AADHIKARonline - Muhammad Haque ethical commentary at 1335 Hrs GMT London Sunday 6 July 2008:
CRASSrail hole plot-peddling Guardian is edited by Alan Rusbridger.. Rusbridger knows someone INTIMATELY. That someone is a VERY CALLOUS liar....
So what did that callous liar lie about that is so relevant to the Crossrail hole plot against the East end of London?
It has everything to do with it.
Like Matthew Parris who incited Tony Blair to DRIVE Crossrail hole through Brick Lane as ‘punishment’ for VOTING OONA KING OUT in May 2005, the Crossrail hole plot-backing Guardian’s ‘Editor’ Alan Rusbridger knows a person INTIMATELY who LIED when justifying their THEN attack that had just been printed in and by the GUARDIAN against the same community in the East End of London.
That attack was unjustified but it was nevertheless carried in the lying Guardian.
The London-based Guardian has for years practised the evil craft of trans-attribution. That is, of false attribution.
It works like this: They hear about or pick up or are somehow pointed in the direction of a truthful statement somewhere about something that they have a race or ethnicity or faith related ‘policy’ on.
Like, SAY, there is a truthful statement about the universe. About the earth. About the sun. About the moon, or about the solar system. Or about the environment around the planet earth.
That someone has made that discovery, observation or invention or even the original comment or statement about it.
And that the Guardian news group further find that objectively speaking the statement is true and is truthful.
But THAT there is a snag.
What is that snag?
They ALSO find that the origin or the source of the core statement or observation or discovery also happens to be a - Muslim.
The Guardian and Muslim do not mix.
The Guardian hates Muslim.
The Guardian was born on hatred of Muslim.
The Guardian lives on hatred of Muslim.
The Guardian cannot stand Muslim.
But it daren’t say so.
For the sake of its business... Not for any other reason.
So the Guardian devises the typically Guardian-evil ploy of running the fact by denying the source. They invent a source.
They falsely attribute the finding to that invented source.
They thus perpetuate a falsehood against the truth so that they could deny the Muslim, any Muslim concerned in the context of the given observation or finding or discovery or event, the objectively deserved authorship, credit....role.....
[To be continued]
Dan Milmo, of the Guardian. The Guardian is the CRASSrail -plugging, Big Business agenda tout Ken Livingstone-promoting 'Fleet Street' 'mainstream news' 'outlets' and 'outfits' that has lied for Big Business and for the City of London interests despite the fact that OBJECTIVELY tested evidence does NOT support Crossrail... Also, dan Milmo has often in the past, published utter inaccuracies. So persistent has Milmo been in his inaccuracies that there must have been a plot by the Guardian to mislead the Uk public for the benefit of Big business that alone have pushed for UK Public to pay £Billions for the CRASSly conceived Crossrail in London.... Today’s printed OBSERVER carries a apiece by Dan Milmo which is another attack on London’s transport needs... Milmo attacks Boris Johnson for wanting to keep his election pledge to bring back the Routemaster Bus... In this attack, Milmo brings in Stephen Gaister... one of the most discreditable and dishonest ‘academic s; whom ken Livingstone had used to peddle for Big Business.......
[To be continued]
“Stephen Glaister, the executive director of the RAC Foundation and a former board member at Transport for London, questioned whether bringing back London's signature double-decker represented good value for money given the pressures on the capital's budget- including the £16bn Crossrail scheme and repairing a funding hole of at least £2bn in the public private partnership programme to upgrade the underground network.” http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/jul/05/boris.transport
No comments:
Post a Comment