhammad Haque
1255 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 January 2008
All rights reserved and IPRs asserted by© MUHAMMAD HAQUE and
KHOODEELAAR! And AADHIKAR Media Foundation and CBRUK 2008. This publication and
communication is from the Brick Lane and Whitechapel and Stepney
London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill [the draft - and
HYBRID- piece of legislation awaiting formal enactment s now in the UK
House of Lords as at Thursday 3 January 2008]
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign information, comments,
position statements and news are published on a number of web sites
including:
www.khoodeelaar.com
www.aadhikar.com
www.cbruk.com
http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnews/today.html
By©Muhammad Haque
1325 Hrs GMT
1425 Hrs UKTime
London Sunday 1 June 2008
We have been commenting for the past five days on and exposing the packaged lies for CROSSRAIL as contained in and represented by the ‘First Report’ published allegedly on 27 May 2008 in the name of the UK legislative House of Lords ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’.
the lies are for making the ‘proceedings’ referred to as being legitimate, genuine and truthful. the fact and the evidence are that the proceedings were a sham. Just as the equivalent proceedings as performed via the ‘House of Commons’ ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ during the two years [2005-2007] had been.
So why is KHOODEELAAR! bothering to pay so much attention to the lies as told via the ‘House of Lords’ by the Big Business Crossrail hole agenda promoters?
The answer is that because the lies are going to remain on the record and the record must be put right. Our publishing the particular expose will put on the public domain the actual facts and the truth can thereby be accessed.
Also the length of time that Khoodeelaar! has been spending in addressing every relevant aspect of the behaviour of the ‘legislative’ ‘UK House of Lords’ ‘Crossrail Bill’ ‘Select Committee’ in the context of our campaign to oppose the Crossrail hole plot has been significant. Our time, our resources and our specialist knowledge are being continued to be given to further the caused of the community’s rights. the community’s collective defence against the unconstitutional, immoral, unwanted attack on our community.
In particular, we are showing that we had ANTICIPATED that Parliament would be used as a barrier to our representation. We evidentially expected to find that democracy would be thwarted in and via Parliament. That democracy would be defied in Parliament. We anticipated correctly. We had done that as far back as December 2005. We had concluded even before that date that ANY bureaucracy that was set up in the UK either by the UK Government or by the UK parliamentary majority in the UK parliament acting under the de facto influences of the lobbys that had been installed in the various parts of the bureaucracies in Parliament would violate the rights of the people. We said that that would be the case because of the corrupt way that the ‘business’ of parliament was carried out in the UK.
We have been vindicated on each and every count since December 2005.
When we were contacted by the agents of the bureaucracy in the UK House of Lords in November 2007 about the possibility of our putting forward our objections to the contents of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ as it was due to be processed in the legislative UK House of Lords, we knew that that approach was not genuine. that it was a sham acton. Intended to create a pretext for the bureaucracy to be able to claim that they did ‘everyone the chance to say what they wanted to s ay about Crossrail’.
As we knew that the UK House of Lords bureaucracy is as corrupt, as unconstitutional as its counterpart set up that existed in relation to the UK House of Commons.
We also knew that the House of Commons bureaucracy had given the Big Business agenda for Crossrail a clear run and had in effect approved of the contents of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ already The sham debate that was stage din the House of Commons on 19 July 2005 was a sham. With a very small - and unstained exception in terms of contribution in that ‘debate - the 19 July 2005 ‘debate’ was a disgrace and a scandal because the overwhelming majority of MPs
So when we got a communication or a circular ‘invite’ to contact the House of Lords bureaucracy,
we made clear our objections to the House of Lords itself being used as a stooge.
So from November 2007 to March 2008, we maintain that opposition.
Thus making our opposition manifold fold.
This multifaceted, multilayered opposition addressed the wrongs that are contained both in the particular piece of legislation that we were addressing As well as to parliament itself which was in control of the legislation. Or in apparent control of the legislation.
In drafting our analysis, or representation, we addressed all the key parts of the UK state and of the Uk Parliament.
In our e-mail sent on 14 and 15 January 2008, for instance, we addressed the key problems that stood in the way of our properly representing our opposition to the Crossrail hole Bill and the agenda that created that Bill. That agenda:: was and remains that of Big Business. And that of their stooges and touts. And that agenda was and remains hostile to the needs of the community. The Khoodeelaar! campaign having been founded for the community, founded in the community is the voice of opposition to that agenda and for the continuing defence of the community.
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law campaign; against Crossrail hole Plot - evidence dated 14 and 15 january 2008
“Date:
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:09:49 -0800 (PST)
From:
"Khoodeelaar NotoCrossrailholeBillUK" View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert
Subject:
Pre-formal communication to the House of Lords from KHOODEELAAR! Khoodeelaar! Objections to Crossrail Bill - as at 1255 Hrs Monday 15.01.2008
To:
[emailaddress1]@parliament.uk, [emailaddress{2}]@parliament.uk
CC:
bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk, lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk
Khoodeelaar! needs answers to the factual questions as
put to you on 14.01.2008
All rights reserved and IPRs asserted by© MUHAMMAD HAQUE and
KHOODEELAAR! And AADHIKAR Media Foundation and CBRUK 2008. This
publication and communication is from the Brick Lane and Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill [the draft - and HYBRID- piece of legislation awaiting formal enactment s now in the UK House of Lords as at Thursday 3 January 2008] Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign information, comments, position statements and news are published on a number of web sites including:
www.khoodeelaar.com
www.aadhikar.com
www.cbruk.com
http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnews/today.html
________________________________________________________
Message [ Download File ]
Date:
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:57:22 -0800 (PST)
From:
"Khoodeelaar NotoCrossrailholeBillUK"
Subject:
Pre-formal communication to the House of Lords from KHOODEELAAR! Khoodeelaar! Objections to Crossrail Bill - as at 1255 Hrs Monday 15.01.2008
To:
[email address.{3}]@parliament.uk
CC:
[email address.{3}]@parliament.uk, bricklanekhoodeelaar@yahoo.co.uk, lawmedia@hotmail.co.uk
Dear [[email address.{3}] A and Ms B and Ms C]
the Objections to the CROSSRAIL BILL
Khoodeelaar! Questions as put to the House of Lords
office concerned on Monday 14 January 2008, about the
Procedural 'decision' by [=including on the ASSUMED
behalf of] the 'House of Lords' about the scope of the
objections to the ‘Crossrail Bill’
the Context:
the contents of the ‘guidance’ notes so far received,
show that there are limitations to the
Objections. Those limitations are described in the
notes. So there is no need to repeat them here.
the Question [in parts marked by alphabets]:
a. Did the House of Lords [as defined here, above]
make the decision by actively considering the
constitutional duties, obligations and implications of
the UK Houses of Parliament [=UK Parliament] as those
arise from the UK’s Treaty obligations [ECHR]
[=’Treaty of Rome’ and the relevant subsequent forms,
formulations and agreements, as those stood on the
date/s of the relevant ‘decision/s’]?
b. If they did, what part of the ‘guidance notes’
contain categorical, unambiguous, straightforward and
clear reference/s to and evidence of such
consideration [=‘actively considering the
constitutional duties.’]?
c. If they did not, why?
d. Where – and what - are the, or any, [of the] sources in
constitutional and legally valid ‘justification’ and
or ‘support’ of the decision/s by ignoring and or overlooking the UK’s ECHR Treaty obligations concerned [as described and defined above]
[if any such is citable and or applicable]?
Yours sincerely
Muhammad Haque
1255 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 January 2008
All rights reserved and IPRs asserted by© MUHAMMAD HAQUE and
KHOODEELAAR! And AADHIKAR Media Foundation and CBRUK 2008. This publication and
communication is from the Brick Lane and Whitechapel and Stepney
London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill [the draft - and
HYBRID- piece of legislation awaiting formal enactment s now in the UK
House of Lords as at Thursday 3 January 2008]
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign information, comments,
position statements and news are published on a number of web sites
including:
www.khoodeelaar.com
www.aadhikar.com
www.cbruk.com
http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnews/today.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)