Khoodeelaar! No to "Crossrail hole agenda" focus on Tower Hamlets Council [3]

The KHOODEELAAR! legal, ethical, professional analysis [updated at Monday 14 July 2008] of the relevant conduct of the ‘East London IDIOTISER... KHOODEELAAR! case is that the ‘East London Advertiser’ has been shielding the Crossrail hole plotting clique on Tower Hamlets Council... And that the IDIOTISER has been overly biased against the campaign....


By©Muhammad Haque
0920 Hrs GMT
Monday
14 July 2008

The 'East London IDIOTISER' is a phoney paper. Most of the times. Nowhere more so than in the 'reason' that Malcolm Starbrook gave to Khoodeelaar! in the IDIOTISER's bid to continue to conceal the truth about the campaign against Crossrail hole collusion...

The Khoodeelaar! question and communication to the EL IDIOTISER [the title, not necessarily any ember of the staff] was about the literally hundreds of specially written communication and analyses about the EL IDIOTISER role....

Malcolm Starbrook DENIED that the IDIOTISER has got those.Or has kept those.....

That denial is like someone allegedly [ INCLUDING as in notionally, conceivably, theoretically] claiming to be an editor [in the legal sense] of a newspaper and then saying that they do not keep news reports.

For one of the very first essential acts, BASIC, routine, unmistakable, consistent things, TRADE things, trade-reflex-things that any news gather and publisher does is to keep THE evidence.

And everything that KHOODEELAAR! has sent to them would constitute evidence in the appropriate context.

So would Malcolm Starbrook throw the evidence away?


Or 'delete' them in the case of e-mails?


[To be continued]