KHOODEELAAR! constitutional, constitutional law and legal defence of the East End of London against Crossrail hole Bill and agenda

This page of AADHIKARonline was last edited at 0438 GMT London Monday 21 July 2008


KHOODEELAAR! constitutional, constitutional law and legal defence of the East End of London against Crossrail hole Bill and agenda: a social, legal and ethical update and commentary from the heart of the inner cities UK

By©Muhammad Haque
Written at 0420 Hrs GMT
London Monday 21 July 2008

The WORK , all done voluntarily and over the period so far of 55 months plus since January 2004, in setting up an maintaining the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against the Crossrail hole has been and remains the unique set of daily commitments and activities that no other ‘community-based’ ‘campaign’ has done from the area called the East End of London there is no record or evidence of similar work in similar context at any time in the past more than 100 years.

The only other campaign from any base in the East End of London and done in the last century too was not done on the extensive scale and in the intensive ap[application as the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crossrail hole agenda has been.

The defence of the community in the East End of London against the agenda that contains the Big Business Crossrail hole plot is multifaceted. For the past 55 months, the defence has been articulated and advocated on all the relevant levels. The main UK destination of the Khoodeelaar! argument has of course been the UK executive, fronted first by Tony Blair and now by Gordon Brown.

The next level has been the UK formal parliament. In between those, we have also been addressing the intermediate agencies, outfits, units and personnel and postholders. Those have included the London-linked Transport for London which has been allowed to operate the corruption funded by the allocation of the £100 Million of ‘Crossrail’ misfunding under Section 6 of the very corruptly contrived and separate legislative pretext and device called the Railways Act 2005.

In the long haul constitutional law actions that we are now starting - which will be formally filed [that is, instituted in the UK domestic course first, before being taken to the international judicial forums] as soon a s the procedures allow after the Harriet Harman announcement of the ‘Royal Assent’ is done on tuesday 22 July 2008 - Khoodeelaar! will cite and refer to evidence that will represent the widest widest possible range of sources in any contemporary examination of executive misconduct .

Our challenge will firmly focus on the brazen unconstitutionality of the UK Govt.

All the conclusions of the unconstitutionality, and the undeniable and unmistakable adverse consequences that will be felt by people in the ordinary community in the East End of London will be show to have been solidly based on facts that are demonstrable. Like the fact FOR INSTANCE that the ‘local’ ‘East London Idiotiser’ has been ‘edited’ in a persistently prejudiced, ignorant biased and misleading way.

That the ‘East London Advertiser’ has been fundamentally changed as far as the ownership of the business is concerned as a direct result of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign... And that despite that ‘change’, the policy of the prejudiced and the ignorant ‘local’ ‘newspaper’ remains unchanged To serious detriment in local information context . The picture that we publish for the first time today Monday 21 July 2008 [we have been mentioning this same photographic evidence in our previous commentaries concerned. The photograph itself has never before been published], was taken at the Khoodeelaar! demonstration held outside the Tower Hamlets Council’s ‘town hall’ [!!!!!] Mulberry Place in the evening of 11 September 2007. We shall discuss that picture and its evidential relevance and significance in the course of this series of constitutional law action updater commentary this week.

We have also been addressing the conduct - or rather the misconduct., on the facts, and IN CONTEXT of the clique that has been making the relevant decisions for the Crossrail hole agenda in the name of the formally existent ‘local’ London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council.

In total, we have focussed attention on the role and the conduct [both of which have been mala fide role and misconduct] of the hundreds of individuals and outfits that INCLUDE in key parts the following:-

Named individuals as councillors and as ‘senior’ employees in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council
Named individuals on the London Assembly
The named holder of the post of mayor in the name of and at the expense of the people of and in London
The named promoters and personnel careerists in the various corrupting lobbies and outfits including London First
The named corrupter and fronter for the capitalist City of London and identified as Michael Snyder
The named members of the bureaucracy set up in each of the two ‘Houses of Parliament’ at Westminster, London under the ‘Crossrail Bill’
The named members of the bureaucracy that is found at the relevant times in the rest of the ‘Palace of Westminster’ other than those that have been seen and identified as being engaged in the processing of the ‘Crossrail Bill Select committees’ in the two “Houses’ of the UK Parliament
The editor and publisher of each of the locally circulating titles in East London and in London
The editor and publisher of each of the so-called national print titles published from addresses in London
The relevant units of the BBC, radio, TV and online
The relevant units of ITV
The Channel 4 News
The relevant publishers and editors of the ‘ethnicity--linked titles and publications and ‘channels’
All the relevant decision-making personnel in place at the relevant time in the relevant regulatory bodies on the media including the OFCOM and the Press Complaints Commission
The relevant ‘member of parliament’ at the relevant time for the local parliamentary constituency of Bethnal Green and Bow and their counterpart in the adjoining constituency of LimeHouse [=Limehouse] and Poplar [or ‘Poplar and Limehouse’ or ‘Poplar and Canning Town’, whichever or whatever the formal name may be at the relevant time]..

The evidence of the conduct and in the relevant parts the MISCONDUCT and the unconstitutional behaviour of the parties against whom we t we are making the applications to court/s will show that the KHOODEELAAR! Canning has been covering ALL key aspects of the defence and the advocacy of the area known as the the London borough of Tower Hamlets in ways that should have been done by many of those who are already in place with hundreds of £MIllions [AND more] of public money being spent in their hiring, bribing, touting, ‘employment’, use and abuses and ‘professional’ and ‘commercial’ uses, abuses and roles and mis-roles.

So the consolidated REASON, the depth, the extents of the reason why the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been and continues to be so wide-ranging is a continuing evidential , historical and far-reaching condemnation of the failed local institutions and state and publicly ‘legitimised’ agencies and of their persistent failures. These agencies, bodies and personnel who are supposed to be serving the East End of London but have on the facts been doing the opposite...

It is in these facts that Jacqui Smith, - assuming that she is not found to be herself blundering her way out of the ‘top, token’ job at the UK Ministry of the Interior [=’The Home office’] sooner than it will take her to find out all the facts - should be looking for the answers to her current, headlines-linked woes!

Talking of headlines! The less said about the predicaments of some of the most notoriously;reported, Tower Hamlets-linked ‘top’ cops in the London Metropolitan Police, the better. Tow come to mind: Tarique Ghafoor and the targets of his tribunalised torments! Ian Blair, the incumbent t Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, for the time being...

With such news at and from places like the top Cops’ mansions, we in the inner city, deprived borough of the East End of London are not able to even theoretically pretend that things are going to be okay for the community without fighting for the comprehensive social political, democratic, environmental, economic and human rights of the community against holders of state and Governmental power... and those that hold similar positions in the name of the local people in and on the ‘locally’ and ‘regionally’ elected bodies and at the UK central Parliament at Westminster....

The poverty in the East End borough is far deeper as a result than the senseless utterance quoted in the Times last week and attributed - repeat, attributed by them - to the ‘former’ ‘leader’ on the Tower Hamlets Borough Council.

Tower Hamlets is worse than the ‘most deprived borough in the country’. It is also the subject of the most despite political misrepresentation and cultural and social exclusion, criminalisation being committed against the people by the local Council and all its colluders....

[To be continued]