POVERTY in Britain and the poverty of the Brown-fronted Blairing regime that is maintaining poverty in the UK today more brazenly than Brown would ever admit
By © Muhammad Haque
0920 hrs GMT
London Monday 22 December 2008
Talking about ‘child poverty’ by definition excludes discussion of poverty as a whole. That is why the correct term to use is ‘poverty’. Not just ‘child poverty’. So why do the Blaired ‘professionals’ holding the positions on ‘combatting’ ‘poverty’ refuse to use the single word poverty? The answer is to be found in the fact that they are essentially in denial. And in deep ignorance. The half of their dishonest ‘term’ is on many levels misleading. ‘Child’ may sound like the call for care, compassion and delicacy with the fragility of the vulnerable. But this is a confidence trick. Like so many of the terms they use, this [‘child poverty’] is to dress themselves up as a party [with a small p] dedicated to upholding the needs and the rights of the ‘more vulnerable and needy’. The word ‘child’ carries so much instant positive recognition of all things good or at least innocent.…. As different from the whole family.. The neighbourhood. The community. The population... That would be a daunting reality. That one the peddlers of concern on ‘child poverty’ dare not face up to, let alone deal with...
When the entire population is organised in a way that CAUSES poverty, imposes poverty, adds to poverty, it is little wonder that children in it are in poverty.….
By the population I am here referring to that part of the population that is the target of poverty causation, poverty imposition, poverty addition...
The parts that are to be found in the inner cities in the UK.
There are people in poverty in the other parts of the UK populations and conurbation.
But the incidence, the spread, the perpetration and the persistence of poverty in the inner cities areas are so high, frequent and noticeable that a discussion of poverty in Britain today would be done more comprehensively and accurately by looking at the inner cities than by looking at the other areas where poverty also does exist.
Tower Hamlets in the East End of London is of course the London borough that contains most of the features of inner city poverty.…
[To be continued]
UPDATE
5th Edition of day 0755 GMT London Monday 21 June 2010
Editor © Muhammad Haque
Founding News Editor
Shah M Azizul Haque
AADHIKAR Media Foundation, established with the publication of AADHIKAR the weekly on Monday 19 December 1980 from London E1 UK. INTO the 6th. CAMPAIGNING year with KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail holes agenda, the Big Business SCAM, ADDING to poverty in the inner city and in particular the East End of London...” CAMPAIGN
Monday, December 22, 2008
Sunday, December 21, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! review of 2008 and the campaign against Crossrail agenda [206]
KHOODEELAAR! review of 2008 and the campaign against Crossrail agenda [206]
2210 Hrs GMT London Sunday 21 December 2008
The most comprehensive series of communications that Khoodeelaar! wrote made and issued and put to any part of the UK Parliament on the subject of the Crossrail agenda was done during the year 2008.
And we addressed those to the so-called Select committee located in the UK House of Lords on Crossrail.
We shall be publishing the key documents and materials as part of this KHOODEELAAR! campaign Review, here:
2210 Hrs GMT London Sunday 21 December 2008
The most comprehensive series of communications that Khoodeelaar! wrote made and issued and put to any part of the UK Parliament on the subject of the Crossrail agenda was done during the year 2008.
And we addressed those to the so-called Select committee located in the UK House of Lords on Crossrail.
We shall be publishing the key documents and materials as part of this KHOODEELAAR! campaign Review, here:
KHOODEELAAR! tells Gordon Brown to stop concealing the poverty of his spending [400]
1020 Hrs GMT London Sunday 21 December 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO!
Brown is going over the top [OTT] in funding banks without asking questions about where the money had gone....If he had asked the questions in private they shall remain private. that is, the banks will never be under public pressure to account for their robbery... And Brown will condemn the UK ordinary public; to an age of avoidable debt and resulting social depression... The fundamental problem and the alleged contagion [the inappropriate word that Brown has been using without any criticism so far in the ‘mainstream media’] is in the corruption of the greedy system that allows banks and big business to behave in the way they they do..Brown cannot be touting for them and then be expecting to be getting lasting - as different from speculative electoral - credit... Brown will find, sooner than his careerist, time-serving promoters of the moment tell him, that his over-pumped balloon has burst......Unless he starts to face up-to the fact that the British banks and the banks ‘nearby’ and all the other ‘institutions’ he is making public funds available to, are socially and sustainably economically responsible, credible and above all accountable... HOWEVER Brown cannot feel under much pressure to do that when the likes of Vince Cable turn out to be mere adjuncts to Brown’s propaganda... Vince Cable has had a year of exceedingly disproportionate facilities given him in the media and in particular on the BBC... But what has he done in return for the public? Has he told the truth? Does he even know the truth? Apart from that one utterance that got him all the facilities and invites from the media, what has been the transformation in Vince Cable’s politics in 2008? Going by Cable’s utterances broadcast in the past 80 minutes, NOTHING.…. In fact Cable has become Gordon Brown’s propaganda side-kick, from the allegedly independent party....[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO!
Brown is going over the top [OTT] in funding banks without asking questions about where the money had gone....If he had asked the questions in private they shall remain private. that is, the banks will never be under public pressure to account for their robbery... And Brown will condemn the UK ordinary public; to an age of avoidable debt and resulting social depression... The fundamental problem and the alleged contagion [the inappropriate word that Brown has been using without any criticism so far in the ‘mainstream media’] is in the corruption of the greedy system that allows banks and big business to behave in the way they they do..Brown cannot be touting for them and then be expecting to be getting lasting - as different from speculative electoral - credit... Brown will find, sooner than his careerist, time-serving promoters of the moment tell him, that his over-pumped balloon has burst......Unless he starts to face up-to the fact that the British banks and the banks ‘nearby’ and all the other ‘institutions’ he is making public funds available to, are socially and sustainably economically responsible, credible and above all accountable... HOWEVER Brown cannot feel under much pressure to do that when the likes of Vince Cable turn out to be mere adjuncts to Brown’s propaganda... Vince Cable has had a year of exceedingly disproportionate facilities given him in the media and in particular on the BBC... But what has he done in return for the public? Has he told the truth? Does he even know the truth? Apart from that one utterance that got him all the facilities and invites from the media, what has been the transformation in Vince Cable’s politics in 2008? Going by Cable’s utterances broadcast in the past 80 minutes, NOTHING.…. In fact Cable has become Gordon Brown’s propaganda side-kick, from the allegedly independent party....[To be continued]
Saturday, December 20, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! series of Review of the campaign against Crossrail scam in 2008 is due to start appearing here this weekend
KHOODEELAAR! series of Review of the campaign against Crossrail scam in 2008 is due to start appearing here this weekend
Thursday, December 18, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! tells Gordon Brown to pay heed to Rowan Williams on wanton debts-indulgence and scrap Crossrail
KHOODEELAAR! tells Gordon Brown to pay heed to Rowan Williams on wanton debts-indulgence and scrap Crossrail
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Tower Hamlets Council's role as a tool for Big Business Crossrail, has been CRASS!
HOW CRASS has been the 'policy' of Tower Hamlets Council on Crossrail? The EVIDENCE of that came floating on the peddling statement made last night..
That happened in the Council chamber at Mulberry Place, Clove Crescent, London E14 2BG.
Someone stood up, at the cue given by the chair of the meeting, and spoke in the name of the controlling ‘group’ on the Council. By the time he had finished his first sentence, it became clear that he was not really au fait with the facts. let alone with the evidence.
We shall be publishing the report ands analysis on this site and on twitter.com/khoodeelaar during the day today Thursday 18 December 2008
That happened in the Council chamber at Mulberry Place, Clove Crescent, London E14 2BG.
Someone stood up, at the cue given by the chair of the meeting, and spoke in the name of the controlling ‘group’ on the Council. By the time he had finished his first sentence, it became clear that he was not really au fait with the facts. let alone with the evidence.
We shall be publishing the report ands analysis on this site and on twitter.com/khoodeelaar during the day today Thursday 18 December 2008
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Even moderate MPs have found Crossrail-peddler UK DfT to be DAFT! We say SCRAP the DfT too
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Even moderate MPs have found Crossrail-peddler UK DfT to be DAFT! We say SCRAP the DfT too
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That the UK Department for Transport is in cahoots with liars...
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That the UK Department for Transport is in cahoots with liars...
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That the UK Department for Transport is in cahoots with liars...
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That the UK Department for Transport is in cahoots with liars...
Sunday, December 14, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law action : publication of evidence against the House of Peers Crossrail Bill Select Committee falsifying evidence.
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law action : publication of evidence against the House of Peers Crossrail Bill Select Committee falsifying evidence.
What does this mean?
Answer: it means that the comments made by the chair of the Crossrail Bill Select committee in the UK house of Lords in march 2008 about in particular Khoodeelaar! formal objections to Crossrail, were false. untrue. misleading and Not justified.
How are we saying this?
Answer: because the co,moments were so beyond the pale that to leave them unchallenged would amount to our being clueless. Out of touch. uninformed about our own community.
The comments that were made by the Chair of the Crossrail Bill Select committee in the House of Lords will be continued to be examine here.…
We here publish exhibit 2008/6
The references to the ‘Crossrail Bill’ are to be treated as being made in relation to events before 28 july 2008 when that same Bill was rubber stamped into the ‘Crossrail Act’.
"
At the time that the formal objections
['petitions'] against the 'Crossrail Bill' were being
prepared to be submitted, it became necessary to
comply with the paper requirements of the committee.
Especially the one about 'certificate of
respectability' [!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]'. In that
connection, you referred to a member of the
Spitalfields Society and said that this individual was
a practising 'solicitor' and would give - or [as
you later said] would be approached to give - a
certificate of respectability. In the event the person
refused to give a certificate of respectability. Did
the same person also claim to be opposed to the
Crossrail Bill? If so, in what regard did their
'opposition' relate to the KHOODEELAAR campaign's
opposition IN PRINCIPLE? Or was their opposition to
Crossrail LESS severe than their Opposition TO
Khoodeelaar! And if the person had been OPPOSED to the
same Crossrail Bill that the Khoodeelaar! campaign had
been opposed to then had the person been abroad for
the past 50 months? And is that why they had not
'known' of the Khoodeelaar! campaign or had
heard of them? And is that why they had not known the
Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser? Or was there another
reason, in any way linked with the fact that they, the
individual concerned a and the Spitalfields Society,
did not wish to come across to the 'authorities' as
being in any way in agreement with let alone
supportive of the Khoodeelaar! campaign?
"
What does this mean?
Answer: it means that the comments made by the chair of the Crossrail Bill Select committee in the UK house of Lords in march 2008 about in particular Khoodeelaar! formal objections to Crossrail, were false. untrue. misleading and Not justified.
How are we saying this?
Answer: because the co,moments were so beyond the pale that to leave them unchallenged would amount to our being clueless. Out of touch. uninformed about our own community.
The comments that were made by the Chair of the Crossrail Bill Select committee in the House of Lords will be continued to be examine here.…
We here publish exhibit 2008/6
The references to the ‘Crossrail Bill’ are to be treated as being made in relation to events before 28 july 2008 when that same Bill was rubber stamped into the ‘Crossrail Act’.
"
At the time that the formal objections
['petitions'] against the 'Crossrail Bill' were being
prepared to be submitted, it became necessary to
comply with the paper requirements of the committee.
Especially the one about 'certificate of
respectability' [!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]'. In that
connection, you referred to a member of the
Spitalfields Society and said that this individual was
a practising 'solicitor' and would give - or [as
you later said] would be approached to give - a
certificate of respectability. In the event the person
refused to give a certificate of respectability. Did
the same person also claim to be opposed to the
Crossrail Bill? If so, in what regard did their
'opposition' relate to the KHOODEELAAR campaign's
opposition IN PRINCIPLE? Or was their opposition to
Crossrail LESS severe than their Opposition TO
Khoodeelaar! And if the person had been OPPOSED to the
same Crossrail Bill that the Khoodeelaar! campaign had
been opposed to then had the person been abroad for
the past 50 months? And is that why they had not
'known' of the Khoodeelaar! campaign or had
heard of them? And is that why they had not known the
Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser? Or was there another
reason, in any way linked with the fact that they, the
individual concerned a and the Spitalfields Society,
did not wish to come across to the 'authorities' as
being in any way in agreement with let alone
supportive of the Khoodeelaar! campaign?
"
KHOODEELAAR! again advising David Cameron to sort out the Tory Party's ‘alternative’ to Brown's CRASS Keynesian indulgence
By © Muhammad Haque 1500 Hrs GMT London Sunday 14 December 2008
KHOODEELAAR! again advising David Cameron to sort out the Tory Party's ‘alternative’ to Brown's CRASS Keynesian indulgences..
That spiel by cameron staged last week at the opportunistically marketing London School of Economics, was not good enough... Cameron has not reconciled most of the Conservative contradictions.. Unless that happens, no one in their rational, sensible, informed minds can give real credit to Cameron...
Cameron has not addressed the crassest case of crass Keynesianism, that is Boris Johnson's’ persistent and very ignorant peddling of Crossrail...
Where does Cameron stand on Crossrail? Is he as stupidly for Crossrail as Grayling was... As Boris Johnson has been? If Cameron is for Crossrail then he can say goodbye to being taken seriously as the offerer of an alternative economic policy.…
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! again advising David Cameron to sort out the Tory Party's ‘alternative’ to Brown's CRASS Keynesian indulgences..
That spiel by cameron staged last week at the opportunistically marketing London School of Economics, was not good enough... Cameron has not reconciled most of the Conservative contradictions.. Unless that happens, no one in their rational, sensible, informed minds can give real credit to Cameron...
Cameron has not addressed the crassest case of crass Keynesianism, that is Boris Johnson's’ persistent and very ignorant peddling of Crossrail...
Where does Cameron stand on Crossrail? Is he as stupidly for Crossrail as Grayling was... As Boris Johnson has been? If Cameron is for Crossrail then he can say goodbye to being taken seriously as the offerer of an alternative economic policy.…
[To be continued]
Monday, December 8, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)