Monday, June 9, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN is due to start legal action against Ruth Kelly - more, here, soon
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN is due to start legal action against Ruth Kelly - more, here, soon
Contrary to his preaching about justice, Gordon Brown takes the side with Big Business... Crossrail is a Big Business ploy...
Monday's belated bid by UK Transport fronter in Gordon Brown's cabinet reinforces the view that as with London Crossrail they are wrong on M'chester
By©Muhammad Haque
1950 GMT
London
Monday
9 June 2008
Gordon Brown has shown that contrary to his preaching about justice, he takes the side with Big Business... Crossrail is a Big Business ploy...
More on this after I update on the errors of Gordon Brown and his 'cabinet' on Transport. As illustrated today in the 'decision' or the spin by his transport fronter Ruth kelly on Manchester...
Gordon Brown is wrong to have made the statement in late September 2007 and early October 2007] that he will make £Billions of public money available to Crossrail in London. That scheme is a big Business scam. That scam is wasteful, irrelevant and obsolete. Because of that, even Gordon Brown's own 'expert', ex head of British Airways Rod Eddington, had refused to recommend or to to endorse Crossrail....
And as Brown, his fronter on transport in his cabinet, Ruth Kelly is guilty of incomplete [if any] thought. This has become clear in the response from several MPs, from Brown's Blaired side in the UK House of Commons, who have spoken of their unease at Kelly's announcement of a C-Charge in Manchester....And on Manchester
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1950 GMT
London
Monday
9 June 2008
Gordon Brown has shown that contrary to his preaching about justice, he takes the side with Big Business... Crossrail is a Big Business ploy...
More on this after I update on the errors of Gordon Brown and his 'cabinet' on Transport. As illustrated today in the 'decision' or the spin by his transport fronter Ruth kelly on Manchester...
Gordon Brown is wrong to have made the statement in late September 2007 and early October 2007] that he will make £Billions of public money available to Crossrail in London. That scheme is a big Business scam. That scam is wasteful, irrelevant and obsolete. Because of that, even Gordon Brown's own 'expert', ex head of British Airways Rod Eddington, had refused to recommend or to to endorse Crossrail....
And as Brown, his fronter on transport in his cabinet, Ruth Kelly is guilty of incomplete [if any] thought. This has become clear in the response from several MPs, from Brown's Blaired side in the UK House of Commons, who have spoken of their unease at Kelly's announcement of a C-Charge in Manchester....And on Manchester
[To be continued]
The behaviour of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ 'select committees' in the UK Parliament has been totally servile to Big Business agenda....
The behaviour of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ 'select committees' in the UK Parliament has been totally servile to Big Business agenda. And a disgrace to the idea of democratic, accountable parliament
By©Muhammad Haque
1555 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 9 June 2008
DISSECTING THE LUDICROUS BEHAVIOUR in PARLIAMENT OF THE STOOGED SELECT COMMITTEE IN THE NAME of the UK HOUSE OF LORDS and under the de facto influence of Big BUSINESS and assorted corrupting ‘professionals ’ lobbyists and lying lawyers that have been peddling the lies in the ‘palace of Westminster’....
What is the ‘ludicrous behaviour’ that I am talking about?
Short answer is this: the UK Houses of Parliament,ent are behaving ludicrously. Most of the times. They are not representing the people on most things. they are participating in prompting the line that the UK Executive [that is the 'Government' of the day - more on that concept, later] is proposing... This is to be understood even in the week when the latest charade of rebellion is being hyped up in propaganda terms by the pliant, servile media. Servile to the Executive. Serving the pro[agenda purpose of the paraders of democracy in the name of Parliament... There is no rigourous parliament in Britain. Never has been. And as I have said, the ‘nearest’ moment in historic terms that can be found when parliament was in in any real sense ‘sovereign’ and active was when Oliver Cromwell did those unconstitutional things. But then Cromwell was not sustainable. And there were more questions than answers in what he did. Dreadful dire things. Not really democratic.
Not really sustainable.
Not really just. Not in the end...
But as moments of what could be done in asserting a real rebellion, his activities were undeniably representative.
Citable....
Since Cromwell’s time, and since the reversal of his actions, the behaviour of Parliament has been a token.
A fake.
A token of what in truth should happen but is not allowed to happen.
. So much so that the word ‘opposition’ in Parliament has lost all meaning....
No, it never had any meaning...
So the Opposition has no meaning....
I shall apply this analysis to what has been going on in the ‘Select Committees’ in both Houses where that formula of pliant rebellion has been sued to advance the Big Business agenda.......
How did the ‘peers’ [!] peering into the abyss of absurdity attributable to the crass conceivers of the Crossrail hole assault on the East End of London LOOK when they paid a ‘site’ ‘visit’ on 20 February 2008?
Did they LOOK real?
Did they LOOK human as when human beings listening, thinking and understanding?
Did they LOOK as if they were being shown the evidence of just how wrong the CRASS plot was? Did they get told how imprudent [note that word again] Gordon Brown had come across as on Crossrail ?
More, including more historic KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot CAMPAIGN pictures of the peering peers on site visit in the Hanbury Street, off Brick Lane, London E1 on 20 February 2008, here soon
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1555 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 9 June 2008
DISSECTING THE LUDICROUS BEHAVIOUR in PARLIAMENT OF THE STOOGED SELECT COMMITTEE IN THE NAME of the UK HOUSE OF LORDS and under the de facto influence of Big BUSINESS and assorted corrupting ‘professionals ’ lobbyists and lying lawyers that have been peddling the lies in the ‘palace of Westminster’....
What is the ‘ludicrous behaviour’ that I am talking about?
Short answer is this: the UK Houses of Parliament,ent are behaving ludicrously. Most of the times. They are not representing the people on most things. they are participating in prompting the line that the UK Executive [that is the 'Government' of the day - more on that concept, later] is proposing... This is to be understood even in the week when the latest charade of rebellion is being hyped up in propaganda terms by the pliant, servile media. Servile to the Executive. Serving the pro[agenda purpose of the paraders of democracy in the name of Parliament... There is no rigourous parliament in Britain. Never has been. And as I have said, the ‘nearest’ moment in historic terms that can be found when parliament was in in any real sense ‘sovereign’ and active was when Oliver Cromwell did those unconstitutional things. But then Cromwell was not sustainable. And there were more questions than answers in what he did. Dreadful dire things. Not really democratic.
Not really sustainable.
Not really just. Not in the end...
But as moments of what could be done in asserting a real rebellion, his activities were undeniably representative.
Citable....
Since Cromwell’s time, and since the reversal of his actions, the behaviour of Parliament has been a token.
A fake.
A token of what in truth should happen but is not allowed to happen.
. So much so that the word ‘opposition’ in Parliament has lost all meaning....
No, it never had any meaning...
So the Opposition has no meaning....
I shall apply this analysis to what has been going on in the ‘Select Committees’ in both Houses where that formula of pliant rebellion has been sued to advance the Big Business agenda.......
How did the ‘peers’ [!] peering into the abyss of absurdity attributable to the crass conceivers of the Crossrail hole assault on the East End of London LOOK when they paid a ‘site’ ‘visit’ on 20 February 2008?
Did they LOOK real?
Did they LOOK human as when human beings listening, thinking and understanding?
Did they LOOK as if they were being shown the evidence of just how wrong the CRASS plot was? Did they get told how imprudent [note that word again] Gordon Brown had come across as on Crossrail ?
More, including more historic KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot CAMPAIGN pictures of the peering peers on site visit in the Hanbury Street, off Brick Lane, London E1 on 20 February 2008, here soon
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole Bill CAMPAIGN is also the campaign against IMPOSING new poverty on the inner city East End...
Our exclusive investigative report due here during Monday 9 June 2008
Sunday, June 8, 2008
Boris Johnson, the 'successor' to Ken Livingstone in the name of London, will FAIL as Livingstone if Johnson does not show he is NOT another liar..
By©Muhammad Haque
0050 Hrs GMT
London Monday 9 June 2008
Boris Johnson, the 'successor' to Ken Livingstone in the name of London, will FAIL as Livingstone if Johnson does not show he is NOT another liar
How could Johnson possibly unravel? And do so faster than his 'advisers' and himself, may think?
This may happen by Johnson not realising - and by his not behaving in accordance with that unimplemented realisation - that his 'team' as he has appointed so far, does not constitute a democratic, ethical, accountable improvement at all on what Ken Livingstone had created....
I shall show how Boris Johnson has got things wrong so far . I have already said that Johnson is guilty of a major mistake in attacking the Scottish people.
As I have said on hundreds of occasions before, it is not acceptable for anyone doing 'political representation' in the name of the people of London to attack another people. Especially not the Scottish people., In context. I shall return to the Johnson wrong over Scotland in a late part.
I begin this by looking at Patience Wheatcroft. I shall examine her in a number of parts in this commentary.
Patience Wheatcroft has shown, so far, that she is an alien. To London. And to the idea of accountability.
Contrary to the image that she is involved in promoting for herself and for Boris Johnson, her ‘boss’. I note for the record and as evidence the point she is making so far about not being paid [and also in not being interested in being paid] for her job at Boris Johnson's Onion!
It is like being back in the era of John Major and dealing with or trying to deal with the utter, total, complete ignorance of the majority of his cabinet. Typified by two in context. One Peter Lilley, who defied his notoriety as one of Major’s bastards and behaved like he was officially in an officially Tory Government but he believed in the bankrupt ‘ideals and values’ that the Neil Kinnock Party ‘gloried in and exhibited’.
The other was Gillian Shepherd. The so-called Education Secretary.
She was the nearest example in John Major’s UK administration that resembled the corrupt, the immoral and the bankrupt policies exhibited by Ken Livingstone at the Ghastly Livingstone Confection [the GLC] or the Greedy Lying Conurbation during the 3rd, the 4th, the 5th and the 6th year of the decade of the 1980s when Thatcher was allegedly dismantling the GLC.
‘Value for money’ , the phrase that Wheatcroft kept uttering as she spoke to Tim Donovan on the BBC TV programme ‘the Politics Show’ [London segment, broadcast on Sunday 8 June 2008] is total, utter and complete rubbish if it is the main ‘concept’ that defines and determines conduct of the holders of public office as far as the money available to the operation of the ‘mayor’ in the name of London.
And Tim Donavan [the BBC TV London political editor] let himself down by not going over the key failures of the Lyingstill Livingstone's maladministration.
For without that checklist - although even the Donovan list was far from complete when articulated in the months before 1 May 2008 - the people who watched that edition on 8 June 2008 would not know the NEW SITUATION.
There ha got to be a political perspectives and sufficient political context shown in the BBC’s packaging and the presenting of events...
And the less said about John Biggs the better!
Strangely, there is nothing to John Biggs. Politically. Ethically. Democratically. Not as far as his being in the political office is anything to go by.
He is politically as empty as he is amoral.
What is the point of John Biggs in a political office?
[To be continued]
0050 Hrs GMT
London Monday 9 June 2008
Boris Johnson, the 'successor' to Ken Livingstone in the name of London, will FAIL as Livingstone if Johnson does not show he is NOT another liar
How could Johnson possibly unravel? And do so faster than his 'advisers' and himself, may think?
This may happen by Johnson not realising - and by his not behaving in accordance with that unimplemented realisation - that his 'team' as he has appointed so far, does not constitute a democratic, ethical, accountable improvement at all on what Ken Livingstone had created....
I shall show how Boris Johnson has got things wrong so far . I have already said that Johnson is guilty of a major mistake in attacking the Scottish people.
As I have said on hundreds of occasions before, it is not acceptable for anyone doing 'political representation' in the name of the people of London to attack another people. Especially not the Scottish people., In context. I shall return to the Johnson wrong over Scotland in a late part.
I begin this by looking at Patience Wheatcroft. I shall examine her in a number of parts in this commentary.
Patience Wheatcroft has shown, so far, that she is an alien. To London. And to the idea of accountability.
Contrary to the image that she is involved in promoting for herself and for Boris Johnson, her ‘boss’. I note for the record and as evidence the point she is making so far about not being paid [and also in not being interested in being paid] for her job at Boris Johnson's Onion!
It is like being back in the era of John Major and dealing with or trying to deal with the utter, total, complete ignorance of the majority of his cabinet. Typified by two in context. One Peter Lilley, who defied his notoriety as one of Major’s bastards and behaved like he was officially in an officially Tory Government but he believed in the bankrupt ‘ideals and values’ that the Neil Kinnock Party ‘gloried in and exhibited’.
The other was Gillian Shepherd. The so-called Education Secretary.
She was the nearest example in John Major’s UK administration that resembled the corrupt, the immoral and the bankrupt policies exhibited by Ken Livingstone at the Ghastly Livingstone Confection [the GLC] or the Greedy Lying Conurbation during the 3rd, the 4th, the 5th and the 6th year of the decade of the 1980s when Thatcher was allegedly dismantling the GLC.
‘Value for money’ , the phrase that Wheatcroft kept uttering as she spoke to Tim Donovan on the BBC TV programme ‘the Politics Show’ [London segment, broadcast on Sunday 8 June 2008] is total, utter and complete rubbish if it is the main ‘concept’ that defines and determines conduct of the holders of public office as far as the money available to the operation of the ‘mayor’ in the name of London.
And Tim Donavan [the BBC TV London political editor] let himself down by not going over the key failures of the Lyingstill Livingstone's maladministration.
For without that checklist - although even the Donovan list was far from complete when articulated in the months before 1 May 2008 - the people who watched that edition on 8 June 2008 would not know the NEW SITUATION.
There ha got to be a political perspectives and sufficient political context shown in the BBC’s packaging and the presenting of events...
And the less said about John Biggs the better!
Strangely, there is nothing to John Biggs. Politically. Ethically. Democratically. Not as far as his being in the political office is anything to go by.
He is politically as empty as he is amoral.
What is the point of John Biggs in a political office?
[To be continued]
Boris Johnson, the 'successor' to Ken Livingstone in the name of London, will FAIL as Livingstone if Johnson does not show he is NOT another liar..
By©Muhammad Haque
0050 Hrs GMT
London Monday 9 June 2008
Boris Johnson, the 'successor' to Ken Livingstone in the name of London, will FAIL as Livingstone if Johnson does not show he is NOT another liar
How could Johnson possibly unravel? And do so faster than his 'advisers' and himself, may think?
This may happen by Johnson not realising - and by his not behaving in accordance with that unimplemented realisation - that his 'team' as he has appointed so far, does not constitute a democratic, ethical, accountable improvement at all on what Ken Livingstone had created....
I shall show how Boris Johnson has got things wrong so far . I have already said that Johnson os guilty of a major mistake in attacking the Scottish people.
As I have said on hundreds of occasions before, it is not acceptable for anyone doing 'political representation' in the name of the people of London to attack another people. Especially not the Scottish people., In context. I shall return to the Johnson wring over Scotland in a late part.
I begin this by looking at Patience Wheatcroft. I shall examine her in a number of parts in this commentary.
Patience Wheatcroft has shown, so far, that she is an alien. To London. And to the idea of accountability.
Contrary to the image that she is involved in promoting for herself and for Boris Johnson, her ‘boss’. I note for the record and as evidence the point she is making so far about not being paid [and also in not being interested in being paid] for her job at Boris Johnson's Onion!
It is like being back in the era of John Major and dealing with or trying to deal with the utter, total, complete ignorance of the majority of his cabinet. Typified by two in context. One Peter Lilley, who defied his notoriety as one of Major’s bastards and behaved like he was officially in an officially Tory Government but he believed in the bankrupt ‘ideals and values’ that the Neil Kinnock Party ‘gloried in and exhibited’.
The other was Gillian Shepherd. The so-called Education Secretary.
She was the nearest example in John Major’s UK administration that resembled the corrupt, the immoral and the bankrupt policies exhibited by Ken Livingstone at the Ghastly Livingstone Confection [the GLC] or the Greedy Lying Conurbation during the 3rd, the 4th, the 5th and the 6th year of the decade of the 1980s when Thatcher was allegedly dismantling the GLC.
‘Value for money’ , the phrase that Wheatcroft kept uttering as she spoke to Tim Donovan on the BBC TV programme ‘the Politics Show’ [London segment, broadcast on Sunday 8 June 2008] is total, utter and complete rubbish if it is the main ‘concept’ that defines and determines conduct of the holders of public office as far as the money available to the operation of the ‘mayor’ in the name of London.
And Tim Donavan [the BBC TV London political editor] let himself down by not going over the key failures of the Lyingstill Livingstone's maladministration.
For without that checklist - although even the Donovan list was far from complete when articulated in the months before 1 May 2008 - the people who watched that edition on 8 June 2008 would not know the NEW SITUATION.
There ha got to be a political perspectives and sufficient political context shown in the BBC’s packaging and the presenting of events...
And the less said about John Biggs the better!
Strangely, there is nothing to John Biggs. Politically. Ethically. Democratically. Not as far as his being in the political office is anything to go by.
He is politically as empty as he is amoral.
What is the point of John Biggs in a political office?
[To be continued]
0050 Hrs GMT
London Monday 9 June 2008
Boris Johnson, the 'successor' to Ken Livingstone in the name of London, will FAIL as Livingstone if Johnson does not show he is NOT another liar
How could Johnson possibly unravel? And do so faster than his 'advisers' and himself, may think?
This may happen by Johnson not realising - and by his not behaving in accordance with that unimplemented realisation - that his 'team' as he has appointed so far, does not constitute a democratic, ethical, accountable improvement at all on what Ken Livingstone had created....
I shall show how Boris Johnson has got things wrong so far . I have already said that Johnson os guilty of a major mistake in attacking the Scottish people.
As I have said on hundreds of occasions before, it is not acceptable for anyone doing 'political representation' in the name of the people of London to attack another people. Especially not the Scottish people., In context. I shall return to the Johnson wring over Scotland in a late part.
I begin this by looking at Patience Wheatcroft. I shall examine her in a number of parts in this commentary.
Patience Wheatcroft has shown, so far, that she is an alien. To London. And to the idea of accountability.
Contrary to the image that she is involved in promoting for herself and for Boris Johnson, her ‘boss’. I note for the record and as evidence the point she is making so far about not being paid [and also in not being interested in being paid] for her job at Boris Johnson's Onion!
It is like being back in the era of John Major and dealing with or trying to deal with the utter, total, complete ignorance of the majority of his cabinet. Typified by two in context. One Peter Lilley, who defied his notoriety as one of Major’s bastards and behaved like he was officially in an officially Tory Government but he believed in the bankrupt ‘ideals and values’ that the Neil Kinnock Party ‘gloried in and exhibited’.
The other was Gillian Shepherd. The so-called Education Secretary.
She was the nearest example in John Major’s UK administration that resembled the corrupt, the immoral and the bankrupt policies exhibited by Ken Livingstone at the Ghastly Livingstone Confection [the GLC] or the Greedy Lying Conurbation during the 3rd, the 4th, the 5th and the 6th year of the decade of the 1980s when Thatcher was allegedly dismantling the GLC.
‘Value for money’ , the phrase that Wheatcroft kept uttering as she spoke to Tim Donovan on the BBC TV programme ‘the Politics Show’ [London segment, broadcast on Sunday 8 June 2008] is total, utter and complete rubbish if it is the main ‘concept’ that defines and determines conduct of the holders of public office as far as the money available to the operation of the ‘mayor’ in the name of London.
And Tim Donavan [the BBC TV London political editor] let himself down by not going over the key failures of the Lyingstill Livingstone's maladministration.
For without that checklist - although even the Donovan list was far from complete when articulated in the months before 1 May 2008 - the people who watched that edition on 8 June 2008 would not know the NEW SITUATION.
There ha got to be a political perspectives and sufficient political context shown in the BBC’s packaging and the presenting of events...
And the less said about John Biggs the better!
Strangely, there is nothing to John Biggs. Politically. Ethically. Democratically. Not as far as his being in the political office is anything to go by.
He is politically as empty as he is amoral.
What is the point of John Biggs in a political office?
[To be continued]
Crossrail hole plot-backing John Biggs on the Ken Livingstone LDA appears to have nodded off... no wonder there's been such waste....
Crossrail hole plot-backing John Biggs on the Ken Livingstone LDA appears to have nodded off... no wonder there's been such waste....
Khoodeelaar! No to “CRASSrail hole plot” CAMPAIGN, in association with AADHIKAR Media Foundation, reports shortly and in detail, on the long nap that John Briggs [the so-called ‘increased’ ‘ voter-approved’ ‘rep’ in the name of the East End of London on the Lousy Assembly [‘the so-called London regional Assembly’ contrived and created by the lying regime of Tony Blair] has taken where matters of public funding of corrupt outfits may have been involved and we show how John Biggs has defied his apparent size [denoted by his name][ and has in fact been a very small player where the matter of accountability for the East End of London has been concerned...
More, here, shortly
Khoodeelaar! No to “CRASSrail hole plot” CAMPAIGN, in association with AADHIKAR Media Foundation, reports shortly and in detail, on the long nap that John Briggs [the so-called ‘increased’ ‘ voter-approved’ ‘rep’ in the name of the East End of London on the Lousy Assembly [‘the so-called London regional Assembly’ contrived and created by the lying regime of Tony Blair] has taken where matters of public funding of corrupt outfits may have been involved and we show how John Biggs has defied his apparent size [denoted by his name][ and has in fact been a very small player where the matter of accountability for the East End of London has been concerned...
More, here, shortly
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)